Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 156, Issue 2, pp 141–153 | Cite as

Rapid tissue reduction and recovery in the sponge Aplysinella sp.

  • Carsten Thoms
  • Ute Hentschel
  • Susanne Schmitt
  • Peter J. Schupp
Original Paper

Abstract

We observed a pronounced, yet reversible tissue reduction in the tropical sponge Aplysinella sp. under non-experimental conditions in its natural habitat, after transfer into seawater tanks, as well as after transplantation from deep to shallow water in the field. Tissue reduction resulted in the formation of small “reduction bodies” tightly attached to the sponge skeleton. Although volume loss and gain were substantial, both tissue reduction and regeneration were often remarkably rapid, occurring within few hours. Microscopic analysis of the reduction bodies revealed morphological similarities to previously described sponge primmorphs, with densely packed archaeocytes and spherulous cells enclosed by a thin layer of epithelial-like cells. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) revealed pronounced changes in the sponge-associated microbial community upon tissue reduction during laboratory and field experiments and following changes in ambient conditions after transplantation in the field. Generally, the microbial community associated with this sponge proved less stable, less abundant, and less diverse than those of other, previously investigated Verongid sponges. However, one single phylotype was consistently present in DGGE profiles of Aplysinella sp. This phylotype clustered with γ-proteobacterial sequences found previously in other sponge species of different taxonomic affiliations and geographic provenances, as well as in sponge larvae. No apparent changes in the total secondary metabolite content (per dry weight) occurred in Aplysinella sp. upon tissue reduction; however, comparative analysis of intact and reduced tissue suggested changes in the concentrations of two minor compounds. Besides being ecologically interesting, the tissue reduction phenomenon in Aplysinella sp. provides an experimentally manipulable system for studies on sponge/microbe symbioses. Moreover, it may prove useful as a model system to investigate molecular mechanisms of basic Metazoan traits in vivo, complementing the in vitro sponge primmorph system currently used in this context.

Keywords

Sponge Reef Flat Sponge Species Sponge Cell Sponge Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

LC/MS analyses were conducted by A. Grube (Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany). We thank N. J. de Voogd (National Museum of Natural History in Leiden) for advice on the taxonomy of the sponge species studied. M. Taylor and an anonymous reviewer gave valuable comments on the manuscript. C. Thoms gratefully acknowledges support with a Fedodor Lynen Fellowship and a “Rückkehrstipendium” from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. This research was supported by NIH MBRS SCORE grant SO6-GM-44796 and NCI grant 5U56CA096278 to P. J. Schupp and BMBF BiotecMarin grant# 03F0414E to U. Hentschel. This is University of Guam Marine Laboratory contribution number 616. The experiments of this study comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashelford KE, Chuzhanova NA, Fry JC, Jones AJ, Weightman AJ (2005) At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7724–7736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.7724-7736.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergquist PR (1978) Sponges. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond C (1992) Continuous cell movements rearrange anatomical structures in intact sponges. J Exp Zool 263:284–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402630308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Custodio MR, Prokic I, Steffen R, Koziol C, Borojevic R, Brümmer F, Nickel M, Müller WEG (1998) Primmorphs generated from dissociated cells of the sponge Suberites domuncula: a model system for studies of cell proliferation and cell death. Mech Ageing Dev 105:45–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(98)00078-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Voogd NJ, Cleary DFR (2007) Relating species traits to environmental variables in Indonesian coral reef sponge assemblages. Mar Freshw Res 58:240–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devos L, Rozenfeld F (1974) Ultrastructure of collagen shell of sponge gemmules. J Microsc (Oxf) 20:15–28Google Scholar
  8. Dyrynda PEJ (1986) Defensive strategies of modular organisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 313:227–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedrich AB, Merkert H, Fendert T, Hacker J, Proksch P, Hentschel U (1999) Microbial diversity in the marine sponge Aplysina cavernicola (formerly Verongia cavernicola) analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Mar Biol (Berl) 134:461–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedrich AB, Fischer I, Proksch P, Hacker J, Hentschel U (2001) Temporal variation of the microbial community associated with the Mediterranean sponge Aplysina aerophoba. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:105–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00888.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaino E, Magnino G (1999) Dissociated cells of the calcareous sponge Clathrina: a model for investigating cell adhesion and cell motility in vitro. Microsc Res Tech 44:279–292. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990215)44:4<279::AID-JEMT7>3.0.CO;2-ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrone R (1985) The collagen of Porifera. In: Bairati A, Garrone R (eds) Biology of invertebrate and lower vertebrate collagens. Plenum Press, London, pp 157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hentschel U, Hopke J, Horn M, Friedrich AB, Wagner M, Hacker J, Moore BS (2002) Molecular evidence for a uniform microbial community in sponges from different oceans. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4431–4440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.9.4431-4440.2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hentschel U, Fieseler L, Wehrl M, Gernert C, Steinert M, Hacker J, Horn M (2003) Microbial diversity of marine sponges. In: Müller WEG (ed) Marine molecular biotechnology: Sponges (Porifera). Springer, Berlin, pp 59–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hentschel U, Usher KM, Taylor MW (2006) Marine sponges as microbial fermenters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55:167–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2005.00046.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hepperle D (2004) Align Ver.07/04©. Multisequence alignment-editor and preparation/manipulation of phylogenetic datasets. Win32-Version, 2004. [Distributed by the author via: http://www.sequentix.de]
  17. Hirose E, Hirabayashi S, Hori K, Kasai F, Watanabe MM (2006) UV protection in the photosymbiotic ascidian Didemnum molle inhabiting different depths. Zoolog Sci 23:57–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.23.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jimenez C, Crews P (1991) Novel marine sponge derived amino-acids, 13 additional psammaplin derivatives from psammaplysilla-purpurea. Tetrahedron 47:2097–2102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96120-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Forster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, Konig A, Liss T, Lussmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer KH (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Monismith SG, Genin A, Reidenbach MA, Yahel G, Koseff JR (2006) Thermally driven exchanges between a coral reef and the adjoining ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 36:1332–1347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2916.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller WEG (2006) The stem cell concept in sponges (Porifera): Metazoan traits. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:481–491. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller WEG, Wiens M, Adell T, Gamulin V, Schröder HC, Müller IM (2004) Bauplan of Urmetazoa: basis for genetic complexity of Metazoa. Int Rev Cytol 235:53–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(04)35002-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller WEG, Müller IM, Schroder HC (2006) Evolutionary relationship of Porifera within the eukaryotes. Hydrobiologia 568:167–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0318-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muyzer G, Brinkhoff T, Nübel U, Santegoeds C, Schäfer H, Wawer C (1998) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology. In: Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn FJ (eds) Molecular microbial ecology, manual 344. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  25. Pham NB, Butler MS, Quinn RJ (2000) Isolation of Psammaplin A 11¢-Sulfate and Bisaprasin 11¢-Sulfate from the Marine Sponge Aplysinella rhax. J Nat Prod 63:393–395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/np990335y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pina IC, Gautschi JT, Wang G, Sanders ML, Schmitz FJ, France D, Cornell-Kennon S, Sambucetti LC, Remiszewski SW, Perez LB, Bair KW, Crews P (2003) Psammaplins from the Sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea: inhibition of both histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase. J Org Chem 68:3866–3873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo034248t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reiswig HM, Miller TL (1998) Freshwater sponge gemmules survive months of anoxia. Invertebr Biol 117:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3226846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  29. Schill RO, Pfannkuchen M, Fritz G, Köhler H-R, Brümmer F (2006) Quiescent gemmules of the freshwater sponge, Spongilla lacustris (Linnaeus, 1759), contain remarkably high levels of hsp70 stress protein and hsp70 stress gene mRNA. J Exp Zool 305A:449–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt S, Weisz JB, Lindquist N, Hentschel U (2007) Vertical transmission of a phylogenetically complex microbial consortium in the viviparous sponge Ircinia felix. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2067–2078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01944-06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shin J, Lee HS, Seo Y, Rho JR, Cho KW, Paul VJ (2000) New bromotyrosine metabolites from the sponge Aplysinella rhax. Tetrahedron 56:9071–9077. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00761-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson TL (1984) Collagen fibrils, spongin, matrix substances. In: Simpson TL (ed) The cell biology of sponges. Springer, New York, pp 216–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simpson TL, Fell PE (1974) Dormancy among the Porifera: gemmule formation and germination in freshwater and marine sponges. Trans Amer Micros Soc 93:544–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabudravu JN, Eijsink VGH, Gooday GW, Jaspars M, Komander D, Legg M, Synstad B, Van Alten DMF (2002) Psammaplin A, a chitinase inhibitor isolated from the Fijian marine sponge Aplysinella rhax. Bioorg Med Chem 10:1123–1128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00372-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor MW, Radax R, Steger D, Wagner M (2007a) Sponge-associated microorganisms: Evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71:295–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00040-06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor MW, Thacker RW, Hentschel U (2007b) Genetics—Evolutionary insights from sponges. Science 316:1854–1855. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson JE, Barrow KD, Faulkner DJ (1983) Localization of two brominated metabolites, aerothionin and homoaerothionin, in spherulous cells of the marine sponge Aplysina fistularis. Acta Zoologica 64:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thoms C, Horn M, Wagner M, Hentschel U, Proksch P (2003) Monitoring microbial diversity and natural product profiles of the sponge Aplysina cavernicola following transplantation. Mar Biol (Berl) 142:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thoms C, Schupp PJ (2008) Activated chemical defense in marine sponges—a case study on Aplysinella sp. J Chem Ecol 34:1242–1252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-008-9518-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turon X, Becerro MA, Uriz MJ (2000) Distribution of brominated compounds within the sponge Aplysina aerophoba: coupling of X-ray microanalysis with cryofixation techniques. Cell Tissue Res 301:311–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410000233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vacelet J (1975) Electron-microscope study of association between bacteria and sponges of genus Verongia (Dictyoceratida). J Microsc Biol Cell 23:271–288Google Scholar
  43. Wiens M, Mangoni A, D’Esposito M, Fattorusso E, Korchagina N, Schroder HC, Grebenjuk VA, Krasko A, Batel R, Müller IM, Müller WEG (2003) The molecular basis for the evolution of the metazoan bodyplan: extracellular matrix-mediated morphogenesis in marine demosponges. J Mol Evol 57:S60–S75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-003-0008-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilkinson CR (1978) Microbial associations in sponges. III. Ultrastructure of the in situ associations in coral reef sponges. Mar Biol (Berl) 49:177–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson CR, Garrone R, Vacelet J (1984) Marine sponges discriminate between food bacteria and bacterial symbionts: electron microscope radioautography and in situ evidence. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 220:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jena School for Microbial Communication (JSMC)Friedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Research Center for Infectious DiseasesUniversity of WuerzburgWuerzburgGermany
  3. 3.University of Guam Marine LaboratoryGuamUSA

Personalised recommendations