Differences in somatic and gonadic growth of sea urchins (Stronglyocentrotus droebachiensis) fed kelp (Laminaria longicruris) or the invasive alga Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides are related to energy acquisition
- 234 Downloads
The rocky subtidal community off the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia has historically undergone a cyclical transition between Laminaria-dominated kelp beds and sea urchin-dominated barrens. Since the introduction of the invasive alga Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, a third community state has emerged: Codium-dominated algal beds. We conducted a 42-week feeding experiment in the laboratory, which mimicked the quantity and quality of food available to urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in each of these community states. Feeding rate, growth, reproduction, and survival of urchins fed either Laminaria longicruris or C. fragile ad libidum, or L. longicruris 2 days per month, were measured. Although the ad libidum feeding rate on C. fragile was higher than that on kelp, energy intake was lower. Urchins in the ad libidum kelp treatment were larger and had larger gonads than those in the C. fragile treatment. Urchins fed kelp infrequently exhibited little somatic and gonadic growth over the course of the experiment. Regression analysis revealed that urchin performance on these diets was strongly related to energy intake. Diet treatment had no effect on survival or gonad maturation. Although urchins can consume substantial amounts of C. fragile, it appears that they cannot, or do not, feed quickly enough to compensate for its lower nutritional value. Our results suggest that, although urchins feeding on C. fragile are capable of surviving, growing, and reproducing, the replacement of kelp by C. fragile in some areas might negatively affect urchin populations as they continue to repopulate the shallow subtidal zone.
KeywordsGonad Index Gonad Weight Test Diameter Gonadic Growth Gametogenic Cycle
We thank Ebony Wicks, Mark Ulett, John Lindley, Allison Schmidt, Olivier D’Amours, and Meagan Saunders for their assistance with diving and lab work. Jean-Sébastien Lauzon-Guay and Marie Auger Méthé and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript. The research was funded by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to RES. DAL was supported by scholarships from NSERC.
- Bird CJ, Dadswell MJ, Grund DW (1993) First record of the potential nuisance alga Codium fragile spp. tomentosoides (Chlorophyta, Caulerpales) in Atlantic Canada. Proc N S Inst Sci 40:11–17Google Scholar
- Chapman AS, Scheibling RE, Chapman ARO (2002) Species introductions and changes in marine vegetation of Atlantic Canada. In: Claudi R, Nantel P, Muckle-Jeffs E (eds) Alien invaders in Canada’s waters, wetlands, and forests. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian forest service science branch, Ottawa, pp 133–148Google Scholar
- Cho DM, Kim DS, Lee DS, Kim HR, Pyeun JH (1995) Trace components and functional saccharides in seaweed. 1. Changes in proximate composition and trace elements according to harvest season and places. Bull Korean Fish Soc 28:49–59Google Scholar
- Ebert TA (1980) Relative growth of sea urchin jaws: an example of plastic resource allocation. Bull Mar Sci 30:467–474Google Scholar
- Himmelman JH (1984) Urchin feeding and macroalgal distribution in Newfoundland, eastern Canada. Nat Can 111:337–348Google Scholar
- Johnson CR, Mann KH (1982) Adaptations of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis for survival on barren grounds in Nova Scotia. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Echinoderms: Proceedings of the international conference, Tampa Bay. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 277–283Google Scholar
- Klinger TS (1982) Feeding rates of Lytechinus variegatus Lamark (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) on differing physiognomies of an artificial food on a uniform composition. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Echinoderms: Proceedings of the international conference, Tampa Bay. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 29–32Google Scholar
- Lawrence JM (1975) On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 13:213–286Google Scholar
- Meidel SK, Scheibling RE (1998b) Differences in size and age structure of subpopulations of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in kelp beds, barren grounds and grazing fronts in relation to growth rate and nutritional condition. In: Mooi R, Telford M (eds) Echinoderms: proceedings of the international conference, San Francisco. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 737–742Google Scholar
- Propp MV (1977) Ecology of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis of the Barents Sea: metabolism and regulation of abundance. Sov J Mar Biol 3:27–37Google Scholar
- Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar