Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 2, pp 607–616 | Cite as

Similar soft-bottom polychaete diversity in Arctic and Antarctic marine inlets

  • Maria Wlodarska-Kowalczuk
  • Jacek Sicinski
  • Slawomira Gromisz
  • Michael A. Kendall
  • Salve Dahle
Research Article

Abstract

The diversity of soft-bottom polychaete assemblages in one Antarctic (Admiralty Bay) and two Arctic (Kongsfjord and van Mijenfjord) localities was compared. The data sets included 79 (Admiralty Bay), 80 (Kongsfjord) and 44 (van Mijenfjord) samples collected with use of 0.1 m2 van Veen grab. The number of species per sample in Kongsfjord (mean 19.9 ± 8.0 SD) was higher than that in Van Mijenfjord (13.7 ± 8.3) or Admiralty Bay (15.7 ± 9.4). The differences in species numbers reflected differences in numbers of individuals in samples: 310.4 ind/0.1 m± 178.0 in Kongsfjord, 132.7 ind/0.1 m2 ± 88.7 in Van Mijenfjord and 138.9 ind/0.1 m2 ± 91.5 in Admiralty Bay. The Hurlbert diversity for 50 individuals (ES [50]) was similar at all sites: 10.7 ± 3.4 in Kongsfjord, 9.7 ± 4.2 in van Mijenfjord, 10.5 ± 4.9 in Admiralty Bay. The shape of species accumulation curves was also similar for all localities. There was no significant difference (at P < 0.05) either in the total number of species or in species richness as estimated by Chao1 and Chao2 estimators. The generic and family richness at three sites was also similar. We found no substantial differences in the distribution of species among families. At both poles Terebellidae, Ampharetidae, Maldanidae, Spionidae and Polynoidae were dominant in terms of species numbers. The similarity of infaunal polychaete diversity at the polar sites studied contrasts with the substantial differences reported for epi-megafauna. Our study suggests that the patterns of diversity of polar benthic communities are shaped by patterns of habitat heterogeneity which appears to mask any historical processes.

Keywords

Species Richness Polychaete Total Species Richness Species Accumulation Curve Latitudinal Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the participants of the R.V Oceania cruises who took part in sampling in Kongsfjord and van Mijenfjord. The sampling and analyses of samples from van Mijenfjord were conducted thanks to economical support of coal company Store Norske which is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Dr. P. E. Renaud and Prof. J. M. Weslawski for valuable discussions and comments on the paper. The study has been completed thanks to funds provided by a grant from the Committee of Scientific Research, Poland, no. PBZ-KBN-108/P04/2004. We acknowledge also the support by the MarBEF Network of Excellence “Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning” which is funded by the Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystems Programme of the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme (contract no. GOCE-CT-2003-505446). This publication is contribution number MPS-06041 of MarBEF and a contribution to the MarBEF responsive mode program ArctEco.

References

  1. Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao A (2004) Species richness estimation. In: Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, New York, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  3. Clarke A (1992) Is there a latitudinal diversity cline in the sea? Trends Ecol Evol 7:286–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke A, Crame JA (1997) Diversity, latitude and time: patterns in the shallow sea. In: Ormong RFG, Gage JD, Angel MV (eds) Marine biodiversity. patterns and processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 122–147Google Scholar
  5. Clarke A, Johnston NM (2003) Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 41:47–114Google Scholar
  6. Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 345:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727Google Scholar
  8. Cornell HV, Lawton JH (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. J Anim Ecol 61:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis MA (1972) Depth distribution of benthic polychaetes in two fiords on Ellesmere Island, N.W.T. J Fish Res Bd Canada 29:1319–1327Google Scholar
  10. Dahle S, Cochrane S, Gulliksen B, Larsen LH, Oug E, Palerud R (1997) The northern Barents Sea: geographical distribution of benthic fauna. Akvaplan-niva report no 421.93.301, Akvaplan-niva, TromsoGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahle S, Denisenko SG, Denisenko NV, Cochrane S (1998) Benthic fauna in the Pechora Sea. Sarsia 83:183–210Google Scholar
  12. Dahle S, Anisimova NA, Parerud R, Pearson TH, Matishov GG (2006) Macrobenthic fauna of the Frantz Josef land archipelago (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Dayton PK (1990) Polar Benthos. In: Smith WO (ed) Polar oceanography. Part B: Chemistry, biology and geology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 631–685Google Scholar
  14. Dayton PK, Mordida BJ, Bacon F (1994) Polar marine communities. Am Zool 34:90–99Google Scholar
  15. Dunton K (1992) Arctic biogeography: the paradox of the marine benthic fauna and flora. Trends Ecol Evol 7:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foggo A, Attrill M, Frost MT, Rowden AA (2003) Estimating marine species richness: an evaluation of six extrapolative techniques. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 248:15–26Google Scholar
  17. Gage JD, Lambshead PJD, Bishop JDD, Stuart CT, Jones NS (2004) Large-scale biodiversity pattern of Cumacea (Peracarida: Crustacea) in the deep Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277:181–196Google Scholar
  18. Gambi MC, Castelli A, Guizzardi M (1997) Polychaete populations of the shallow soft bottoms off Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica): distribution, diversity and biomass. Polar Biol 17:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray JS (2000) The measurement of marine species diversity, with an application to the benthic fauna of the Norwegian continental shelf. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 250:23–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray JS (2001) Antarctic marine benthic biodiversity in a world-wide latitudinal context. Polar Biol 24:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gulliksen B, Holte B, Jakola KJ (1985) The soft-bottom fauna in vanMijenfjord and Raudfjord, Svalbard. In: Gray J, Christiansen ME (eds) Marine biology of polar regions and effects of stress on marine organisms. Wiley, Oslo, pp 199–215Google Scholar
  22. Gutt J, Piepenburg D (2003) Scale-dependent impact on diversity of Antarctic benthos caused by grounding of icebergs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:77–83Google Scholar
  23. Gutt J, Schickan T (1998) Epibiotic relationships in the Antarctic benthos. Antarctic Sci 10:398–405Google Scholar
  24. Gutt J, Sirenko BI, Smirnov IS, Arntz WE (2004) How many macrozoobenthic species might inhabit the Antarctic shelf? Antarct Sci 16:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hop H, Pearson TH, Hegseth EN, Kovacs KM, Wiencke C, Kwasniewski S, Eiane K, Mehlum F, Gulliksen B, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M, Lydersen C, Weslawski JM, Cochrane S, Gabrielsen GW, Leakey R, Lonne OJ, Zajaczkowski M, Falk-Petersen S, Kendall MA, Wängberg S-Å, Bischof K, Voronkov A, Kovaltchouk NA, Wiktor J, Poltermann M, di Prisco G, Papucci C, Gerland S (2002) The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Res 21:167–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurlbert SH (1971) The non-concept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jazdzewski K, Jurasz W, Kittel W, Presler E, Presler P, Sicinski J (1986) Abundance and biomass estimates of the benthic fauna in Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Polar Biol 6:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jazdzewski K, Weslawski JM, de Broyer C (1995) A comparison of the amphipod faunal diversity in two polar fjords: Admiralty Bay, King George Island (Antarctic) and Hornsund, Spitsbergen (Arctic). Pol Arch Hydrobiol 42:367–384Google Scholar
  29. Jorgensen LL, Pearson TH, Anisimova NA, Gulliksen B, Dahle S, Denisenko SG, Matishov GG (1999) Environmental influences on benthic fauna associations of the Kara Sea (Arctic Russia). Polar Biol 22:395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kendall MA (1994) Polychaete assemblages along a depth gradient in a Spitsbergen fjord. Mem Mus Nat Hist 162:463–470Google Scholar
  31. Kendall MA, Aschan M (1993) Latitudinal gradients in the structure of macrobenthic communities: a comparison of Arctic, temperate and tropical sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 172:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knox GA, Lowry JK (1977) A comparison between the benthos of the southern ocean and the north polar ocean with special reference to the Amphipoda and the Polychaeta. In: Dunbar MJ (ed) Polar ocean conference. McGill University, Montreal, pp 423–461Google Scholar
  33. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  34. Marzluff JM, Dial KP (1991) Life history correlates of taxonomic diversity. Ecology 72:428–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McHugh D, Fong PP (2002) Do life history traits account for diversity of polycheate annelids? Invertebr Biol 121:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piepenburg D (2005) Recent research on Arctic benthos: common notions need to be revisited. Polar Biol 28:733–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piepenburg D, Voß J, Gutt J (1997) Assemblages of sea stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) and brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in the Weddell Sea (antarctica) and off Northeast Greenland (Arctic): a comparison of diversity and abundance. Polar Biol 17:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ragua-Gil J, Gutt J, Clarke A, Arntz WE (2004) Antarctic shallow-water mega-epibenthos: shaped by circumpolar dispersion or local conditions? Mar Biol 144:829–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rakusa-Suszczewski S (1993) The maritime Antarctic coastal ecosystem of Admiralty Bay. Department of Antarctic Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  40. Renaud PE, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M, Trannum H, Holte B, Weslawski JM, Covhrane S, Dahle S, Gulliksen B (2006) Multidecadal stability of benthic community structure in a high-Arctic glacial fjord (van Mijenfjord, Spitsbergen). Polar Biol. DOI 10.1007/s00300-006-0183-9Google Scholar
  41. Rex MA, Stuart CT, Hessler RR, Allen JA, Sanders HL, Wilson GDF (1993) Global-scale latitudinal patterns of species diversity in the deep-sea benthos. Nature 365:636–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson MD, Hedgepth JW (1977) Antarctic soft-bottom, macrobenthic community adaptations to a cold, stable, highly productive glacially affected environment. In: Llano A (ed) Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems. Proceedings of the third SCAR symposium on Antarctic biology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, pp 181–196Google Scholar
  43. Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235:167–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. San Martin G, Parapar J, Garcia FJ, Redondo MS (2000) Quantitative analyses of soft bottom infaunal macrobenthic polychaetes from South Shetland Islands (Antarctica). Bull Mar Sci 67:83–102Google Scholar
  46. Schmid MK, Piepenburg D (1993) The benthos zonation of the Disko Fjord, West Greenland. Meddr Grønland 37:1–21Google Scholar
  47. Sicinski J (2000) Polychaeta (Annelida) of Admiralty Bay: species richness, diversity and abundance. Pol Polar Res 21:153–169Google Scholar
  48. Sicinski J, Janowska E (1993) Polychaetes of the shallow sublittoral of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Antarctic Sci 5:161–167Google Scholar
  49. Sirenko BI (2001) List of species of free-living invertebrates of Eurasian Arctic seas and adjacent waters. Explor Fauna Seas 51:1–131Google Scholar
  50. Starmans A, Gutt J (2003) Mega-epibenthic diversity: a polar comparison. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 225:45–52Google Scholar
  51. Svendsen H, Beszczynska-Moller A, Hagen JO, Lefauconnier B, Tverberg V, Gerland S, Orbaek JB, Bischof K, Papucci C, Zajaczkowski M, Azzolini R, Bruland O, Wiencke C, Winther JG, Dallmann W (2002) The physical environment of Kongsfjorden–Krossfjorden, an Arctic fjord system in Svalbard. Polar Res 21:133–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thorson G (1957) Bottom Communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). In: Hedgepth, JW (ed) Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. Mem Geol Soc Am 1:461–534Google Scholar
  53. Warwick RM, Dashfield SL, Somerfield PJ (2006) The integral structure of a benthic infaunal assemblage. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 330:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whittaker R (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Witman JD, Etter RJ, Smith F (2004) The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15664–15669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wlodarska-Kowalczuk M, Pearson TH (2004) Soft-bottom macrobenthic faunal associations and factors affecting species distributions in an Arctic glacial fjord (Kongsfjord, Spitsbergen). Polar Biol 27:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Wlodarska-Kowalczuk
    • 1
  • Jacek Sicinski
    • 2
  • Slawomira Gromisz
    • 3
  • Michael A. Kendall
    • 4
  • Salve Dahle
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Oceanology PASSopotPoland
  2. 2.Department of Polar Biology and OceanologyUniversity of LodzLodzPoland
  3. 3.Sea Fisheries InstituteGdyniaPoland
  4. 4.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthUK
  5. 5.Akvaplan-niva ASPolar Environment CentreTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations