Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 155, Issue 1, pp 91–103 | Cite as

Reversal and transfer of spermatophores by Octopus vulgaris and O. hummelincki

  • Jerome Wodinsky
Original Paper

Abstract

Copulatory behavior in the octopus consists of a patterned series of movements whose individual functions are not well understood. Observations and experiments on mating in Octopus vulgaris and O. hummelincki from Bimini, Bahamas and Haiti were made over a number of years in the laboratory. The study reveals how the male octopus reverses its spermatophore prior to transferring it to the female. The male’s terminal organ (penis) extrudes the sperm end of the spermatophore as it exits from Needham’s sac up to the cap or filament thread and then, holding onto the cap thread, inserts the ejaculatory end of the spermatophore into the groove of the hectocotylus, thus reversing it. It is hypothesized that the primary function of the cap or filament thread, one part of the spermatophore, is to be a handle by which the reversal and transfer is accomplished. The siphon is merely a conduit through which the terminal organ functions and plays no role whatsoever in either the reversal of the spermatophore or in its insertion into the groove. The stimulus to which the male orients to find the groove of the hectocotylus is the apex of the retracted interbrachial membrane between the third and fourth right arms, which bears a fixed spatial relationship to the origin of the groove. A number of deviations from the successful transfer process, which represent loss of sperm from the reproductive process, are illustrated. Despite these deviations, the delicately balanced integration of the various movements serves to transfer the spermatophore to the female to ensure reproductive success.

Keywords

Sexual Behavior Ventral Side Deep Breath Mantle Cavity Copulatory Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I gratefully thank Joel Cohen, Jean Fraser, Barbara Gruenthal, Mark Jacquin, David Lewkowitz, Jennifer Mather, Nancy Sack, Gayle Schectman, David Segal, Nedra Shulkin, and Dr. James Goldberg for assistance in various phases of this research. I thank the New England aquarium for its generous supply of filtered seawater. I thank Harvey Wang for Figures 1, 2, and 3. I thank Drs. Philip Zeigler and Peter Moller for their helpful comments on the manuscript. I thank Keren Klein and Phil Gnatowski for preparation of the manuscript. I also thank the reviewers of Marine Biology for their detailed, helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Bone Q, Pulsford AL, Chubb AD (1981) Squid mantle muscle. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 61:327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dew B (1959) Some observations on the development of two Australian octopuses. Proc R Zool Soc N S W 1957(58):44–52Google Scholar
  3. Drew GA (1919) The structure and ejaculation of the spermatophore of Octopus americana. Carnegie Institution of Washington. Pap Tortugas Lab XIV:33–47Google Scholar
  4. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB (1996) Cephalopod behaviour. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 1–232Google Scholar
  5. Hanson D, Mann T, Martin AW (1973) Mechanism of the spermatophoric reaction in the giant octopus of the North Pacific, Octopus dofleini martini. J Exp Biol 58:711–723Google Scholar
  6. Mann T (1984) Spermatophores: Development, structure, biochemical attributes, and role in the transfer of spermatozoa. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–217Google Scholar
  7. Mann T, Martin AW, Thiersch JB (1966) Spermatophores and spermatophoric reaction in the giant octopus of the North Pacific, Octopus dofleini martini. Nature 211:1279–1282. doi: 10.1038/2111279a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mann T, Martin AW, Thiersch JB (1970) Male reproductive tract, spermatophores and spermatophoric reaction in the giant octopus of the North Pacific, Octopus dofleini martini. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 175:31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Needham J (1745) New microscopical discoveries. F Needham, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Packard A, Trueman ER (1974) Muscular activity of the mantle of Sepia and Loligo (Cephalopoda) during respiratory movements and jetting, and its physiological interpretation. J Exp Biol 61:411–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Racovitza EG (1894) Notes de biologie. I Accouplement et fécondation chez l’Octopus vulgaris Lam. Arch Zool Exp Gen 2:23–49Google Scholar
  12. Steenstrup J (1856) Die Hectocotylenbildung bei den Cephalopoden. Archival Naturegesch 22, 211–257 Translated in 1857. Hectocotylus-formation in Argonauta and Tremoctopus explained by observation on similar formations in the Cephalopoda in general. Ann Mag Nat Hist 20:81–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Swammerdam J (1737) Biblia Naturae. Leyden: Isaack Severinus, Boubowyn Vander and Peter Vander. Translated in 1758 The Book of Nature CG Seyffert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Verrill AB (1882) The Cephalopods of the north-eastern coast of America. Part II: the smaller cephalopods, including the “squids” and the octopi, with other allied forms. Trans Conn Acad Arts Sci V:259–446Google Scholar
  15. Voight JR (2002) Morphometric analysis of male reproductive features of Octopodids (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Biol Bull 202:148–155. doi: 10.2307/1543651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. von Orelli M (1962) Die Ubertragung der spermatophore von Octopus and Eledone (Cephalopoda). Rev Suisse Zool 69:93–102Google Scholar
  17. Ward DV (1972) Locomotory function of the squid mantle. J Zool 167:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ward DV, Wainwright SA (1972) Locomotory aspects of squid muscle structure. J Zool 167:437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wells MJ, Wells J (1972) Sexual displays and mating of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier and O. cyanea Gray and attempts to alter performances by manipulating the glandular condition of the animals. Anim Behav 20:293–308. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80051-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wodinsky J (1972) Breeding season of Octopus vulgaris. Mar Biol (Berl) 16:59–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00347848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wodinsky J (1973) Ventilation rate and copulation in Octopus vulgaris. Mar Biol (Berl) 20:154–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00351454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolterding MR (1971) The rearing and maintenance of Octopus briareus in the laboratory, with aspects of their behaviour and biology. MA Thesis, University of MiamiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, MS 062Brandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations