Marine Biology

, Volume 146, Issue 3, pp 531–541 | Cite as

Impacts of copepods on marine seston, and resulting effects on Calanus finmarchicus RNA:DNA ratios in mesocosm experiments

  • C. Becker
  • D. Brepohl
  • H. Feuchtmayr
  • E. Zöllner
  • F. Sommer
  • C. Clemmesen
  • U. Sommer
  • M. Boersma
Research Article

Abstract

We investigated the impact of copepods on the seston community in a mesocosm set-up, and assessed how the changes in food quantity, quality and size affected the condition of the grazers, by measuring the RNA:DNA ratios in different developmental stages of Calanus finmarchicus. Manipulated copepod densities did not affect the particulate carbon concentration in the mesocosms. On the other hand, chlorophyll a content increased with higher copepod densities, and increasing densities had a positive effect on seston food quality in the mesocosms, measured as C:N ratios and ω3:ω6 fatty acid ratios. These food quality indicators were significantly correlated to the nutritional status of C. finmarchicus. In contrast to our expectations, these results suggest a lower copepod growth potential on higher quality food. However, in concordance with earlier studies, we found that when copepods were in high densities the large particles (>1000 µm3) decreased and that the smaller particles (<1000 µm3) increased in number. These patterns were closely linked to the condition of C. finmarchicus, which were of better condition (RNA:DNA ratios) with increasing biovolumes of large particles, and, conversely, lower RNA:DNA ratios with increasing biovolumes of smaller particles. Consequentially, the selective grazing by copepods stimulated increased biovolumes of smaller plankton, and this increase was responsible for the increased food quality, in terms of C:N and ω3:ω6 ratios. Thus, we conclude that the decreasing growth potentials of C. finmarchicus were a result of a decrease of favourably sized food particles, induced by copepod grazing.

References

  1. Båmstedt U (1983) RNA concentration in zooplankton—seasonal-variation in boreal species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:291–297Google Scholar
  2. Båmstedt U, Skjoldal HR (1980) RNA concentration of zooplankton—relationship with size and growth. Limnol Oceanogr 25:304–316Google Scholar
  3. Becker C, Feuchtmayr H, Brepohl D, Santer B, Boersma M (2004) Differential impacts of copepods and cladocerans on lake seston, and resulting effects on zooplankton growth. Hydrobiologia (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bedo AW, Acuna JL, Robins D, Harris RP (1993) Grazing in the micron and the submicron particle size range—the case of Oikopleura dioica (Appendicularia). Bull Mar Sci 53:2–14Google Scholar
  5. Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B, Moldaenke C, Luring C, Meyerhofer M, Hansen UP, Dau H (2002) A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. Photosynth Res 72:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler NM, Suttle CA, Neill WE (1989) Discrimination by freshwater zooplankton between single algal cells differing in nutritional status. Oecologia 78:368–372Google Scholar
  7. Clemmesen C (1993) Improvements in the fluorometric determination of the RNA and DNA content of individual marine fish larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 100:177–183Google Scholar
  8. Clemmesen C (1994) The effect of food availability, age or size on the RNA/DNA ratio of individually measured herring larvae—laboratory calibration. Mar Biol 118:377–382Google Scholar
  9. Clemmesen C (1996) Importance and limits of RNA/DNA ratios as a measure of nutritional condition in fish larvae. In: Watanabe Y, Yamashita Y, Oozeki Y (eds) Survival strategies in early life stages of marine resources. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  10. Clemmesen C, Buehler V, Carvalho G, Case R, Evans G, Hauser L, Hutchinson WF, Kjesbu OS, Mempel H, Moksness E, Otteraa H, Paulsen H, Thorsen A, Svaasand T (2003) Variability in condition and growth of Atlantic cod larvae and juveniles reared in mesocosms: environmental and maternal effects. J Fish Biol 62:706–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowles TJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW (1988) Food selection by copepods’ discrimination on the basis of food quality. Mar Biol 100:41–50Google Scholar
  12. DeMott WR (1986) The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton. Oecologia 69:334–340Google Scholar
  13. Frangoulos M, Guisande C, Maneiro I, Riveiro I, Franco J (2000) Short-term and long-term effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum on the copepod Acartia clausi. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 203:161–169Google Scholar
  14. Frost BW (1972) Effects of size and concentration of food particles on feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol Oceanogr 17:805–815Google Scholar
  15. Frost BW (1977) Feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus in mixtures of food particles. Limnol Oceanogr 22:472–491Google Scholar
  16. Hirche HJ (1996) Diapause in the marine copepod, Calanus finmarchicus—A review. Ophelia 44:129–143Google Scholar
  17. Ianora A, Poulet SA, Miralto A (2003) The effects of diatoms on copepod reproduction: a review. Phycologia 42:351–363Google Scholar
  18. Jónasdóttir SH (1994) Effects of food quality on the reproductive success of Acartia tonsa and Acartia hudsonica: laboratory observations. Mar Biol 121:67–81Google Scholar
  19. Jónasdóttir SH, Fields D, Pantoja S (1995) Copepod egg production in Long Island Sound, USA, as a function of the chemical composition of seston. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 119:87–98Google Scholar
  20. Kaartvedt S (2000) Life history of Calanus finmarchicus in the Norwegian Sea in relation to planktivorous fish. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1819–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim SW, Onbe T, Yoon YH (1989) Feeding habits of marine cladocerans in the Inland Sea of Japan. Mar Biol 100:313–318Google Scholar
  22. Kiørboe T (1989) Phytoplankton growth rate and nitrogen content: implications for feeding and fecundity in a herbivorous copepod. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 55:229–234Google Scholar
  23. Kleppel GS, Burkart CA (1995) Egg production and the nutritional environment of Acartia tonsa: the role of food quality in copepod nutrition. ICES J Mar Sci 52:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laabir M, Poulet SA, Harris RP, Pond DW, Cueff A, Head RN, Ianora A (1998) Comparative study of the reproduction of Calanus helgolandicus in well-mixed and seasonally stratified coastal waters of the western English Channel. J Plankton Res 20:407–421Google Scholar
  25. Lopez-Urrutia A, Harris RP, Smith T (2004) Predation by calanoid copepods on the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica. Limnol Oceanogr 49:303–307Google Scholar
  26. Marker T, Andreassen P, Arashkewich E, Hansen BW (2003) Lipid deposition and sexual maturation in cohorts of Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus) originating from Bergen (60°N) and Tromsø (69°N) reared in Tromsø, Norway. Mar Biol 143:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakata K (1990) Abundance of nauplii and protein synthesis activity of adult female copepods in the Kuroshio front during the Japanese sardine spawning season. J Oceanogr Soc Jpn 46:219–229Google Scholar
  28. Nakata K, Nakano H, Kikuchi H (1994) Relationship between egg productivity and RNA/DNA ratio in Paracalanus sp. in the frontal waters of the Kuroshio. Mar Biol 119:591–596Google Scholar
  29. O’Connors HB, Small LF, Donaghay PL (1976) Particle-size modification by 2 size classes of estuarine copepod Acartia clausi. Limnol Oceanogr 21:300–308Google Scholar
  30. Olsen Y (1999) Lipids and essential fatty acids in aquatic food webs: What can freshwater ecologists learn from mariculture? In: Arts MT, Wainman BC (eds) Lipids in freshwater ecosystems. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, pp 161–202Google Scholar
  31. Paffenhöfer GA (2002) An assessment of the effects of diatoms on planktonic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:305–310Google Scholar
  32. Paffenhöfer GA, Van Sant KB (1985) The feeding response of a marine planktonic copepod to quantity and quality of particles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 27:55–65Google Scholar
  33. Richardson K, Jónasdóttir SH, Hay SJ, Christoffersen A (1999) Calanus finmarchicus egg production and food availability in the Faroe-Shetland Channel and northern North Sea: October–March. Fish Oceanogr 8:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothhaupt KO (1997) Grazing and nutrient influences of Daphnia and Eudiaptomus on phytoplankton in laboratory microcosms. J Plankton Res 19:125–139Google Scholar
  35. Saage A (2003) Populationsentwicklungen des Zooplankton in Mesokosmosexperimenten. Diplomarbeit, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  36. Saiz E, Calbet A, Fara A, Berdalet E (1998) RNA content of copepods as a tool for determining adult growth rates in the field. Limnol Oceanogr 43:465–470Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt K, Koski M, Engström-Öst J, Atkinson A (2002) Development of Baltic Sea zooplankton in the presence of a toxic cyanobacterium: a mesocosm approach. J Plankton Res 24:979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sommer F, Hansen T, Feuchtmayr H, Santer B, Tokle N, Sommer U (2003) Do calanoid copepods suppress appendicularians in the coastal ocean? J Plankton Res 25:869–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sommer U, Sommer F, Santer B, Jamieson C, Boersma M, Becker C, Hansen T (2001) Complementary impact of copepods and cladocerans on phytoplankton. Ecol Lett 4:545–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sommer U, Sommer F, Santer B, Zöllner E, Jürgens K, Jamieson C, Boersma M, Gocke K (2003) Daphnia versus copepod impact on summer phytoplankton: functional compensation at both trophic levels. Oecologia 135:639–647Google Scholar
  41. Sterner RW, Hessen DO (1994) Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner JT, Lincoln JA, Cembella AD (1998) Effects of toxic and non-toxic dinoflagellates on copepod grazing, egg production and egg hatching success. In: Reguera B, Blanco J, Fernandez ML, Wyatt T (eds) Harmful algae. Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Twombly S, Clancy N, Burns CW (1998) Life history consequences of food quality in the freshwater copepod Boeckella triarticulata. Ecology 79:1711–1724Google Scholar
  44. Villar-Argaiz M, Sterner RW (2002) Life history bottlenecks in Diaptomus clavipes induced by phosphorus-limited algae. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1229–1233Google Scholar
  45. Villar-Argaiz M, Medina-Sanchez JM, Carrillo P (2002) Linking life history strategies and ontogeny in crustacean zooplankton: implications for homeostasis. Ecology 83:1899–1914Google Scholar
  46. von Elert E (2002) Determination of limiting polyunsaturated fatty acids in Daphnia galeata using a new method to enrich food algae with single fatty acids. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1764–1773Google Scholar
  47. Vrede T, Persson J, Aronsen G (2002) The influence of food quality (P:C ratio) on RNA:DNA ratio and somatic growth rate of Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 47:487–494Google Scholar
  48. Wagner M, Durbin E, Buckley L (1998) RNA:DNA ratios as indicators of nutritional condition in the copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 162:173–181Google Scholar
  49. Wagner MM, Campbell RG, Boudreau CA, Durbin EG (2001) Nucleic acids and growth of Calanus finmarchicus in the laboratory under different food and temperature conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221:185–197Google Scholar
  50. Wiltshire KH, Boersma M, Möller A, Buhtz H (2000) Extraction of pigments and fatty acids from the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus (Chlorophyceae). Aquat Ecol 34:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zöllner E, Santer B, Boersma M, Hoppe HG, Jürgens K (2003) Cascading predation effects of Daphnia and copepods on microbial food web components. Freshw Biol 48:2174–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Becker
    • 1
    • 4
  • D. Brepohl
    • 2
  • H. Feuchtmayr
    • 1
  • E. Zöllner
    • 1
  • F. Sommer
    • 2
  • C. Clemmesen
    • 2
  • U. Sommer
    • 2
  • M. Boersma
    • 3
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für LimnologiePlönGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institut für MeereswissenschaftenIFM-GEOMAR Marine ÖkologieKielGermany
  3. 3.Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar und MeeresforschungBiologische Anstalt HelgolandHelgolandGermany
  4. 4.WK Kellogg Biological StationMichigan State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations