Marine Biology

, Volume 148, Issue 5, pp 1135–1141 | Cite as

Trophic strategies of garfish, Arrhamphus sclerolepis, in natural coastal wetlands and artificial urban waterways

Research Article

Abstract

We used carbon stable isotope and stomach content analyses to test whether snub-nosed garfish, Arrhamphus sclerolepis (Hemiramphidae), in the extensive artificial urban waterways of southeast Queensland, Australia, rely on autotrophic sources different to those in natural wetlands. Carbon isotope values of A. sclerolepis were similar to those in previous investigations, with enriched values in natural habitat (mean = −13.9‰, SE=0.6) and depleted values (−19.1‰, 0.1) in artificial habitat. A. sclerolepis in natural habitat consumed large amounts of seagrass during the day and night, and at night also ingested small quantities of crustacean prey. In artificial habitat, A. sclerolepis consumed macroalgae during the night and switched to invertebrates (terrestrial ants) in the day. Values of δ15 N in all the fish were 3–8‰ more enriched than sources. Mathematical modelling of feasible source mixtures showed that in natural habitat the bulk of the dietary carbon is obtained from seagrass, but the nitrogen is obtained from animal prey. In artificial habitat, carbon is obtained from a mixture of macroalgae and animals. We could not determine the nitrogen sources in artificial habitat of A. sclerolepis since, even after accounting for trophic fractionation of δ15 N, the values were outside the range of potential sources. If the types of animals ingested vary over time, perhaps one or more types of animal important in the provision of nitrogen was not sampled during the study. This study demonstrates that not only does A. sclerolepis occur in both artificial and natural habitats, but it uses the same strategy of bulk herbivory with the inclusion of smaller amounts of animal prey. This understanding of how ecological processes support fisheries production in artificial habitat improves the overall understanding of the effects of urbanisation on coastal food webs.

References

  1. Blaber SJM, Blaber TG (1980) Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish. J Fish Biol 17:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunn SE, Loneragan NR, Kempster MA (1995) Effects of acid washing samples on stable isotope ratios of C and N in penaeid shrimp and seagrass: implications for food web studies using multiple stable isotopes. Limnol Oceanogr 40:622–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carseldine L, Tibbetts IR (2005) Dietary analysis of the herbivorous hemiramphid Hyporhamphorus regularis ardelio: an isotopic approach. J Fish Biol 66:1589–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen JE, Small C, Mellinger A, Gallup J, Sachs J (1997) Estimates of coastal populations. Science 278:1211–1212Google Scholar
  5. Connolly RM (2003) Differences in trophodynamics of commercially important fish between artificial waterways and natural coastal wetlands. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:929–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connolly RM, Hindell JS, Gorman D (2005) Seagrass and epiphytic algae support the nutrition of a fisheries species, Sillago schomburgkii, in adjacent intertidal habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 286:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaston TF, Kostoglidis A, Suthers IM (2004) The 13C, 15N and 34S signatures of a rocky reef planktivorous fish indicate different coastal discharges of sewage. Mar Freshw Res 55:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guest MA, Connolly RM, Loneragan NR (2004) Within and among-site variability in δ13C and δ15N for three estuarine producers, Sporobolus virginicus, Zostera capricorni, and epiphytes of Z. capricorni. Aquat Bot 79:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hesslein RH, Hallard KA, Ramlal P (1993) Replacement of sulfur, carbon and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C and δ15N. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2071–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jennings S, Reñones O, Morales-Nin B, Polunin NVC, Moranta J, Coll J (1997) Spatial variation in the 15N and 13C stable isotope composition of plants, invertebrates and fishes on Mediterranean reefs: implications for the study of trophic pathways. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinch JC (1979) Trophic habits of the juvenile fishes within artificial waterways—Marco Island, Florida. Contrib Mar Sci 22:77–90Google Scholar
  12. Klumpp DW, Nichols PD (1983) Nutrition of the southern sea garfish Hyporhamphus melanochir: gut passage rate and daily consumption of two food types and assimilation of seagrass components. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 12:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCutchan J, Lewis W, Kendall C, McGrath C (2003) Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios in carbon, nitrogen and sulphur. Oikos 102:378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maxted JR, Eskin RA, Weisberg SB, Chaillou JC, Kutz FW (1997) The ecological condition of dead-end canals of the Delaware and Maryland coastal bays. Estuaries 20:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Melville AJ, Connolly RM (2003) Spatial analysis of stable isotope data to determine primary sources of nutrition for fish. Oecologia 136:499–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Odum EP (1984) The status of three ecosystem level hypotheses regarding salt marsh estuaries: tidal subsidy, outwelling and detritus based food chains. In: Kennedy VS (ed) Estuarine perspectives. Academic, New York, pp 485–495Google Scholar
  17. Oliver DL (1998) The importance of insects and lerp in the diet of juvenile regent honeyeaters, Xanthomyza phrygia: implications for the conservation of an endangered woodland bird. Wild Res 29:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC (2000) Contributions of stable isotope data to elucidating food webs of Mediterranean rocky littoral fishes. Oecologia 122:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robertson AI, Klumpp DW (1983) Feeding habits of the southern Australian garfish Hyporhamphus melanochir: a diurnal herbivore and nocturnal carnivore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rose MD, Polis GA (1998) The distribution and abundance of coyotes: the effects of allochthonous food subsidies from the sea. Ecology 79:998–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlacher TA, Wooldridge TH (1996) Origin and trophic importance of detritus: evidence from stable isotopes in benthos of a small temperate estuary. Oecologia 106:382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shattuck S (1999) Australian ants: their biology and identification. CSIRO Publishing, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  25. Szepanski MM, Ben-David M, Van Ballengerghe V (1999) Assessment of anadromous salmon resources in the diet of the Alexander Archipelago wolf using stable isotope analysis. Oecologia 120:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tibbetts IR (1991) The trophic ecology, functional morphology and phylogeny of the Hemiramphidae (Beloniformes). PhD Thesis, University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  27. Tibbetts IR (1997) The distribution and function of mucous cells and their secretions in the alimentary tract of Arrhamphus sclerolepis krefftii. J Fish Biol 50:809–820Google Scholar
  28. Vizzini S, Mazzola A (2002) Stable carbon and nitrogen ratios in the sand smelt from a Mediterranean coastal area: feeding habits and effect of season and size. J Fish Biol 60:1498–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wainright SC, Weinstein MP, Able KW, Currin CA (2000) Relative importance of benthic microalgae, phytoplankton and the detritus of smooth cordgrass Spartina alterniflora and the common reed Phragmites australis to brackish-marsh food webs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 200:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winning MA, Connolly RM, Loneragan NR, Bunn SE (1999) 15N enrichment as a method of separating the isotopic signatures of seagrass and its epiphytes for food web analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Aquatic Processes and Pollution, and School of Environmental & Applied SciencesGriffith UniversityGold Coast Mail CentreAustralia
  2. 2.Gold Coast City CouncilGold Coast Mail CentreAustralia

Personalised recommendations