Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 2, pp 269–282 | Cite as

Predicting regional spread of non-native species using oceanographic models: validation and identification of gaps

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Predicting spread is a central goal of invasion ecology. Within marine systems, researchers have increasingly made use of oceanographic circulation models to estimate currents and track species dispersal. However, the accuracy of these models for predicting biological patterns, particularly for non-native species, has generally not been validated. Particularly, we wished to examine the ability of models to predict physical and biological processes, which jointly determine the spread of marine larval organisms. We conducted two empirical studies—a recruitment study and a drift card study—along the coast of New England, USA, focusing on two invaders of concern—the European green crab (Carcinus maenas) and the Asian shore crab (Hemigrapsus sanguineus), to explicitly evaluate the ability of oceanographic models to predict patterns of spread. We used data from the large-scale drift card study to validate our ability to capture dispersal patterns driven purely by physical processes. Next, we conducted a recruitment study to evaluate our ability to reproduce patterns of biological dispersal. We were generally capable of reproducing drift cards patterns—suggesting that the physical mechanics in the model were predictive. However, predicted biological patterns were inconsistent—we were able to predict dispersal patterns for H. sanguineus but not for C. maenas. Our results highlight the importance of validating models and suggest that more work is necessary before we can reliably use oceanographic models to predict biological spread of intertidal organisms.

Keywords

Propagule Pressure Diel Vertical Migration Adult Density Southern Site Complete Spatial Randomness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by NOAA’s National Sea Grant Aquatic Invasive Species Research and Outreach Program (NA05OAR4171088). D. Delaney was partially supported by an Addison E. Verrill Fellowship from the University of Maine. The deployment of drift cards and settlement collectors was assisted by B. Warren of Salem Sound Coastwatch and more than a dozen volunteers including S. Large. We thank J. Chaffey of the Bedford Institute of Oceanography for providing extended vector data and source code. A. Irwin and K. Hasegawa assisted with processing the samples. We also wish to thank the editor, 4 anonymous reviewers, M. F. Delaney and H. R. Spence for offering comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Amaral V, Paula J (2007) Carcinus maenas (Crustacea: Brachyura): influence of artificial substrate type and patchiness on estimation of megalopae settlement. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 346:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JA, Epifanio CE (2010) Response of the Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus to a water-soluble metamorphic cue under natural field conditions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 384:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anger K, Spivak E, Luppi T (1998) Effects of reduced salinities on development and bioenergetics of early larval shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslan B, Zech G (2008) Comparison of different goodness-of-fit tests. Available at: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0207/0207300v1.pdf. Last accessed on 17 Aug 2009
  5. Ayres DR, Smith DL, Zaremba K, Klohr S, Strong DR (2004) Spread of exotic cordgrasses and hybrids (Spartina sp.) in the Tidal Marshes of San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Biol Invasions 6:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baringhaus L, Franz C (2004) On a new multivariate two-sample test. J Multivar Anal 88:190–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes DKA (2002) Biodiversity: invasions by marine life on plastic debris. Nature 416:808–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Behrens Yamada SB (2001) Global invader: the European green crab. Oregon Sea Grant, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrens Yamada S, Gillespie GE (2008) Will the European green crab (Carcinus maenas) persist in the Pacific Northwest? ICES J Mar Sci 65:725–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berrill M (1982) The life cycle of the green crab Carcinus maenas at the northern end of its range. J Crustac Biol 2:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broekhuysen GJ (1936) On development, growth and distribution of Carcinides maenas. Archs Néerl Zool 2:257–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brousseau DJ, Baglivo JA (2005) Laboratory investigations of food selection by the Asian shore crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus: Algal versus animal preference. J Crustac Biol 25:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byers JE, Pringle J (2006) Going against the flow: retention, range limits and invasions in advective environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlton JT (1999) The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlton JT, Cohen AN (2003) Episodic global dispersal in shallow water marine organisms: the case history of the European shore crabs Carcinus maenas and C. aestuarii. J Biogeogr 30:1809–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costanza R (1989) Model goodness of fit: a multiple resolution procedure. Ecol Model 47:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawford WR, Cherniawsky JY, Hannah CG, Ballantyne VA (1996) Current predictions for oil spill models. Spill Sci Technol Bull 3:235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronin TW (1982) Estuarine retention of the crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 15:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crothers JH (1967) The biology of the shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.) 1. The background—anatomy, growth and life history. Field Stud 2:407–434Google Scholar
  20. Dawirs RR (1985) Temperature and larval development of Carcinus maenas (Decapoda) in the laboratory; predictions of larval dynamics in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dawirs RR, Dietrich A (1986) Temperature and laboratory feeding rates in Carcinus maenas L. (Decapoda: Portunidae) larvae from hatching through metamorphosis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 99:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunstan PK, Bax NJ (2007) How far can marine species go? Influence of population biology and larval movement on future range limits. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 344:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eggleston DB, Armstrong DA (1995) Pre- and post-settlement determinants of estuarine dungeness crab recruitment. Ecol Monogr 65:193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Epifanio CE (1988) Dispersal strategies of two species of swimming crab on the continental shelf adjacent to Delaware Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 49:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Epifanio CE, Dittel AI, Park S, Schwalm S, Fouts A (1998) Early life history of Hemigrapsus sanguineus, a non-indigenous crab in the Middle Atlantic Bight (USA). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 170:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eriksson S, Edlund AM (1977) On the ecological energetics of 0-group Carcinus maenas (L.) from a shallow sandy bottom in Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 30:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisher RA (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugen 7:355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forward RB Jr (1988) Diel vertical migration: zooplankton photobiology behavior. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 26:361–393Google Scholar
  30. Fox CJ, McCloghrie P, Young EF, Nash RDM (2006) The importance of individual behaviour for successful settlement of juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.): a modelling and field study in the eastern Irish Sea. Fish Oceanogr 15:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallego A (2011) Bio-physical models: an evolving tool in marine ecological research. In: Jopp F, Reuter H, Breckling B (eds) Modelling complex ecological dynamics. Springer, New York, pp 279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillis DM, Wade E, Swain DP (2006) Spatial evidence for information exchange and competition in the Gulf of St. Lawrence snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) fishery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green Crab Control (GCC) Committee (2002) Management plan for the European green crab force. In: Grosholz E, Ruiz G (eds) Aquatic Nuisance Species Task, pp 1–55. Available at: http://www.anstaskforce.gov/GreenCrabManagementPlan.pdf. Last accessed on 15 April 2010
  34. Griffen BD, Byers JE (2009) Community impacts of two invasive crabs: the interactive roles of density, prey recruitment, and indirect effects. Biol Invasions 11:927–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffen BD, Delaney DG (2007) Species invasion shifts the importance of predator dependence. Ecology 88:3012–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grosholz ED (1996) Contrasting rates of spread for introduced species in terrestrial and marine systems. Ecology 77:1680–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1995) Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in central California. Mar Biol 122:239–247Google Scholar
  38. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1996) Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: lessons from the multiple invasions of the European green crab Carcinus maenas. Biol Conserv 78:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hannah CG, Shore JA, Loder JW (2000) The drift-retention dichotomy on Browns Bank: a model study of interannual variability. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2506–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hannah CG, Shore JA, Loder JW (2001) Seasonal circulation on the Western and Central Scotian Shelf. J Phys Oceanogr 31:591–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hebling NJ (1982) Desenvovimento dos primeiros estagios juvenis de Panopeus herbstii. Milne-Edwards, 1834 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Xanthidae), criados em laboratorio. Naturalia, Sao Paulo 7: 177–188Google Scholar
  42. Highsmith RC (1985) Floating and algal rafting as potential dispersal mechanisms in brooding invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hwang SG, Lee C, Kim CH (1993) Complete larval development of Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Decapoda, Brachyura, Grapsidae) reared in laboratory. Korean J Syst Zool 9:69–86Google Scholar
  44. Jamieson GS (1993) Marine invertebrate conservation: evaluation of fisheries over-exploitation concerns. Am Zool 33:551–567Google Scholar
  45. Johnson WS, Allen DM (2005) Zooplankton of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts: a guide to their identification and ecology. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  46. Klassen G, Locke A (2007) A biological synopsis of the European green crab, Carcinus maenas. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2818: 1–75Google Scholar
  47. Kornienko ES, Korn OM, Kashenko SD (2008) Comparative morphology of larvae of coastal crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Varunidae). Russian J Mar Biol 34:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kraemer GP, Sellberg M, Gordon A, Main J (2007) Eight-year record of Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Asian shore crab) invasion in Western Long Island Sound Estuary. Northeast Nat 14:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee SH, Ko HS (2008) First zoeal stages of six species of Hemigrapsus (Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsidae) from the northern Pacific including an identification key. J Crustac Biol 28:675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leung B, Mandrak NE (2007) The risk of establishment of aquatic invasive species: joining invasibility and propagule pressure. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:2603–2609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lodge DM, Stein RA, Brown KM, Covich AP, Bronmark C, Garvey JE, Klosiewski SP (1998) Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: challenges in spatial scaling. Aust J Ecol 23:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lohrer AM, Whitlatch RB (2002) Interactions among aliens: apparent replacement of one exotic species by another. Ecology 83:719–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McDermott JJ (1991) A breeding population of the western Pacific crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Grapsidae) established on the Atlantic coast of North America. Biol Bull 181:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McDermott JJ (1998) The western Pacific brachyuran (Hemigrapsus sanguineus: Grapsidae), in its new habitat along the Atlantic coast of the United States: geographic distribution and ecology. ICES J Mar Sci 55:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Metaxas A, Saunders M (2009) Quantifying the “Bio-” components in biophysical models of larval transport in marine benthic invertebrates: advances and pitfalls. Biol Bull 216:257–272Google Scholar
  56. Moksnes PO (2004) Self-regulating mechanisms in cannibalistic populations of juvenile shore crabs Carcinus maenas. Ecology 85:1343–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muraoka K (1971) On the post-larval stage of three species of the shore crab, Grapsidae. Bull Kanagawa Prefect Mus 1:8–17Google Scholar
  58. North EW, Schlag Z, Hood RR, Li M, Zhong L, Gross T, Kennedy VS (2008) Vertical swimming behavior influences the dispersal of simulated oyster larvae in a coupled particle tracking and hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palmer JD (1995) The biological rhythms and clocks of intertidal animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  60. Paris CB, Cowen RK (2004) Direct evidence of a biophysical retention mechanism for coral reef fish larvae. Limnol Oceanogr 49(6):1964–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park W, Shirley TC (2005) Diel vertical migration and seasonal timing of the larvae of three sympatric Cancrid crabs, Cancer spp., in Southeastern Alaska. Estuaries 28:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Park S, Epifanio CE, Grey EK (2004) Behavior of larval Hemigrapsus sanguineus (de Haan) in response to gravity and pressure. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 307:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pauly D, Christensen V, Guenette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, Walters CJ, Watson R, Zeller D (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peck MA, Hufnagl M (in press) Can IBMs tell us why most larvae die in the sea? Model sensitivities and scenarios reveal research needs. J Mar Syst. doi:  10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.08.005
  65. Queiroga H, Blanton J (2004) Interactions between behavior and physical forcing in the control of horizontal transport of decapod crustacean larvae. Adv Mar Biol 47:107–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Queiroga H, Costlow JD, Moreira MH (1997) Vertical migration of the crab Carcinus maenas first zoea in an estuary: implications for tidal stream transport. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 149:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ricciardi A (2007) Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change? Conserv Biol 21:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ropes JW (1968) The feeding habits of the green crab, Carcinus maenas (L.). Fish Bull 67:183–203Google Scholar
  69. Scheibling RE, Robinson MC (2008) Settlement behavior and early post-settlement predation of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 365:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  71. Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218Google Scholar
  72. Steinberg MK, Krimsky LS, Epifanio CE (2008) Induction of metamorphosis in the Asian shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus: effects of biofilms and substratum texture. Estuar Coasts 31:738–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Montfrans J, Peery CA, Orth RJ (1990) Daily, monthly, and annual settlement patterns by Callinectes sapidus and Neopanope sayi megalopae on artificial collectors deployed in the York River, Virginia: 1985–1988. Bull Mar Sci 46:214–229Google Scholar
  74. Vikebø F, Jørgensen C, Kristiansen T, Fiksen Ø (2007) Drift, growth, and survival of larval Northeast Arctic cod with simple rules of behaviour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 347:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Voss R, Schmidt JO, Schnack D (2007) Vertical distribution of Baltic sprat larvae: changes in patterns of diel migration? ICES J Mar Sci 64:956–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walton WC, MacKinnon C, Rodriguez LF, Proctor C, Ruiz GM (2002) Effect of an invasive crab upon a marine fishery: green crab, Carcinus maenas, predation upon a venerid clam, Katelysia scalarina, in Tasmania (Australia). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 272:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Werner F, Page F, Lynch D, Loder J, Lough R, Perry R, Greenberg D, Sinclair M (1993) Influences of mean advection and simple behavior on the distribution of cod and haddock early life stages on Georges Bank. Fish Oceanogr 2:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams AB (1984) Shrimps, lobsters, and crabs of the Atlantic coast of the eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  79. Wonham MJ, Lewis MA (2008) Modeling marine invasions: current and future approaches. In: Rilov MG, Crooks J (eds) Biological invasions in marine ecosystems (Ch 4). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  80. Yoshimura A, Kawasaki K, Takasu F, Togashi K, Futai K, Shigesada N (1999) Modeling the spread of pine wilt disease caused by nematodes with pine sawyers as vector. Ecology 80:1691–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zeng C, Naylor E (1996) Occurrence in coastal waters and endogenous tidal swimming rhythms of late megalopae of the shore crab Carcinus maenas: implications for onshore recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 136:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Delaney
    • 1
    • 3
  • Paul K. Edwards
    • 2
  • Brian Leung
    • 2
  1. 1.Citizen Science Institute, Marine Invasive Species Monitoring OrganizationCarverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biology and School of EnvironmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Oceans ResearchMossel BaySouth Africa

Personalised recommendations