Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 411–420 | Cite as

Phylogenetic relationships within Ovulidae (Gastropoda: Cypraeoidea) based on molecular data from the 16S rRNA gene

  • S. Schiaparelli
  • M. Barucca
  • E. Olmo
  • M. Boyer
  • A. Canapa
Research Article

Abstract

Closely interacting groups, such as hosts and parasites, sometimes provide useful models to study evolution and adaptive processes. In Ovulidae, a widespread family of specialised browsing carnivorous molluscs that feed on polyps and tissues of Anthozoa, close association with the host has produced a plethora of adaptations affecting shell morphology, colour pattern and mantle shape. These morphological characters have been widely used in ovulid taxonomy, although putative differences are often based on trivial and inconsistent variations. In this work we used a molecular approach to generate the basal phylogeny of the family. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences of 32 species from 23 genera reveal unexpected taxonomic groupings from the genus up to the family level, as well as unexpected phenomena of homoplasy in conchological features. Since molecular phylogenies also provide an evolutionary framework where character transformations are polarised, we used this basal ovulid phylogeny to explore the specificity of the association and the degree of morphological adaptation to the host.

Keywords

Colour Pattern Soft Coral Shell Morphology Black Coral Extinct Taxon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Franci for her kind assistance in the field and in the laboratory; Celebes Divers, the Biodiversity Program, LIPI (Indonesian Institute for Science), and Prof. Berhimpon for providing assistance and facilities during the expeditions; D. Moreno Lapreave and C. Cerrano kindly provided ovulid pictures. We thank M. Oliverio, C. Meyer and an anonymous reviewer for comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. We declare that the experiments we performed comply with the current laws of Italy. This study was financed by grant from the Italian Ministero degli Affari Esteri.

Supplementary material

supp.pdf (7.2 mb)
(PDF 7.3 MB)

References

  1. Allan J (ed) (1956) Cowry shells of world seas. Georgian House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang HP, Newmann LJ (1998) Warning colouration in pseudocerotid flatworms (Platyhelminthes, Polycladida). A preliminary study. Hydrobiologia 383:29–33Google Scholar
  3. Berntson EA, Bayer FM, McArthur AG, France SC (2001) Phylogenetic relationships within the Octocorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) based on nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mar Biol 138:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertsch H (1984) Jenneria pustulata, the pustulate ‘cowrie’. Opisthobranch 16:10Google Scholar
  5. Briggs JC (ed) (1974) Marine zoogeography. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Cate CN (1973a) A systematic revision of the recent cypraeid family Ovulidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Veliger 15:1–116Google Scholar
  7. Cate CN (1973b) The Ovulidae: replacement names for four ovulid homonyms. Veliger 16:238–239Google Scholar
  8. D’Asaro CN (1969) The egg capsules of Jenneria pustulata (Lightfoot, 1786) with notes on spawning in the laboratory. Veliger 11:182–184Google Scholar
  9. Debelius H (ed) (1996) Nudibranchs and sea snails. Indo-Pacific field guide. IKAN Unterwasserarchiv, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  10. DeSalle R, Wray C, Absher R (1994) Computational problems in molecular systematics. In: Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, Desalle R (eds) Molecular ecology and evolution: approaches and applications. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 353–370Google Scholar
  11. Dolin L, Ledon D (2002) Noveaux taxons et discussion de la systematique des genres correspondants d’Ovulidae (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda) de l’Éocène inférieur de Gan (France). Geodiversitas 24:329–347Google Scholar
  12. Dolin L, Lozouet P (2004) Nouvelles espèces de gastéropodes (Mollusca: Gastropoda) de l’Ologocène et du Miocène Inférieur de l’Aquitaine (Sud-Ouest de la France), Partie 3. Cypraeidae et Ovulidae. Cossmanniana 4:1–164Google Scholar
  13. Fabricius K, Alderslade P (eds) (2001) Soft corals and sea fans: a comprehensive guide to the tropical shallow-water genera of the Central-West Pacific, the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehse D (2001) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ovulidae (Mollusca: Cypraeoidea). VIII. Einleitung zur Familie sowie Katalog, Taxonomie und Bibliographie und Bemerkungen zu verwandten Gruppen. Acta Conchyliorum 5:1–51Google Scholar
  15. France SC, Rosel PE, Agenbroad JE, Mullineaux LS, Kocher TD (1996) DNA sequence variation of mitochondrial large-subunit rRNA provides support for a two-subclass organization of the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5:15–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gagliardo A, Guilford T (1993) Why do aposematic prey live gregariously? Proc R Soc Lond 251:69–74Google Scholar
  17. Gerhart DJ (1986) Gregariousness in the gorgonian-eating gastropod Cyphoma gibbosum: tests of several possible causes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:255–263Google Scholar
  18. Giribet G, Wheeler WC (1999) On gaps. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13:132–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ (1997) Consistency, characters and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:320–330Google Scholar
  20. Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ (1998) Homoplasy in molecular versus morphological data: the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. In: Givnish TJ, Sytisma KJ (eds) Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–101Google Scholar
  21. Gosliner TM, Behrens DW (1989) Special resemblance, aposematic coloration and mimicry in opisthobranch gastropods. In: Wicksten M (ed) Symposium on the Adaptive Significance of Color in Invertebrates. Sponsored by American Society of Zoologists, Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  22. Gosliner TM, Liltved WR (1985) Aspects of the morphology of the endemic South African Cypraeidae with a discussion of the evolution of the Cypraeacea and Lamellariacea. Ann S Afr Mus 96:67–122Google Scholar
  23. Gosliner TM, Behrens DW, Williams GC (eds) (1996) Coral reef animals of the Indo-Pacific. Animal life from Africa to Hawaii’ exclusive of the vertebrates. Sea Challengers, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  24. Habe T (1955) Notes on Pedicularia (Pediculariona) stylasteris Hedley var. Venus 18:157–160Google Scholar
  25. Harvell CD, Suchanek TH (1987) Partial predation on tropical gorgonians by Cyphoma gibbosum (Gastropoda). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38:37–44Google Scholar
  26. Hsü KJ (1986) Unresolved problem concerning the Messinian salinity crisis. J Geol 47:203–212Google Scholar
  27. Johnson KP, Drown DM, Clayton DH (2001) A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis. Zool Scr 30:79–87Google Scholar
  28. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, New York, pp 21–132Google Scholar
  29. Kerstitch A (ed) (1989) Sea of Cortez marine invertebrates. Sea Challengers, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight A, Mindell DP (1993) Substitution bias weighting of DNA sequence evolution and the phylogenetic position of Fea’s viper. Syst Biol 42:18–31Google Scholar
  32. Knowlton N (1986) Cryptic and sibling species among the decapod Crustacea. J Crustac Biol 6:356–363Google Scholar
  33. Knowlton N (1993) Sibling species in the sea. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:189–216Google Scholar
  34. Knowlton N, Jackson BC (1994) New taxonomy and niche partitioning on coral reefs: Jack of all trades or master of some? Trends Ecol Evol 9:7–9Google Scholar
  35. Liltved WR (ed) (2000) Cowries and their relatives of southern Africa, 2nd edn. Seacomber Publications, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  36. Mase K (1989) Taxonomic significance of color patterning of the soft body in the family Ovulidae, description of soft body of 26 species. Venus 1:75–120Google Scholar
  37. Merlaita S, Kaitala V (2002) Community structure and the evolution of aposematic coloration. Ecol Lett 5:495–501Google Scholar
  38. Meyer CP (2003) Molecular systematic of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification patterns in the tropics. Biol J Linn Soc 79:401–459Google Scholar
  39. Meyer CP (2004) Toward comprehensiveness: increased molecular sampling within Cypraeidae and its phylogenetic implications. Malacologia 46:127–156Google Scholar
  40. Mindell DP, Honeycutt RL (1990) Ribosomal RNA in vertebrates: evolution and phylogenetic applications. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:541–566Google Scholar
  41. Morton B (ed) (1988) Partnerships in the sea: Hong Kong’s marine symbioses. Hong Kong University Press, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  42. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J (2003) Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evol Dev 5:269–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. New TR (1999) Descriptive taxonomy as a facilitating discipline in invertebrate conservation. In: Ponder W, Lunney D (eds) The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 154–158Google Scholar
  44. Nishiguchi MK (2002) The use of physiological data to corroborate cospeciation events in symbiosis. In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W (eds) Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 237–245Google Scholar
  45. Okutani T (ed) (2000) Marine molluscs in Japan. Tokai University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  46. Oliverio M, Villa R (1995) Familia Ovulidae. Enumeratio moluscorum maris nostri. Assoc Malacol Int 469:1–9Google Scholar
  47. Oliverio M, Villa R (1998) Notes on the Ovulidae of Canary Islands (Prosobranchia, Eratoidea). Argonauta 11:49–58Google Scholar
  48. Oliverio M, Chemello R, Taviani M (1995) Host association and external morphology of Dentiovula dorsuosa from the Red Sea (Prosobranchia, Caenogastropoda, Ovulidae). Argonauta 9:23–30Google Scholar
  49. Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G (eds) (1991) The simple fool’s guide to PCR. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips A, Janies D, Wheeler W (2000) Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 16:317–330Google Scholar
  51. Posada D, Crandall K A (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Robertson R (1970) Review of the predators and parasites of stony corals, with special reference to symbiotic prosobranch gastropods. Pac Sci 14:43–54Google Scholar
  53. Rosenberg G (1989) Aposematism evolves by individual selection: evidence from marine gastropods with pelagic larvae. Evolution 43:1811–1813Google Scholar
  54. Rosenberg G (1992) An introduction to the Ovulidae (Gastropoda: Cypraeacea). Am Conchologist 20:4–7Google Scholar
  55. Rowe C, Guilford T (2000) Aposematism: to be red or dead. Trends Ecol Evol 15:261–262Google Scholar
  56. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sánchez JA, Lasker HR, Taylor DJ (2003a) Phylogenetic analyses among octocorals (Cnidaria): mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences (lsu-rRNA, 16S and ssu-rRNA, 18S) support two convergent clades of branching gorgonians. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:31–42Google Scholar
  58. Sánchez JA, McFadden CS, France SC, Lasker HR (2003b) Molecular phylogenetic analyses of shallow-water Caribbean octocorals. Mar Biol 142:975–987Google Scholar
  59. Schilder FA (1932) Cypraeacea. In: Quenstedt K (ed) Fossilium catalogues. I. Animalia. Junk, Berlin, pp 1–276Google Scholar
  60. Schilder M, Schilder FA (1971) A catalogue of living and fossil cowries. Taxonomy and bibliography of Triviacea and Cypraeacea, Gastropoda Prosobranchia. Mem Inst R Sci Nat Belg 85:170–246Google Scholar
  61. Song J-I, Won JH (1997) Systematic relationship of the anthozoan orders based on the partial nuclear 18S rDNA sequences. Korean J Biol Sci 1:43–52Google Scholar
  62. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., USAGoogle Scholar
  63. Tajima F, Nei M (1984) Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol Biol Evol 1:269–285Google Scholar
  64. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TG (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson B (1998) Superfamily Cypraeoidea. In: Beesley PL, Ross GJB, Wells A (eds) Mollusca. The southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia, vol 5. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 780–786Google Scholar
  66. Won JH, Rho BJ, Song JI (2001) A phylogenetic study of the Anthozoa (phylum Cnidaria) based on morphological and molecular characters. Coral Reefs 20:39–50Google Scholar
  67. Yamamoto T (1973) Mollusc symbiotic with coelenterates in Japan, with special reference to Ovulidae and allied forms. In: Tokioka T, Nishimura S (eds) Recent trends in research in coelenterate biology. The 2nd international symposium on Cnidaria, Shirahama and Kushimoto, 1972. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Seto, pp 567–581Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Schiaparelli
    • 1
  • M. Barucca
    • 2
  • E. Olmo
    • 2
  • M. Boyer
    • 3
  • A. Canapa
    • 2
  1. 1.Dip.Te.Ris., Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue RisorseUniversità degli Studi di GenovaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Biologia e GeneticaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  3. 3.Biodiversity ProjectManadoIndonesia

Personalised recommendations