Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 8, pp 1659–1672 | Cite as

Contrasting population structures in two sympatric fishes in the Baltic Sea basin

  • Jacquelin DeFaveri
  • Takahito Shikano
  • Nurul Izza Ab Ghani
  • Juha Merilä
Original Paper

Abstract

Detailed multispecies studies on the patterns of genetic variability and differentiation in marine environments are still rare. Using mitochondrial and nuclear genetic markers, we compared genetic variability and population structuring of threespine (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and ninespine (Pungitius pungitius) sticklebacks from the same eleven marine and six freshwater locations within the Baltic Sea basin. Analyses of both marker types revealed a significantly lower degree of genetic structuring in both marine and freshwater populations of threespine than those ninespine sticklebacks. Isolation-by-distance (IBD) was detected across the marine populations in both species, suggesting spatially limited gene flow. However, the levels of genetic diversity and differentiation across the localities were uncorrelated between the two species in both marine and freshwater environments. Accordingly, estimates of effective population sizes were larger and migration rates were higher for three- than for ninespine sticklebacks. Hence, ninespine stickleback populations from the Baltic Sea basin appear to be subject to stronger genetic drift than sympatric threespine sticklebacks, and the proximate reason for this difference is likely to be found from autecological differences between the two species. In accordance with the earlier studies, genetic variability was higher and the degree of genetic differentiation was lower in marine than in freshwater populations in both species.

Keywords

Electronic Supplementary Material Genetic Differentiation Effective Population Size Threespine Stickleback Marine Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Anders Adil, Janis Birzaks, Folmer Bokma, Christer Brönmark, Pär Byström, Gabor Herczeg, Agnieszka Kijewska, Lotta Kvarnemo, Tuomas Leinonen, Hannu Mäkinen, Jouko Pokela, Jarmo Saarikivi, Kaisa Välimäki and Helmut Winkler for their help in obtaining the samples, and Kari Merilä for drawing the Fig. 1. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 217246 made with BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea research and development programme (JM), from LUOVA Graduate School (JD), University of Putra Malaysia (NA), Academy of Finland (grant no. 134728; JM), Center of Excellence in Evolutionary Genetics and Physiology (grant no. 129662; JM) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation (TS).

Supplementary material

227_2012_1951_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 11 kb)
227_2012_1951_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 11 kb)
227_2012_1951_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 15 kb)
227_2012_1951_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 11 kb)

References

  1. Aldenhoven JT, Miller MA, Corneli PS, Shapiro MD (2010) Phylogeography of ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) in North America: glacial refugia and the origins of adaptive traits. Mol Ecol 19:4061–4076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allendorf F, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinform 9:323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC (1992) Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63:62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avise JC (1993) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Avise JC, Reeb CA, Saunders NC (1987) Geographic population structure and species differences in mitochondrial DNA of mouthbrooding marine catfish (Ariidae) and demersal spawning toadfishes (Batrachoididae). Evolution 41:991–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bănărescu PM, Paepke HJ (2001) The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 5/III. AULA-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  9. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (2001) Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4563–4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell MA, Stewart JD, Park PJ (2009) The world’s oldest fossil threespine stickleback fish. Copeia 2009:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berner D, Grandchamp A-C, Hendry AP (2009) Variable progress toward ecological speciation in parapatry: stickleback across eight lake-stream transitions. Evolution 63:1740–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bohonack BA (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74:21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brede EG, Beebee TJC (2004) Contrasting population structures in two sympatric anurans: implications for species conservation. Heredity 92:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown AHD (1978) Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation. Theor Appl Genet 52:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cano JM, Shikano T, Kuparinen A, Merilä J (2008a) Genetic differentiation, effective population size and gene flow in marine fishes: implications for stock management. J Integr Field Sci 5:1–10Google Scholar
  16. Cano JM, Mäkinen HS, Merilä J (2008b) Genetic evidence for male-biased dispersal in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Mol Ecol 17:3234–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AW (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257Google Scholar
  18. Conover DO, Clarke LM, Munch SB, Wagner GN (2006) Spatial and temporal scales of adaptive divergence in marine fishes and the implication for conservation. J Fish Biol 69(Suppl. C):21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Copp GH, Kovác V (2003) Sympatry between threespine Gasterosteus aculeatus and ninespine Pungitius pungitius sticklebacks in English lowland streams. Ann Zool Fennici 40:341–355Google Scholar
  20. Cowen RK, Chiarella LA, Gomez CJ, Bell MA (1991) Offshore distribution, size, age, and lateral plate variation of ate larval/early juvenile sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey and New York. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 48:1679–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Craig D, FitzGerald GJ (1982) Reproductive tactics of four sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). Environ Biol Fish 7:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford NG (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Res 10:556–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeFaveri J, Shikano T, Shimada Y, Goto A, Merilä J (2011) Global analysis of genes involved in freshwater adaptation in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 65:1800–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeWoody JA, Avise JC (2000) Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J Fish Biol 56:461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2010) Geneious v5.1. Available from http://www.geneious.com
  26. Ellegren H, Primmer CR, Sheldon BC (1995) Microsatellite evolution: directionality or bias? Nat Genet 11:360–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elphinstone MS, Hinten GN, Anderson MJ, Nock CJ (2003) An inexpensive and high-throughput procedure to extract and purify total genomic DNA for population studies. Mol Ecol Notes 3:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Estoup A, Angers B (1998) Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical considerations. In: Carvlho GR (ed) Advances in molecular ecology. NATO science series. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  29. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetic analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fauvelot C, Planes ES (2002) Understanding origins of present-day genetic structure in marine fish:biologically or historically driven patterns? Mar Biol 141:773–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2008) A genome scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:977–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frankham R (1995) Effective population size adult population size ratios in wildlife—a review. Genet Res 66:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS (2000) Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87:783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a computer program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indicies (version 2.9.3)Google Scholar
  36. Gyllensten U (1985) The genetic structure of fish: differences in the intraspecific distribution of biochemical genetic variation between marine, anadromous, and freshwater species. J Fish Biol 26:691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haglund TR, Buth DG, Lawson R (1992) Allozyme variation and phylogenetic relationships of Asian, North American, and European populations of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Copeia 1992:432–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hart PJB (2003) Habitat use and feeding behaviour in two closely related fish species, the three-spined and nine-spined stickleback: an experimental analysis. J Anim Ecol 72:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hellberg ME (2009) Gene flow and isolation among populations of marine animals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herczeg G, Gonda A, Merilä J (2009) Evolution of gigantism in ninespine sticklebacks. Evolution 63:3190–3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hewitt G (2004) Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the quaternary. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 359:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Etter PD, Stiffler N, Johnson EA, Cresko WA (2010) Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet 2:e1000862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johannesson K, André C (2006) Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea. Mol Ecol 15:2013–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johannesson K, Smolarz K, Grahn M, André C (2011) The future of Baltic Sea populations: local extinction or evolutionary rescue? Ambio 40:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jurvelius J, Leinikki J, Mamylovc V, Pushkin S (1996) Stock assessment of pelagic three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): a simultaneous up- and down-looking echo-sounding study. Fish Res 27:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kerdelhué C, Magnoux E, Lieutier F, Roques A, Rousselet J (2006) Comparative population genetic study of two oligophagous insects associated with the same hosts. Heredity 97:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ketele AGL, Verheyen RF (1985) Competition for space between the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L.f. leiura and the nine-spined stickleback, Pungitius pungitius (L.). Behaviour 93:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J (1995) Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 140:1421–1430Google Scholar
  52. Kyle CJ, Boulding EG (2000) Comparative population genetic structure of marine gastropods (Littorina spp.) with and without pelagic larval dispersal. Mar Biol 137:835–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Langella O (2002) Population 1.2.28. Logiciel de gènètique des populations. Laboratoire Populations, gènètique et èvolution, CNRS UPR9034, Gif-sur-YvetteGoogle Scholar
  54. Largiader CR, Fries V, Kobler B, Bakker TCM (1999) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Mol Ecol 8:342–344Google Scholar
  55. Leinonen T, O’Hara RB, Cano JM, Merilä J (2008) Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J Evol Biol 21:1–17Google Scholar
  56. Leis JM, Van Herwerden L, Patterson HM (2011) Estimating connectivity in marine fish populations: what works best? Annu Rev Oceanog Mar Biol 49:193–234Google Scholar
  57. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5. A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mäkinen HS, Merilä J (2008) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in Europe—evidence for multiple glacial refugia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46:167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mäkinen HS, Cano JM, Merilä J (2006) Genetic relationships among marine and freshwater populations of the European three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol 15:1519–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mäkinen HS, Cano JM, Merilä J (2008) Identifying footprints of directional and balancing selection in marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations. Mol Ecol 17:3565–3582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and monte carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Mattern MY (2007) Phylogeny, systematic, and taxonomy of stickleback. In: Östlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA (eds) Biology of the three-spined stickleback. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 6–8Google Scholar
  63. McCusker MR, Bentzen P (2010) Positive relationships between genetic diversity and abundance in fishes. Mol Ecol 19:4852–4862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mitton JB (1997) Selection in natural populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Mitton JB, Lewis WM Jr (1989) Relationships between genetic variability and life-history features of bony fishes. Evolution 43:1712–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nelson JS (1968) Salinity tolerance of brook sticklebacks, Culaea inconstans, freshwater ninespine sticklebacks, Pungitius pungitius, and freshwater fourspine sticklebacks, Apeltes quadracus. Can J Zool 46:663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nielsen SB, Gallagher K, Leighton C, Balling N, Svenningsen L, Jacobsen BH, Thomsen E, Nielsen OB, Heilmann-Clausen C, Egholm DL, Summerfield MA, Clausen OR, Piotrowski JA, Thorsen MR, Huuse M, Abrahamsen N, King C, Lykke-Andersen H (2009) The evolution of western Scandinavian topography: a review of Neogene uplift versus the ICE (isostasy–climate–erosion) hypothesis. J Geodyn 47:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Olsson J, Mo K, Florin A-B, Aho T, Ryman N (2011) Genetic population structure of perch Perca fluviatilis along the Swedish coast of the Baltic Sea. J Fish Biol 79:122–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Orti G, Bell MA, Reimchen TE, Meyer A (1994) Global survey of mitochondrial DNA sequences in the threespine stickleback: Evidence for recent migrations. Evolution 48:608–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ouborg NJ, Piquot Y, VanGroenedael JM (1999) Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J Ecol 87:551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ovajeer E, Pihu E, Saat T (2000) Fishes of Estonia. Estonian Marine Institute, TallinGoogle Scholar
  72. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Peichel CL, Nereng KS, Ohgi KA, Cole BL, Colosimo PF, Buerkle CA, Schluter D, Kingsley DM (2001) The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414:901–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peltonen H, Vinni M, Lappalainen A, Pönni J (2004) Spatial feeding patterns of herring (Clupea harengus L.), sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.), and the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) in the Gulf of Finland, B. Baltic Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 61:966–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Quinn TP, Light JT (1989) Occurrence of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in the open North Pacific Ocean: migration or drift? Can J Zool 67:2850–2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  77. Reusch TBH, Wegner KM, Kalbe M (2001) Rapid genetic divergence in postglacial populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): the role of habitat type, drainage and geographical proximity. Mol Ecol 10:2435–2445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD (2011) PASSaGE: pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods Ecol Evol 2:229–232Google Scholar
  80. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228Google Scholar
  81. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org
  82. Schnabel A, Hamrick JL (1990) Comparative analysis of population genetic structure in Quercus macrocarpa and Q. gambelii (Fagaceae). Syst Bot 15:240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shikano T, Shimada Y, Herczeg G, Merilä J (2010a) History vs. habitat type: explaining the genetic structure of European nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations. Mol Ecol 19:1147–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shikano T, Ramadevi J, Merilä J (2010b) Identification of local- and habitat-dependent selection: scanning functionally important genes in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius). Mol Biol Evol 27:2775–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shimada Y, Shikano T, Merilä J (2011) A high incidence of selection on physiologically important genes in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Mol Biol Evol 28:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC:maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Taggart JB, Hynes RA, Prodöuhl PA, Ferguson A (1992) A simplified protocol for routine total DNA isolation from salmonid fishes. J Fish Biol 40:963–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Takahashi H, Goto A (2001) Evolution of East Asian ninespine sticklebacks as shown by mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 21:135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taylor EB, McPhail JD (1999) Evolutionary history of an adaptive radiation in species pairs of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): insights from mitochondrial DNA. Biol J Lin Soc 66:271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Teacher AGF, Shikano T, Karjalainen ME, Merilä J (2011) Phylogeography and genetic structuring of European nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)—mitochondrial DNA evidence. PLoS ONE 6:e19476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Teske PR, Papadopoulos I, Mmonwa KL, Matumba TG, McQuiad, CD, Barker NP, Beheregaray LB (2011) Climate-driven genetic divergence of limpets with different life histories across a southeast African marine biogeographic disjunction: different processes, same outcome. Mol Ecol 20:5025–5041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wade MJ, McCauley DE (1988) Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution 42:995–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ward RD, Skibinsky DO, Woodwark M (1992) Protein heterozygosity, protein structure and taxonomic differentiation. Evol Biol 26:73–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ward RD, Woodwark M, Skibinsky DO (1994) A comparison of genetic diversity in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes. J Fish Biol 44:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wootton RJ (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  97. Wootton RJ (1984) A functional biology of sticklebacks. University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138Google Scholar
  99. Yue GH, David L, Orban L (2007) Mutation rate and pattern of microsatellites in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genetica 129:329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zeller M, Reusch TBH, Lampert W (2006) A comparative population genetic study on calanoid freshwater copepods: Investigation of isolation-by-distance in two eudiaptomus species with a different potential for dispersal. Limnol Oceanogr 51:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zink R, Remsen V (1986) Evolutionary processes and patterns of geographic variation in birds. In: Johnston RF (ed) Current ornithology, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacquelin DeFaveri
    • 1
  • Takahito Shikano
    • 1
  • Nurul Izza Ab Ghani
    • 1
  • Juha Merilä
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations