Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 443–450 | Cite as

Trophic segregation between sexes in the Black Skimmer revealed through the analysis of stable isotopes

  • Rocío Mariano-Jelicich
  • Florencia Botto
  • Paulina Martinetto
  • Oscar Iribarne
  • Marco Favero
Original Paper

Abstract

The degree of individual or gender variation when exploiting food resources is an important aspect in the study of foraging ecology within a population. Previous information on non-breeding skimmers obtained through conventional methodologies suggested sex-related differences in prey species. In this study, stable isotope techniques were used to investigate the intraspecific segregation in diet and foraging habits of the Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger intercedens) at Mar Chiquita Coastal Lagoon (37°40′S, 57°22′W), Argentina. These results were compared with contemporary data on the trophic composition obtained by conventional methodologies. Blood samples were taken from birds captured with mist-nets during their non-breeding season. The isotopic signatures of skimmers showed a diet mainly composed of marine prey with some degree of estuarine fish intake. When comparing diet between sexes, males showed enrichment in 15N compared to females, while no differences were observed in 13C. The use of mixing models revealed differences in the relative composition of prey in the diet of male and female skimmers. This study highlights stable isotope analysis as a valuable tool to test inter-individual differences and sexual segregation in trophic ecology of Black Skimmers as compared to conventional methodologies. The results show a trophic segregation in the Black Skimmer during the non-breeding season that can be explained by differences in prey species and larger prey sizes of male skimmers. Our findings have significant implications for conservation since any environmental change occurring at wintering areas might have profound effects on several avian life-history traits, and could be different for males and females due to trophic segregation.

Keywords

Stable Isotope Large Prey Sexual Segregation Stable Isotope Signature Conventional Methodology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mirta García, Flavio Quintana and Juan M. Díaz de Astarloa for providing helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript and C. García-Mata, P. Silva Rodríguez, G. García, A. Gómez Laich, G. Scioscia, J. P. Seco Pon, L. Josens, L. Mauco and M. S. Bó for their help in data gathering and logistic support. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. All the samplings were performed under permission and comply with the current laws of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Financial support was provided by the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (Grant 15/E238), CONICET (Rs1294 and PIP5669), Fundación Antorchas (13900-13) and ANPCyT (1-7213). RMJ and PM were supported by fellowships from CONICET. This is part of RMJ’s Doctoral Dissertation.

References

  1. Barret RT, Camphuysen KCJ, Anker-Nilssen T, Chardine JW, Furness RW, Garthe S et al (2007) Diet studies of seabirds: a review and recommendations. ICES J Mar Sci 64:1675–1691. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, Macleod H (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearhop S, Phillips RA, Thompson DR, Waldron S, Furness RW (2000) Variability in mercury concentrations of great skuas Catharacta skua: the influence of colony, diet and trophic status inferred from stable isotope signatures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 195:261–268. doi: 10.3354/meps195261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bearhop S, Phillips RA, McGill R, Cherel Y, Dawson DA, Croxall JP (2006) Stable isotopes indicate sex-specific and long-term individual foraging specialization in diving seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:157–164. doi: 10.3354/meps311157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bearhop S, Waldron S, Votier SC, Furness RW (2002) Factors that influence assimilation rates and fractionation of nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes in avian blood and feathers. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:451–458. doi: 10.1086/342800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botto F, Bremec C, Marecos A, Schejter L, Lasta M, Iribarne O (2006) Identifying predators of the SW Atlantic Patagonian scallop Zygochlamys patagonica using stable isotopes. Fish Res 81:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botto F, Valiela I, Iribarne O, Martinetto P, Alberti J (2005) Impact of burrowing crabs on C and N sources, control, and transformations in sediments and food webs of SW Atlantic estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:155–164. doi: 10.3354/meps293155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catry P, Phillips RA, Croxall JP (2005) Sexual segregation in birds: patterns, processes and implications for conservation. In: Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–378Google Scholar
  9. Cherel Y, Hobson KA, Guinet C, Vanpe C (2007) Stable isotopes document seasonal changes in trophic niches and winter foraging individual specialization in diving predators from the southern Ocean. J Anim Ecol 76:826–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01238.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke J, Manly B, Kerry K, Gardner H, Franchi E, Corsolini S et al (1998) Sex differences in Adelie penguin foraging strategies. Polar Biol 20:248–258. doi: 10.1007/s003000050301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connolly RM, Guest MA (2004) Critical estuarine habitats for food webs supporting fisheries in Port Curtis, central Queensland, Australia. Cooperative research centre for coastal zone, estuary and waterway management, p 25Google Scholar
  12. Cousseau MB, Díaz de Astarloa JM, Figeroa D (2001) La ictiofauna de la laguna mar chiquita. In: Iribarne O (ed) Reserva de la biosfera mar chiquita. Características físicas. biológicas y ecológicas. Editorial Martín Mar del Plata, Argentina, pp 187–203Google Scholar
  13. Duffy DC, Jackson S (1986) Diet studies of seabirds: a review of methods. Colon Waterbirds 9:1–17. doi: 10.2307/1521138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. dit Durell SE (2000) Individual feeding specialization in shorebirds: population consequences and conservation implications. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:503–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Favero M, Becker PH (2007) Effect of NAO and ENSO on return rates, body mass and timing of migration of common terns breeding in Germany. In: Boere GC, Galbraith CA, Scott D, Stroud DA, Underhill LG (eds) Waterbirds of the World. The Stationery Office, UK, pp 258–262Google Scholar
  16. Favero M, Casaux R, Silva P, Barrera Oro E, Coria N (1998) The diet of the Antarctic Shag during summer at Nelson Island, Antarctica. Condor 100:112–118. doi: 10.2307/1369902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forero MG, Hobson KA (2003) Using stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon to study seabird ecology: applications in the Mediterranean seabird community. Sci Mar 67:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forero MG, Bortolotti GR, Hobson KA, Donázar JA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2004) High trophic overlap within the seabird community of Argentinean Patagonia: a multiscale approach. J Anim Ecol 73:789–801. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00852.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forero MG, González-Solís J, Hobson KA, Donazar JA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G et al (2005) Stable isotopes reveal trophic segregation by sex and age in the southern giant petrel in two different food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:107–113. doi: 10.3354/meps296107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forero MG, Tella JL, Hobson KA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2002) Conspecific food competition explains variability in colony size: a test in Magellanic penguins. Ecology 83:3466–3475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116–121. doi: 10.2307/3677252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Wood AG (2000) Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in foraging strategies of northern giant petrels, Macronectes halli, during incubation. Oikos 90:390–398. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900220.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. González-Solís J, Oro D, Pedrocchi V, Jover L, Ruiz X (1997) Biases associated with diet samples in Audouin’s gulls. Condor 99:773–779. doi: 10.2307/1370488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González-Solís J, Croxall JP (2005) Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels. In: Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 92–111Google Scholar
  25. Grall J, Le Loc’h F, Guyonnet B, Riera P (2006) Community structure and food web based on stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C) analysis of a North eastern Atlantic maerl bed. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes. 1. Turnover of C-13 in tissues. Condor 94:181–188. doi: 10.2307/1368807 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobson KA, Gibbs HL, Gloutney ML (1997) Preservation of blood and tissue samples for stable-carbon and stable-nitrogen isotope analysis. Can J Zool 75:1720–1723. doi: 10.1139/z97-799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Kato A, Nishiumi I, Naito Y (1996) Sexual differences in diet of king cormorants at Macquarie Island. Polar Biol 16:75–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly JF (2000) Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Can J Zool 78:1–27. doi: 10.1139/cjz-78-1-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koffijberg K, van Eerden MR (1995) Sexual dimorphism in the cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis: possible implications for difference in structural size. Ardea 83:37–46Google Scholar
  32. Kwak TJ, Zedler JB (1997) Food web analysis of southern California coastal wetlands using multiple stable isotopes. Oecologia 110:262–277. doi: 10.1007/s004420050159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindsay DJ, Minagawa M, Mitani I, Kawaguchi K (1998) Trophic shift in the Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus in its early life history stages as detected by stable isotope ratios in Sagami Bay, Central Japan. Fish Sci 64:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mariano-Jelicich R, Favero M (2006) Assessing the diet of the Black Skimmer through different methodologies: is the analysis of pellets reliable? Waterbirds 29:81–87. doi: 10.1675/1524-4695(2006)29[81:ATDOTB]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mariano-Jelicich R, Favero M, Silva Rodriguez MP (2003) Fish prey of the Black Skimmer (Rynchops niger) at Mar Chiquita, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Mar Ornithol 31:199–202Google Scholar
  36. Mariano-Jelicich R, Madrid E, Favero M (2007) Sexual dimorphism and diet segregation in the Black Skimmer Rynchops niger. Ardea 95:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinetto P, Iribarne O, Palomo G (2005) Effect of fish predation on intertidal benthic fauna is modified by crab bioturbation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 318:71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martinetto P, Ribeiro P, Iribarne O (2007) Changes in distribution and abundance of juvenile fishes in intertidal soft sediment areas dominated by the burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulatus. Mar Freshw Res 58:194–203. doi: 10.1071/MF06079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mysterud A (2000) The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores. Oecologia 124:40–54. doi: 10.1007/s004420050023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pakhomov EA, McClelland JW, Bernard K, Kaehler S, Montoya JP (2004) Spatial and temporal shifts in stable isotope values of the bottom-dwelling shrimp Nauticaris marionis at the sub-Antarctic archipelago. Mar Biol (Berl) 144:317–325. doi: 10.1007/s00227-003-1196-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearson SF, Levey DJ, Greenberg CH, Martinez del Río C (2003) Effects of elemental composition on the incorporation of dietary nitrogen and carbon. Oecologia 135:516–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2003) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136:261–269. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1218-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reta R, Martos O, Perillo G, Piccolo C, Ferrante A (2001) Características hidrológicas del estuario de la laguna mar chiquita. In: Iribarne O (ed) Reserva de la biosfera mar chiquita. Características físicas, biológicas y ecológicas. Editorial Martín. Mar del Plata, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubenstein DR, Hobson KA (2004) From birds to butterflies: animal movement patterns and stable isotopes. Trends Ecol Evol 19:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt K, Atkinson A, Stubing D, McClelland JW, Montoya JP, Voss M (2003) Trophic relationships among southern ocean copepods and krill: some uses and limitations of a stable isotope approach. Limnol Oceanogr 48:277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151. doi: 10.2307/1365712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaffer SA, Weimerskirch H, Costa DP (2001) Functional significance of sexual dimorphism in wandering Albatrosses, Diomedea exulans. Funct Ecol 15:203–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00514.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1995) Summer versus winter limitation of populations: what are the issues and what is the evidence? In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. A synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 85–120Google Scholar
  50. Silva Rodríguez P, Favero M, Berón MP, Mariano-Jelicich R, Mauco L (2005) Ecología y conservación de aves marinas que utilizan el litoral Bonaerense como área de invernada. Hornero 20:111–130Google Scholar
  51. Tieszen LL, Boutton TW, Tesdahl KG, Slade NA (1983) Fractionation and turn-over of stable carbon isotopes in animal tissues: implications for d13C analysis of diet. Oecologia 57:32–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00379558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Votier SC, Bearhop S, Ratcliffe N, Furness RW (2004) Reproductive consequences for great skuas specializing as seabird predators. Condor 106:275–287. doi: 10.1650/7261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. West JB, Bowen GJ, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR (2006) Stable isotopes as one of nature’s ecological recorders. Trends Ecol Evol 21:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zusi RL (1996) Family Rynchopidae (Skimmers). In: Del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 3 Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, pp 668–677Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocío Mariano-Jelicich
    • 1
    • 3
  • Florencia Botto
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paulina Martinetto
    • 2
    • 3
  • Oscar Iribarne
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marco Favero
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Vertebrados, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations