Marine Biology

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 387–397 | Cite as

Is the burrowing performance of a sandy beach surfing gastropod limiting for its macroscale distribution?

  • T. VanagtEmail author
  • M. Vincx
  • S. Degraer
Original Paper


The size-specific burrowing capacity of Olivella semistriata, an extremely abundant surfing gastropod of exposed sandy beaches in the tropical East Pacific, was investigated in terms of sediment grain size. For all investigated sand classes, there was a significant increase in burial time with size. Burrowing was fastest in sand with grain size between 150 and 355 μm, as well as in native sediment (median grain size 209 μm) and in field conditions (median grain size 223 μm). Values of the burrowing rate index (BRI) were found to be between 3 and 7, rating the burrowing capacity of O. semistriata to be fast to very fast. Data from previous qualitative and quantitative sampling campaigns were used to identify the macroscale (i.e., between beaches) distribution of O. semistriata in terms of sediment grain size and swash conditions. Swash period was shorter than burial time, excluding this as a factor limiting the distribution. Swash standstill time (the time between uprush and backwash), however, was just long enough on the beaches, where O. semistriata was present to allow for securing firm anchorage. On reflective beaches, the swash standstill time is as short as 1 or 2 s, denying O. semistriata the time to burry itself before being swept away by the backwash. As such, swash standstill time is advocated as a valuable part of the swash exclusion hypothesis. A survey of the available literature on the burrowing of surfers shows that mole crabs are by far the fastest burrowers and the only surfers that burrow sufficiently fast to withstand the extremely short swash standstill time on reflective beaches. Burrowing ability of surfing gastropods is found in the same range as surfing bivalves, both being insufficient to cope with coarse sediment on steep beaches. Finally, we suggest that neither burial time nor BRI, yet rather the minimal burial time—the time needed to anchor securely in a certain sand at a given swash velocity—should be used to judge the limitations of burial in terms of sediment and swash conditions.


Beach Shell Length Sandy Beach Swash Zone Burial Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors wish to thank three anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and comments. The first author and the field campaign were financially supported by a research assistant grant from the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Belgium). Additional financial support for the field work was provided by the Leopold III fund. We thank Ann Merckx, Lien Steenhuyse, Danielle Schram and Galo Chancay for their help with the data collection and help in the lab. The Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral ESPOL, Guayaquil (Ecuador) and the Centro Nacional de Acuicultura e Investigaciones Marinas CENAIM, San Pedro (Ecuador) are acknowledged for their logistic support.


  1. Aerts K, Vanagt T, Fockedey N et al (2004) Macrofaunal community structure and zonation of an Ecuadorian sandy beach (bay of Valdivia). Belg J Zool 134(1):17–24Google Scholar
  2. Alexander R, Stanton R, Dodd J (1993) Influence of sediment grain size on the burrowing of bivalves: correlation with distribution and stratigraphic persistence of selected neogene clams. Palaios 8:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown A, McLachlan A (1990) Ecology of Sandy Shores. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown A, Trueman E (1994) The burrowing rate index. J Molluscan Stud 60:354–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown A, Stenton-Dozey J, Trueman E (1989) Sandy-beach Bivalves and Gastropods: a comparison between Donax serra and Bullia digitalis. Adv Mar Biol 25:179–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan J (1984) Sediment analysis. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 41–65Google Scholar
  7. Caine E (1975) Feeding and masticatory structures of selected Anomura. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 18:277–301. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(75)90112-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cubit J (1969) The behaviour and physical factors causing migration and aggregation in the sand crab Emerita analoga (Stimpson). Ecology 50:118–123. doi: 10.2307/1934669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Defeo O (1996) Experimental management of an exploited sandy beach bivalve population. Rev Chil Hist Nat 69:605–614Google Scholar
  10. Defeo O, McLachlan A (2005) Patterns, processes and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: a multi-scale analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:1–20. doi: 10.3354/meps295001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de la Huz R, Lastra M, Lopez J (2002) The influence of sediment grain size on burrowing, growth and metabolism of Donax trunculus L. (Bivalvia: Donacidae). J Sea Res 47:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudley E, Vermeij G (1989) Shell form and burrowing performance in gastropods from Pacific Panama, with comments on regional differences in functional specialization. Veliger 32(3):284–287Google Scholar
  13. Dugan J, Hubbard D, Lastra M (2000) Burrowing abilities and swash behavior of three crabs, Emerita analoga Stimpson, Blepharipoda occidentalis Randall, and Lepidopa californica Efford (Anomura, Hippidae), of exposed sandy beaches. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 255:229–245. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00294-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellers O (1995a) Behavioral control of swash-riding in the clam Donax variabilis. Biol Bull 189:120–127. doi: 10.2307/1542462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellers O (1995b) Discrimination among wave-generated sound by a swash-riding clam. Biol Bull 189:128–137. doi: 10.2307/1542463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellers O (1995c) Form and motion of Donax variabilis in flow. Biol Bull 189:138–147. doi: 10.2307/1542464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lastra M, Dugan J, Hubbard D (2002) Burrowing and swash behavior of the pacific mole crab Hippa pacifica (Anomura, Hippidae) in tropical sandy beaches. J Crustac Biol 22(1):53–58. doi: 10.1651/0278-0372(2002)022[0053:BASBOT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lastra M, Jaramillo E, Lopez J, Contreras H, Duarte C, Rodriguez G (2004) Population abundances, tidal movement, burrowing ability and oxygen uptake of Emerita analoga (Stimpson) (Crustacea, Anomura) on a sandy beach of South-central Chile. Mar Ecol 25(1):71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McArdle S, McLachlan A (1991) Dynamics of the swash zone and effluent line on sandy beaches. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McArdle S, McLachlan S (1992) Sandy beach ecology: swash features relevant to the macrofauna. J Coast Res 8:398–407Google Scholar
  21. McLachlan A (1990) Dissipative beaches and macrofauna communities on exposed intertidal sands. J Coast Res 6:57–71Google Scholar
  22. McLachlan A, Young N (1982) Effects of low temperature on burrowing rates of four sandy beach molluscs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLachlan A, Dorvlo A (2005) Global patterns in sandy beach macrobenthic communities. J Coast Res 21(4):674–687. doi: 10.2112/03-0114.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLachlan A, Brown A (2006) The ecology of sandy shores, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. McLachlan A, Jaramillo E, Donn T, Wessels F (1993) Sandy beach macrofauna communities and their control by the physical environment: a geographical comparison. J Coast Res 81(15):27–38Google Scholar
  26. McLachlan A, Jaramillo E, Defeo O, Dugan J, de Ruyck A, Coetzee P (1995) Adaptations of bivalves to different beach types. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 187:147–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(94)00176-E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nel R, McLachlan A, Winter D (2001) The effect of grain size on the burrowing of two Donax species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 265:219–238. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00335-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsson A (1956) Studies on the genus Olivella. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 108:155–225Google Scholar
  29. Short A (1999) Handbook of beach and shoreface morphodynamics. Wiley, Chichester 373 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanley S (1970) Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of American Mem 125, Baltimore, MarylandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trueman E (1971) The control of burrowing and the migratory behaviour of Donax denticulatus (Bivalvia: Tellinacea). J Zool 165:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trueman E, Brown A (1989) The effect of shell shape on the burrowing performance of species of Bullia (Gastropoda: Nassariidae). J Molluscan Stud 55:129–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vanagt T (2007) The role of swash in the ecology of Ecuadorian sandy beach macrofauna, with special reference to the surfing gastropod Olivella semistriata. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  34. Vanagt T, Vincx M, Degraer S (2008) Can sandy beach molluscs show an endogenously controlled circatidal migrating behaviour? Hints from a swash rig experiment. Mar Ecol 29(Suppl 1):118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vermeij G, Zipser E (1986) Burrowing performance of some tropical pacific gastropods. Veliger 29(2):200–206Google Scholar
  36. Warman D, Reid D, Naylor E (1993) Circatidal variability in the behavioural responses of a sandbeach isopod Eurydice pulchra (Leach) to orientational cues. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 168:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yannicelli B, Palacios R, Gimenez L (2002) Swimming ability and burrowing time of two cirolanid isopods from different levels of exposed sandy beaches. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 273:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Biology Section, Biology DepartmentGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesThe University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.Marine Biology Field StationGrontmij l AquaSenseColijnsplaatThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine Ecosystem Management SectionBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations