Marine Biology

, 158:2565 | Cite as

Abundance of the New Zealand subantarctic southern right whale population estimated from photo-identification and genotype mark-recapture

  • E. L. Carroll
  • N. J. Patenaude
  • S. J. Childerhouse
  • S. D. Kraus
  • R. M. Fewster
  • C. S. Baker
Original Paper

Abstract

The abundance of New Zealand subantarctic southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) was estimated for the first time using mark-recapture methods based on photo-identification and microsatellite genotyping (13 loci). Individual identification photographs of 383 whales and microsatellite genotypes of 235 whales were collected during annual austral winter field surveys from 1995 to 1998. Given the 4-year survey period and lack of geographic and demographic closure, we estimated super-population abundance using the POPAN Jolly-Seber model implemented in the software programme MARK. Models with constant survivorship but time-varying capture probability and probability of entry into the population were the most suitable due to the survey design. This provided estimates of abundance in 1998 of 908 non-calf whales (95% C.L. = 755, 1,123) for the photo-identification and 910 non-calf whales (95% C.L. = 641, 1,354) for the microsatellite genotype data sets. The current estimate of 900 whales may represent less than 5% of the pre-whaling abundance in New Zealand waters.

Supplementary material

227_2011_1757_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)
227_2011_1757_MOESM2_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 14 kb)
227_2011_1757_MOESM3_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Aasen E, Medrano J (1990) Amplification of the ZFX and ZFY genes for sex identification in humans, cattle, sheep and goats. Nat Biotechnol 8:1279–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnason A, Schwartz MK (1999) Using POPAN-5 to analyse banding data. Bird Study 46(Suppl):S157–S168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnason A, Schwarz C (1996) A general methodology for the analysis of capture–recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52:860–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker CS, Slade RW, Bannister JL, Abernethy R, Weinrich M, Lien J, Urban J, Corkeron P, Calambokidis J, Vasquez O, Palumbi S (1994) Hierarchical structure of mitochondrial DNA gene flow among humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, world-wide. Mol Ecol 3:313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker CS, Medrano-Gonzalez L, Calambokidis J, Perry A, Pichler F, Rosenbaum H, Straley J, Urban-Ramirez J, Yamaguchi M, von Ziegesar O (1998) Population structure of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation among humpback whales in the North Pacific. Mol Ecol 7:695–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bannister JL (2008) Population trend in right whales off southern Australia 1993–2007. Unpublished report (SC/60/BRG14) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Bérubé M, Jørgensen H, McEwing R, Palsbøll P (2000) Polymorphic di-nucleotide microsatellite loci isolated from the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Mol Ecol 9:2181–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Best P (1993) Increase rates in severely depleted stocks of baleen whales. ICES J Mar Sci 50:169–186Google Scholar
  10. Best P (1994) Seasonality of reproduction and the length of gestation in southern right whales Eubalaena australis. J Zool (Lond) 232:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Best P, Reeb D, Rew M, Palsbøll P, Schaeff C, Brandao A (2005) Biopsying southern right whales: their reactions and effects on reproduction. J Wildl Manage 69:1171–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonin A, Bellemain E, Eidesen PB, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetic studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Botsetein D, White R, Skolnick M, Davis R (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Gen 32:314–331Google Scholar
  14. Brandão A, Best P, Butterworth D (2010) Estimates of demographic parameters for southern right whales off South Africa from survey data 1979 to 2006. Unpublished report (SC/62/BRG30) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnell SR (2008) Estimates of demographic parameters of southern right whales off Australia. Unpublished report (SC/60/BRG12) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Method Res 33:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll EL, Patenaude NJ, Alexander AM, Steel D, Harcourt R, Childerhouse S, Smith S, Bannister JL, Constantine R, Baker CS (2011) Population structure and individual movement of southern right whales around New Zealand and Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 432:257–268Google Scholar
  19. Cawthorn M (1978) New Zealand progress report on cetacean research June 1976 to May 1977. Rep Int Whal Comm 28:109–113Google Scholar
  20. Cawthorn M (1989) New Zealand progress report on cetacean research January 1987 to April 1988. Rep Int Whal Comm 39:185–187Google Scholar
  21. Cawthorn M (1993) New Zealand progress report on cetacean research, April 1991 to April 1992. Rep Int Whal Comm 43:286–288Google Scholar
  22. Childerhouse S, Double M, Gales N (2010) Satellite tracking of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) at the Auckland Islands, New Zealand. Unpublished report (SC/62/BRG19) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Choquet R, Lebreton J-D, Gimenez O, Reboulet A-M, Pradel R (2009) U-CARE: utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulationg CApture–REcapture data. Ecography 32:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Constantine R, Garrigue C, Steel D, Jackson JA, Burns D, Clapham P, Hauser N, Mattila D, Oremus M, Poole M, Robbins J, Thompson K, Baker CS (2010) Abundance of humpback whales in Oceania based on fluke photo-identification and DNA profiling. Unpublished report (SC/62/SH18) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooch E, White BN (2010) Program MARK: a gentle introduction. Available from http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/
  26. Cooke J, Rowntree V, Payne R (2001) Estimates of demographic parameters for southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) observed off Peninsula Valdes, Argentina. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:125–132Google Scholar
  27. Cooke J, Rowntree V, Payne R (2003) Analysis of inter-annual variation in reproductive success of South Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena australis) from photo-identification of calving females observed off Peninsula Valdés. Unpublished report (SC/55/O23) presented to the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Dawbin W (1986) Right whales caught in waters around south eastern Australia and New Zealand during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Rep Int Whal Comm Special Issue 10:261–268Google Scholar
  29. Donoghue M (1995) New Zealand progress report on cetacean research, April 1993 to March 1994. Rep Int Whal Comm 45:247–250Google Scholar
  30. Dreher B, Winterstein S, Luckacs P, Etter D, Rosa G, Lopez V, Libants S, Fileck K (2007) Noninvasive estimation of black bear abundance incorporating genotyping errors and harvested bear. J Wildl Manage 71:2684–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fewster R, Patenaude NJ (2009) Cubic splines for estimating the distribution of residence time using individual resighting data. Environ Ecol Stat 3:393–415Google Scholar
  32. Frasier TR, Rastogi T, Brown MW, Hamilton P, Kraus SD, White BN (2006) Characterization of tetranucleotide microsatellite loci and development and validation of multiplex reactions for the study of right whale species (genus Eubalaena). Mol Ecol Notes 6:1025–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garrigue C, Dodemont R, Steel D, Baker CS (2004) Organismal and ‘gametic’ capture-recapture using microsatellite genotyping confirm low abundance and reproductive autonomy of humpback whales on the wintering ground of New Caledonia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 274:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gaskin DE (1964) Return of the southern right whale (Eubalaena australis Desm.) to New Zealand waters, 1963. Tuatara 12:115–118Google Scholar
  35. Gilson A, Syvanen M, Levine K, Banks J (1998) Deer gender determination by polymerase chain reaction: validation study and application to tissues, bloodstains, and hair forensic samples from California. Calif Fish Game 84:159–169Google Scholar
  36. Groch K, Palazzo J, Flores P, Ardler F, Fabian M (2005) Recent rapid increase in the right whale (Eubalaena australis) population off southern Brazil. Lat Am J Aquat Mamm 4:41–47Google Scholar
  37. Hammond PS (1986) Estimating the size of naturally marked whale populations using capture-recapture techniques. Rep Int Whal Comm Special Issue 8:253–282Google Scholar
  38. Hurvich C, Tsai C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IWC (2001) Report of the workshop on the comprehensive assessment of right whales: a worldwide comparison. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:1–60Google Scholar
  40. Jackson JA, Carroll EL, Smith T, Patenaude NJ, Baker CS (2009) Appendix 3: Taking stock: the historical demography of the New Zealand right whale (the Tohora) ZBD2005-05 progress report #5 to the NZ Ministry of Fisheries, June 2009, pp 188Google Scholar
  41. Kalinowski S, Taper M, Marshall T (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 9:801–888Google Scholar
  42. Kemper C, Cochran D, Warneke R, Pirzl R, Watson M, Gales R, Gibbs S (2008) Southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) mortalities and human interactions in Australia, 1950–2006. J Cetacean Res Manage 10:1–8Google Scholar
  43. Kraus SD, Moore MJ, Price CA, Crone M, Watkins W, Winn H, Prescott JH (1986) The use of photographs to identify individual North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). Rep Int Whal Comm Special Issue 10:145–151Google Scholar
  44. Kraus SD, Hamilton P, Kenney R, Knowlton AR, Slay CK (2001) Reproductive parameters of the North Atlantic right whale. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:231–236Google Scholar
  45. Lambersten R (1987) A biopsy system for large whales and its use for cytogenetics. J Mamm 68:443–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leaper R, Cooke J, Trathan P, Reid K, Rowntree V, Payne R (2006) Global climate drives southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) population dynamics. Biol Lett 2:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK (2005) DROPOUT: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework. Mol Ecol Notes 5:716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mills LS, Citta JJ, Lair KP, Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA (2000) Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecol Appl 10:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oremus M, Poole M, Steel D, Baker CS (2007) Isolation and interchange among insular spinner dolphin communities in the South Pacific revealed by individual identification and genetic diversity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 336:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Palsbøll P, Allen J, Bérubé M, Clapham P, Fedderson T, Hammond PS, Hudson R, Jørgensen H, Katona S, Larsen AH, Larsen F, Lien J, Mattila D, Sigurjonsson J, Sears R, Smith T, Sponer R, Stevick PT, Øien N (1997a) Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature 388:767–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palsbøll P, Bérubé M, Larsen AH, Jørgensen H (1997b) Primers for the amplification of tri- and tetramer microsatellite loci in baleen whales. Mol Ecol 6:893–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patenaude NJ (2002) Demographic and genetic status of right whales at the Auckland Islands, New Zealand. PhD thesis, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  55. Patenaude NJ (2003) Sightings of southern right whales around ‘mainland’ New Zealand. Science for Conservation New Zealand Department of Conservation, vol 225, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  56. Patenaude NJ, Baker CS (2001) Population status and habitat use of southern right whales in the sub-Antarctic Auckland Islands of New Zealand. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:111–116Google Scholar
  57. Patenaude NJ, Baker CS, Gales N (1998) Observations of southern right whales on New Zealand’s subantarctic wintering grounds. Mar Mamm Sci 14:350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patenaude NJ, Todd B, Stewart R (2001) A note on movement of southern right whales between the sub-Antarctic Auckland and Campbell Islands, New Zealand. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:121–123Google Scholar
  59. Patenaude NJ, Portway V, Schaeff C, Bannister JL, Best P, Payne R, Rowntree V, Rivarola M, Baker CS (2007) Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population structure among southern right whales (Eubalaena australis). J Hered 98:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Payne R, Brazier O, Dorsey E, Perkins J, Rowntree V, Titus A (1983) External features in southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) and their use in identifying individuals. In: Payne R (ed) Communication and behaviour of whales. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 371–445Google Scholar
  61. Peakall R, Smouse P (2005) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107:1–97Google Scholar
  63. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 6:847–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pradel R, Hine J, Lebreton J-D, Nichols JD (1997) Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60–72Google Scholar
  65. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  68. Sherrin R (1886) Handbook of the fishes of New Zealand. Wilsons & Horton, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  69. Statistics New Zealand (1841–1853) Blue book of statistics. 1841–1853. Australian Joint Copying Project Colonial Office (CO213) Pro reel 1502–1504Google Scholar
  70. Stewart S, Todd B (2001) A note on observations of southern right whales at Campbell Island, New Zealand. J Cetacean Res Manage Special Issue 2:117–120Google Scholar
  71. Taberlet P, Luikart G (1999) Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biol J Linn Soc 68:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taberlet P, Camarra JJ, Griffin S, Uhrés E, Hanotte O, Waits LP, Dubois-Paganon C, Burke T, Bouvet J (1997) Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population. Mol Ecol 6:869–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tormosov D, Mikhaliev Y, Best P, Zemsky V, Sekiguchi M, Brownell R (1998) Soviet catches of Southern right whales Eubalaena australis 1951–1971: biological data and conservation implications. Biol Conserv 86:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Valsecchi E, Amos W (1996) Microsatellite markers for the study of cetacean populations. Mol Ecol 5:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson W, Wills D, Shipley P (2004) MICROCHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol 8:1762–1765Google Scholar
  76. Wade P, Kennedy A, LeDuc RG, Barlow J, Carretta J, Shelden K, Perryman W, Pitman R, Robertson K, Rone B, Salinas JC, Zerbini AN, Brownell R, Clapham P (2010) The world’s smallest whale population? Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0477
  77. Waits JP, Leberg PL (2000) Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging. Anim Conserv 3:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waldick RC, Brown MW, White BN (1999) Characterization and isolation of microsatellite loci from the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Mol Ecol 8:1763–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Suppl):120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Whitehead H, Christal J, Tyack P (2000) Studying cetacean social structure in space and time: innovative techniques. In: Mann J, Connor R, Tyack P, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies. University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 65–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. L. Carroll
    • 1
  • N. J. Patenaude
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. J. Childerhouse
    • 3
  • S. D. Kraus
    • 4
  • R. M. Fewster
    • 5
  • C. S. Baker
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.LGL Limited, Environmental Research AssociatesKing CityCanada
  3. 3.Australian Marine Mammal Centre, Australian Antarctic Division, DSEWPCKingstonAustralia
  4. 4.New England Aquarium, Central WharfBostonUSA
  5. 5.Department of StatisticsUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  6. 6.Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science CenterOregon State UniversityNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations