Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 147, Issue 6, pp 1425–1434 | Cite as

Auditory and olfactory abilities of pre-settlement larvae and post-settlement juveniles of a coral reef damselfish (Pisces: Pomacentridae)

  • K. J. Wright
  • D. M. Higgs
  • A. J. Belanger
  • J. M. Leis
Research Article

Abstract

The propagules of most species of reef fish are advected from the reef, necessitating a return to reef habitats at the end of the pelagic stage. There is increasing evidence of active attraction to the reef but the sensory abilities of reef fish larvae have not been characterized well enough to fully identify cues. The electrophysiological methods of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and electroolfactogram (EOG) were used to investigate auditory and olfactory abilities of pre- and post-settlement stages of a damselfish, Pomacentrus nagasakiensis (Pisces, Pomacentridae). Audiograms of the two ontogenetic stages were similar. Pre-settlement larvae heard as well as their post-settlement counterparts at all but two of the tested frequencies between 100 Hz and 2,000 Hz. At 100 and 600 Hz, pre-settlement larvae had ABR thresholds 8 dB higher than those of post-settlement juveniles. Both stages were able to detect locally recorded reef sounds. Similarly, no difference in olfactory ability was found between the two ontogenetic stages. Both stages showed olfactory responses to conspecifics as well as L-alanine. Therefore, the auditory and olfactory senses have similar capabilities in both ontogenetic stages. Settlement stage larvae of P. nagasakiensis can hear and smell reef cues but it is unclear as to what extent larvae use these sounds or smells, or both, as cues for locating settlement sites.

Keywords

Coral Reef Auditory Brainstem Response Auditory Threshold Sensory Ability Olfactory Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ARC Discovery Grant (DP0345876), DST International Science Linkages Grant (IAP-IST-CG03-00442), and I. Suthers. We thank K. Poling for designing the EOG apparatus, technical advice and draft critiquing, R. Piola for laboratory assistance and draft reading, A. Hay for manuscript revisions and D. Cato for help with the tank design and acoustics. Thanks also to the staff at the Lizard Island Research station for all their assistance.

References

  1. Allen GR (1991) Damselfishes of the World. Mergus Publishers, MelleGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvedlund M, McCormick MI, Fautin DG, Bildsoe M (1999) Host recognition and possible imprinting in the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvedlund M, Neilson LE (1996) Do the anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris (Pisces: Pomacentridae) imprint themselves to their host sea anemone Heteractis magnifica (Anthozoa: Actinidae)? Ethology 102:197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atema J, Kingsford MJ, Gerlach G (2002) Larval reef fish could use odour for detection, retention and orientation to reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 241:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belanger AJ, Arbuckle WJ, Corkum LD, Gammon DB, Li W, Scott AP, Zeilinski BS (2005) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses by reproductive female round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) to odours released by conspecific males. J Fish Biol (submitted)Google Scholar
  6. Caprio J (1978) Olfaction and taste in the channel catfish: an electrophysiological study of the responses to amino acids and derivatives. J Comp Physiol A 123:357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr WES, Blumenthal KM, Netherton JC (1977) Chemoreception in the pigfish, Orthopristis chrysopterus: the contribution of amino acids and betaine to stimulation of feeding behaviour by various extracts. Comp Biochem Physiol A 58:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cato DH (1978) Marine biological choruses observed in tropical waters near Australia. J Acoust Soc Am 64:736–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corwin JT (1983) Postembryonic growth of the macula neglecta auditory detector in the ray, Raja clavata: Continual increases in hair cell number, neural convergence, and physiological sensitivity. J Comp Neurol 217:345–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Corwin JT, Bullock TH, Schweitzer J (1982) The auditory brainstem response in five vertebrate classses. Electroen Clin Neuro 54:629–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egner SA, Mann D (2005) Auditory sensitivity of sergeant major damselfish Abudefduf saxatilis from post-settlement juvenile to adult. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot J, Elliot JM, Mariscal RN (1995) Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Mar Biol 122:377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay RR, Megala Simmons A (1999) The sense of hearing in fishes and amphibians. In: Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Comparative hearing: fish and amphibians. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 269–318Google Scholar
  14. Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KA, Jesteadt W (1988) Auditory brainstem response to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res 31:87–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hara TJ (1992) Mechanisms of olfaction. In: Hara TJ (ed) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 150–170Google Scholar
  16. Higgs DM (2002) Development of the fish auditory system: how do changes in auditory structure affect function? Bioacoustics 12:180–182Google Scholar
  17. Higgs DM, Rollo AK, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2003) Development of form and function in peripheral auditory structures of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Acoust Soc Am 113:1145–1154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgs DM, Souza MJ, Wilkins HR, Presson JC, Popper AN (2002) Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:174–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishida Y, Kobayashi H (1992) Stimulatory effectiveness of amino acids on the olfactory response in an algivorous marine teleost, the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens Houttuyn. J Fish Biol 41:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwashita A, Sakamoto M, Kojima T, Watanabe Y, Soeda H (1999) Growth effects on the auditory threshold of red sea bream. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 65:833–838Google Scholar
  21. Jones GP, Milicich MJ, Emslie MJ, Lunow C (1999) Self-recruitment in a coral reef fish population. Nature 402:802–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kenyon TN (1996) Ontogenetic changes in the auditory sensitivity of damselfishes (Pomacentridae). J Comp Physiol A 179:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kenyon TN, Ladich F, Yan HY (1998) A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach. J Comp Physiol A 182:307–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leis JM (1991) The pelagic stage of reef fishes: the larval biology of coral reef fishes. In: Sale P (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic, San Diego, pp 183–230Google Scholar
  25. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (1997) In situ swimming speeds of the late pelagic larvae of some Indo-Pacific coral reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (1999) In situ swimming and settlement behaviour of larvae of an Indo-Pacific coral-reef fish, the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Pisces, Serranidae). Mar Biol 134:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (2002) In situ settlement behaviour of damselfish (Pomacentridae) larvae. J Fish Biol 61:325–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (2003) Orientation of pelagic larvae of coral-reef fishes in the ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM, Cato DH (2002) Sound detection in situ by the larvae of a coral-reef damselfish (Pomacentridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 232:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM, Hay AC, Cato DH (2003) Coral-reef sounds enable nocturnal navigation by some reef-fish larvae in some places and at some times. J Fish Biol 63:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leis JM, Lockett MM (2005) Localization of reef sounds by settlement-stage larvae of coral-reef fishes (Pomacentridae). Bull Mar Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Leis JM, McCormick MI (2002) The biology, behavior, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Sale P (ed) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  33. Leis JM, Sweatman HPA, Reader SE (1996) What the pelagic stages of coral reef fishes are doing out in blue water: daytime field observations of larval behavioural capabilities. Mar Freshwater Res 47:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mann DA, Higgs DM, Tavolga WN, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2001) Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes. Acoust Soc Am 109:3048–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCauley RD, Cato DH (2000) Patterns of fish calling in a nearshore environment in the Great Barrier Reef. Philos Tr Roy Soc Lond B 355:1289–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCormick MI, Makey L, Dufour V (2002) Comparative study of metamorphosis in tropical reef fishes. Mar Biol 141:841–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michel WC, Lubomudrov LM (1995) Specificity and sensitivity of the olfactory organ of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Comp Physiol A 177:191–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore A, Waring CP (1996) Electrophysiological and endocrinological evidence that F-series prostaglandins function as priming pheromones in mature male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) Parr. J Exp Biol 199:2307–2316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy CA, Stacey NE, Corkum LD (2001) Putative steroidal pheromones in the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus: olfactory and behavioral responses. J Chem Ecol 27:443–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Myrberg Jr AA, Fuiman LA (2002) The sensory World of coral reef fishes. In: Sale P (ed) Coral reef fishes, pp 123–148Google Scholar
  41. Myrberg Jr AA, Spires JY (1980) Hearing in damselfishes: an analysis of signal detection among closely related species. J Comp Physiol A 140:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohman MC, Munday PL, Jones GP, Julian Caley M (1998) Settlement strategies and distribution patterns of coral-reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 225:219–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popper AN (1971) The effects of size on auditory capacities of the goldfish. J Audit Res XI:239–247Google Scholar
  44. Roberts CM (1997) Connectivity and management of Caribbean Coral Reefs. Science 278:1454–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers PH, Cox M (1988) Underwater sound as a biological stimulus. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga W (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 131–150Google Scholar
  46. Saglio P, Fauconneau B (1985) Free amino acid content in the skin mucus of goldfish, Carassius auratus L.: influence of feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A 82:67–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpson SD, Meekan MG, McCauley RD, Jeffs A (2004) Attraction of settlement-stage coral reef fishes to reef noise. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 276:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sorensen PW, Scott AP, Stacey NE, Bowdin L (1995) Sulfated 17,20 beta-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one functions as a potent and specific olfactory stimulant with pheromonal actions in the goldfish. Gen Comp Endocr 100:128–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stobutzki IC, Bellwood DR (1997) Sustained swimming abilities of the late pelagic stages of coral reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 149:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stobutzki IC, Bellwood DR (1998) Nocturnal orientation to reefs by late pelagic stage coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 17:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swearer SE, Caselle JE, Lea DW, Warner RR (1999) Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish. Nature 402:799–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sweatman H (1988) Field evidence that settling coral reef fish larvae detect resident fishes using dissolved chemical cues. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 124:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor MS, Hellberg ME (2003) Genetic evidence for local retention of pelagic larvae in a Caribbean Reef Fish. Science 299:107–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tolimieri N, Haine O, Jeffs A, McCauley RD, Montgomery JC (2004) Directional orientation of pomacentrid larvae to ambient reef sound. Coral Reefs 23:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tolimieri N, Jeffs A, Montgomery JC (2000) Ambient sound as a cue for navigation by the pelagic larvae of reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Valentincic T, Kralj J, Stenovec M, Koce A, Caprio J (2000) The behavioral detection of binary mixtures of amino acids and their individual components by catfish. J Exp Biol 203:3307–3317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wysocki LE, Ladich F (2001) The ontogenetic development of auditory sensitivity, vocalization and acoustic communication in the labyrinth fish Trichopsis vittata. J Comp Phys A 187:177–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wysocki LE, Ladich F (2003) The representation of conspecific sounds in the auditory brainstem of teleost fishes. J Exp Biol 206:2229–2240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yan HY, Curtsinger WS (2000) The otic gasbladder as an ancillary auditory structure in a mormyrid fish. J Comp Physiol A 186:595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yan HY, Fine ML, Horn NS, Colon WE (2000) Variability in the role of the gasbladder in fish audition. J Comp Physiol A 186:435–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeiske E, Theisen B, Bruecker H (1992) Structure, development, and evolutionary aspects of the peripheral olfactory system. In: Hara TJ (ed) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 13–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Wright
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. M. Higgs
    • 2
  • A. J. Belanger
    • 2
  • J. M. Leis
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  3. 3.Ichthyology and Division of Aquatic ZoologyAustralian MuseumSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations