Marine Biology

, Volume 153, Issue 2, pp 213–223

18S rRNA phylogeny of sea spiders with emphasis on the position of Rhynchothoracidae

  • Koichiro Nakamura
  • Yasunori Kano
  • Nobuo Suzuki
  • Takashi Namatame
  • Akinori Kosaku
Research Article

Abstract

The phylogenetic relationships among all living families of sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) are investigated using nearly complete 18S rRNA sequences from 57 ingroup species and five chelicerates under the Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods. Monophyly of Colossendeidae, Pycnogonidae, Phoxichilidiidae, Endeidae and Pallenopsidae is consistently supported. However, the genera formerly classified in the family Ammotheidae are split up into two distantly related groups. The genera Ascorhynchus and Eurycyde (here recognized as Ascorhynchidae) are possibly an early offshoot of sea spiders, whereas other ammotheids constitute a robust terminal clade with Pallenopsidae, Phoxichilidiidae and Endeidae. This topology also opposes the prevalent assumption of successive losses and simplification of three kinds of cephalic appendages like in a previous cladistic analysis. At least three independent losses are suggested for palps by the inferred topology, and both chelifores and female ovigers may have been lost twice. Our knowledge of early ontogeny and internal anatomy is more congruent with the present 18S rRNA data. The families Callipallenidae and Nymphonidae with unique “attaching larvae” are grouped together in present molecular trees, suggesting that extended paternal care of offspring evolved only once in Pycnogonida. Confident clustering of Pycnogonidae and Rhynchothoracidae indicates that the number of female genital pores is an evolutionary conservative character.

References

  1. Arango CP (2002) Morphological phylogenetics of the sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida). Org Divers Evol 2:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arango CP (2003) Molecular approach to the phylogenetics of sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) using partial sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 28:588–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arango CP, Wheeler WC (2007) Phylogeny of the sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) based on direct optimization of six loci and morphology. Cladistics 23:255–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnaud F, Bamber RN (1987) The biology of Pycnogonida. Adv Mar Biol 24:1–95Google Scholar
  5. Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (2003) Invertebrates, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Child CA (1979) Shallow-water Pycnogonida of the Isthmus of Panama and the coast of middle America. Smithson Contrib Zool 293:1–86Google Scholar
  7. Child CA (1998) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Pycnogonida (Sea Spiders). NIWA Biodivers Mem 109:1–71Google Scholar
  8. Child CA (2001) Resolution for a confusing problem in the classification of Pycnogonida by setting a new family Pallenopsidae. PhD Thesis, Hokkaido UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunlop JA, Arango CP (2004) Pycnogonid affinities: a review. J Zool Syst Evol Res 43:8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fry WG (1978) A classification within the pycnogonids. Zool J Linn Soc 63:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillespie JM, Bain BA (2006) Postembryonic development of Tanystylum bealensis (Pycnogonida, Ammotheidae) from Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada. J Morphol 267:308–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC (2001) Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hassanin A (2006) Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:100–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedgpeth JW (1947) On the evolutionary significance of the Pycnogonida. Smithson Misc Coll 106:1–53Google Scholar
  15. Hedgpeth JW (1948) The Pycnogonida of the western North Atlantic and the Caribbean. Proc US Natl Mus 98:157–342Google Scholar
  16. Hedgpeth JW (1982) Pycnogonida. In: Parker SP (ed) Synopsis and classification of living organisms, vol 2, pp 169–173Google Scholar
  17. Hoek PPC (1881) Nouvelles études sur les Pycnogonides. Arch Zool Exp Gén 9:445–542Google Scholar
  18. Jager M, Murienne J, Clabaut C, Deutsch J, Le Guyader H, Manuel M (2006) Homology of arthropod anterior appendages revealed by Hox gene expression in a sea spider. Nature 441:506–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Löytynoja A, Milinkovitch MC (2003) A hidden Markov model for progressive multiple alignment. Bioinformatics 19:1505–1513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2005) MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.08. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Mallatt J, Giribet G (2006) Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:772–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manuel M, Jager M, Murienne J, Clabaut C, Guyader HL (2006) Hox genes in sea spiders (Pycnogonida) and the homology of arthropod head segments. Dev Genes Evol 216:481–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maxmen A, Browne WE, Martindale MQ, Giribet G (2005) Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment. Nature 437:1144–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan TH (1891) A contribution to the embryology and phylogeny of the pycnogonids. Stud Biol Lab J Hopkins Univ 5:1–76Google Scholar
  25. Munilla T (1999) Evolución y filogenia de los Picnogónidos. In: Melic A, de Haro JJ, Mendez M, Ribera I (eds) Evolución y filogenia de Arthropoda. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 26:273–279Google Scholar
  26. Nakamura K (1981) Post embryonic development of a pycnogonid, Propallene longiceps. J Nat Hist 15:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakamura K, Child CA (1983) Shallow-water Pycnogonida from the Izu Peninsula, Japan. Smiths Contrib Zool 386:1–71Google Scholar
  28. Nakamura K, Child CA (1991) Pycnogonida from waters adjacent to Japan. Smithson Contrib Zool 512:1–74Google Scholar
  29. Okuda S (1940) Metamorphosis of a pycnogonid parasitic in a hydromedusa. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ 7:73–86Google Scholar
  30. Podsiadlowski L, Braband A (2006) The complete mitochondrial genome of the sea spider Nymphon gracile (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida). BMC Genomics 7:284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poschmann M, Dunlop JA (2006) A new sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) with a flagelliform telson from Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany. Palaeontology 49:983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Kambic RE (2005) Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic. Proc R Soc B 272:395–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (1999) Multiple comparisons of log-likelihood with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 16:1114–1116Google Scholar
  36. Siveter DJ, Sutton MD, Briggs DEG, Siveter DJ (2004) A Silurian sea spider. Nature 431:978–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stock JH (1955) Pycnogonida from the West Indies, Central America and the Pacific Coast of North America. Papers from Dr. Mortensen’s Pacific Expedition 1914–1916. Vidensk Medd fra Dansk Naturh Foren 117:209–266Google Scholar
  38. Stock JH (1974) Pycnogonida from the continental shelf, slope, and deep sea of the tropical Atlantic and East Pacific. Bull Mar Sci 24:957–1092Google Scholar
  39. Stock JH (1994) Indo-west pacific Pycnogonida collected by some major oceanographic expeditions. Beaufortia 44:17–77Google Scholar
  40. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vilpoux K, Waloszek D (2003) Larval development and morphogenesis of the sea spider Pycnogonum litorale (Ström, 1762) and the tagmosis of the body of Pantopoda. Arthropod Struct Dev 32:349–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Waloszek D, Dunlop JA (2002) A larval sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Upper Cambrian “Orsten” of Sweden, and the phylogenetic position of pycnogonids. Palaeontology 45:421–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheeler WC (1996) Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  46. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD Thesis, University Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koichiro Nakamura
    • 1
    • 4
  • Yasunori Kano
    • 2
  • Nobuo Suzuki
    • 1
  • Takashi Namatame
    • 3
  • Akinori Kosaku
    • 3
  1. 1.Japan Women’s College of Physical EducationTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biological Production and Environmental ScienceUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Medical ScienceDokkyo Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
  4. 4.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations