Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 153, Issue 6, pp 1207–1217 | Cite as

Phylogeography, historical demography, and the role of post-settlement ecology in two Hawaiian damselfish species

  • Marina L. Ramon
  • Peter A. Nelson
  • Edward De Martini
  • William J. Walsh
  • Giacomo BernardiEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Coral reef fish generally have relatively sedentary juvenile and adult phases and a presumed highly dispersive pelagic larval phase, yet previous studies that have tried to relate pelagic larval duration (PLD) to population structure have given inconsistent results. In the present study, the population structures of two damselfishes, Stegastes fasciolatus and Dascyllus albisella, were examined using mitochondrial control region sequences. The two species have similar PLDs (∼25 and 27 days respectively), but consistently differ in their settlement preferences, habitat, and densities in populations throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago, from Hawaii north to Kure Atoll, and south to Johnston Atoll. Information on habitat preferences and population densities were collected between September 2000 and October 2002, and tissue samples for the genetic studies were collected between January and April 2004. Based on the differences in habitat and abundance of the two species, the expectation was that S. fasciolatus would have high genetic variability but little population structure compared to D. albisella, and this was largely confirmed. Stegastes fasciolatus had little population structure in most of the Hawaiian Islands, and D. albisella showed evidence of strong population structure throughout its range. An exception to this pattern was the large difference between the Kure Atoll population of S. fasciolatus and all others. These results suggest that the interaction of several biological factors (e.g. species-specific spawning habitat and season) with environmental factors (e.g. seasonal wind and current patterns) may have more influence on population structure than single life history characteristics, such as the PLD.

Keywords

Atoll Coral Reef Fish Mitochondrial Control Region Pelagic Larval Duration Hawaiian Archipelago 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank K. Asoh and Editor J. Grassle for helpful comments and B. Bowen for providing additional NWHI specimens. This research was funded by the Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources, Department of Land and Natural Resources and the David and Lucille Packard Foundation PISCO program and the NOAA Fisheries Office of Habitat Conservation.

References

  1. Almany GR, Berumen ML, Thorrold SR, Planes S, Jones GP (2007) Local replenishment of coral reef fish populations in a marine reserve. Science 316:742–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asoh K (2003) Reproductive parameters of female Hawaiian damselfish Dascyllus albisella with comparison to other tropical and subtropical damselfishes. Mar Biol 143:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer CF (1999) Among-locus variation in F-st: fish, allozymes and the Lewontin–Krakauer test revisited. Genetics 152:653–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bay LK, Crozier RH, Caley MJ (2006) The relationship between population genetic structure and pelagic larval duration in coral reef fishes on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 149:1247–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardi G (2000) Barriers to gene flow in Embiotoca jacksoni, a marine fish lacking a pelagic larval stage. Evolution 54:226–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernardi G, Vagelli A (2004) Population structure in banggai cardinalfish, Pterapogon kauderni, a coral reef species lacking a pelagic larval phase. Mar Biol 145:803–810Google Scholar
  7. Bernardi G, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, Crane NL, DeMartini E (2002) Species boundaries, populations and colour morphs in the coral reef three-spot damselfish (Dascyllus trimaculatus) species complex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth DJ (1992) Larval settlement-patterns and preferences by domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen BW, Bass AL, Muss A, Carlin J, Robertson DR (2006) Phylogeography of two Atlantic squirrelfishes (Family Holocentridae): exploring links between pelagic larval duration and population connectivity. Mar Biol 149:899–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen RK (2002) Larval dispersal and retention and consequences for population connectivity. In: Coral reef fishes—dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem chapter 7 (edn Sale PF), Elsevier Science, p 22Google Scholar
  11. Cowen RK, Kamazima KMM, Sponaugle S, Paris CB, Olson DB (2000) Connectivity of marine populations: open or closed? Science 287:857–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowen RK, Paris CB, Srinivasan A (2006) Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311:522–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danilowicz BS (1995a) Spatial patterns of spawning in the coral-reef damselfish Dascyllus albisella. Mar Biol 122:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danilowicz BS (1995b) The role of temperature in spawning of the damselfish Dascyllus albisella. Bull Mar Sci 57:624–636Google Scholar
  15. Danilowicz BS (1997) The effects of age and size on habitat selection during settlement of a damselfish. Environ Biol Fishes 50:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeMartini EE, Friedlander AM (2004) Spatial patterns of endemism in shallow-water reef fish populations of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 271:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doherty PJ, Planes S, Mather P (1995) Gene flow and larval duration in seven species of fish from the Great Barrier Reef. Ecology 76:2373–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes—application to human mitochondrial-DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fauvelot C, Planes S (2002) Understanding origins of present-day genetic structure in marine fish: biologically or historically driven patterns? Mar Biol 141:773–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fauvelot C, Bernardi G, Planes S (2003) Reductions in the mitochondrial DNA diversity of coral reef fish provide evidence of population bottlenecks resulting from Holocene sea-level change. Evolution 57:1571–1583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Firing J, Brainard RE (2006) Ten years of shipboard ADCP measurements along the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res Bull 543:347–363Google Scholar
  22. Grant PR (1999) Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s finches. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill KT, Radtke RL (1988) Gerontological studies of the damselfish, Dascyllus albisella. Bull Mar Sci 42:424–434Google Scholar
  24. Hobson ES (1974) Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona, Hawaii. Fish Bull 72:915–1031Google Scholar
  25. Jones GP, Planes S, Thorrold SR (2005) Coral reef fish larvae settle close to home. Curr Biol 15:1314–1318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kingsford M, Finn M (1997) The influence of phase of the moon and physical processes on the input of presettlement fishes to coral reefs. J Fish Biol 51:176–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinlan BP, Gaines SD, Lester SE (2005) Propagule dispersal and the scales of marine community process. Divers Distrib 11:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kobayashi DR (2006) Colonization of the Hawaiian Archipelago via Johnston Atoll: a characterization of oceanographic transport corridors for pelagic larvae using computer simulation. Coral Reefs 25:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kobayashi DR, Polovina JJ (2006) Simulated seasonal and interannual variability in larval transport and oceanography in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands using satellite remotely sensed data and computer modeling. Atoll Res Bull 543:365–390Google Scholar
  30. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J (1998) Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics 149:429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Largier JL (2003) Considerations in estimating larval dispersal distances from oceanographic data. Ecol Appl 13:S71–S89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee WJ, Conroy J, Howell WH, Kocher TD (1995) Structure and evolution of teleost mitochondrial control regions. J Mol Evol 41:54–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leis JM, McCormick MI (2002) The biology, behavior, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Coral reef fishes—dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem chapter 8 (edn Cowen RK), Elsevier Science, EUA, p 28Google Scholar
  34. Lester SE, Ruttenberg BI (2005) The relationship between pelagic larval duration and range size in tropical reef fishes: a synthetic analysis. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin LA (2006) Recent progress in understanding larval dispersal: new directions and digressions. Integr Comp Biol 46:282–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lobel PS (2003) Marine life of Johnston Atoll, central Pacific Ocean. Natural World Press, VidaGoogle Scholar
  37. Lobel PS, Robinson AR (1988) Larval fishes and zooplankton in a cyclonic eddy in Hawaiian waters. J Plankton Res 10:1209–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacDonald CD (1981) Reproductive strategies and social organization in damselfishes, PhD, University of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  39. Macpherson E, Raventos N (2006) Relationship between pelagic larval duration and geographic distribution of Mediterranean littoral fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 327:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDowall RM (2003) Hawaiian biogeography and the islands’ freshwater fish fauna. J Biogeogr 30:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milicich MJ (1994) Dynamic coupling of reef fish replenishment and oceanographic processes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 110:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Planes S, Doherty PJ, Bernardi G (2001) Strong genetic divergence among populations of a marine fish with limited dispersal, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, within the Great Barrier Reef and the Coral Sea. Evolution 55:2263–2273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Model test: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Purcell JFH, Cowen RK, Hughes CR, Williams DA (2006) Weak genetic structure indicates strong dispersal limits: a tale of two coral reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1483–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quenouille B, Bermingham E, Planes S (2004) Molecular systematics of the damselfishes (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:66–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rambaut A (1996) Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/
  47. Randall JE (2005) Reef and shore fishes of the South Pacific: New Caledonia to Tahiti and the Pitcairn Islands. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  48. Riginos C, Victor BC (2001) Larval spatial distributions and other early life-history characteristics predict genetic differentiation in eastern Pacific blennioid fishes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1931–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts CM (1997) Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science 278:1454–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rozas J, Rozas R (1997) DnaSP version 2.0: a novel software package for extensive molecular population genetics analysis. Comput Appl Biosci 13:307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. In: Oxford series in ecology and evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 288Google Scholar
  53. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Deptartment of Anthropology, University of GenevaGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaklee JB (1984) Genetic variation and population structure in the damselfish, Stegastes fasciolatus, throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago. Copeia 1984:629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shulman MJ, Bermingham E (1995) Early life histories, ocean currents, and the population genetics of Caribbean reef fishes. Evolution 49:897–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swearer SE, Shima JS, Hellberg ME, Thorrold SR, Jones GP, Robertson DR, Morgan SG, Selkoe KA, Ruiz GM, Warner RR (2002) Evidence of self-recruitment in demersal marine populations. Bull Mar Sci 70:251–271Google Scholar
  57. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor AC, Hellberg ME (2003) Larvae retention: genes or oceanography? Response. Science 300:1657–1658Google Scholar
  59. Thorpe RS, McGregor DP, Cumming AM, Jordan WC (1994) DNA evolution and colonization sequence of island lizards in relation to geological history - MtDNA RFLP, Cytochrome-B, Cytochrome-Oxidase, 12s Ribosomal-Rna Sequence, and Nuclear RAPD Analysis. Evolution 48:230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walsh WJ (1987) Patterns of recruitment and spawning in Hawaiian reef fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 18:257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waples RS, Rosenblatt RH (1987) Patterns of larval drift in southern California marine shore fishes inferred from allozyme data. Fish Bull 85:1–11Google Scholar
  62. Wellington GM, Victor BC (1989) Planktonic larval duration of one hundred species of Pacific and Atlantic damselfishes (Pomacentridae). Mar Biol 101:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina L. Ramon
    • 1
  • Peter A. Nelson
    • 2
  • Edward De Martini
    • 3
  • William J. Walsh
    • 4
  • Giacomo Bernardi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.H.T. Harvey and AssociatesLos GatosUSA
  3. 3.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science CenterHonolulu LaboratoryHonoluluUSA
  4. 4.Division of Aquatic ResourcesKailua-KonaUSA

Personalised recommendations