Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 156, Issue 4, pp 787–795 | Cite as

Using shell middens to assess effects of fishing on queen conch (Strombus gigas) populations in Los Roques Archipelago National Park, Venezuela

  • Diego SchapiraEmail author
  • Irene A. Montaño
  • Andrzej Antczak
  • Juan M. Posada
Original Paper

Abstract

Queen conch, Strombus gigas, is a commercially important gastropod that has been exploited throughout the Caribbean islands for thousands of years. Shell middens in the region are the physical record of a long-term fishery and their study can provide valuable information on selectivity patterns followed by fishermen and on resulting morphological shifts reflected by shells. In this study, we surveyed 27 middens located at Los Roques, Venezuela, to assess pre-Columbian and modern fisheries and measure their impact on local populations of queen conch. Pre-Columbian middens, covering a period of approximately 350 years of exploitation (1160–1540 A.D.), were mostly composed of adult shells (89%) and mean length of catch was estimated at 22.4 ± 0.2 cm (mean ± SE). A decrease in mean length of catch was observed throughout the modern fishery regime, estimated at 22.2 ± 0.3 cm in 1950–1971 and 20.0 ± 0.3 cm in 1990–1995. Higher proportions of immature individuals ranging from 48 to 67% were found in modern middens. Additionally, a decrease in mean length of mature individuals was detected throughout the modern fishery regime. The appearance of younger and smaller specimens is considered as a sign of heavy exploitation of local populations of queen conch during modern fisheries. Pre-Columbian middens in contrast, permitted to establish a relative baseline from which to compare values registered throughout modern times.

Keywords

Fishing Venezuela Shell Length Immature Individual Mature Individual 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Fondo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (FONACIT, S1-2001000711). We deeply thank R.S. Appeldoorn, S.K. Wilson, N.J. Graham and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. To Fundación Científica Los Roques (FCLR) and their members for the logistical support. To Instituto Nacional de Parques (INPARQUES) for facilitating the permissions to conduct the surveys. We are especially grateful to M.M. Antczak for her valuable archaeological expertise during excavations and to M. Reyes, K. Antczak, O. Antczak, G. González, P. Núñez, F. Vásquez, E. Herrera, D. Muñoz and all staff at Dos Mosquises Biological Station for their valuable assistance in the field.

References

  1. Aldana D, Brulé T (1994) Estado actual de la pesquería, del cultivo y programa de investigación del caracol Strombus gigas en México. In: Appeldoorn RS, Rodriguez B (eds) Queen conch biology, fisheries and mariculture. Fundación Científica Los Roques, Caracas, pp 97–112Google Scholar
  2. Anderson AJ (1981) A model of prehistoric collecting on rocky shore. J Arch Sci 8:109–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(81)90020-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antczak A, Antczak MM (2005) Pre-Hispanic fishery of the queen conch, Strombus gigas, on the Islands off the coast of Venezuela. In: Miloslavich P, Klein E (eds) Caribbean marine biodiversity: the known, the unknown. DEStech Publications Inc., Lancaster, pp 213–243Google Scholar
  4. Antczak MM, Antczak A (2006) Ídolos de las islas prometidas: arqueología prehispánica del archipiélago de Los Roques. Editorial Equinoccio, CaracasGoogle Scholar
  5. Appeldoorn RS (1988) Age determination, growth, mortality and age of first reproduction in adult queen conch, Strombus gigas, off Puerto Rico. Fish Res 6:363–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(88)90005-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appeldoorn RS (1992) Development of a combined model of growth in weight for juvenile and adult queen conch, Strombus gigas, and its application to the population of La Parguera, Puerto Rico. Proc Gulf Carib Fish Inst 42(A):13–21Google Scholar
  7. Appeldoorn RS (1997) Status of queen conch fishery in the Caribbean Sea. In: Posada JM, García-Moliner G (eds) Conferencia Internacional del Caracol Reina Strombus gigas. CFMC, San Juan, pp 40–59Google Scholar
  8. Bailey GN (1983) Hunter-gatherer enconomy in prehistory; a European perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird DW, Bliege RL (1997) Contemporary shellfish gathering strategies among the meriam of the Torres Strait islands, Australia: testing predictions of a central place foraging model. J Arch Sci 24:39–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1995.0095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakalall B, Cochrane KL (1997) The queen conch fishery in the Caribbean—an approach to responsible fisheries and regulations by country. In: Posada JM, García-Moliner G (eds) Conferencia Internacional del Caracol Reina Strombus gigas. CFMC, San Juan, pp 60–77Google Scholar
  11. Claassen C (1998) Shells. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Erlandson J (2001) The archaeology of aquatic adaptations: paradigms for a new millennium. J Arch res 9:287–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzpatrick SM, Keegan WF (2007) Human impacts and adaptations in the Caribbean islands: and historical ecology approach. Trans R Soc Edimburgh Earth Sci 98:29–45Google Scholar
  14. Friedlander A, Appeldoorn RS, Beets J (1994) Spatial and temporal variations in stock abundance of queen conch, Strombus gigas, the US Virgin Islands. In: Appeldoorn RS, Rodriguez B (eds) Queen conch biology, fisheries and mariculture. Fundación Científica Los Roques, Caracas, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  15. Glazer RA, Berg CJ (1994) Queen conch research in Florida: an overview. In: Appeldoorn RS, Rodriguez B (eds) Queen conch biology, fisheries and mariculture. Fundación Científica Los Roques, Caracas, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  16. Holm P (2003) History of marine animal populations: a global research program of the Census of Marine Life. Oceanol Acta 25:207–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(02)01200-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293(5530):629–637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keegan WF, Portell RW, Slapcinsky J (2003) Changes in invertebrate taxa at two pre-Columbian sites in southern Jamaica, AD 800–1500. J Arch Sci 30:1607–1617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00062-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Link JS (2005) Translating ecosystem indicators into decision criteria. ICES J Mar Sci 62:569–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/282454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maninno MA, Thomas KD (2002) Depletion of a resource? The impact of prehistoric human foraging on intertidal mollusc communities and its significance for human settlement, mobility and dispersal. World Archaeol 33(3):452–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240120107477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mateo I (1997) Spatial variation in stock abundance of queen conch, Strombus gigas, in the west and east coast of Puerto Rico. MS dissertation. University of Puerto Rico, MayagueyGoogle Scholar
  23. Mora O (1994) Análisis de la pesquería del caracol pala (Strombus gigas L.) en Colombia. In: Appeldoorn RS, Rodriguez B (eds) Queen conch biology, fisheries and mariculture. Fundación Científica Los Roques, Caracas, pp 137–144Google Scholar
  24. Nagaoka L (2003) Explaining subsistence change in southern New Zealand using foraging theory modles. World Arch 34(1):84–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240220134278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newsom LA, Wing ES (2004) On land and sea: native American uses of biological resources in the West Indies. University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  26. Pandolfi JM, Bradbury RH, Sala E, Hughes TP, Bjorndal KA, Cooke RG, McArdle D, McClenachan L, Newman MJH, Paredes G, Warner RR, Jackson JBC (2003) Global Trajectories of the long-term decline of Coral Reef Ecosystems. Science 301(5635):955–958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Randall JE (1964) Contributions to the biology of the queen conch, Strombus gigas. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 14:246–295Google Scholar
  28. Rodríguez B, Posada JM (1994) Revisión histórica de la pesquería del botuto o guarura (Strombus gigas) y el alcance de su programa de manejo en el Parque Nacional Archipiélago de Los Roques, Venezuela. In: Appeldoorn RS, Rodriguez B (eds) Queen conch biology, fisheries and mariculture. Fundación Científica Los Roques, Caracas, pp 13–24Google Scholar
  29. Roff DA (2001) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Schweizer D, Posada JM (2006) Distribution, density, and abundance of the queen conch, Strombus gigas, in Los Roques Archipelago National Park, Venezuela. Bull Mar Sci 79(2):243–257Google Scholar
  31. Sokal R, Rohlf J (1995) Biometry. Freeman Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoner AW, Glazer RA (1998) Variation in natural mortality: implications for queen conch stock enhancement. Bull Mar Sci 62:427–442Google Scholar
  34. Stoner AW, Ray M (1996) Shell remains provide clues to historical distribution and abundance patterns in a large seagrass-associated gastropod (Strombus gigas). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 135:101–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps135101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoner AW, Ray-Culp M (2000) Evidence for Allee effects in an over-harvested marine gastropod: density-dependent mating and egg production. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:297–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps202297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoner AW, Sandt VJ (1992) Population structure, seasonal movements, and feeding of queen conch, Strombus gigas, in deep-water habitats of the Bahamas. Bull Mar Sci 51:287–300Google Scholar
  37. Stoner AW, Schwarte KC (1994) Queen conch, Strombus gigas, reproductive stocks in the central Bahamas: distribution and probable sources. Fish Bull (Wash D C) 92:171–179Google Scholar
  38. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Braziunas TF (1998) High-precision radiocarbon age calibration for terrestrial and marine samples. Radiocarb 40(3):1127–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Talma AS, Vogel JC (1993) A simplified approach to calibrating C-14 dates. Radiocarb 35(2):317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas F (2002) An evaluation of central-place foraging among mollusk gatherers in Western Kiribati, Micronesia: linking behavioral ecology with ethnoarchaeology. World Arch 34(1):182–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240220134313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas F (2007) The behavioral ecology of shellfish gathering in Western Kiribati, Micronesia. 2: Patch choice, patch sampling, and risk. Hum Ecol 35(5):515–526. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9119-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Torres R, Sullivan-Sealey KM (2002) Shell midden surveys as source of information about fished queen conch (Strombus gigas) populations: a case study in Parque Nacional del Este, Dominican Republic. Proc Gulf Caribb Fish Inst 53:143–153Google Scholar
  43. Weil E, Laughlin R (1984) The biology, population dynamics and reproduction of the queen conch, Strombus gigas Linne in the Archiliélago de los Roques National Park. J Shell Res 4:45–62Google Scholar
  44. Wing SR, Wing ES (2001) Prehistoric fisheries in the Caribbean. Coral Reefs 20:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380100142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Schapira
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Irene A. Montaño
    • 1
  • Andrzej Antczak
    • 2
    • 3
  • Juan M. Posada
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología de OrganismosUniversidad Simón BolívarSartenejasVenezuela
  2. 2.Departamento de Diseño, Arquitectura y Artes PlásticasUniversidad Simón BolívarSartenejasVenezuela
  3. 3.Unidad de Estudios Arqueológicos (IERU)Universidad Simón BolívarSartenejasVenezuela
  4. 4.Newcastle Upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations