Marine Biology

, Volume 149, Issue 5, pp 1093–1101 | Cite as

Influence of contrasting larval developmental types upon the population-genetic structure of cheilostome bryozoans

Research Article

Abstract

For many sedentary or sessile benthic marine invertebrates the planktonic duration of the larval stage is believed to be a key determinant of the magnitude of genetic differences between populations. An obvious dichotomy in dispersal potential exists within cheilostome bryozoans that develop from either (1) a cyphonautes larva that spends several weeks in the plankton or (2) a brooded coronate larva that settles soon after release from the adult colony. This study characterises the pattern of variation at allozyme loci among British populations of four species of bryozoan—two species with cyphonautes and two with coronate larvae. There is some variation in the estimates of genetic differentiation among similarly separated populations that may be a consequence of non-equilibrium genetic conditions arising from sporadic migration, possibly through dispersal by rafting on macroalgae by mature colonies. Despite this, however, both the level of genetic differentiation between populations and the pattern of migrant exchange correlate with the larval developmental mode. Bryozoan species that brood coronate larvae show higher levels of genetic heterogeneity between populations and significant isolation by distance genetic structure while, by contrast, distance has little or no effect upon the amount of genetic differentiation among populations of bryozoans with cyphonautes larvae. For cheilostome bryozoans, therefore, it appears that genetic differentiation between populations is directly associated with the type of larval development. These data are discussed also with respect to levels of gene diversity and the geological pattern of cheilostome bryozoan species diversity.

References

  1. Allcock AL, Brierly AS, Thorpe JP, Rodhouse PG (1997) Restricted gene flow and evolutionary divergence between geographically separated populations of the Antarctic octopus Pareledone turqueti. Mar Biol 129:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anil AC, Venkat K, Sawant SS, Dileepkumar M, Dhargalkar VK, Ramaiah N, Harkantra SN, Ansari ZA (2002) Marine bioinvasion: concern for ecology and shipping. Curr Sci 83:214–218Google Scholar
  3. Barnes DKA, Milner P (2005) Drifting plastic and its consequences for sessile organism dispersal in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 146:815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74:21–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton RS (1983) Protein polymorphisms and genetic differentiation of marine invertebrate populations. Mar Biol Lett 4:193–206Google Scholar
  6. Burnett WJ, Benzie JAH, Beardmore JA, Ryland JS (1994) High genetic variability and patchiness in a common Great Barrier Reef zoanthid (Palythoa caesia). Mar Biol 121:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JT, Hodder J (1995) Biogeography and dispersal of coastal marine organisms: experimental studies on a replica of a 16th-century sailing vessel. Mar Biol 121:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman AS, Scheibling RE, Chapman ARO (2002) Species introductions and changes in marine vegetation of Atlantic Canada. In: Claudi R, Nantel P, Muckle-Jeffs E (eds) Alien invasive species in Canada’s waters, wetlands and forests. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, pp 133–148Google Scholar
  10. Colson I, Hughes RN (2004) Rapid recovery o genetic diversity of dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus L.) populations after local extinction and recolonization contradicts predictions from life-history characteristics. Mol Ecol 13:2223–2233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craddock C, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1997) Patterns of dispersal and larval development of archaeogastropod limpets at hydrothermal vents in the eastern Pacific. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 210:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crisp DJ (1978) Genetic consequences of different reproductive strategies in marine invertebrates. In: Battaglia B, Beardmore JA (eds) Marine organisms: genetics, ecology and evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp 257–273Google Scholar
  13. Edmands S, Potts DC (1997) Population genetic structure in brooding sea anemones (Epiactis spp.) with contrasting reproductive modes. Mar Biol 127:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) An introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., HarlowGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilpin M (1991) The genetic effective size of a metapopulation. Biol J Linn Soc 42:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldson AJ, Hughes RN, Gliddon CJ (2001) Population genetic consequences of larval dispersal mode and hydrography: a case study with bryozoans. Mar Biol 138:1037–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goudet J (1994) FSTAT, a program for IBM PC compatibles to calculate Weir and Cockerham’s (1984) estimators of F-statistics. (version 1.2). Bangor University, privately distributedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant WS, Lang M (1991) Mode of larval development and genetic population structure in Nodolittorina africana knysnaensis (Prosobranchia: Littorinidae). Mar Biol 109:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant WS, ds Silva-Tatley FM (1997) Lack of genetically-subdivided population structure in Bullia digitalis, a southern African marine gastropod with lecithotrophic development. Mar Biol 129:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayward PJ, Ryland JS (1979) British ascophoran bryozoans. In: Kermack DM, Barnes RSK (eds) Synopses of the British Fauna, new series. Plenum Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hedgecock D (1986) Is gene flow from pelagic larval dispersal important in the adaptation and evolution and evolution of marine invertebrates? Bull Mar Sci 39:550–564Google Scholar
  24. Hellberg ME (1994) Relationships between inferred levels of gene-flow and geographic distance in a philopatric coral, Ballanophyllia elegans. Evolution 48:1829–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hellberg ME (1995) Stepping-stone gene flow in the solitary coral Ballanophyllia elegans: equilibrium and nonequilibrium at different spatial scales. Mar Biol 123:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hellberg ME (1996) Dependence of gene flow on geographic distance in two solitary corals with different larval dispersal capabilities. Evolution 50:1167–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Highsmith RC (1985) Floating and algal rafting as potential dispersal mechanisms in brooding invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 25:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hilbish TJ (1996) Population genetics of marine species: the interaction of natural selection and historically differentiated populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoare K, Hughes RN, Goldson AJ (1999) Molecular genetic evidence for the prevalence of outcrossing in the hermaphroditic brooding bryozoan Celleporella hyalina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoskin MG (1997) Effects of contrasting modes of larval development on the genetic structures of populations of three species of prosobranch gastropods. Mar Biol 127:647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt A (1993) Effects of contrasting patterns of larval dispersal on the genetic connectedness of local populations of two intertidal starfish, Patiriella calcar and P. exigua. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingólfsson A (1995) Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and a means of dispersal for shore fauna. Mar Biol 122:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jablonski D (1986) Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bull Mar Sci 39:565–587Google Scholar
  35. Jablonski D, Lutz RA (1983) Larval ecology of marine invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biol Rev 58:21–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jablonski D, Roy K (2004) Geographical range and speciation in fossil and living molluscs. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 270:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Janson K (1987) Allozyme and shell variation in two marine snails (Littorina, Prosobranchia) with different dispersal abilities. Bio J Linn Soc 30:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johannesson K (1988) The paradox of Rockall: why is a brooding gastropod (Littorina saxatilis) more widespread than one having a planktonic larval dispersal stage (L. littorea)? Mar Biol 99:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johannesson K, Tatarenkov A (1997) Allozyme variation in a snail (Littorina saxatilis)—deconfounding the effects of microhabitat and gene flow. Evolution 51:402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson MS, Black R (1996) Geographic cohesiveness versus associations with habitat: genetic subdivision of Bembicium vittatum Phillipi (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in the Houtman Abrolhos Islands. Bio J Linn Soc 58:57–74Google Scholar
  41. Keough MJ, Chernoff H (1987) Dispersal and population variation in the bryozoan Bugula neritina. Ecology 68:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimura M, Weiss GH (1964) The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49:561–576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyle CJ, Boulding EG (2000) Comparative population genetic structure of marine gastropods (Littorina spp.) with and without pelagic larval dispersal. Mar Biol 137:835–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lavery S, Moritz C, Fielder DR (1995) Changing patterns of population structure and gene flow at different spatial scales in Birgus latro (the coconut crab). Heredity 74:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Malécot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l’hérédité. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. Marko PB (2004) ‘What’s larvae got to do with it?’ Disparate patterns of post-glacial population structure in two benthic marine gastropods with identical dispersal potential. Mol Ecol 13:597–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McKinney FK, Jackson JBC (1991) Bryozoan evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy RW, Sites JW Jr, Buth DG, Haufler CH (1990) Proteins I: isozyme electrophoresis. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, pp 45–126Google Scholar
  49. Nishida M, Lucas JS (1988) Genetic differences between geographic populations of the Crown-of-thorns starfish throughout the Pacific region. Mar Biol 98:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter JS, Ryland JS, Carvalho GR (2002) Micro- and macrogeographic genetic structure in bryozoans with different larval strategies. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 272:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP, Version 1.2. Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicisms. J Hered 86:249–249Google Scholar
  53. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryland JS (1970) Bryozoans. Hutchinson University Library, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryland JS, Hayward PJ (1977) British anascan bryozoans. In: Kermack DM, Barnes RSK (eds) Synopses of the British Fauna, new series. Plenum Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheltema RS (1978) On the relationship between dispersal of pelagic veliger larvae and the evolution of marine prosobranch gastropods. In: Battaglia B, Beardmore JA (eds) Marine organisms: genetics, ecology and evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp 303–322Google Scholar
  58. Schopf TJM (1973) Population genetics of Ectroprocts: In: Larwood GP (ed) Living and fossil Bryozoa. Academic, London, pp 585–592Google Scholar
  59. Schopf TJM (1977) Population genetics of bryozoans. In: Woollacott RM, Zimmer RL (eds) Biology of bryozoans. Academic, New York, pp 459–486Google Scholar
  60. Schwaninger HR (1999) Population structure of the widely dispersing marine bryozoan Membranipora membranacea (Cheilostomata): implications for population history, biogeography and taxonomy. Mar Biol 135:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shaw PW, Arkhipkin AI, Al-Khairulla H (2004) Genetic structuring of Patagonian toothfish populations in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean: the effect of the Antarctic Polar Front and deep-water troughs as barriers to genetic exchange. Mol Ecol 13:3293–3303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shapiro DF (1992) Intercolony coordination of zooid behaviour and a new class of pore plates in a marine bryozoan. Bil Bull 182:221–230Google Scholar
  63. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stevens LM, Gregory MR, Foster BA (1996) Fouling Bryozoa on pelagic and moored plastics from northern New Zealand. In: Gordon DP, Smith AM, Grant-Mackie JA (eds) Bryozoans in space and time. NIWA, Wellington, pp 321–340Google Scholar
  65. Tatarenkov A, Johannesson K (1994) Habitat related allozyme variation on a microgeographic scale in a marine snail Littorina mariae (Prosobranchia, Littorinacea). Biol J Linn Soc 53:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taylor PD (1988) Major radiation of cheilostome bryozoans: triggered by the evolution of a new larval type? Hist Biol 1:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor PD (1994) An early cheilostome bryozoan from the Upper Jurassic of Yemen. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen 191:331–344Google Scholar
  68. Watts PC, Thorpe JP, Taylor PD (1998) Natural and anthropogenic dispersal mechanisms in the marine environment: a study using cheilostome Bryozoa. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 16:97–159Google Scholar
  72. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eug 15:323–354Google Scholar
  73. Yoshioka PM (1982) Role of planktonic and benthic factors in the population dynamics of the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. Ecology 63:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine and Freshwater Biology Research Group, The Biosciences Building, School of Biological SciencesLiverpool UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Liverpool, Port Erin Marine LaboratoryPort ErinUK

Personalised recommendations