A comparison of filtration rates among pelagic tunicates using kinematic measurements
- 185 Downloads
Salps have higher filtration rates than most other holoplankton, and are capable of packaging and exporting primary production from surface waters. A method of kinematic analysis was employed to accurately measure salp feeding rates. The data were then used to explain how diverse body morphologies and swimming motions among species and lifecycle stages influence salp feeding performance. We selected five species, representing a range of morphologies and swimming styles, and used digitized outlines from video frames to measure body-shape change during a pulse cycle. Time-varying body volume was then calculated from the digitized salp outlines to estimate the amount of fluid passing through the filtering mesh. This non-invasive method produced higher feeding rates than other methods and revealed that body volume, pulse frequency and degree of contraction are important factors for determining volume filtered. Each species possessed a unique combination of these three characteristics that resulted in comparable filtration (range: 0.44–15.33 ml s−1) and normalized filtration rates (range: 0.21–1.27 s−1) across species. The convergence of different species with diverse morphologies on similar normalized filtration suggests a tendency towards a flow optimum.
KeywordsPulse Frequency Volume Flow Rate Body Volume Pulse Cycle High Pulse Frequency
This work was supported by NSF project OCE-0647723. We thank the people who facilitated work at the Liquid Jungle Lab in Panama, including Ellen Bailey and Luis Camilli, and the SCUBA divers that helped with the project, Emily Abbott, Andrew Gray, David Kushner, Dan Martin, and Dave Sutherland. Erik Anderson was an important resource for data analysis and interpretation. Alex Techet and Tony Moss, as well as an anonymous reviewer, provided useful advice and suggestions.
- Bejan A (2000) Shape and structure, from engineering to nature. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Bejan A, Marden JH (2006) Constructing animal locomotion from new thermodynamics theory. Am Sci 94:342–349Google Scholar
- Bone Q, Braconnot JC, Ryan KP (1991) On the pharyngeal feeding filter of the salp Pegea confoederata (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Acta Zool 72:55–60Google Scholar
- Godeaux J (1998) The relationship and systematics of the Thaliacea, with keys for identification. In: Bone Q (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 273–294Google Scholar
- Haddock SHD, Heine JN (2005) Scientific blue-water diving. California Sea Grant College Program Report No. T-057Google Scholar
- Hamner WM (1975) Underwater observations of blue-water plankton: Logistics, techniques, and safety procedures for divers at sea. Limnol Oceanogr 20:1045–1051Google Scholar
- Madin LP, Deibel D (1998) Feeding and energetics of Thaliacea. In: Bone Q (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–103Google Scholar
- Madin LP, Kremer P, Wiebe PH, Purcell JE, Horgan EH, Nemanzie DA (2006) Periodic swarms of the salp Salpa aspera in the Slope Water off the NE United States: Biovolume, vertical migration, grazing and vertical flux. Deep Sea Res IGoogle Scholar
- Nishikawa J, Terazaki M (1994) Measurement of swimming speeds and pulse rate of salps using a video equipment. Bull Plankton Soc Japan 41:170–173Google Scholar
- Yount JL (1954) The taxonomy of the Salpidae (Tunicata) of the Central Pacific Ocean. Pac Sci 3:276–330Google Scholar