Marine Biology

, Volume 147, Issue 1, pp 243–250

Changes in morphology and physiology of an East Mediterranean sponge in different habitats

Research Article

Abstract

The sponge Tetilla sp. (Tetractinomorpha: Tetillidae) is a common species in the eastern Mediterranean. This sponge inhabits four different habitat types differing in wave impact and irradiance levels. Two of these habitats (a shallow cave and deep water) are characterized by relatively calm water, whereas the other two (shallow exposed site and tide pools) are in turbulent water with high energy flow. The present study examined the influence of physical (depth, illumination and water motion) and biotic factors on morphology, skeletal plasticity and reproductive traits among the four spatially separated populations. Sponges from tidal pools had significantly larger body volume than sponges from deep water and from shallow caves (ANOVA: tidal-deep P<0.0001; tidal-shallow caves P<0.05). Sponges from exposed habitats were significantly larger than deep-water sponges (ANOVA: P=0.01). In addition, individuals from tide pools and from the exposed habitat had a significantly higher proportion of structural silica than sponges from the calmer deep water and from the cave sites. Oxea spicules in sponges from the calm habitats were significantly shorter than in those from the tidal pools and the exposed habitats. The percentage of spicules out of a sponge’s dry weight in individuals transplanted from deep (calm) to shallow (turbulent) water significantly increased by 21.9±12.9%. The new spicule percentage did not differ significantly from that of sponges originally from shallow water. Oocyte diameter differed significantly between habitats. The maximal size of mature eggs was found in deep-water sponges in June (97±5 μm). In the shallow habitats, a smaller maximal oocyte diameter was found in the cave, in May (56.5±3 μm). Furthermore, oocyte density in shallow-water sponges was highest in May and decreased in June (with 88.2±9 and 19.3±9 oocytes mm−2, respectively). At the same time (June), oocyte density of deep-water sponges had just reached its maximum (155±33.7 oocytes mm−2). The difference in oocyte size and density between deep- and shallow-water individuals indicates an earlier gamete release in the shallow sponge population. The results suggest that plasticity in skeletal design of this sponge indicates a trade off between spicule production and investment in reproduction.

References

  1. Alvarez B, Diaz MC, Laughlin RA (1990) The sponge fauna on a fringing coral reef in Venezuela. I. Composition, distribution and abundance. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 358–366Google Scholar
  2. Babcock RC, Bull GD, Harrison PL, Heyward AJ, Oliver JK, Wallace CC, Willis BL (1986) Synchronous spawning of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 90:379–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bavestrello G, Bonito M, Sara M (1993) Influence of depth on the size of sponge spicules. Sci Mar 57:415–420Google Scholar
  4. Becerro MA, Uriz MJ, Turon X (1994) Trends in space occupation by the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe—variation in shape as a function of size and environment. Mar Biol 12:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becerro MA, Uriz MJ, Turon X (1997) Chemically-mediated interactions in benthic organisms: the chemical ecology of Crambe crambe (Porifera, Poecilosclerida). Hydrobiologia 355:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell JJ, Barnes DKA (2000) The influences of bathymetry and flow regime upon the morphology of sublittoral sponge communities. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80:707–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell JJ, Barnes DKA, Turner JR (2002) The importance of micro- and macro-morphological variation in the adaptation of a sublittoral demosponge to current extremes. Mar Biol 140:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diaz MC, Alvarez B, Laughlin RA (1990) The sponge fauna on a fringing coral reef in Venezuela. II. Community structure. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 367–375Google Scholar
  9. Doty MS (1971) Measurement of water movement in reference to benthic algal growth. Bot Mar 14:4–7Google Scholar
  10. Fan TY, Dai CF (1995) Reproductive ecology of the scleractinian coral Echinopora lamellosa in northern and southern Taiwan. Mar Biol 123:565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan TY, Dai CF (1999) Reproductive plasticity in the reef coral Echinopora lamellosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 190:297–301Google Scholar
  12. Frøhlich H, Barthel D (1997) Silica uptake of the marine sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight. Mar Biol 128:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fromont J (1994) Reproductive development and timing of tropical sponges (Order Haplosclerida) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 13:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fry WG (1970) The sponge as a population: a biometric approach. In: The biology of the Porifera. Proc Zool Soc Lond 25:135–161Google Scholar
  15. Hill MS, Hill AL (2002) Morphological plasticity in the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians: response to predators and wave energy. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 202:86–95Google Scholar
  16. Ilan M, Loya Y (1990) Sexual reproduction and settlement of the coral reef sponge Chalinula sp. from the Red Sea. Mar Biol 105:25–31Google Scholar
  17. Jokiel PL, Morrissey JI (1993) Water motion on coral reefs: evaluation of the ‘clod card’ technique. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:175–181Google Scholar
  18. Kaandorp JA (1999) Morphological analysis of growth forms of branching marine sessile organisms along environmental gradients. Mar Biol 134:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koehl MAR (1982) Mechanical design of spicule-reinforced connective tissue: stiffness. J Exp Biol 98:239–267Google Scholar
  20. Manconi R, Pronzato R (1991) Life cycle of Spongilla lacustris (Porifera, Spongillidae): a cue for environment-dependent phenotype. Hydrobiologia 220:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonald JI, Hooper JNA, McGuinness KA (2002) Environmentally influenced variability in the morphology of Cinachyrella australiensis (Carter, 1886) (Porifera: Spirophorida: Tetillidae). Mar Freshw Res 53:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meroz-Fine E, Ilan M (1995) Life history characteristics of a coral reef sponge. Mar Biol 124:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paine RT (1964) Ash and calorie determinations of sponge and opisthobranch tissues. Ecology 45:384–387Google Scholar
  24. Palumbi SR (1984) Tactics of acclimation: morphological changes of sponges in an unpredictable environment. Science 225:1478–1480Google Scholar
  25. Palumbi SR (1986) How body plans limit acclimation: responses of a demosponge to wave force. Ecology 67:208–214Google Scholar
  26. Porter ET, Sanford LP, Suttles SE (2000) Gypsum dissolution is not a universal integrator of ‘water motion’. Limnol Oceanogr 45:145–158Google Scholar
  27. Pronzato R, Dorcier M, Sidri M, Manconi R (2003) Morphotypes of Spongia officinalis (Demospongiae, Dictyoceratida) in two Mediterranean populations. Ital J Zool 70:327–332Google Scholar
  28. Sarà M (1992) Porifera. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive biology of invertebrates, vol V. Wiley-Interscience, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  29. Sier CJS, Olive PJW (1994) Reproduction and reproductive variability in the coral Pocillopora verrucosa from the Republic of Maldives. Mar Biol 118:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uriz MJ, Turon X, Becerro MA, Galera J, Lozano J (1995) Patterns of resource-allocation to somatic, defensive, and reproductive functions in the Mediterranean encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:159–170Google Scholar
  31. Wilkinson CR, Evans EA (1989) Sponge distribution across Davis Reef Great Barrier Reef relative to location, depth and water movement. Coral Reefs 8:1–7Google Scholar
  32. Witte U, Barthel D, Tendal O (1994) The reproductive cycle of the sponge Halichondria panicea Pallas (1766) and its relationship to temperature and salinity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 183:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Centre for Marine StudiesUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations