Marine Biology

, Volume 159, Issue 1, pp 65–75

Size-dependent photosynthetic performance in the giant clam Tridacna maxima, a mixotrophic marine bivalve

Original Paper


Giant clams form a symbiosis with photosynthetic algae of the genus Symbiodinium that reside in clam mantle tissue. The allometry of symbiont photosynthetic performance was investigated as a mechanism for the increasing percentage of giant clam carbon respiratory requirements provided by symbionts as clam size increases. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of symbionts of the giant clam Tridacna maxima were measured during experiments conducted in September of 2009 using specimens 0.5–200 g tissue wet weight (3–25 cm long), collected from waters around southern Taiwan (N 21°36′, E 120°47′) from July to August of 2009. Light-dependent decreases in effective quantum yield (∆F/Fm′) calculated as the noontime maximum excitation pressure over PSII (Qm), relative electron transport rates (rETR), and dark-adapted maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) all varied as a quadratic function of clam size. Both Qm and rETR increased as clam size increased up to ~10–50 g then decreased as clam size increased. Fv/Fm decreased as clam size increased up to ~5–50 g then increased as clam size increased. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements of rETR were positively correlated with gross primary production measured during chamber incubations. Overall, symbionts of mid-sized clams ~5–50 g exhibited the highest light-dependent decreases in effective photosynthetic efficiencies, the highest relative electron transport rates, and the lowest maximum photosynthetic efficiencies, and symbiont photosynthetic performance is allometric with respect to host clam size.


  1. Abrego D, Ulstrup KE, Willis BL, Van Oppen MJH (2008) Species–specific interactions between algal endosymbionts and coral hosts define their bleaching response to heat and light stress. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 275:2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrefouet S, Gilbert A, Yan L, Remoissenet G, Payri C, Chancerelle Y (2005) The remarkable population size of the endangered clam Tridacna maxima assessed in Fangatau Atoll (Eastern Tuamotu, French Polynesia) using in situ and remote sensing data. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1037–1048Google Scholar
  3. Anthony K, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2003) Kinetics of photoacclimation in corals. Oecologia 134:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asada K (1999) The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baillie BK, Belda-Baillie CA, Maruyama T (2000) Conspecificity and Indo-Pacific distribution of Symbiodinium genotypes (Dinophyceae) from giant clams. J Phycol 36:1153–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer S, Larsson C, Poryan O, Axelsson L (2000) Photosynthetic rates of Ulva (Chlorophyta) measured by pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry. Eur J Phycol 35:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buck BH, Rosenthal H, Saint-Paul U (2002) Effect of increased irradiance and thermal stress on the symbiosis of Symbiodinium microadriaticum and Tridacna gigas. Aquat Living Resour 15:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information—theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantin N, van Oppen M, Willis B, Mieog J, Negri A (2009) Juvenile corals can acquire more carbon from high-performance algal symbionts. Coral Reefs 28:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlos AA, Baillie BK, Kawachi M, Maruyama T (1999) Phylogenetic position of Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) isolates from Tridacnids (Bivalvia), Cardiids (Bivalvia), a sponge (Porifera), a soft coral (Anthozoa), and a free-living strain. J Phycol 35:1054–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cayabyab NM, Enríquez S (2007) Leaf photoacclimatory responses of the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum under mesocosm conditions: a mechanistic scaling-up study. New Phytol 176:108–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Critchley C (2000) Photoinhibition. In: Raghavendra AS (ed) Photosynthesis. A comprehensive treatise. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 264–272Google Scholar
  13. Elfwing T, Blidberg E, Tedengren M (2002) Physiological responses to copper in giant clams: a comparison of two methods in revealing effects on photosynthesis in zooxanthellae. Mar Environ Res 54:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elfwing T, Blidberg E, Sison M, Tedengren M (2003) A comparison between sites of growth, physiological performance and stress responses in transplanted Tridacna gigas. Aquaculture 219:815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enríquez S, Borowitzka MA (2010) The use of the fluorescence signal in studies of seagrasses and macroalgae. In: Suggett DJ, Prášil O, Borowitzka MA (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence in aquatic sciences: methods and applications. Springer, Netherlands, pp 187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher CR, Fitt WK, Trench RK (1985) Photosynthesis and respiration in Tridacna gigas as a function of irradiance and size. Biol Bull 169:230–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitt WK, Trench RK (1981) Spawning, development, and acquisition of zooxanthellae by Tridacna squamosa (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Biol Bull 161:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitt WK, Rees TAV, Braley RD, Lucas JS, Yellowlees D (1993) Nitrogen flux in giant clams: Size-dependency and relationship to zooxanthellae density and clam biomass in the uptake of dissolved inorganic nitrogen. Mar Biol 117:381–386Google Scholar
  19. Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths CL, Klumpp DW (1996) Relationships between size, mantle area and zooxanthellae numbers in five species of giant clam (Tridacnidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 137:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawkins AJS, Klumpp DW (1995) Nutrition of the giant clam Tridacna gigas (L.). II. Relative contributions of filter-feeding and the ammonium-nitrogen acquired and recycled by symbiotic alga towards total nitrogen requirements for tissue growth and metabolism. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 190:263–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoogenboom MO, Anthony KRN, Connolly SR (2006) Energetic cost of photoinhibition in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iglesias-Prieto R, Beltran VH, LaJeunesse TC, Reyes-Bonilla H, Thome PE (2004) Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant reef corals in the Eastern Pacific. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 271:1757–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishikura M, Adachi K, Maruyama T (1999) Zooxanthellae release glucose in the tissue of a giant clam, Tridacna crocea. Mar Biol 133:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jantzen C, Wild C, El-Zibdah M, Roa-Quiaoit H, Haacke C, Richter C (2008) Photosynthetic performance of giant clams, Tridacna maxima and T. squamosa, Red Sea. Mar Biol 155:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeffrey SW, Haxo FT (1968) Photosynthetic pigments of symbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae) from corals and clams. Biol Bull 135:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johannes RE (1978) Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klumpp DW, Griffiths CL (1994) Contributions of phototrophic and heterotrophic nutrition to the metabolic and growth requirements of four species of giant clam (Tridacnidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 115:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klumpp DW, Lucas JS (1994) Nutritional ecology of the giant clams Tridacna tevoroa and T. derasa from Tonga—influence of light on filter-feeding and photosynthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klumpp DW, Bayne BL, Hawkins AJS (1992) Nutrition of the giant clam Tridacna gigas (L.). I. Contribution of filter feeding and photosynthates to respiration and growth. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas JS (1994) The biology, exploitation, and mariculture of giant clams (Tridacnidae). Rev Fish Sci 2:181–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton B (1978) The diurnal rhythm and the processes of feeding and digestion in Tridacna crocea (Bivalvia: Tridacnidae). J Zool 185:371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norton JH, Shepherd MA, Long HM, Fitt WK (1992) The zooxanthellal tubular system in the giant clam. Biol Bull 183:503–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Öquist G, Chow WS, Anderson JM (1992) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II. Planta 186:450–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pochon X, Gates RD (2010) A new Symbiodinium clade (Dinophyceae) from soritid foraminifera in Hawai’i. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56:492–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raghavendra AS (ed) (2000) Photosynthesis: a comprehensive treatise. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Ralph PJ, Gademann R (2005) Rapid light curves: a powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity. Aquat Bot 82:222–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reid RGB, Fankboner PV, Brand DG (1984) Studies on the physiology of the giant clam Tridacna gigas Linne—I. Feeding and digestion. Comp Biochem Physiol 78A:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richter C, Roa-Quiaoit H, Jantzen C, Al-Zibdah M, Kochzius M (2008) Collapse of a new living species of giant clam in the Red Sea. Curr Biol 18:1349–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosewater J (1965) The family Tridacnidae in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pacific, Mollusca, pp 347–394Google Scholar
  42. Rowan R (1998) Review: diversity and ecology of zooxanthellae on coral reefs. J Phycol 34:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schreiber U (2004) Pulse-amplitude-modulation (PAM) fluorometry and saturation pulse method: an overview. In: Papageorgiou G, Govindjee (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 279–319Google Scholar
  44. Trench RK (1993) Microalgal-invertebrate symbioses: a review. Endocytobio Cell Res 9:135–175Google Scholar
  45. Trench RK, Wethey DS, Porter JW (1981) Observations on the symbiosis with zooxanthellae among the Tridacnidae (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Biol Bull 161:180–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Wijk K, van Hasselt P (1993) Photoinhibition of photosystem II in vivo is preceded by down-regulation through light-induced acidification of the lumen: consequences for the mechanism of photoinhibition in vivo. Planta 189:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Venn AA, Loram JE, Douglas AE (2008) Photosynthetic symbioses in animals. J Exp Bot 59:1069–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White AJ, Critchley C (1999) Rapid light curves: a new fluorescence method to assess the state of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photosynth Res 59:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.National Museum of Marine Biology and AquariumPingtungPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations