Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 11, pp 2407–2414 | Cite as

No evidence for homeoviscous adaptation in intertidal snails: analysis of membrane fluidity during thermal acclimation, thermal acclimatization, and across thermal microhabitats

Open Access
Original Paper


Many eurythermal organisms alter composition of their membranes to counter perturbing effects of environmental temperature variation on membrane fluidity, a process known as homeoviscous adaptation. Marine intertidal gastropods experience uniquely large thermal excursions that challenge the functional integrity of their membranes on tidal and seasonal timescales. This study measured and compared membrane fluidity in marine intertidal snail species under three scenarios: (1) laboratory thermal acclimation, (2) thermal acclimatization during a hot midday low tide, and (3) thermal acclimatization across the vertical intertidal zone gradient in temperature. For each scenario, we used fluorescence polarization of the membrane probe DPH to measure membrane fluidity in individual samples of gill and mantle tissue. A four-week thermal acclimation of Tegula funebralis to 5, 15, and 25°C did not induce differences in membrane fluidity. Littorina keenae sampled from two thermal microhabitats at the beginning and end of a hot midday low tide exhibited no significant differences in membrane fluidity, either as a function of time of day or as a function of thermal microhabitat, despite changes in body temperature up to 24°C within 8 h. Membrane fluidities of a diverse group of snails collected from high, middle, and low vertical regions of the intertidal zone varied among species but did not correlate with thermal microhabitat. Our data suggest intertidal gastropod snails do not exhibit homeoviscous adaptation of gill and mantle membranes. We discuss possible alternatives for how these organisms counter thermal excursions characteristic of the marine intertidal zone.


Biological membranes are structurally and functionally essential to all living organisms and are particularly sensitive to temperature variation because of the effect temperature has on the physical properties of lipids (Cossins and Prosser 1978; Hazel and Williams 1990). To function properly, membranes must exist in a state of fluidity maintained primarily by hydrophobic, van der Waals, and electrostatic interactions among the non-polar acyl-chain regions of phospholipids that compose the membrane bilayer. Both increases in temperature, which typically result in greater membrane fluidity, and decreases in temperature, which lead to greater membrane rigidity, can result in membrane dysfunction (Harris 1985; Cossins et al. 1986; Williams and Hazel 1992). Poikilotherms often compensate for the thermal sensitivity of their membranes by modifying membrane composition through changes in phospholipid head groups, acyl-chain length, acyl-chain saturation, and sterol content (Cossins and Prosser 1978; Hazel 1984). The adaptive reordering of membrane composition to conserve a biologically optimal range for membrane fluidity is referred to as homeoviscous adaptation (HVA) (Sinensky 1974; Hazel and Williams 1990; Hazel et al. 1992; Hazel 1995) and has been reported in a range of organisms and tissues (Sinensky 1974; Cossins 1983; Behan-Martin et al. 1993; Logue et al. 2000; Overgaard et al. 2008).

A relatively straightforward approach to assess membrane fluidity, or more precisely membrane packing and order, is to use monochromatic polarized light to measure the anisotropy of fluorescent hydrophilic membrane probes (e.g. 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH)) embedded in lipid bilayers (Pottel et al. 1983). DPH fluorescence anisotropy is inversely proportional to fluidity and thus decreases with increasing temperature as DPH molecules embedded in highly fluid membranes have increased rotational freedom, and thus lower anisotropy, than do DPH molecules in highly ordered low fluidity membranes (Hazel and Williams 1990). In HVA modifications to membranes (as described above), the mobility of embedded DPH is altered (Sinensky 1974; Pottel et al. 1983; Hazel and Williams 1990). The net result is that DPH anisotropy is similar at adaptation/acclimation temperatures across organisms with a wide range of body temperatures (Logue et al. 2000), but at a common measurement temperature, DPH anisotropy will be higher in lower fluidity membranes from warm-adapted or acclimated organisms than higher fluidity membranes from cold-adapted or acclimated organisms (Logue et al. 2000, Overgaard et al. 2008).

Marine intertidal poikilotherms routinely face extreme variation in habitat temperature on both a tidal and a seasonal basis (Williams and Somero 1996; Tomanek and Somero 1999; Helmuth et al. 2002, Finke et al. 2007; Stillman and Tagmount 2009) and thus are expected to possess robust mechanisms for conserving membrane order during thermal excursions. In fact, both intertidal and subtidal marine species have been shown to exhibit HVA in response to fluctuations in habitat temperature. Williams and Somero (1996) demonstrated that the intertidal mussel, Mytilus californianus, remodels gill phospholipids during simulations of seasonal and tidal temperature fluctuations. In abalone species from different thermal environments, Dahlhoff and Somero (1993) found a strong correlation among mitochondrial membrane fluidity, intertidal zone distribution, and habitat temperature. Seasonal changes in membrane lipids have been found in blue mussel, Mytilus edulis (Pernet et al. 2008), the subtidal eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Pernet et al. 2008), and the hard clam, Mercenaria mercenaria (Parent et al. 2008). While these species may experience significant thermal fluctuations (Pernet et al. 2008), gastropod mollusks that live in the highest regions of the intertidal zone (e.g. Littorina sp.) generally experience much greater thermal fluctuations (Garrity 1984, McQuaid and Scherman 1988; Cleland and McMahon 1990; Jones and Boulding 1999) and therefore face a greater challenge to membrane integrity in the face of more extreme thermal variation.

To determine whether gastropod mollusks modify their membrane order during thermal excursions commonly experienced in the intertidal zone, we examined membrane fluidity in a selection of marine intertidal gastropods under three scenarios: (1) laboratory thermal acclimation, (2) short-term acclimatization during extreme thermal conditions in the natural environment when midday low tides coincide with hot weather (Helmuth et al. 2002), and (3) acclimatization to a vertical range of thermal microhabitats spanning the marine intertidal zone. Under scenario one, we examined membrane fluidity in the mid-intertidal snail Tegulafunebralis acclimated to a 20°C range of temperature. In scenario two, we examined membrane fluidities of Littorina keenae individuals sampled from two intertidal zone microhabitats at the beginning and end of a hot midday low tide; one microhabitat was protected from waves and wind and was hotter than the other microhabitat that was exposed to waves and wind. In both microhabitats L. keenae were situated in the upper regions of the intertidal zone, about three to four feet above the mean lower low water level. For the third scenario, we compared membrane fluidities of multiple species of gastropod mollusks from throughout the vertical range of the intertidal zone at Cape Arago, OR.

Materials and methods

Specimen collection and maintenance

Tegula funebralis

Specimens were collected from Hopkins Marine Station (36°37′ N; 121°54′ W) on August 21, 2002, and N = 20 individuals were placed into each of three constant-temperature re-circulating aquaria held at 5, 15, or 25°C (±1°C). Acclimation temperatures for T. funebralis were within temperature ranges experienced in the natural environment, where body temperatures for this species often change 20−25°C within a 24-h period (Tomanek and Somero 1999, 2000). Snails were fed algae (Macrocystis pyrifera fronds) once per week during acclimation. After 4 weeks of acclimation, snails were frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until sample preparation.

Littorina keenae

Specimens were collected from exposed and protected sites at Hopkins Marine Station on May 30, 2002, once just before sunrise at 05:30 as the high tide was ebbing, and again at 13:15 near the end of the low tide. Body temperatures (Tb) of snails were obtained by inserting a K-type hypodermic needle thermocouple (Omega) into the foot of each organism. Specimens were then immediately frozen on dry ice and stored each at −80°C until sample preparation.

Cape Arago species

Snails from the south cove intertidal zone of Cape Arago, OR (43°21′ N; 124°19′ W) were collected on July 23, 2002, during morning low tide. Snails were dissected in the field, and tissue samples were immediately frozen in a liquid nitrogen dry shipper (Taylor Wharton). Samples were transported to Hopkins Marine Station and stored at −80°C until sample preparation.

Sample preparation

Approximately 6 mg gill and mantle tissue from each snail were homogenized in 3.5 ml of iced 50 mmol l−1 phosphate buffer (buffer A) using a kontes-duall ground glass homogenizer. The small size of some species (especially L. keenae, max length = 25 mm) required use of combined gill and mantle tissue to obtain sufficient tissue mass, and for consistency, all samples were prepared in this manner. The 3.5 ml volume of homogenization buffer ensured sufficient volume for analysis. Homogenates were centrifuged at 80 g for 3 min at 4°C, and resulting supernatants were decanted to fresh tubes.

For crude preparations, the supernatants were diluted with buffer A to an absorbance of 0.15 at 364 nm, and 2 ml of the resulting suspension was placed into a plastic fluorescence cuvette designed specifically for use in fluorescence measurements at the wavelengths used in this study (see, e.g. Williams and Somero 1996). To each cuvette, 2 μl of the fluorescent probe (2 mmol L−1 diphenylhexatriene (DPH) in N′,N′-dimethylformamide) was added. The cuvette was sealed with parafilm, and the solution was stirred for 30 min in the dark, allowing diffusion of the DPH molecule into the membranes.

For microsome preparations, the crude supernatant (above) was centrifuged at 20,000 g for 1 h at 4°C to remove mitochondria, lysosomes, and peroxisomes. The resulting supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 h at 4°C to pellet out plasma membrane and microsomal fractions. The resulting pellet was stored under nitrogen gas at −80°C and resuspended in 3 ml iced buffer A immediately before DPH was added as described earlier.

Fluorescence anisotropy (described below) of crude homogenate was compared with fluorescence anisotropy for microsomal preparations to check for consistency. Anisotropy values for the two preparation methods did not significantly differ, although at cold temperatures (≤10°C) data for crude homogenate samples had a greater variance (Fig. 1). Thus, microsome preparations were used whenever sufficient tissue was available (i.e. for thermally acclimated T. funebralis and snail species collected from Cape Arago), and crude homogenate was used for the small L. keenae samples.
Fig. 1

Fluorescence anisotropy of DPH in crude homogenate (filled symbols) and microsomal (open symbols) preparations of a combined gill and mantle tissue sample from n = 3 Tegula funebralis acclimated to 15°C (see text for sample preparation details). Samples from the same snail share a similar shaped symbol. Variation in anisotropy was highest in the 10°C test temperature in the crude homogenate preparation. There was no significant difference between the fluorescence anisotropy of crude and microsomal preparations at any test temperature, and there was no difference in the temperature sensitivity of fluorescence anisotropy in the two preparations

Fluorescence anisotropy measurements

Cuvettes containing prepared samples were equilibrated to the test temperature for 15 min prior to each measurement. Fluorescence anisotropy of the DPH in each sample was determined as described elsewhere (Williams and Somero 1996) using a Perkin-Elmer MPF-44A fluorescence spectrophotometer with spectral band widths set to 16.7 nm at test temperatures ranging from 10 to 35°C. Excitation was at 364 nm and emission was measured at 430 nm. Anisotropy values were determined multiple times for each sample at each test temperature, and average anisotropy values for each sample at each test temperature were used in subsequent analyses.

Statistical analysis

Fluorescence anisotropy values for each sample were plotted as a function of test temperature, and slopes of best-fit lines were generated using linear regression analysis (SPSS, ver. 14.0). These slopes were then used to calculate anisotropy values at 20°C for each sample, and these values were used for comparisons among groups, using analysis of variance (ANOVA, SPSS, ver. 14.0).


Membrane fluidity in laboratory acclimated Tegula funebralis

Thermal acclimation of Tegula funebralis did not induce any measurable changes in membrane fluidity. Fluorescence anisotropy of DPH was similar in all three acclimation groups at each test temperature, and there were no significant differences in the temperature sensitivity of DPH fluorescence anisotropy among snails acclimated to different temperatures (Fig. 2). The mean (±1 SD) fluorescence anisotropy calculated at 20°C was 0.194 ± 0.011, 0.190 ± 0.022, and 0.208 ± 0.017 for snails acclimated to 5, 15, and 25°C, respectively. Acclimation temperature and membrane anisotropy at 20°C showed no significant correlation (ANOVA, F1,13 = 1.565, P = 0.233, r2 = 0.107, Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Fluorescence anisotropy of DPH in microsomal preparations from Tegula funebralis acclimated to 5° (squares), 15° (circles), and 25°C (triangles), determined at a range of temperatures. Each point represents the mean ± SE of n = 5 snails. For all three groups of snails, there was a significant inverse relationship between fluorescence anisotropy and temperature, indicating that membranes were more fluid at higher temperatures. There was no significant effect of thermal acclimation on the fluorescence anisotropy at any given temperature nor was there an effect on the temperature dependence of membrane fluidity

Fig. 3

Fluorescence anisotropy of DPH at 20°C in membrane preparations from Tegula funebralis acclimated to 5°, 15°, and 25°C. Values calculated from data in Fig. 2. There was no significant effect of acclimation temperature on fluorescence anisotropy calculated at 20°C, despite a slight increase with increasing acclimation temperature

Membrane fluidity in field acclimated Littorina keenae across a tidal cycle

Body temperatures for Littorina keenae fluctuated with tide and time of day at both exposed and protected sites, but snails at the protected site were found to experience more extreme temperature ranges than those at the exposed site. Body temperatures (Tb) recorded during spring and summer 2002 at the exposed site ranged from 9 to 19°C, whereas measurements at the protected site exhibited a wider fluctuation ranging from 10 to 37°C. On May 30, 2002, a very calm hot day with midday low tide, Tb values of L. keenae at exposed and protected sites were similar at 05:30 (13.0 ± 0.4°C and 13.1 ± 0.2°C, respectively), but by 13:15, Tb at exposed and protected sites differed greatly (17.8 ± 1.2°C and 27.5 ± 0.8°C, respectively). On an extremely hot day during an afternoon low tide (July 1, 2002, at 15:00), Tb of L. keenae at the protected site reached as high as 37.3°C, with a mean Tb of 35.2 ± 1.8°C.

The large Tb changes of Littorina keenae during low tide periods were not accompanied by changes in membrane fluidity. Fluorescence anisotropy values did not differ between collection times at either site nor did anisotropy values differ appreciably among snails from exposed and protected sites at any time of collection (Figs. 4, 5). Snails from the protected site had slightly less fluid membranes than snails from the exposed site at the beginning of the low tide in the morning (Fig. 5), and there was a statistically significant effect of site in a multiple linear regression fit (ANOVA P < 0.004). However, sampling time had no effect within each site nor did snail membrane fluidities differ significantly between sites in the afternoon.
Fig. 4

Membrane fluidity of crude homogenates of gill and mantle tissues from Littorina keenae collected from exposed and protected sites at the beginning and end of the low tide period on May 30, 2002, a clear, sunny, and hot day. Morning samples (5:30) were collected as the tide receded, and mean body temperatures of snails at exposed and protected sites were similar (13.0 and 13.1°C, respectively), and afternoon samples (13:15) were collected as the tide was coming back in, and mean body temperatures of snails at exposed and protected sites were different (17.8 and 27.5°C, respectively). Each point is the mean ± 1 SE of each group of snails. Symbols and samples sizes are given on the figure

Fig. 5

Fluorescence anisotropy at 20°C in crude homogenate membrane preparations from Littorina keenae collected from exposed and protected sites at the beginning and end of the low tide period on May 30, 2002. Values calculated from data in Fig. 4. Neither collection location nor time of day showed a significant effect on membrane fluidity, though snails collected from the protected site in the morning before low tide did have greater membrane fluidity

Membrane fluidity in field acclimatized gastropods across vertical intertidal zones

In a broad comparison of membrane fluidities in snails from throughout the intertidal zone at Cape Arago, OR, we observed large interspecific variation in fluorescence anisotropy values (Fig. 6), but the differences in membrane fluidity between species were not consistently related to thermal microhabitat (i.e. vertical zonation) (Fig. 7). Anisotropy values for the snails in this study (Fig. 6) had as great a range as those published from fish at body temperatures ranging from 1 to 24°C (Logue et al. 2000). Interspecific variation in mean fluorescence anisotropy values at 20°C was greatest for species from the low intertidal zone, intermediate for species living in the mid-intertidal zone and lowest for high intertidal zone species (Fig. 7).
Fig. 6

Fluorescence anisotropy of microsomal membrane preparations in gastropod mollusks from throughout the intertidal zone at Cape Arago, OR determined at a range of temperatures. Each symbol is the mean ± 1 SE for each species (sample size given on the figure legend). Orange colored symbols and lines indicate snails from the upper intertidal zone, purple symbols indicate snails from the middle intertidal zone, and blue symbols indicate snails from the low intertidal and subtidal zones. Black lines are fluorescence anisotropy data of membranes from fishes adapted to a wide range of temperatures (data of Logue et al. (2000), figure adapted from Hochachka and Somero (2002))

Fig. 7

Mean fluorescence anisotropy at 20°C of membranes from Cape Arago, OR calculated from data in Fig. 6. Symbols are as in Fig. 6. Species are grouped by intertidal height using published data on maximum vertical distribution ranges (Morris et al. 1980)


The fluidity of biological membranes tends to be preserved within a narrow range across many species adapted to a wide range of body temperatures, a phenomenon termed homeoviscous adaptation (HVA) (Sinensky 1974; Cossins and Prosser 1978; Logue et al. 2000). Relatively few studies have examined how membrane fluidity is preserved during the large and rapid temperature changes commonly experienced by intertidal organisms (Dahlhoff and Somero 1993; Williams and Somero 1996). This study aimed at assessing whether intertidal gastropod mollusks reorder their membranes during low-tide thermal excursions, laboratory thermal acclimation, or acclimatization to vertical position in the intertidal zone.

Eurythermal organisms that routinely face such rapid and significant ambient thermal excursions as those in the intertidal zone have been shown to maintain membrane fluidity within the narrow range required for biological function via HVA (Hazel and Williams 1990; Behan-Martin et al. 1993). Body temperatures of snails can increase by over 20°C during summertime low tide periods (this study, Garrity 1984; Tomanek and Somero 1999); thus through direct thermal perturbations, we would expect membrane fluidity to increase dramatically during low tides unless the snails have mechanisms to rapidly and selectively alter and stabilize the fluidity of their membranes. Such observations have been made for the mid-intertidal mussel, Mytilus californianus, which has been shown to reorder gill membranes to maintain relatively constant membrane fluidities during seasonal acclimatization and during simulations of the rapid thermal changes associated with low tide (Williams and Somero 1996). Dahlhoff and Somero (1993) showed that fluidity of mitochondrial membranes from species of abalone living across a range of thermal habitats varies with acclimation temperature and thermal habitat. Other bivalves (e.g. oysters and clams) also seasonally vary both phospholipid composition and sterol content of gill tissue in response to simulated seasonal temperature changes (Pernet et al. 2008; Parent et al. 2008). Our data suggest intertidal snails do not alter membrane fluidity during thermal acclimation (Figs. 2, 3) or thermal acclimatization (Figs. 4, 5), and further, interspecific differences in membrane fluidity do not correlate with vertical zonation (Figs. 6, 7). The absence of HVA in intertidal snails is unexpected and raises questions as to what other adaptive strategies may stabilize their membranes at high temperatures.

Homeoviscous adaptation through changes in membrane composition is not the only way an organism can maintain membrane fluidity during thermal perturbations. Membrane fluidity can also be influenced by the milieu surrounding the membrane (Tocanne and Teissié 1990; Hazel et al. 1992). Due to our method of membrane preparation, the fluidity of snail membranes measured in our study should reflect only membrane composition, not differences in composition of the surrounding milieu. Thus, while our results indicate that intertidal marine snails do not make compensatory adjustments to membrane composition in response to thermal acclimation or acclimatization, it is entirely possible that their membranes are stabilized by changes in the surrounding milieu during ambient thermal fluctuations.

Two plausible explanations for how membrane fluidity is maintained over a wide range of temperatures arise as extensions of a “stabilizing milieu” hypothesis. First, high temperature could lower the pH of the milieu surrounding these membranes, causing ionization of phosphate head groups and greater membrane stability without changing membrane composition. During high-temperature excursions, the pH of internal fluids in these snails would likely drop, changing the ionization state of membrane phospholipids and thereby affecting their molecular packing (Tocanne and Teissié 1990). In poikilotherms, intracellular pH varies inversely with body temperature (see, e.g. Hazel et al. 1992). Such decreases in pH could diminish the strength of the charge on phosphate head groups, decreasing their hydration state and causing them to become more densely packed. This condensation of membrane phospholipids would serve to reduce fluidity, thereby stabilizing membranes at high temperatures (Hazel et al. 1992). Indeed, a decrease in pH of the milieu surrounding biological membranes has been shown to reduce membrane fluidity in a variety of organisms (see Hazel et al. 1992 and references therein).

Second, marine gastropods possess high levels of organic osmolytes (e.g. betaine, taurine, and trehalose) (Rosenberg et al. 2006, Tsvetkova and Quinn 1994) that stabilize membrane lipids and some membrane-associated proteins (Rudolph et al. 1986, Tsvetkova and Quinn 1994, Yancey 2005), and in the milieu surrounding membranes may counteract thermal perturbations to membrane fluidity. These organic osmolytes can increase molecular spacing of membrane phospholipids, preventing spontaneous phase transitions at low temperatures. At high temperatures, however, the presence of these osmolytes increases membrane fluidity and energetically favors Hex II phase formation (Tsvetkova and Quinn 1994), which could destabilize membranes (see e.g. Hochachka and Somero 2002). For intertidal zone snails, membranes may be stabilized by reduced pH during periods of high temperature, and potentially organic osmolytes could aid in maintenance of membrane fluidity during periods of low temperature. Organic osmolytes play additional roles in maintaining membrane order during exposure to non-thermal stresses associated with intertidal zone environments, including desiccation (Rudolph et al. 1986; Yancey 2005) and hypoxia (Yancey 2005), but the role of organic osmolytes in thermal acclimation and acclimatization of intertidal zone gastropods remains to be fully understood.

The small size of many specimens we studied necessitated using a combination of gill and mantle tissues in our preparations; it is possible that the two tissues respond differently to temperature variations, such that lack of HVA in one tissue masked HVA in the other. Not all tissues exhibit HVA, and in some cases, different tissues within a single organism exhibit different propensities for HVA. Cossins et al. (1978) found no evidence for HVA in sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and Crocket and Hazel (1995) found that while basolateral membranes from trout intestinal epithelium showed HVA, brush border membranes did not. In tuna, Fudge et al. (1998) found no evidence for HVA when comparing opposite ends of the visceral rete mirabile, despite an estimated 10°C thermal gradient.

One explanation for tissue-specific membrane responses, offered by Cossins et al. (1978), suggests that if membrane function is not influenced by changes in membrane composition (i.e. viscotropic effects), HVA may not be beneficial. They surveyed SR membrane fluidity from a range of species and found no evidence of HVA, despite the fact previous and subsequent studies have shown synaptic membranes from many of the same species exhibit near perfect HVA (Cossins and Prosser 1978; Behan-Martin et al. 1993). Cossins et al. (1978) speculated that if the primary function of the SR (i.e. Ca2+-stimulated ATPase activity) is not influenced by viscotropic effects (as indicated by previous studies, see Cossins et al. 1978), then HVA would serve no purpose in this membrane.

It is also possible that if membranes experience hostile conditions in the microenvironment, HVA may not be favorable. Crockett and Hazel (1995) demonstrated that basolateral membranes from trout intestinal epithelial cells varied acyl-chain composition with temperature but that the brush border membranes did not, and in fact, increased fluidity with increasing temperature. They attributed this lack of HVA in brush border membranes to the presence of bile in the apical microenvironment, which might impose unusual requirements on membrane order. Similarly, Pernet et al. (2008) found that gill and digestive gland membranes from both Mytilus edulis and Crassostrea virginica differed in their responses to temperature. Gill membranes showed a near perfect increase in fluidity with decreasing temperature, whereas fluidity of digestive gland membranes varied across a much narrower temperature range. Pernet et al. (2008) attributed the different response of digestive gland membranes to the proximity of digestive enzymes (e.g. lipases) and acids, regular exposure to which might suggest a need for greater membrane stability.

In our study, if lack of HVA in one tissue concealed HVA in the other, there would be two possibilities. First, mantle tissue exhibits HVA, but this fact was masked by the lack of HVA in gill membranes. Second, gill membranes exhibit HVA, but this observation was concealed by the lack of HVA in mantle membranes. While either result is possible, we suggest both are unlikely. First, gill membranes have been repeatedly shown to exhibit near perfect HVA (Williams and Somero 1996; Pernet et al. 2008; Parent et al. 2008). Thus, we suspect that if these species were to exhibit HVA, it would be observed in gills, making it unlikely that lack of HVA in gill membranes masked HVA in mantle membranes. Second, mantle tissue is not typically exposed to such inhospitable conditions as those involving digestive enzymes or acids, and its roles in shell formation (Chave 1984) and osmo- and iono-regulation (Little 1981) would likely be vulnerable to viscotropic effects and membrane instability. We therefore see no reason to assume gill and mantle membranes should differ in their propensity to exhibit HVA, and thus it seems unlikely that lack of HVA in mantle tissue obscured evidence of HVA in gill membranes.

The remaining, if unexpected, alterative is that neither gill nor mantle membranes of the tested intertidal gastropods exhibit HVA, and as previously described, changes in the surrounding milieu may help maintain proper membrane fluidity. Experiments involving larger gastropod species, in which gill and mantle tissues could be analyzed separately, would be valuable in testing our current hypotheses. Moreover, characterization of the internal aqueous microenvironment of marine gastropod tissues during thermal acclimation or acclimatization could account for the lack of HVA observed in our study and clarify whether marine gastropods have evolved different mechanisms to cope with thermal fluctuations.



We thank Dr. George Somero for his support and NSF grant BIO OEI 0920050 to JHS.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Behan-Martin MJ, Jones GR, Bowler K, Cossins AR (1993) A near perfect temperature adaptation of bilayer order in vertebrate brain membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1151:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chave KE (1984) Physics and chemistry of biomineralization. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 12:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleland JD, McMahon RF (1990) Upper thermal limit of nine intertidal gastropod species from a Hong Kong rocky shore in relation to vertical distribution and desiccation associated with evaporative cooling. In: Morton B (ed) The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China II, vol 3. Behaviour, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 1141–1152Google Scholar
  4. Cossins AR (1983) The adjustment of membrane fluidity during thermal adaptation. In: Cossins AR, Sheterline P (eds) Cellular acclimatization to environmental change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  5. Cossins AR, Prosser CL (1978) Evolutionary adaptation of membranes to temperature. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 75:2040–2043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cossins AR, Christiansen J, Prosser CL (1978) Adaptation of biological membranes to temperature: lack of homeoviscous adaptation in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochem Biophys Acta 511:442–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cossins AR, Lee JAC, Lewis RNAH, Bowler K (1986) The adaptation to cold of membrane order and (Na+/K+)-ATPase properties. In: Heller HC (ed) Living in the Cold. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  8. Crockett EL, Hazel JR (1995) Cholesterol levels explain inverse compensation of membrane order in brush border but not homeoviscous adaptation in basolateral membranes from the intestinal epithelia of rainbow trout. J Exp Biol 198:1105–1113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlhoff E, Somero GN (1993) Effects of temperature on mitochondria from abalone (genus Haliotis): adaptive plasticity and its limits. J Exp Biol 185:151–168Google Scholar
  10. Finke GR, Naverrete SA, Bozinovic F (2007) Tidal regimes of temperate coasts and their influences on aerial exposure for intertidal organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 343:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fudge DS, Stevens ED, Ballantyne JS (1998) No evidence for homeoviscous adaptation in a heterothermic tissue: tuna heat exchangers. Am J Physiol Reg Integ Comp 44:R818–R823Google Scholar
  12. Garrity SD (1984) Some adaptations of gastropods to physical stress on a tropical rocky shore. Ecology 65:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris WE (1985) Modulation of Na + , K + -ATPase activity by the lipid bilayer examined with dansylated phosphatidylserine. Biochemistry 24:2873–2883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazel JR (1984) Effects of temperature on the structure and metabolism of cell membranes in fish. Am J Physiol 246:R460–R470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hazel JR (1995) Thermal adaptation in biological-membranes—is homeoviscous adaptation the explanation? Annu Rev Physiol 57:19–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazel JR, Williams EE (1990) The role of alterations in membrane lipid composition in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical environment. Prog Lipid Res 29:167–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hazel JR, McKinley SJ, Williams EE (1992) Thermal adaptation in biological-membranes—interacting effects of temperature and pH. J Comp Physiol B: Biochem, Systemic, Environ Physiol 162:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helmuth B, Broitman BR, Blanchette CA, Gilman S, Halpin P, Harley CDG, O’Donnell MJ, Hofmann GE, Menge B, Strickland D (2002) Mosaic patterns of thermal stress in the rocky intertidal zone: implications for climate change. Ecol Monog 74:461–479Google Scholar
  19. Hochachka PW, Somero GN (2002) Biochemical adaptation: mechanism and process in physiological evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones KMM, Boulding EG (1999) State-dependent habitat selection by an intertidal snail: the costs of selecting a physically stressful microhabitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 242:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little C (1981) Osmoregulation and excretion in prosobranch gastropods Part I: physiology and biochemistry. J Mollusc Studies 47:221–247Google Scholar
  22. Logue JA, de Vries AL, Fodor E, Cossins AR (2000) Lipid compositional correlates of temperature-adaptive interspecific differences in membrane physical structure. J Exp Biol 203:2105–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McQuaid CD, Scherman PA (1988) Thermal stress in a high shore intertidal environment morphological and behavioural adaptations of the gastropod Littorina africana. NATO ASI (Advanced Science Institutes) series a life sciences 151:213–224Google Scholar
  24. Morris RH, Abbott DP, Haderlie EC (1980) Intertidal Invertebrates of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 1–690Google Scholar
  25. Overgaard J, Tomcala A, Sorensen JG, Holmstrup M, Krogh PH, Simek P, Kostal V (2008) Effects of acclimation temperature on thermal tolerance and membrane phospholipids composition in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 54:619–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Parent GJ, Pernet F, Tremblay R, Sevigny J, Ouellete M (2008) Remodeling of membrane lipids in gills of adult hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria during declining temperature. Aquatic Biol 3:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pernet F, Tremblay R, Redjah I, Sevigny J, Gionet C (2008) Physiological and biochemical traits correlate with differences in growth rate and temperature adaptation among groups of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. J Exp Biol 211:969–977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pottel H, Van Der Meer W, Herreman W (1983) Correlation between the order parameter and the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of 1, 6-diphenyl-1, 3, 5-hexatriene and an evaluation of membrane fluidity. Biochim Biophys Acta 730:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenberg NK, Lee RW, Yancey PH (2006) High contents of hypotaurine and thiotaurine in hydrothermal-vent gastropods without thiotrophic endosymbionts. J Exp Zool 305A:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudolph AS, Crowe JH, Crowe LM (1986) Effects of three stabilizing agents—proline, betaine, and trehalose—on membrane phospholipids. Arch Biochem Biophys 245:134–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinensky M (1974) Homeoviscous adaptation–a homeostatic process that regulates the viscosity of membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:522–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stillman JH, Tagmount A (2009) Seasonal and latitudinal acclimatization of cardiac transcriptome responses to thermal stress in porcelain crabs, Petrolisthes cinctipes. Mol Ecol 18:4206–4226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tocanne JF, Teissié J (1990) Ionization of phospholipids and phospholipid-supported interfacial lateral diffusion of protons in membrane model systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1031:111–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tomanek L, Somero GN (1999) Evolutionary and acclimation-induced variation in the heat-shock responses of congeneric marine snails (genus Tegula) from different thermal habitats: implications for limits of thermotolerance and biogeography. J Exp Biol 202:2925–2936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomanek L, Somero GN (2000) Time course and magnitude of synthesis of heat-shock proteins in congeneric marine snails (Genus Tegula) from different tidal heights. Phys and Biochem Zool 73:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsvetkova NM, Quinn PJ (1994) Compatible solutes modulate membrane lipid phase behavior. In: Cossins AR (ed) Temperature adaptation of biological membranes. Portland Press, London, pp 49–61Google Scholar
  37. Williams EE, Hazel JR (1992) The role of docosahexaenoic acid-containing molecular species of phospholipids in the thermal acclimation of biological membranes. In: Sinclair A, Gibson R (eds) Essential fatty acids and eicosanoids: invited papers from The Third International Congress. Am Oil Chem Soc, Australia, pp 128–133Google Scholar
  38. Williams EE, Somero GN (1996) Seasonal-, tidal-cycle- and microhabitat-related variation in membrane order of phospholipid vesicles from gills of the intertidal mussel Mytilus californianus. J Exp Biol 199:1587–1596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yancey PH (2005) Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolic and counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity and other stresses. J Exp Biol 208:2819–2830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amber Rais
    • 1
  • Nathan Miller
    • 2
  • Jonathon H. Stillman
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Hopkins Marine StationStanford UniversityPacific GroveUSA
  2. 2.Romberg Tiburon CenterSan Francisco State UniversityTiburonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations