Marine Biology

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 171–176 | Cite as

Surface glycoproteins are not the contact pheromones in the Lysmata shrimp

  • Dong ZhangEmail author
  • Jing Zhu
  • Junda Lin
  • Jörg D. HardegeEmail author
Original Paper


Behavioral evidence suggests that some male caridean shrimp, such as those of Lysmata species, identify conspecific females via contact pheromones that coat the cuticle surface of the females. In this study, we attempted to determine whether the contact pheromones in three Lysmata species, Lysmata ankeri, Lysmata boggessi, and Lysmata wurdemanni, are glycoproteins as hypothesized previously in a diverse group of aquatic invertebrates. Twenty lectins were screened and lectin-binding experiments indicated that lectin treatment did not affect mate recognition in the shrimps. The behavior of the male-phase (MP) shrimp in the three treatments (non-lectin-treated MP and lectin-treated euhermaphrodite-phase (EP) shrimp, lectin-treated MP and lectin-treated EP shrimp, and lectin-treated MP and non-lectin-treated EP shrimp) and in the control was not different in responding to lectin-treated and control EP shrimp. All the MP shrimp copulated with lectin-treated and control EP shrimp successfully. All the MP shrimp copulated with ethylenediamine tetraacetate-treated EP shrimp (with glycoproteins removed from their cuticle surface) immediately after they detected the EP shrimp. The results suggest that glycoproteins are not likely to be the contact sex pheromones in the three Lysmata shrimp species.


Surface Glycoprotein Cuticular Hydrocarbon Lectin Binding Decapod Crustacean Mate Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This project is partially funded by Project 5010 of Wenzhou Medical College, China. We are grateful for the valuable comments made by the reviewers of the manuscript. The experiments comply with current laws of the United States.


  1. Ameyaw-Akumfi C, Hazlett BA (1975) Sex recognition in crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Science 190:1225–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen SO (1991) Cuticular proteins from the shrimp, Pandalus borealis. Comp Biochem Physiol B 99:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atema J (1984) Review of sexual selection and chemical communication in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2283–2290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer RT (1979) Sex attraction and recognition in the caridean shrimp Heptacarpus paludicola Holmes (Decapoda: Hippolytidae). Mar Behav Physiol 6:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer RT (2000) Simultaneous hermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a unique and puzzling sexual system in the Decapoda. J Crust Biol 20:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burkenroad MD (1947) Reproductive activities of decapod crustacean. Am Nat 81:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caskey JL, Bauer RT (2005) Behavioral tests for a possible contact sex pheromone in the caridean shrimp Palaemonetes pugio. J Crust Biol 25:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunham PJ (1978) Sex pheromones in Crustacea. Biol Rev 53:555–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunham PJ (1988) Pheromones and behavior in Crustacea. In: Laufer H, Downer GH (eds) Endocrinology of selected invertebrate types. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 375–392Google Scholar
  10. Etges WJ, Jackson LL (2001) Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species. J Chem Ecol 27:2125–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher N, Hardege JD (2009) The cost of conflict: agonistic encounters influence responses to chemical signals in the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Anim Behav 77:357–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Focarelli R, Rosati F (1995) The 220-kDa vitelline coat glycoprotein mediated sperm binding in the polarized egg of Unio elongatulus through O-linked oligosaccharides. Develop Biol 171:606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginzel MD, Blomquist GJ, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2003) Role of contact pheromones in mate recognition in Xylotrechus colonus. J Chem Ecol 29:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glabe CG, Clark D (1991) The sequence of the Arbacia punctulata Bindin cDNA and implications for the structural basis of species-specific sperm adhesion and fertilization. Develop Biol 143:282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gleeson RA (1980) Pheromone communication in the reproductive behavior of the crab, Callinectes sapidus. Mar Behav Physiol 7:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardege JD, Jennings A, Hayden D, Müller CT, Pascore D, Bentley MG, Clare AS (2002) Novel behavioural assay and partial purification of a female-derived sex pheromone in Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 244:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgie M, Chenoweth S, Blows MW (2000) Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard RW, Jackson LL, Banse H, Blows MW (2003) Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata identification and role in mate choice. J Chem Ecol 29:961–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamiguchi Y (1972) Mating behavior in the freshwater prawn, Palaemon paucidens. A study of the sex pheromone and its effect on males. J Facult Sci Hokkaido Univ, Ser VI, Zool 18:347–355Google Scholar
  20. Kelly LS, Snell TW (1998) Role of surface glycoproteins in mate-guarding of the marine harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Mar Biol 130:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linn CE, Roelofs WL (1995) Pheromone communication in moths and its role in the speciation process. In: Lambert DM, Spencer HG (eds) Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and application. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp 263–300Google Scholar
  22. Lonsdale DJ, Snell TW, Frey MA (1996) Lectin binding to surface glycoproteins on Coullana spp. (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) can inhibit mate guarding. Mar Behav Physiol 27:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez A, Miraglia SJ, Glabe CG (1993) Structure/function analysis of the sea urchin sperm adhesive protein binding. Develop Biol 156:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marlowe RL, Dillaman RM, Roer RD (1994) Lectin binding by crustacean cuticle: the cuticle of Callinectes sapidus throughout the molt cycle, and the intermolt cuticle of Procambarus clarkii and Ocypode quadrata. J Crust Biol 14:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyake A, Beyer J (1974) Blepharmone: a conjugation-inducing glycoprotein in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science 185:621–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan EP (1966) Pheromone: evidence in a decapod crustacean. Science 151:340–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seifert P (1982) Studies on the sex pheromone of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas, with special regard to ecdysone excretion. Ophelia 21:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shafer TH, Roer RD, Miller CG, Dillaman RM (1994) Postecdysial changes in the protein and glycoprotein composition of the cuticle of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. J Crust Biol 14:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shine RR, Reed N, Shetty S, Lemaster M, Mason RT (2002) Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric sibling species of sea snakes. Evolution 56:1655–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snell TW, Carmona MJ (1994) Surface glycoproteins in copepods: potential signals for mate recognition. Hydrobiologia 292(293):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snell TW, Stelzer CP (2005) Removal of surface glycoproteins and transfer among Brachionus species. Hydrobiologia 546:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snell TW, Rico-Martinez R, Kelly LS, Battle TE (1995) Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Mar Biol 123:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sugeno W, Hori M, Matsuda K (2006) Identification of the contact sex pheromone of Gastrophysa atrocyanea (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Appl Entomol Zool 41:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tierney AJ, Thompson CS, Dunham EW (1984) Site of pheromone reception in the crayfish Orconectes propinquus (Decapoda, Cambaridae). J Crust Biol 4:554–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ting JH, Kelly LS, Snell TW (2000) Identification of sex, age and species-specific proteins on the surface of the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Mar Biol 137:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wabnitz PA, Bowie JH, Tyler MJ, Wallace JC, Smith BP (2000) Differences in the skin peptides of the male and female Australian tree frog Litoria splendida. Eur J Biochem 267:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiese L (1965) On sexual agglutination and mating type substances (gamones) in isogamous heterophallic Chlamydamondes. I. Evidence of the identity of the gamone with the surface components responsible for sexual flagellar content. J Phycol 1:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang D, Lin J (2005a) Comparative mating success of smaller male-phase and larger male-role euhermaphrodite-phase shrimp, Lysmata wurdemanni (Caridea: Hippolytidae). Mar Biol 147:1387–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang D, Lin J (2005b) Mating without anterior pleopods in shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni, a protandric simultaneous hermaphrodite (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea). Crustaceana 77:1203–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang D, Lin J (2006) Mate recognition in a simultaneous hermaphroditic shrimp, Lysmata wurdemanni (Caridea: Hippolytidae). Anim Behav 71:1191–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang A, Oliver JE, Chauhan K, Zhao B, Xia L, Xu Z (2003) Evidence for contact sex recognition pheromone of the Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften 90:410–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang D, Cai S-L, Liu H, Lin J (2008) Antennal sensilla in the genus Lysmata (Caridea). J Crust Biol 28:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment and Public Health, Wenzhou Medical CollegeUniversity TownWenzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Vero Beach Marine LaboratoryFlorida Institute of TechnologyVero BeachUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesHull UniversityHullUK

Personalised recommendations