Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 3, pp 1099–1110 | Cite as

Oithona similis in a high latitude ecosystem: abundance, distribution and temperature limitation of fecundity rates in a sac spawning copepod

  • P. Ward
  • A. G. Hirst
Research Article

Abstract

In this study we report the abundance, fecundity and an index of the relative survival of Oithona similis (nauplii to copepodites) across a large latitudinal and temperature range within the Southern Ocean. The abundance of O. similis was strongly related to temperature and to depth-integrated (0–100 m) chlorophyll a, abundance increasing with increasing temperature (and therefore decreasing latitude) and Chl a. In situ egg production rates and fecundity per female were also significantly and positively related to temperature and Chl a. Egg hatch times rapidly lengthen as temperature decreases and in sac spawning species the next batch of eggs cannot be produced until the previous clutch hatch. Consequently, we predict that in O. similis, fecundity must decline rapidly at low temperatures, especially below 5°C. A model comparing maximum rates of fecundity with in situ data suggested production rates were strongly food limited across our study region. However, the relationship of in situ and maximum rates to temperature were similar, confirming the importance of temperature. Further, as time taken to develop from egg to adult also rapidly extends with declining temperature, it is increasingly unlikely that O. similis will be able to maintain its population against mortality. Our findings have broad implications for the cold temperature (and hence geographic) limits of O. similis, but also for the distribution of other sac spawning copepods and planktonic species generally.

Keywords

Southern Ocean Fecundity Rate Secondary Production Copepodite Stage Maximum Fecundity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the officers and crew of the RRS James Clark Ross and our colleagues who assisted with the sampling programmes. Beki Korb and Mick Whitehouse are thanked for the Chl a and temperature data respectively and Rachael Shreeve for drafting Fig. 1. This work forms part of the BAS Discovery 2010 Flexicon and CEMI projects.

References

  1. Ashjian CJ, Campbell RG, Welch HE, Butler M, Van Keuren D (2003) Annual cycle in abundance, distribution, and size in relation to hydrography of important copepod species in the western Arctic Ocean. Deep Sea Res I 50:1235–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson A (1998) Life cycle strategies of epipelagic copepods in the Southern Ocean. J Mar Syst 15:289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson A, Ward P (1988) Summer–winter differences in copepod distribution around South Georgia. Hydrobiologia 167/168:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson A, Sinclair JD (2000) Zonal distribution and seasonal vertical migration of copepod assemblages in the Scotia Sea. Polar Biol 23:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunker AJ, Hirst AG (2004) Fecundity of marine planktonic copepods: global rates and patterns in relation to chlorophyll a, temperature and body weight. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 279:161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell RG, Wagner MM, Teegarden GJ, Boudreau CA, Durbin EG (2001) Growth and development of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus reared in the laboratory. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221:161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellani C, Irigoien X, Harris RP, Lampitt RS (2005) Feeding and egg production of Oithona similis in the North Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 288:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Checkley DM (1980) Food limitation of egg production by a marine, planktonic copepod in the sea off southern California. Limnol Oceanogr 25:991–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corkett CJ (1984) Observations on development in copepods. Crustaceana (Suppl) 7:150–153Google Scholar
  10. Edmondson WT, Comita GW, Anderson GC (1962) Reproductive rate of copepods in nature and its relation to phytoplankton population. Ecology 43:625–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eiane K, Ohman MD (2004) Stage-specific mortality of Calanus finmarchicus, Pseudocalanus elonmgatus and Oithona similis on Fladen Ground, North Sea, during a spring bloom. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fransz HG (1988) Vernal abundance, structure and development of epipelagic copepod populations of the eastern Weddell sea (Antarctica). Polar Biol 9:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fransz HG, Gonzalez SR (1995) The production of Oithona similis (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in the Southern Ocean. ICES J Mar Sci 52:549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallienne CP, Robins DB (2001) Is Oithona the most important copepod in the world’s oceans? J Plank Res 23:1421–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirst AG, Bunker (2003) Growth in marine planktonic copepods: global rates and patterns in relation to chlorophyll a, temperature, and body weight. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1988–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirst AG, Kiørboe T (2002) Mortality of marine planktonic copepods: global rates and patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 230:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopcroft RR Clarke V, Nelson RJ, Raskoff KA (2005) Zooplankton communities of the Arctic’s Canada Basin: the contribution by smaller taxa. Polar Biol 28:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopcroft RR, Roff JC (1996) Zooplankton growth rates: diel egg production in the copepods Oithona, Euterpina and Corycaeus from tropical waters. J Plankton Res 18:789–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hopcroft RR, Roff JC (1998) Zooplankton growth rates: the influence of female size and resources on egg production of tropical marine copepods. Mar Biol 132:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiørboe T, Sabatini M (1995) Scaling of fecundity, growth and development in marine planktonic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 12:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korb R, Whitehouse M (2004) Contrasting primary production regimes around South Georgia, Southern Ocean: mega blooms vs high nutrient low chlorophyll waters. Deep Sea Res I 51:721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lischka S, Hagen W (2005) Life histories of the copepods Pseudocalanus minutes, P. acuspes (Calanoida) and Oithonasimilis (Cyclopoida) in the Arctic Kongsfjorden (Svalbard). Polar Biol 28:910–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKinnon AD, Klumpp DW (1998) Mangrove zooplankton of North Queensland, Australia. II. Copepod egg production and diet. Hydrobiologia 362:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLaren IA, Corkett CJ, Zillioux EJ (1969) Temperature adaptations of copepod eggs from the Arctic to the tropics. Biol Bull 137:486–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metz C (1995) seasonal variation in the distribution and abundance of Oithona and Oncaea species (Copepoda, Crustacea) in the southeastern Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biol 15:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metz C (1996) Life strategies of dominant Antarctic Oithonidae (Cyclopoida, Copepoda) and Oncaeidae (Poecliostomatoida, Copepoda) in the Bellinghausen Sea. Ber Polarforsch 207:123Google Scholar
  27. Møller EF, Nielsen TG, Richardson K (2006) The zooplankton community in the Greenland Sea: composition and role in carbon turnover. Deep Sea Res I 53:76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielsen TG, Sabatini M (1996) Role of cyclopoid copepods Oithona spp. in North Sea plankton communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 139:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen TG, Møller EF, Satapoomin S, Ringuette M, Hopcroft RR (2002) Egg hatching of the cyclopoid copepod Oithona similis in arctic and temperate waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 236:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paffenhöfer GA (1993) On the ecology of marine cyclopoid copepods (Crustacea, Copepoda). J Plankton Res 15:37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sabatini M, Kiørboe T (1994) Egg production, growth and development of the cyclopod copepod Oithona similis. J Plankton Res 16:1329–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uye S-I, Sano K (1995) Seasonal reproductive biology of the small cyclopoid copepod Oithona davisae in a temperate eutrophic inlet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 118:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Uye S-I, Sano K (1998) Seasonal variations in biomass, growth rate and production rate of the small cyclopoid copepod Oithona davisae in a temperate eutrophic inlet. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations