Brooding behaviour and reproductive success in two species of free-living simultaneous hermaphrodites
Although polyclads are amongst the most structurally simple of the triploblastic metazoans, they adopt a wide range of reproductive strategies. Parental care behaviour in this group is yet to be quantified for any species. We assessed the significance of brooding behaviour to the reproductive success of two free-living marine flatworms. Echinoplana celerrima and Stylochus pygmaeus were collected from the field and placed in pairs in containers of filtered seawater where they laid batches of eggs. Both parents were then removed from half of the containers and the brooding behaviour and hatching success of eggs were quantified. There were interspecific differences in brooding behaviour. Egg masses were covered by one E. celerrima parent for 12 ± 2% of time, whereas egg masses of S. pygmaeus were covered by one or both parents simultaneously for 85 ± 8% of time. Egg batches were abandoned by both species immediately prior to the onset of hatching (10–12 days). Hatching success was generally high (~90%) and brooding did not enhance the hatching success of eggs. We assessed the significance of parental care to hatching success of E. celerrima egg masses in the presence of three potential egg predators; in the presence of other organisms. E. celerrima devoted less time to brooding; however, hatching success was not affected. The amount of time spent brooding eggs differed greatly between the two polyclad species but was not essential to their reproductive success under benign conditions. Parental care may be of adaptive value under more stressful environmental conditions commonly experienced in estuarine environments such as lowered salinity, increased hypoxia or turbidity. Covering egg batches may play an additional role of advertising sexual status and a willingness to care for eggs.
KeywordsParental Care Hatching Success Brooding Behaviour Simultaneous Hermaphrodite Parental Care Behaviour
We would like to thank A. Beal, G. Sella, M. Thiell, D. Marshall, and M. Naud for useful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. We thank R. Piola for assistance in the field and experimental setup, T. Kwok and C. Wong for collection of seawater. This research was supported by a Faculty Research Grant awarded to E. L. Johnston.
- Barnard C (2004) The evolution of parental care. In: Animal behaviour: mechanism, development, function and evolution. Pearson Education Limited, Essex, pp 470–532Google Scholar
- Charnov E (1982) Sex allocation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Clutton-Brock T (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Ghiselin M (1987) Evolutionary aspects of marine invertebrate reproduction. In: Giese A, Pearse J, Pearse V (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, pp 609–665Google Scholar
- Newman LJ, Cannon LRG (2003) Marine flatworms: the world of polyclads. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Prudhoe S (1985) A monograph on polyclad turbellaria. British Museum (Natural History), Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Thiel M (2003) Extended parental care in crustaceans—an update. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76:205–218Google Scholar