Marine Biology

, Volume 149, Issue 6, pp 1577–1583 | Cite as

Latitudinal patterns of diversity and abundance in North Atlantic intertidal boulder-fields

  • P. KuklinskiEmail author
  • D. K. A. Barnes
  • P. D. Taylor
Research Article


In order to study taxon richness, biodiversity and abundance patterns in the North Atlantic from temperate latitudes through Arctic to high Arctic latitudes, we recorded the faunas (at ELWS level) colonizing 20 cobbles from three sites at each of seven boulder-field localities (south-west England, 50°N; Wales, 51°N; west Scotland, 56°N; Iceland, 64°N; Tromsø, 70°N; Svalbard, 77°N, 79°N). Inverse correlations were found between latitude and all measures of richness (species, orders, and phyla numbers) and biodiversity (S–W, P). However, these correlations were driven mostly by the consistently impoverished Arctic sites; an even cline of decreasing diversity from south to north did not exist. Multidimensional scaling revealed two communities, temperate–subarctic species-rich and high arctic species-poor. Evenness as measured by Pielou’s index was similar across all latitudes. Abundance data exhibited a similar trend to the species richness and diversity data with a significant negative correlation with latitude, but when Arctic data were excluded the correlation vanished.


Cobble Taxon Richness Latitudinal Cline Local Species Richness Regional Species Pool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank several people without whom this study would not have been possible: Jan Marcin Weslawski, Wojtek Walkusz, Kit Kovac, Haakon Hop, Joanne Porter and Adam Hughes. We also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for comments leading to an improved manuscript. The study has been completed thanks to the financial support to one of us (PK) from the EU Marie Curie programme BRYOARC.


  1. Allen AP, Brown JH, Gillooly JF (2002) Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science 297:1545–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arntz WE, Brey T, Gallardo AV (1994) Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanogr Mar Biol 32:241–304Google Scholar
  3. Barnes DKA (1999) The influence of ice on polar near shore benthos. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes DKA (2002) Polarization of competition increases with latitude. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2061–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes DKA (2005) Changing chain: past, present and future of the Scotia Arc’s and Antarctica’s shallow benthic communities. Sci Mar 69:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes DKA, Brockington S (2003) Zoobenthic biodiversity, biomass and abundance at Adelaide Island, Antarctica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 249:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes DKA, Kuklinski P (2003) High polar spatial competition: extreme hierarchies at extreme latitude. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 259:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschi EE (2000) Biodiversity of marine decapod brachyurans of the Americas. J Crustacean Biol 20:337–342Google Scholar
  9. Brattegard T, Holthe T (1997) Distribution of marine, benthic macro-organisms in Norway. A tabulated catalogue. Preliminary edition. Research report No. 1991–1 Directorate for nature management, Trondheim, Norway, pp 409Google Scholar
  10. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown KM, Fraser KPP, Barnes DKA, Peck LS (2004) Links between the structure of an Antarctic shallow-water community and ice-scour frequency. Oecologia 141:121–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke A (1992) Is there a latitudinal diversity cline in the sea? Trends Ecol Evol 7:286–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial, Plymouth:PRIMER—EGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke A, Lidgard S (2000) Spatial patterns of diversity in the sea: bryozoan species richness in the North Atlantic. J Anim Ecol 69:799–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conlan KE, Lenihan HS, Kvitek RG, Oliver JS (1998) Ice scour disturbance to benthic communities in the Canadian high Arctic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornell HV, Karlson RH (1996) Species richness of reef-building corals determined by local and regional processes. J Anim Ecol 65:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crame JA (2000) Evolution of taxonomic diversity gradients in the marine realm: evidence from the composition of recent bivalve faunas. Paleobiology 26:188–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dauvin JC, Kendall M, Paterson G, Gentil F, Jirkov I, Sheader M, de Lange M (1994) An initial assessment of polychaete diversity in the Northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Biodivers Lett 2:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dayton PK (1990) Polar benthos. In: Smith WO (ed) Polar oceanography, Academic, London, pp 6 31–685Google Scholar
  20. Dunton KH (1992) Arctic biogeography: the paradox of the marine benthic fauna and flora. Trends Ecol Evol 7:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellingsen KE, Gray JS (2002) Spatial patterns of benthic diversity: is there a latitudinal gradient along the Norwegian continental shelf? J Anim Ecol 71:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Pattern and process in macroecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Giangrande A, Licciano M (2004) Factors influencing latitudinal pattern of biodiversity: an example using Sabellidae (Annelida, Polychaeta). Biodivers Conserv 13:1633–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray JS (2001) Antarctic marine benthic biodiversity in a world-wide latitudinal context. Polar Biol 24:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gulliksen B, Palerud R, Brattegaard T, Sneli J (1999) Distribution of marine benthic macroorganisms at Svalbard (including Bear Island) and Jan Mayen. Research report for DN 1999 4. Directorate for nature management, Trondheim, pp 148Google Scholar
  26. Gutt J (2001) On the direct impact of ice on marine benthic communities, a review. Polar Biol 24:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaufmann DM, Willig MR (1998) Latitudinal patterns of mammalian species richness in the New World: the effects of sampling method and faunal group. J Biogeogr25:795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kendall MA, Aschan M (1993) Latitudinal gradients in the structure of macrobenthic communities: a comparison of Arctic, temperate and tropical sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 172:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klopfer PH, MacArthur RH (1960) Niche size and faunal diversity. Amer Nat 94:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuklinski P, Barnes DKA (2005) Bryodiversity on coastal boulders at Spitsbergen. In: Moyano J, Cancino J, Wase-Jackson PN (eds) Bryozoan studies 2004. Balkema, Abingdon, pp 161–172Google Scholar
  31. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradient in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 910:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rex MA, Etter RJ, Stuart CT (1997) Large-scale patterns of species diversity in the deep-sea benthos. In: Ormond RFG, Gage JD, Angel MV (eds) Marine biodiversity. Patterns and processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94–121Google Scholar
  34. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine JW, Rosenberg G (1998) Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3699–3702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Santelices B, Marquet PA (1998) Seaweeds, latitudinal diversity patterns, and the rapoport’s rule. Divers Distrib 4:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sousa WP (1979) Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60:1225–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stehli FG, Wells JW (1971) Diversity and age patterns in hermatypic corals. Syst Zool 20:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor JD, Taylor CN (1977) Latitudinal distribution of predatory gastropods on the eastern Atlantic shelf. J Biogeogr 4:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Valdovinos C, Navarrete SA, Marquet PA (2003) Mollusk species diversity in the Southeastern Pacific: why are there more species towards the pole? Ecography 26:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsh JA (1996) No second chances? New perspectives on biotic interactions in post-palaeozoic brachiopod history. In: Cooper P, Jin J (eds) Brachiopods. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 281–288Google Scholar
  42. Weslawski JM, Wiktor J, Zajaczkowski M, Swerpel S (1993) Intertidal zone of Svalbard 1. Macroorganism distribution and biomass. Polar Biol 13:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:273–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Witman JD, Etter RJ, Smith F (2004) The relationship between regional and local species diversity in marine benthic communities: a global perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15644–15669CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kuklinski
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. K. A. Barnes
    • 3
  • P. D. Taylor
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Oceanology Polish Academy of SciencesSopotPoland
  2. 2.Natural History MuseumLondonUK
  3. 3.British Antarctic Survey N.E.R.CCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations