Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 9, pp 2071–2086 | Cite as

Importance of freshwater flow in terrestrial–aquatic energetic connectivity in intermittently connected estuaries of tropical Australia

Original Paper

Abstract

δ13C was used to identify seasonal variations in the importance of autochthonous and allochthonous sources of productivity for fish communities in intermittently connected estuarine areas of Australia’s dry tropics. A total of 224 fish from 38 species were collected from six intermittently connected estuarine pools, three in central Queensland (two dominated by C3 forest and one by C4 pasture) and three in north Queensland (one dominated by C3 and two by C4 vegetation). Samples were collected before and after the wet season. Fish collected in the two forested areas in central Queensland had the lowest δ13C, suggesting a greater incorporation of C3 terrestrial material. A seasonal variation in δ13C was also detected for these areas, with mean δ13C varying from −20 to −23‰ from the pre- to the post-wet season, indicating a greater incorporation of terrestrial carbon after the wet season. Negative seasonal shifts in fish δ13C were also present at the pasture site, suggesting a greater dependence on carbon of riparian vegetation (C3 Juncus sp.) in the post-wet season. In north Queensland, terrestrial carbon seemed to be incorporated by fish in the two C4 areas, as δ13C of most species shifted towards slightly heavier values in the post-wet season. A two-source, one-isotope mixing model also indicated a greater incorporation of carbon of terrestrial origin in the post-wet season. However, no seasonal differences in δ13C were detected for fish from the forested area of north Queensland. Overall, hydrologic connectivity seemed to be a key factor in regulating the ultimate sources of carbon in these areas. It is therefore important to preserve the surrounding habitats and to maintain the hydrologic regimes as close to natural conditions as possible, for the conservation of the ecological functioning of these areas.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Johnston, A. Penny and R. Baker for field assistance, and A. Revill and R. Diocares for the analyses of stable isotope samples. We would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments, which significantly improved the quality of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, CSIRO Marine Research Laboratories and the Townsville City Council, and was part of K.A’s PhD funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal. All research procedures reported comply with the current Australian law and received the approval from the Animal Ethics Committee, James Cook University (Ethics Approval A852_03).

References

  1. Bayley PB (1995) Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience 45:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boon PI, Bunn SE (1994) Variations in the stable isotope composition of aquatic plants and their implications for food web analysis. Aquat Bot 48:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boston HL, Hill WR (1991) Photosynthesis-light relations of stream periphyton communities. Limnol Oceanogr 36:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouillon S, Mohan PC, Sreenivas N, Dehairs F (2000) Sources of suspended organic matter and selective feeding by zooplankton in an estuarine mangrove ecosystem as traced by stable isotopes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouillon S, Connolly R, Lee SY (2008) Organic matter exchange and cycling in mangrove ecosystems: recent insights from stable isotope studies. J Sea Res 59:44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30:492–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter SR, Cole JJ, Pace ML, Van De Bogert M, Bade DL, Bastviken D, Gille CM, Hodgson JR, Kitchell JF, Kritzberg ES (2005) Ecosystem subsidies: terrestrial support of aquatic food webs from 13C addition to contrasting lakes. Ecology 86:2737–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childers DL, Boyer JN, Davis SE, Madden CJ, Rudnick DT, Sklar FH (2006) Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentrations in the oligotrophic “upside-down” estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:602–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clapcott JE, Bunn SE (2003) Can C4 plants contribute to aquatic food webs of subtropical streams? Freshw Biol 48:1105–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cloern JE, Alpine AE, Cole BE, Wong RLJ, Arthur JF, Ball MD (1983) River discharge controls phytoplankton dynamics in the northern San Francisco Bay estuary. Est Coast Shelf Sci 16:415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Pace ML (2002) Pathways of organic C utilization in small lakes: results from a whole-lake 13C addition and coupled model. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1664–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1977) A mechanism of carbon isotope fractionation associated with lipid synthesis. Science 197:261–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doi H (2009) Spatial patterns of autochthonous and allochthonous resources in aquatic food webs. Popul Ecol 51:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douglas MM, Bunn SE, Davies PM (2005) River and wetland food webs in Australia’s wet-dry tropics: general principles and implications for management. Mar Freshw Res 56:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eyre B (1998) Transport, retention and transformation of material in Australian estuaries. Estuaries 21:540–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finlayson B, McMahon T (1988) Australia vs. the world: a comparative analysis of stream flow characteristics. In: Werner RF (ed) Fluvial geomorphology of Australia. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  18. France RL (1996) Scope for use of stable carbon isotopes in discerning the incorporation of forest detritus into aquatic foodwebs. Hydrobiologia 325:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. France RL (1997) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic evidence for ecotonal coupling between boreal forests and fishes. Ecol Freshw Fish 6:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman MC, Bowen ZH, Bovee KD, Irwin ER (2001) Flow and habitat effects on juvenile fish abundance in natural and altered flow regimes. Ecol Appl 11:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fry B, Arnold C (1982) Rapid 13C/12C turnover during growth of brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus). Oecologia 54:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelin A, Crivelli A, Rosecchi E, Kerambrun P (2001) Can salinity changes affect reproductive success in the brown shrimp Crangon crangon? J Crustac Biol 21:905–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorokhova E, Hansson S (1999) An experimental study on variations in stable carbon and nitrogen fractionation during growth of Mysis mixta and Neomysis integer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2203–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grange N, Whitfield AK, de Villiers CJ, Allanson BR (2000) The response of two South African east coast estuaries to altered river flow regimes. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 10:155–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guest MA, Connolly RM, Loneragan RL (2004) Within and among-site variability in δ13C and δ15N for three estuarine producers, Sporobolus virginicus, Zostera capricorni, and epiphytes of Z. capricorni. Aquat Bot 79:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hein T, Baranyi C, Herndl GJ, Wanek W, Schiemer F (2003) Allochthonous and autochthonous particulate organic matter in floodplains of the River Danube: the importance of hydrological connectivity. Freshw Biol 48:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herwig BR, Soluk DA, Dettmers JM, Wahl DH (2004) Trophic structure and energy flow in backwater lakes of two large floodplain rivers assessed using stable isotopes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hesslein RH, Halard KA, Ramlal P (1993) Replacement of sulfur, carbon and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2071–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huryn AD, Riley RH, Young RG, Arbuckle CJ, Peacock K, Lyon G (2001) Temporal shift in contribution of terrestrial organic matter to consumer production in a grassland river. Freshw Biol 46:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaywardane PAAT, MacLusky DS, Tytler P (2002) Factors influencing migration of Penaeus indicus in the Negombo lagoon on the west coast of Sri Lanka. Fisheries Manag Ecol 9:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnston R, Sheaves M (2006) Tropical fisheries ecology of urban waterways: part B—Curralea and Paradise Lakes. Report prepared for Townsville City Council, North Queensland Water and Twin Cities Fish Stocking Society, Townsville, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Junk W, Bayley P, Sparks R (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain system. Spec Publ Can J Fish Aquat Sci 106:110–127Google Scholar
  33. Loneragan NR, Bunn SE (1999) River flows and estuarine ecosystems: implications for coastal fisheries from a review and a case study of the Logan River, southeast Queensland. Aust Ecol 24:431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacAvoy SE, Macki SA, Garman GC (2001) Isotopic turnover in aquatic predators: quantifying the exploitation of migratory prey. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mallin MA, Paerl HW, Rudek J, Bates PW (1993) Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marczak LB, Thompson RM, Richardson JS (2007) Meta analysis: trophic level, habitat, and productivity shape the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology 88:140–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McConnaughey T, McRoy CP (1979) Food-web structure and the fractionation of carbon isotopes in the Bering Sea. Mar Biol 53:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCulloch M, Cappo M, Aumend J, Müller W (2005) Tracing the life history of individual barramundi using laser-ablation MC-ICP-MS Sr-isotopic and Sr/Ba ratios in otoliths. Mar Freshw Res 56:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCutchan JH, Lewis WM Jr, Kendall C, McGrath CC (2003) Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur. Oikos 102:378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McMahon TA, Finlayson B, Haines A, Srikanthan R (1992) Global runoff: continental comparisons of annual flows and peak discharges. Catena Verlag, Cremlingen-DestedtGoogle Scholar
  41. Michener WK, Blood ER, Bildstein KL, Brinson MM, Gardner LR (1997) Climate change, hurricanes and tropical storms, and rising sea level in coastal wetlands. Ecol Appl 7:770–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Van De Bogert MC, Bade DL, Kritzberg ES, Bastviken D (2004) Whole-lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic food webs. Nature 427:240–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson B, Howarth RW (1987) Sulfur, carbon and nitrogen isotopes used to trace organic matter flow in the salt-marsh estuaries of Sapelo Island, Georgia. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1195–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC (1999) Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. Funct Ecol 13:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Towards an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA, Takimoto G, Quattrochi J, Montanã CG (2007) Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152:179–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rounick JS, Winterbourn MJ, Lyon GL (1982) Differential utilization of allochthonous and autochthonous inputs by aquatic invertebrates in some New Zealand streams: a stable carbon isotope study. Oikos 39:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Russell DJ, Garrett RN (1983) Use by juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), and other fishes of temporal supralittoral habitats in a tropical estuary in Northern Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 34:805–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell D, Garrett R (1985) Early life history of barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), in north-eastern Queensland. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 36:191–201Google Scholar
  51. Russell DJ, McDougall AJ (2005) Movement and juvenile recruitment of mangrove jack, Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Forsskål), in Northern Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56:465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheirs J, Bruyn LD, Verhagen R (2001) A test of the C3–C4 hypothesis with two grass miners. Ecology 82:410–421Google Scholar
  53. Sheaves M, Johnston R (2006) The physical nature of Fitzroy floodplain wetland pools. In: Sheaves M, Collins JM, Houston W, Dale P, Revill A, Johnston R, Abrantes K (eds) Contribution of floodplain wetland pools to the ecological functioning of the Fitzroy River estuary. Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal, Estuary and Waterway Management, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  54. Sheaves M, Johnston R (2008) Influence of marine and freshwater connectivity on the dynamics of subtropical estuarine wetland fish metapopulations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 357:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sheaves M, Revill A, Abrantes K, Johnston R (2006) Trophic support of Fitzroy wetland pool ecosystems. In: Sheaves M, Collins J, Houston W, Dale P, Revill A, Johnston R, Abrantes K (eds) Contribution of floodplain wetland pools to the ecological functioning of the Fitzroy River estuary. Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal, Estuary and Waterway Management, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheaves M, Brodie J, Brooke B, Dale P, Lovelock C, Waycott M, Gehrke P, Johnston R, Baker R (2007a) Chapter 19—vulnerability of coastal and estuarine habitats in the Great Barrier Reef to climate change. In: Johnson JE, Marshall PA (eds) Climate change and the Barrier Reef: a vulnerability assessment. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Australian Greenhouse Office, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheaves M, Johnston R, Abrantes K (2007b) Fish fauna of dry tropical and subtropical estuarine floodplain wetlands. Mar Freshw Res 58:931–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sklar FH, Browder JA (1998) Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico. Environ Manage 22:547–562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sweeting CJ, Polunin NVC, Jennings S (2006) Effects of chemical lipid extraction and arithmetic lipid correction on stable isotope ratios of fish tissues. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:595–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Thorp J, Delong M (1994) The riverine productivity model: an heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems. Oikos 70:305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorp JH, Delong MD, Greenwood KS, Casper AF (1998) Isotopic analysis of three food web theories in constricted and floodplain regions of a large river. Oecologia 117:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tieszen LL, Boutton TW, Tesdahl KG, Slade NA (1983) Fractionation and turnover of stable carbon isotopes in animal tissues: implications for δ13C analysis of diet. Oecologia 57:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wantzen KM, Machado FA, Voss M, Boriss H, Junk WJ (2002) Seasonal isotopic shifts in fish of the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Aquat Sci 64:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999) Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul Rivers Res Mgmt 15:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson JR, Hacker JB (1987) Comparative digestibility and anatomy of some sympatric C3 and C4 arid zone grasses. Aust J Agr Res 38:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson JR, Hattersley PW (1989) Anatomical characteristics and digestibility of leaves of Panicum and other grass genera with C3 and different types of C4 photosynthetic pathway. Aust J Agr Res 40:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yokoyama H, Tamaki A, Harada K, Shimoda K, Koyama K, Ishihi Y (2005) Variability of diet-tissue isotopic fractionation in estuarine macrobenthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coastal and Estuary Ecosystem Ecology Laboratory, School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Tasmania Aquaculture and Fisheries InstituteUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations