Feeding rates of the jellyfish Aurelia aurita on fish larvae
We quantified feeding rates of field caught Aurelia aurita feeding on yolk sac cod (Gadus morhua) larvae in a series of incubation experiments. A short-time (~1 h) functional response experiment with a wide range of prey concentrations (0.5–16 prey l−1, initial concentration) revealed that ingestion rates increased linearly over this range, such that clearance rates were similar between the different prey concentrations. This suggests that A. aurita is capable of efficiently utilizing dense prey patches. This indication was further supported by a linear increase of prey captured by A. aurita during 2.5 h of feeding at extremely high prey concentration (>200 prey l−1). Clearance rate in darkness scaled with jellyfish diameter to a power of ~1.7 for jellyfish 3.9–9.5 cm in diameter. The jellyfish did not alter their umbrella pulse frequency in response to presence of fish larvae. There were no significant differences between A. aurita feeding rates in light and darkness for yolk sac prey ages 0–7 days (at 7.5°C). Although prey vision and escape abilities of fish may develop rapidly during early larval ontogeny, these factors apparently have little impact on interactions with predators such as A. aurita during the yolk sac stage.
KeywordsClearance Rate Fish Larva Encounter Rate Gelatinous Zooplankton Prey Concentration
We thank Laurianne Gandon and Anne Goarant for catching jellyfish, Frank Midtøy for advice on rearing cod larvae and Erling Otterlei, SagaFjord Sea Farm AS (Stord, Norway) for providing cod eggs. Thomas Kiørboe kindly commented on an earlier draft. This work formed part of the EUROGEL project funded by the European Commission (EVK3-CT-2002–00074). The experiments comply with the current laws of Norway, where the experiments were performed.
- Blaxter JHS (1968) Visual thresholds and spectral sensitivity of herring larvae. J Exp Biol 48:39–53Google Scholar
- Gamble JC, Hay SJ (1989) Predation by the scyphomedusan Aurelia aurita on herring larvae in large enclosures: effects of predator size and prey starvation. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:366–375Google Scholar
- Horridge GA (1956) The nerves and muscles of medusae V. Double innervation in Scyphozoa. J Exp Biol 33:366–383Google Scholar
- Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U (1995) Diet, estimated daily food ration and predator impact by the scyphozoan jellyfishes Aurelia aurita and Cyanea capillata. In: Skjoldal HR, Hopkins C, Erikstad KE, Leinaas HP (eds) Ecology of fjords and coastal waters. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 127–145Google Scholar
- Munk P, Christensen V, Paulsen H (1986) Studies of a larval herring (Clupea harengus L.) patch in the Buchan area. II. Growth, mortality and drift of larvae. Dana 6:11–24Google Scholar
- Möller H (1980) Scyphomedusae as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Meeresforschung 28:90–100Google Scholar
- Skajaa K, Fernö A, Folkvord A (2003) Swimming, feeding and predator avoidance in cod larvae (Gadus morhua L.): tradeoffs between hunger and predation risk. In: Browman HT, Skiftesvik AB (eds) The big fish Bang. Proceedings of the 26th annual larval fish conference. Institute of Marine Research, pp 105–121Google Scholar