Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 4, pp 779–789 | Cite as

Determinants of reproductive potential and population size in open populations of Patella vulgata

  • Andreas Sundelöf
  • Stuart R. Jenkins
  • Carl J. Svensson
  • Jane Delany
  • Stephen J. Hawkins
  • Per Åberg
Original Paper

Abstract

The importance of external and internal population processes in determining variation in reproductive output and variation in population size were quantified with model simulations for open populations of the sequentially hermaphroditic limpet Patella vulgata using field data from the Isle of Man and South West Ireland. Cross-correlation analyses of model outputs and elasticity analyses show that population dynamics are dominated by the effects of large females, and that recruitment adds little to reproductive output. However, populations experiencing low but highly variable recruitment appear male limited and recruitment pulses carrying young males into the population are correlated to reproductive output with a 2–5-year lag. We conclude that pulses in recruitment can be a major structuring force in these limpet populations, but site-specific post-recruitment processes will determine the relative importance of recruitment to population dynamics and the lag between recruitment and reproductive output.

Keywords

Reproductive Output Large Female Elasticity Analysis Birth Function Open Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was performed as a part of the project DELOS (EU EVK3-CT-2000-00041). Data were attained from EUROROCK (EU MAS3-CT95-0012). We would like to thank N. Jonzén for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. SJH and SRT were supported by NERC grant in aid of the MBA and the Oceans 2025 programme.

References

  1. Ballantine WJ (1961) The population dynamics of Patella vulgata and other limpets. Dissertation. University of London, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Boaventura D, da Fonseca LC, Hawkins SJ (2002) Analysis of competitive interactions between the limpets Patella depressa Pennant and Patella vulgata L. on the northern coast of Portugal. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boaventura D, da Fonseca LC, Hawkins SJ (2003) Size matters: competition within populations of the limpet Patella depressa. J Anim Ecol 72(3):435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman RS, Lewis JR (1977) Annual fluctuations in the recruitment of Patella vulgata L. J Mar Biol Ass UK 57:793–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrows MT, Hawkins SJ (1998) Modelling patch dynamics on rocky shores using deterministic cellular automata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 167:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caley MJ, Carr MH, Hixon MA, Hughes TP, Jones GP, Menge BA (1996) Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:477–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatfield C (1999) The analysis of time series—an introduction, 5th edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman RA, Underwood AJ, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Aberg P, Arenas F, Arrontes J, Castro J, Hartnoll RG, Jenkins SR, Paula J, Della Santina P, Hawkins SJ (2006) A continental scale evaluation of the role of limpet grazing on rocky shores. Oecologia 147:556–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen RK, Sponaugle S (2009) Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Annu Rev Mar Sci 1:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowen RK, Paris CB, Srinivasan A (2006) Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311:522–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Creese RG, Underwood AJ (1982) Analysis of inter- and intra-specific competition amongst intertidal limpets with different methods of feeding. Oecologia 53:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies AJ, Johnson MP, Maggs CA (2007) Limpet grazing and loss of Ascophyllum nodosum canopies on decadal time scales. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delany J, Myers AA, McGrath D (1998) Recruitment, immigration and population structure of two coexisting limpet species in mid-shore tidepools, on the West Coast of Ireland. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 221:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon PA, Milicich MJ, Sugihara G (1999) Episodic fluctuations in larval supply. Science 283:1528–1530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dodd JM (1957) Artificial fertilisation, larval development and metamorphosis in Patella vulgata L. and Patella coerulea L. Pubbl Stn Zool Napoli 29:172–186Google Scholar
  17. Doherty PJ, Williams DM (1988) The replenishment of coral-reef fish populations. Oceano Mar Biol 26:487–551Google Scholar
  18. Hartnoll RG, Wright JR (1977) Foraging movements and homing in the limpet Patella vulgata L. Anim Behav 25:806–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins SJ, Kain JM, Hartnoll RG, Norton TA (1992) Plant-animal interactions on hard substrata in the north-east Atlantic. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ, Price JH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  20. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, Tanner JE, Willis BL (1999) Patterns of recruitment and abundance of corals along the Great Barrier Reef. Nature 397:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Dinsdale EA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Pratchett MS, Tanner JE, Willis BL (2000) Supply-side ecology works both ways: the link between benthic adults, fecundity, and larval recruits. Ecology 81:2241–2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins SR (2005) Larval habitat selection, not larval supply, determines settlement patterns and adult distribution in two chthamalid barnacles. J Anim Ecol 74:893–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins SR, Hartnoll RG (2001) Food supply, grazing activity and growth rate in the limpet Patella vulgata L.: a comparison between exposed and sheltered shores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 258:123–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins SR, Aberg P, Cervin G, Coleman RA, Delany J, Della Santina P, Hawkins SJ, LaCroix E, Myers AA, Lindegarth M, Power AM, Roberts MF, Hartnoll RG (2000) Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (L.) (Crustacea : Cirripedia) over a European scale. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 243:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins SR, Coleman RA, Della Santina P, Hawkins SJ, Burrows MT, Hartnoll RG (2005) Regional scale differences in the determinism of grazing effects in the rocky intertidal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson MP (2005) Is there confusion over what is meant by ‘open population’? Hydrobiologia 544:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson MP, Burrows MT, Hawkins SJ (1998) Individual based simulations of the direct and indirect effects of limpets on a rocky shore Fucus mosaic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 169:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Le Quesne WJF, Hawkins SJ (2006) Direct observations of protandrous sex change in the patellid limpet Patella vulgata. J Mar Biol Ass UK 86(1):161–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis JR, Bowman RS (1975) Local habitat-induced variations in the population dynamics of Patella vulgata L. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 17:165–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orton JH, Southward AJ, Dodd JM (1956) Studies on the biology of limpets II. The breeding of Patella vulgata L. in Britain. J Mar Biol Ass UK 35:149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pineda J, Starczak V, Stueckle TA (2006) Timing of successful settlement: demonstration of a recruitment window in the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 320:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pyper BJ, Paterman RM (1998) Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 55:2127–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roughgarden J, Iwasa Y, Baxter C (1985) Demographic theory for an open marine population with space-limited recruitment. Ecology 66:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandin SA, Pacala SW (2005) Demographic theory of coral reef fish populations with stochastic recruitment: comparing sources of population regulation. Am Nat 165:107–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ, Osenberg CW (1999) Quantifying the effects of multiple processes on local abundance: a cohort approach for open populations. Ecol Lett 2:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shepherd SA, Partington D (1995) Studies on southern Australian abalone (Genus Haliotis). 16. Recruitment, habitat and stock relations. Mar Fresh Res 46:669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shepherd SA, Lowe D, Partington D (1992) Studies on southern Australian abalone (Genus Haliotis). 13. Larval dispersal and recruitment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 164:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shulman MJ (1998) What can population genetics tell us about dispersal and biogeographic history of coral-reef fishes? Aus J Ecol 23:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Southward AJ, Southward EC (1978) Recolonization of rocky shores in Cornwall after use of toxic dispersants to clean up the Torrey Canyon spill. J Fish Res Bd Can 35:682–706Google Scholar
  40. Sundelöf A, Åberg P (2006) Birth functions in two-sex demographic models. Ecol Mod 193:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swearer SE, Caselle JE, Lea DW, Warner RR (1999) Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish. Nature 402:799–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Werner FE, Cowen RK, Paris CB (2008) Coupled biological and physical models present capabilities and necessary developments for future studies of population connectivity. Oceanography 20:54–69Google Scholar
  43. Young CM (1990) Larval ecology of marine invertebrates: a sesquicentennial history. Ophelia 32:1–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Sundelöf
    • 1
    • 5
  • Stuart R. Jenkins
    • 2
    • 4
  • Carl J. Svensson
    • 1
  • Jane Delany
    • 3
  • Stephen J. Hawkins
    • 2
    • 4
  • Per Åberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marine EcologyUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.Marine Biological AssociationCitadel Hill, Plymouth, DevonUK
  3. 3.Dove Marine Laboratory, School of Marine Science and TechnologyUniversity of Newcastle-upon-TyneCullercoats, North ShieldsUK
  4. 4.School of Ocean SciencesBangor UniversityMenai Bridge, AngleseyUK
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations