Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 235–248 | Cite as

Spatial variation of otolith elemental signatures among juvenile gray snapper (Lutjanus griseus) inhabiting southern Florida waters

  • Monica R. Lara
  • David L. Jones
  • Zhongxing Chen
  • John T. Lamkin
  • Cynthia M. Jones
Research Article

Abstract

Juvenile gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus, are believed to use bays and estuaries in southern Florida as nurseries before moving out to the adjoining reef tract as adults. Using high-resolution sector field-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (SF-ICP-MS), the elemental chemistry of the otoliths of juveniles from five nursery regions was resolved by establishing elemental “signatures” for each region. In this study we simultaneously analyzed 32 elements including a suite of rare earth elements. A stepwise variable selection procedure retained a subset of eight elements that contributed substantially to separating otolith samples, including two rare earth elements; this is one of the first studies in which rare earth elements in otoliths have contributed to separation of fish stocks. The classification success rate in assigning fishes to the correct region of origin was 82%. Resolution of sites less than 10 km apart suggested high site fidelity in juvenile gray snapper and little mixing of water masses between sites. The juvenile nursery signatures will be used to determine the relative contribution of different nurseries to the adult population on an adjoining reef tract.

Keywords

Discriminant Function Analysis Otolith Microchemistry Randomization Iteration Gray Snapper Classification Success Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a larger study on otolith microchemistry and habitat use of snappers in southern Florida. This research was carried out under the auspices of the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), of the University of Miami under cooperative agreement #NA17RJ1226 with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Funding was provided by the NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program. We thank the many people who helped in the field, especially Yesim Dodanli, Jennifer Hodge, Estrella Malca and Jose Morillo. The experiments described herein comply with the current laws of the United States of America.

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2001a) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust J Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2001b) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg GA, Cappo M, Cameron DS, Boyle S, Sellin MJ (1998) Stock discrimination of school mackerel, Scomberomorus queenslandicus, and spotted mackerel, Scomberomorus munroi, in coastal waters of eastern Australia by analysis of minor and trace elements in whole otoliths. Fish Bull US 96:653–666Google Scholar
  5. Browder JA et al (2003) Synthesis of Florida Bay higher trophic levels research. In: Nuttle W (ed) Florida Bay science conference, April 2003, Tampa Bay, FL 68 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2001) Kullback–Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildl Res 28:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Campana SE (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:263–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campana SE, Gagne JA, McLaren JW (1995) Elemental fingerprinting of fish otoliths using ID-ICPMS. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 122:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campana SE, Chouinard GA, Hanson JM, Fréchet A, Brattey J (2000) Otolith elemental fingerprints as biological tracers of fish stocks. Fish Res 46:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campana SE, Neilson JD (1985) Microstructure of fish otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:1014–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chester AJ, Thayer GW (1990) Distribution of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) and gray snapper (Lutjanus griseus) juveniles in seagrass habitats of western Florida Bay. Bull Mar Sci 46:345–357Google Scholar
  13. Croker RA (1962) Growth and food of the gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus, in Everglades National Park. Trans Am Fish Soc 91:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Pontual H, Lagardére F, Troadec H, Batel A, Désaunay Y, Koutsikopoulos C (2000) Otoliths imprinting of sole (Solea solea) from the Bay of Biscay: a tool to discriminate individuals from nursery origins? Oceanol Acta 23:497–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Domeier ML, Colin PL (1997) Tropical reef fish spawning aggregations: defined and reviewed. Bull Mar Sci 60:698–726Google Scholar
  16. Dorval E, Jones CM, Hannigan R, van Montfrans J (2005) Can otolith chemistry be used for identifying essential seagrass habitats for juvenile spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus, in Chesapeake Bay? Mar Freshw Res 56:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edmonds JS, Moran MJ, Caputi N, Morita M (1989) Trace element analysis of fish saggitae as an aid to stock identification: pink snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) in western Australia waters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forrester GE, Swearer SE (2002) Trace elements in otoliths indicate the use of open-coast versus bay nursery habitat by juvenile California halibut. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 241:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geffen AJ, Jarvis K, Thorpe JP, Leah RT, Nash RDM (2003) Spatial differences in the trace element concentrations of Irish sea plaice Pleuronectes platessa and whiting Merlangius merlangus otoliths. J Sea Res 50(2–3):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillanders BM (2001) Trace metals in four structures of fish and their use for estimates of stock structure. Fish Bull US 99:410–419Google Scholar
  21. Gillanders BM (2002a) Connectivity between juvenile and adult fish populations: do adults remain near their recruitment estuaries? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillanders BM (2002b) Temporal and spatial variability in elemental composition of otoliths: implications for determining stock identity and connectivity of populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:669–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillanders BM, Kingsford MJ (1996) Elements in otoliths may elucidate the contribution of esturaine recruitment to sustaining coastal reef populations of a temperate reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 141:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gillanders BM, Kingsford MJ (2000) Elemental fingerprints of otoliths of fish may distinguish estuarine ‘nursery’ habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 201:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillanders BM, Kingsford MJ (2003) Spatial variation in elemental composition of otoliths of three species of fish (family Sparidae). Est Coast Shelf Sci 57:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Godínez-Domínguez E, Freire J (2003) Information-theoretic approach for selection of spatial and temporal models of community organization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamer PA, Jenkins GP, Gillanders BM (2003) Otolith chemistry of juvenile snapper Pagrus auratus in Victorian waters: natural chemical tags and their temporal variation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 263:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones DL, Lara MR, Yeung C, Jackson TL, Criales MM, Richards WJ (2001) Offshore larval supply of snapper larvae (Pisces: Lutjanidae) into Florida Bay. In: Proceedings of the Florida Bay Science Conference, Florida Sea Grant, Key Largo, FL, pp 186–187Google Scholar
  29. Jones DL (2002) Users manual for FATHOM: a MATLAB toolbox for multivariate ecological and oceanographic data analysis. The Empirical Fish Lab, Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Science, Available from: http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/djones/
  30. Kafemann R, Adlerstein S, Neukamm R (2000) Variation in otolith strontium and calcium ratios as an indicator of life history strategies of fresh water fish species within a brackish water system. Fish Res 46:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee TN, John E, Melo N, Smith RH., Ortner P, Smith D (2006) On Florida Bay hypersalinity and water exchange. Bull Mar Sci 79(2):301–327Google Scholar
  32. Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Legendre P, Legendre L (eds) (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer-Rochow VB, Cook I, Hendy CH (1992) How to obtain clues from the otoliths of an adult fish about the aquatic environment it has been in as larva. Comp Biochem Physiol A 103(2):333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patterson HM, McBride RS, Julien N (2004) Population structure of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) as determined by otolith chemistry. Mar Biol 144(5):855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patterson HM, Kingsford MJ, McCulloch MT (2005) Resolution of the early life history of a reef fish using otolith chemistry. Coral Reefs 24:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petraitis PS, Beaupre SJ, Dunham AE (2001) ANCOVA: Nonparametric and randomization approaches. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 116–133Google Scholar
  39. Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyaá Ser A 26:329–358Google Scholar
  40. Rao CR (1973) Linear statistical inference and its application, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richards WJ, Lindeman KC, Schults JL, Leis JM, Röpke A,Clarke ME, Comyns B (1994) Preliminary guide to the identification of the early life history stages of lutjanid fishes of the western central Atlantic. NOAA Tech Mem NMFS-SEFSC-345Google Scholar
  42. Richards WJ, Saksena VP (1980) Description of larvae and early juveniles of laboratory reared gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus (Linnaeus) (Pisces, Lutjanidae). Bull Mar Sci 30:515–521Google Scholar
  43. Rooker JR, Secor DH, Zdanowicz VS, Itoh T (2001) Discrimination of northern bluefin tuna from nursery areas in the Pacific ocean using otolith chemistry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 218:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rooker JR, Secor DH, Zdanowicz VS, De Metrio G, Relini LO (2003) Identification of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) stocks from putative nurseries using otolith microchemistry. Fish Oceanogr 12(2):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutherford ES, Thue EB, Buker DG (1983) Population structure, food habitats, and spawning activity of gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus, in Everglades National Park. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC–82/02. National Park Service, Homestead, FLGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutherford ES, Schmidt TW, Tilmant JT (1989) Early life history of spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) and gray snapper (Lutjanus griseus) in Florida Bay, Everglades National Park, Florida. Bull Mar Sci 44:49–64Google Scholar
  47. Sako A, O’Reilly CM, Hannigan R, Bickford N, Johnson RL (2005) Variations in the otolith elemental compositions of two clupeid species Stolothrissa tanganicae and Limnothrissa miodon in Lake Tanganyika. Geochem Explor Env Analys 5(1):91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandin SA, Regetz J, Hamilton SL (2005) Testing larval fish dispersal hypotheses using maximum likelihood analysis of otolith chemistry data. Mar Freshw Res 56(5):725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Secor DH, Rooker JR, Zlokovitz E, Zdanowicz VS (2001) Identification of riverine, estuarine and coastal contingents of Hudson River striped bass based upon otolith elemental fingerprints. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 211:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Secor DH, Campana SE, Zdanowicz VS, Lam JWH,Yang L, Rooker JR (2002) Interlaboratory comparison of Atlantic and Mediterranean blue fin tuna otolith microconstituents. J Mar Sci 59:1294–1304Google Scholar
  51. Sholkovitz ER (1995) The aquatic chemistry of rare earth elements in rivers and estuaries. Aquat Geochem 1:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Starck WA II (1970) Investigations on the gray snapper, Lutjanus griseus. Stud Trop Oceanogr Miami 10:11–150Google Scholar
  53. Sturgeon RE, Willie SN, Yang L, Greenberg R, Spatz RO, Chen Z, Scriver C, Clancy V, Lam JW, Thorrold S (2005) Certification of a fish otolith reference material in support of quality assurance for trace element analysis. J Anal Atom Spectrom 20:1067–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stwertka A (2002) A guide to the elements, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Swearer SE, Forrester GE, Steele MA, Brooks AJ, Lea DW (2003) Spatio-temporal and interspecific variation in otolith trace-elemental fingerprints in a temperate estuarine fish assemblage. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56(5–6):1111–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thorrold SR, Jones CM, Campana SE (1997) Response of otolith microchemistry to environmental variations experienced by larval and juvenile Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus). Limnol Oceanogr 42:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thorrold SR, Jones CM, Campana SE, McLaren JW, Lam JWH (1998a) Trace element signatures in otoliths record natal river of juvenile American shad (Alosa sapidissima). Limnol Oceanogr 43(8):1826–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorrold SR, Jones CM, Swart PK, Targett TE (1998b) Accurate classification of juvenile weakfish Cynoscion regalis to estuarine nursery areas based on chemical signatures in otoliths. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 173:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thorrold SR, Hare JA (2002) Otolith applications in reef fish ecology. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes. Dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic, New York, pp 243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thresher RE (1999) Elemental composition of otoliths as a stock delineator in fishes. Fish Res 43:165–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thresher RE, Proctor CH, Gunn JS, Harrowfield IR (1994) An evaluation of electron probe microanalysis of otoliths for stock delineation and identification of nursery areas in a southern temperate groundfish, Nemadactylus macropterus (Cheilodactylidae). Fish Bull US 92:817–840Google Scholar
  62. Tzeng WN, Tsai YC (1994) Changes in otolith microchemistry of the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, during its migration from the ocean to the rivers of Taiwan. J Fish Biol 45:671–683Google Scholar
  63. United States Department of Commerce (USDOC) (2003) NOAA-NMFS website http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica R. Lara
    • 1
  • David L. Jones
    • 1
  • Zhongxing Chen
    • 2
  • John T. Lamkin
    • 3
  • Cynthia M. Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceSoutheast Fisheries Science CenterMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Center for Quantitative Fisheries EcologyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations