Marine Biology

, Volume 152, Issue 6, pp 1319–1331 | Cite as

Growth and mortality rates of the fan mussel Pinna nobilis in Lake Vouliagmeni (Korinthiakos Gulf, Greece): a generalized additive modelling approach

  • Stelios KatsanevakisEmail author
Research Article


The temporal patterns and the effect of shell size and depth on growth and mortality rates of the endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis were investigated in the marine Lake Vouliagmeni (Korinthiakos Gulf, Greece). A total of 160 individuals were tagged and monitored monthly for a period of 17 months. At each visit, the size of the tagged individuals (shell width, w) was measured in situ and recorded. Any mortality event was also recorded and attributed to natural causes or (illegal) fishing. Growth and mortality rates were modeled with generalized additive models, which are non-parametric flexible models that free the researcher from the limiting concept of a strict parametric shape. The use of GAMs allowed the exploration of shapes of growth and mortality response curves in relation to predictor variables and allowed the fitting of statistical models that better agree with ecological theory. Growth rates had a seasonal pattern, with an extended period of very slow growth between late autumn and early spring, i.e., during the cold season, another short period of slow growth during August (when water temperatures reached their maximum values exceeding 29°C), and a peak in growth rates during late spring–early summer, probably related to an optimum combination of temperature and food availability. Growth rates varied with shell size, with a peak at w ∼4.5 cm, followed by a sharp decline to an approximately constant level, with sizes ranging from 9 to 15 cm, and a further decline with larger sizes down to almost zero for w > 20 cm. Growth rates did not vary substantially with depth. Although P. nobilis is a protected species in the EU and its fishing is strictly prohibited, fishing mortality was very high in Lake Vouliagmeni (much greater than natural mortality), especially during the hot season when the lake was crowded by summer visitors. The fan mussels were poached exclusively by free-diving and due to the high turbidity of the lake’s water, fishing mortality was higher in shallow areas (and mostly for large individuals) and was practically zero at depths >9 m. Due to fishing mortality, a size segregation of P. nobilis was observed in the lake: large individuals were restricted to deeper areas, while young and small individuals were more abundant in shallow areas where there was preferential recruitment. Natural mortality was strikingly size dependent and P. nobilis suffered high natural mortality during the first year of life; the probability of death by natural causes quickly diminished as the fan mussels grew in size. No depth-related differences in natural mortality were found.


Bivalve Natural Mortality Fishing Mortality Shell Growth Instantaneous Growth Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments, which helped to improve the quality of the manuscript. This work complies with the current laws of Greece and EU.


  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csàaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1983) Information measures and model selection. B Int Stat Inst 44:277–291Google Scholar
  3. Bachelet G (1980) Growth and Recruitment of the Tellinid Bivalve Macoma balthica at the Southern Limit of Its Geographical Distribution, the Gironde Estuary (SW France). Mar Biol 59:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertalanffy von L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth (Inquiries on growth laws II). Human Biol 10:181–213Google Scholar
  5. Brousseau DJ (1978) Population dynamics of the soft-shell clam Mya arenaria. Mar Biol 50:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH (1997) Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler AJ, Vincente N, Gaulejac B de (1993) Ecology of the pteroid bivalves Pinna bicolor Gmelin and Pinna nobilis L. Mar Life 3:37–45Google Scholar
  9. Côté IM (1995) Effects of predatory crab effluent on byssus production in mussels. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 188:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craven P, Wahba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numer Math 31:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galinou-Mitsoudi S, Vlahavas G, Papoutsi O (2006) Population study of the protected bivalve Pinna nobilis (Linaeus, 1758) in Thermaikos Gulf (North Aegean Sea). J Biol Res 5:47–53Google Scholar
  12. García-March JR, García-Carrascosa AM, Peña Cantero AL, Wang YG (2007a) Population structure, mortality and growth of Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca: Bivalvia) at different depths in Moraira Bay (Alicante, Western Mediterranean). Mar Biol 150:861–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-March JR, Pérez-Rojas L, García-Carrascosa AM (2007b) Influence of hydrodynamic forces on population structure of Pinna nobilis L., 1758 (Mollusca: Bivalvia): the critical combination of drag force, water depth, shell size and orientation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gompertz B (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 115:515–585Google Scholar
  15. Grant J (1996) The relationship of bioenergetics and the environment to the field growth of cultured bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grecian LA, Parsons J, Dabinett P, Couturier C (2000) Influence of season, initial size, depth, gear type and stocking density on the growth rates and recovery of sea scallop, Placopecten magellancius, on a farm-based nursery. Aquacult Int 8:183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey M, Vincent B (1990) Density, size distribution, energy allocation and seasonal variations in shell and soft tissue growth at two tidal levels of a Macoma balthica (L.) population. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 142:151–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Katsanevakis S (2006a) Population ecology of the endangered fan mussel Pinna nobilis in a marine lake. Endang Species Res 1:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katsanevakis S (2006b) Modelling fish growth: model selection, multi-model inference and model selection uncertainty. Fish Res 81:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katsanevakis S (2007) Density surface modelling with line transect sampling as a tool for abundance estimation of marine benthic species: the Pinna nobilis example in a marine lake. Mar Biol 152:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YJ, Gu C (2004) Smoothing spline gaussian regression: more scalable computation via eficient approximation. J Roy Stat Soc B 66:337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Welsey Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Legendre L, Demers S (1985) Auxiliary energy, ergoclines and aquatic biological production. Nat Can 112:5–14Google Scholar
  25. Lehmann A, Overton J McC, Leathwick JR (2002) GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecol Model 157:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lessa R, Duarte-Neto P (2004) Age and growth of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western equatorial Atlantic, using dorsal fin spines. Fish Res 69:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinton JS, Bambach RK (1969) Some ecological aspects of bivalve mortality patterns. Am J Sci 268:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald BA, Thompson RJ (1985) Influence of temperature and food availability on the ecological energetics of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus. I. Growth rates of shell and somatic tissue. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreteau JC, Vicente N (1982) Evolution d’une population de Pinna nobilis L. (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Malacologia 22:341–345Google Scholar
  30. Nakaoka M (1996) Size-dependent survivorship of the bivalve Yoldia notabilis (Yokoyama, 1920): the effect of crab predation. J Shellfish Res 15:355–362Google Scholar
  31. Nakaoka M (1998) Optimal resource allocation of the marine bivalve Yoldia notabilis: the effects of size-limited reproductive capacity and size-dependent mortality. Evol Ecol 12:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Page HM, Hubbard DM (1987) Temporal and spatial patterns of growth in mussels Mytilus edulis on an offshore platform: relationships to water temperature and food availability. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 111:159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramos MA (1998) Impementing the habitats directive for mollusk species in Spain. J Concol Spec Publ 2:125–132Google Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  35. Richardson CA, Kennedy H, Duarte CM, Kennedy DP, Proud SV (1999) Age and growth of the fan mussel Pinna nobilis from south-east Spanish Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadows. Mar Biol 133:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson CA, Peharda M, Kennedy H, Kennedy P, Onofri V (2004) Age, growth rate and season of recruitment of Pinna nobilis (L) in the Croatian Adriatic determined from Mg:Ca and Sr:Ca shell profiles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 299:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fish Res Bd Can 191:1–382Google Scholar
  38. Rodhouse PG, Roden CM, Bumell GM, Hensey MP, McMahon T, Ottway B, Ryan TH (1984) Food resource, gametogenesis and growth of Mytilus edulis on the shore and in suspended culture in Killary Harbour, Ireland. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64:513–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seed R (1993) Invertebrate predators and their role in structuring coastal and estuarine populations of filter feeding bivalves. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shöne B, Tanabe K, Dettman D, Sato S (2003) Environmental controls on shell growth rates and δ18 O of the shallow-marine bivalve mollusk Phacosoma japonicum in Japan. Mar Biol 142:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sinclair M (1978) Summer phytoplankton variability in the lower St. Lawrence Estuary. J Fish Res Bd Can 35:1171–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson JK, Nichols FH (1988) Food availability controls seasonal cycle of growth in Macoma balthica (L.) in San Francisco Bay, California. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 116:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Urrutia MB, Ibarrola I, Iglesias JIP, Navarro E (1999) Energetics of growth and reproduction in a high-tidal population of the clam Ruditapes decussatus from Urdaibai Estuary (Basque Country, N. Spain). J Sea Res 42:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uryu Y, Iwasaki K, Hinoue M (1996) Laboratory experiments on behaviour and movements of a freshwater mussel, Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker). J Mollus Stud 62:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vicente N (1990) Estudio ecológico y protección del molusco lamelibranquio Pinna nobilis L. 1758 en la costa mediterránea. Iberus 9:269–279Google Scholar
  46. Vicente N, Moreteau JC (1991) Statut de Pinna nobilis L. en Mediterranee (mollusque eulamellibranche). In: Boudouresque CF, Avon M, Gravez V (eds) Les espèces marines à protéger en Méditerranée. GIS Posidonie publ., Marseille, pp 159–168Google Scholar
  47. Šiletić T, Peharda M (2003) Population study of the fan shell Pinna nobilis L. in Malo and Veliko Jezero of the Mljet National Park (Adriatic Sea). Sci Mar 67:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Widdows J, Fieth P, Worrall CM (1979) Relationship between seston, available food and feeding activity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 50:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood SN (2000) Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties. J R Stat Soc Ser B 62:413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamaguchi M (1975) Estimating growth parameters from growth rate data: problems with marine sedentary invertebrates. Oecologia 20:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zavodnik D (1967) Contribution to the ecology of Pinna nobilis L. (Moll., Bivalvia) in the Northern Adriatic. Thalassia Yugosl 3:93–102Google Scholar
  53. Zavodnik D, Hrs-Brenko M, Legac M (1991) Synopsis on the fan shell Pinna nobilis L. in the eastern Adriatic Sea. In: Boudouresque CF, Avon M, Gravez V (eds) Les Espèces Marines à Protéger en Méditerranée. GIS Posidonie publ, Marseille, pp 169–178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology-Marine Biology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations