Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 673–682

Effects of brackish water incursions and diel phasing of tides on vertical excursions of the keystone predator Pisaster ochraceus

Original Paper

Abstract

The physical factors that constrain the vertical foraging excursions of the keystone predator, the sea star Pisaster ochraceus, hold considerable interest because they indirectly shape the vivid patterns of zonation of rocky shore communities by impeding or enhancing the ability of P. ochraceus to traverse the intertidal zone. In this paper, we describe a study conducted in the Pacific Northwest of North America in which we examined, in the field and laboratory, the abiotic factors that can affect vertical excursions by P. ochraceus. Our field observations revealed that the extreme upward reach and average shore level height reached by P. ochraceus were significantly lower for daylight high tides than nocturnal high tides. Based on diver observations following a severe storm, it would also appear that these diurnal movements can be impeded by freshwater incursions into the intertidal zone; a regularly occurring event in the Pacific Northwest. As part of an experimental investigation into this phenomenon, we observed that sea stars maintained in tall cylindrical aquaria, without tidal flux, remained near the bottom during daylight and moved to the top of the column at night, suggesting that photoperiod alone can influence the cycle of vertical movement. Adding a freshwater layer to the aquaria restricted these vertical excursions. Our results suggest that on rocky coastlines susceptible to fresh water incursions, the suppression of foraging may be an important factor in the spatial and temporal variation in the intensity of predation. Furthermore, given the relative increase in frequency and intensity of freshwater incursions in the Pacific Northwest and the intolerance of P. ochraceus to lowered salinity, there is the long-term potential to significantly alter patterns of species zonation in this essential marine habitat.

References

  1. Barker MF, Russell MP (2008) The distribution and behaviour of Patiriella mortenseni and P. regularis in the extreme hyposaline conditions of the Southern New Zealand Fiords. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 355:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breen PA (1972) Seasonal migration and population regulation in the limpet Acmaea (Collisela) digitalis. Veliger 15(2):133–141Google Scholar
  3. Connell JD (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Bellknap, Cambridge, pp 460–490Google Scholar
  4. Denny MW, Paine RT (1998) Celestial mechanics, sea level change, and intertidal ecology. Biol Bull 194:108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Environment Canada Database (2008) Accessed 21 April 2008. http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/
  6. Fairweather PG (1988) Movements of intertidal whelks (Morula marginalba and Thais orbita) in relation to availability of prey and shelter. Mar Biol 100:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feder HM (1970) Growth and predation by the ochre sea star Pisaster ochraceus (Brandt), in Monterey Bay, California. Ophelia 8:161–185Google Scholar
  8. Frank PW (1965) The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. Ecology 46(6):831–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garza C (2005) Prey productivity effects on the impact of predators of the mussel, Mytilus californianus (Conrad). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 324(1):76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garza C (2008) Relating spatial scale to patterns of polychaete species diversity in coastal estuaries of the western United States. Landsc Ecol 23(Supplement 1):107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grant Gross M (1990) Oceanography: a view of the earth, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 441 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Harley CDG, Hughes AR, Hultgren KM, Miner BG, Sorte CJB, Thornber CS, Rodriguez LF, Tomanek L, Williams SL (2006) The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol Lett 9:228–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harley CDG, Helmuth BST (2003) Local- and regional-effects of wave exposure, thermal stress, and absolute versus effective shore level on patterns of intertidal zonation. Limnol Oceanogr 48(4):1498–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helmuth B, Harley CDG, Halpin PM, O’Donnell M, Hofmann GE, Blanchette CA (2002) Climate change and latitudinal patterns of intertidal thermal stress. Science 298:1015–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kautsky N (1982) Growth and size structure in a Baltic Mytilus edulis population. Mar Biol 68:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kautsky N, Johannesson K, Tedengren M (1990) Genotypic and phenotypic differences between Baltic and North Sea populations of Mytilus edulis evaluated through reciprocal transplantations. I. Growth and morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamare MD, Channon T, Cornelisen C, Clarke M (2009) Archival electronic tagging of a predatory sea star—testing a new technique to study movement at the individual level. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 373:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Legendre P, Troussellier M (1988) Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Limnol Oceanogr 33:1055–1067Google Scholar
  19. Mauzey KP (1966) Feeding behavior and reproductive cycles in Pisaster ochraceus. Biol Bull Mar Biol Lab Woods Hole 131:127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauzey KP, Birkeland C, Dayton PK (1968) Feeding behavior of asteroids and escape responses of their prey in the Puget Sound region. Ecology 49(4):603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menge JL (1974) Prey selection and foraging period of the predaceous rocky intertidal snail Acanthina punctulata. Oecologia 17:293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1987) Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am Nat 130(5):730–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menge BA, Berlow EL, Blanchette CA, Navarrete SA, Yamada SB (1994) The keystone species concept: variation in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat. Ecol Monogr 64(3):249–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Metaxas A, Young CM (1998) Behavior of echinoid larvae around sharp haloclines: effects of the salinity gradient and dietary conditioning. Mar Biol 131:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moran MJ (1985) Distribution and dispersion of the predatory intertidal gastropod Morula marginalba Blainville. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 22:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paine RT (1969) The PisasterTegula interaction; prey patches, predator food preference, and intertidal community structure. Ecology 50(5):950–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearse JS, Eernise DJ (1982) Photoperiodic regulation of gametogenesis and gonadal growth in the sea star Pisaster ochraceus. Mar Biol 67:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickard GL, Stranton BR (1979) Pacific fjords: a review of their water characteristics. In: Freeland HJ, Farmer DM, Levings CD (eds) Fjord oceanography. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–52Google Scholar
  30. Pincebourde S, Sanford E, Helmuth B (2008) Body temperature during low tide alters the feeding performance of a top intertidal predator. Limnol Oceanogr 53(4):1562–1573Google Scholar
  31. Reimer O, Harms-Ringdahl S (2001) Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator free Baltic Sea. Mar Biol 139:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robles C (1987) Predator foraging characteristics and prey population structure on a sheltered shore. Ecology 68(5):1502–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robles CD, Desharnais R (2002) History and current development of a paradigm of predation in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 83(6):1521–1536Google Scholar
  34. Robles C, Sweetnam DA, Dittman D (1989) Diel variation of intertidal foraging by Cancer productus L. in British Columbia. J Nat Hist 23:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robles C, Sherwood-Stevens R, Alvarado M (1995) Responses of a key intertidal predator to varying recruitment of its prey. Ecology 76(2):565–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robles CD, Desharnais RA, Garza C, Donahue MJ, Martinez CA (2009) Complex equilibria in the maintenance of boundaries: experiments with mussel beds. Ecology 90(4):985–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sameoto JA, Metaxas A (2008) Interactive effects of haloclines and food patches on the vertical distribution of 3 species of temperate invertebrate larvae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 361:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanford E (1999) Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature. Science 283:2095–2097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shirley TC, Stickle WB (1982) Responses of Leptasterias hexactis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) to low salinity. I. Survival, activity, feeding, growth and absorption efficiency. Mar Biol 69:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stickle WB, Ahokas R (1974) The effects of tidal fluctuation of salinity on the perivisceral fluid composition of several echinoderms. Comp Biochem Physiol 47A:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomson RE (1982) Oceanography of the British Columbia coast. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  42. Witman JD, Grange KR (1998) Links between rain, salinity and predation in a rocky subtidal community. Ecology 79(7):2429–2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Science and Environmental PolicyCalifornia State UniversitySeasideUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesCalifornia State University, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations