Bacterial abundance, production, and extracellular enzyme activity were determined in the shallow water column, in the epiphytic community of Thalassiatestudinum, and at the sediment surface along with total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Florida Bay, a subtropical seagrass estuary. Data were statistically reduced by principle components analysis (PCA) and multidimensional scaling and related to T. testudinum leaf total phosphorus content and phytoplankton biomass. Each zone (i.e., pelagic, epiphytic, and surface sediment community) was significantly dissimilar to each other (Global R = 0.65). Pelagic aminopeptidase and sum of carbon hydrolytic enzyme (esterase, peptidase, and α- and β-glucosidase) activities ranged from 8 to 284 mg N m−2 day−1 and 113–1,671 mg C m−2 day−1, respectively, and were 1–3 orders of magnitude higher than epiphytic and sediment surface activities. Due to the phosphorus-limited nature of Florida Bay, alkaline phosphatase activity was similar between pelagic (51–710 mg P m−2 day−1) and sediment (77–224 mg P m−2 day−1) zones but lower in the epiphytes (1.1–5.2 mg P m−2 day−1). Total (and/or organic) C (111–311 g C m−2), N (9.4–27.2 g N m−2), and P (212–1,623 mg P m−2) content were the highest in the sediment surface and typically the lowest in the seagrass epiphytes, ranging from 0.6 to 8.7 g C m−2, 0.02–0.99 g N m−2, and 0.5–43.5 mg P m−2. Unlike nutrient content and enzyme activities, bacterial production was highest in the epiphytes (8.0–235.1 mg C m−2 day−1) and sediment surface (11.5–233.2 mg C m−2 day−1) and low in the water column (1.6–85.6 mg C m−2 day−1). At an assumed 50% bacterial growth efficiency, for example, extracellular enzyme hydrolysis could supply 1.8 and 69% of epiphytic and sediment bacteria carbon demand, respectively, while pelagic bacteria could fulfill their carbon demand completely by enzyme-hydrolyzable organic matter. Similarly, previously measured T. testudinum extracellular photosynthetic carbon exudation rates could not satisfy epiphytic and sediment surface bacterial carbon demand, suggesting that epiphytic algae and microphytobenthos might provide usable substrates to support high benthic bacterial production rates. PCA revealed that T. testudinum nutrient content was related positively to epiphytic nutrient content and carbon hydrolase activity in the sediment, but unrelated to pelagic variables. Phytoplankton biomass correlated positively with all pelagic components and sediment aminopeptidase activity but negatively with epiphytic alkaline phosphatase activity. In conclusion, seagrass production and nutrient content was unrelated to pelagic bacteria activity, but did influence extracellular enzyme hydrolysis at the sediment surface and in the epiphytes. This study suggests that seagrass-derived organic matter is of secondary importance in Florida Bay and that bacteria rely primarily on algal/cyanobacteria production. Pelagic bacteria seem coupled to phytoplankton, while the benthic community appears supported by epiphytic and/or microphytobenthos production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Jim W. Fourqurean, Evelyn E. Gaiser, and the FCE-LTER for providing unpublished Thalassiatestudinum shoot density data. We also thank the many undergraduate and graduate students who volunteered their time to provide field help. CNP analyses were made possible with the help of Florida International University (FIU)’s seagrass ecosystems laboratory. Field transportation was supported in part by FIU’s Marine Biology Program vehicle grant. This work was supported by NSF LTER under NSF grant 9910514 and NOAA COP grant NA04NOS4780020. This is contribution 409 of the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU. This study was written under the support of FIU’s Presidential Dissertation Year Fellowship.
Hernández I, Pérez-Llorens JL, Fernández JA (1994) Alkaline phosphatase activity in Zostera noltii Hornem. and its contribution to the release of phosphate in the Palmones River Estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 39:461–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe H-G (1993) Use of fluorogenic model substrates for extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) measurement of bacteria. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ (eds) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 423–430Google Scholar
Hoppe H-G, Arnosti C, Herndl GJ (2002) Ecological significance of bacterial enzymes in the marine environment. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology, and applications. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York Basel, pp 73–107Google Scholar
Jones JA (1968) Primary Productivity by the tropical marine turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum Köng, and its epiphytes. PhD Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, pp, 196Google Scholar
Kirchman DL (1993) Statistical analysis of direct counts of microbial abundance. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ (eds) Current methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 117–120Google Scholar
Kirchman DL (2001) Measuring bacterial biomass production and growth rates from leucine incorporation in natural aquatic environments. In: Paul JH (ed) Methods in microbiology, vol 30. Academic Press, London, pp 227–237Google Scholar
Lavrentyev PJ, Bootsma HA, Johengen TH, Cavaletto JF, Gardner WS (1998) Microbial plankton response to resource limitation: insights from the community structure and seston stoichiometry in Florida Bay, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 165:45–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps165045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maie N, Yang C, Miyoshi T, Parish K, Jaffé R (2005) Chemical characteristics of dissolved organic matter in an oligotrophic subtropical wetland/estuarine ecosystem. Limnol Oceanogr 50:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marie D, Partensky F, Jacquet S, Vaulot D (1997) Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:186–193PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Misic C, Fabiano M (2005) Enzymatic activity on sandy beaches of the Ligurian Sea (NW Mediterranean). 49: 513–522Google Scholar
Phlips EJ, Badylak S, Lynch TC (1999) Blooms of the picoplanktonic cyanobacterium Synechococcus in Florida Bay, a subtropical inner-shelf lagoon. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1166–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard PC, Kogure K (1993) Bacterial decomposition of detritus in a tropical seagrass (Syringodium isoetifolium) ecosystem, measured with [Methyl-3H]thymidine. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 44:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zieman JC, Fourqurean JW, Iverson RL (1989) Distribution, abundance and productivity of seagrasses and macroalgae in Florida Bay. Bull Mar Sci 44:292–311Google Scholar
Yoon WB, Rosson RA (1990) Improved methods of enumeration of attached bacteria for study of fluctuation in the abundance of attached and free-living bacteria in response to diel variation in seawater turbidity. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:595–600PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar