Marine Biology

, Volume 146, Issue 2, pp 315–323 | Cite as

Musculature of the primitive gastrotrich Neodasys (Chaetonotida): functional adaptations to the interstitial environment and phylogenetic significance

Research Article

Abstract

Gastrotrichs are acoelomate micrometazoans common to marine interstitial environments of sublittoral sediments and exposed sandy beaches. The genus Neodasys (Chaetonotida) contains three marine species known from oceans and seas worldwide, and figures prominently in discussions of gastrotrich origins. To gain insight into the phylogenetic position of Neodasys and to understand the adaptive significance of muscle anatomy in marine interstitial gastrotrichs, a fluorescent phalloidin-linked marker was used to view the organization of muscles in two species from North America and Australia. Muscular topography of Neodasys cirritus from Florida, USA, and Neodasys cf. uchidai from Queensland, Australia, was found to be similar between species and to basal species of Macrodasyida; muscles were present in circular, longitudinal and helicoidal patterns. Musculature of the midgut region was partially reduced relative to basal macrodasyidan gastrotrichs, but well developed relative to most other chaetonotidan gastrotrichs. In general, muscle patterns in species of Neodasys closely correspond with those of other gastrotrichs of similar size and body type, and may therefore reflect a common adaptive solution to the physical demands of the interstitial environment. Results also suggest that reductions in midgut musculature may be functionally related to oviposition and, as such, are probably not homologous with similar reductions of circular muscles in other species of Chaetonotida.

References

  1. Crehshaw DG (1980) How interstitial animals respond to viscous flows. PhD dissertation, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Hondt JL (1971) Gastrotricha. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 9:141–192Google Scholar
  3. Evans WA (1992) Five new species of marine Gastrotricha from the Atlantic coast of Florida. Bull Mar Sci 51:315–328Google Scholar
  4. Giere O, Eleftheriou A, Murison DJ (1988) Abiotic factors. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA, pp 61–78Google Scholar
  5. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2000a) Hexamethyldisilazane for scanning electron microscopy of Gastrotricha. Biotechnol Histochem 75:41–44Google Scholar
  6. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2000b) Phylogeny of Gastrotricha: a morphology-based framework of gastrotrich relationships. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 198:299–305Google Scholar
  7. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2001a) The musculature of Dactylopodola baltica and other macrodasyidan gastrotrichs in a functional and phylogenetic perspective. Zool Scr 30:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2001b) Functional morphology of muscles in Tetranchyroderma papii (Gastrotricha). Zoomorphology 121:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2001c) The musculature of Draculiciteria tessalata: implications for the evolution of dorso-ventral muscles in Gastrotricha. Hydrobiologia 452:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochberg R, Litvaitis MK (2001d) A muscular double helix in Gastrotricha. Zool Anz 240:59–66Google Scholar
  11. Hochberg R, Livaitis MK (2003) Organization of muscles in Chaetonotida Paucitubulatina. Meiofauna Mar 12:47–58Google Scholar
  12. Hummon WD (ed) (2001) Global database for marine gastrotricha on CD. Ohio University Zoological Collections, AthensGoogle Scholar
  13. Pfannkuche O, Thiel H (1988) Sample processing. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA, pp 134–145Google Scholar
  14. Remane A (1927) Beiträge zur Systematik der Süsswassergastrotrichen. Zool Jb 53:268–320Google Scholar
  15. Remane A (1936) Gastrotricha. In: Bronns HG (ed) Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Band 4, Abt. II, Buch I, Teil 2, Lfrg. 1–2. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, pp 1–242Google Scholar
  16. Remane A (1961) Neodasys uchdai nov. spec., eine zweite Neodasys-Art (Gastrotrich Chaetoidea). Kieler Meeresforsch 17:85–88Google Scholar
  17. Riedl RJ (1971) How much water passes through sandy beaches? Int Rev Geol Hydrobiol 56:923–946Google Scholar
  18. Rieger DE, Rieger RM (1977) Comparative fine structure of the gastrotrich cuticle and aspects of cuticle evolution within the aschelminthes. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 15:81–124Google Scholar
  19. Ruppert EE (1978) The reproductive system of Gastrotrichs. II. Insemination in Macrodasys: a unique mode of sperm transfer in Metazoa. Zoomorphologie 89:207–228Google Scholar
  20. Ruppert EE (1982) Comparative ultrastructure of the gastrotrich pharynx and the evolution of myoepithelial foreguts in the Aschelminthes. Zoomorphology 99:181–220Google Scholar
  21. Ruppert EE (1991) Gastrotricha. In: Harrison F, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 4. Aschelminthes. Wiley-Liss, Washington, D.C., USA, pp 41–109Google Scholar
  22. Ruppert EE, Travis PB (1983) Hemoglobin-containing cells of Neodasys (Gastrotricha, Chaetonotida). I. Morphology and ultrastructure. J Morphol 175:57–64Google Scholar
  23. Swedmark B (1964) The interstitial fauna of marine sand. Biol Rev 39:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teuchert G, Lappe A (1980) Zum sogenannten “Pseudocoel” der Nemathelminthes. Ein Vergleich der Leibeshöhlen von mehreren Gastrotrichen. Zool Jb Anat 103:424–438Google Scholar
  25. Todaro MA, Littlewood DTJ, Balsamo M, Herniou EA, Cassanelli S, Manicardi G, Wirz A, Tongiorgi P (2003) The interrelationships of the Gastrotricha using nuclear small rRNA subunit sequence data, with an interpretation based on morphology. Zool Anz 242:145–156Google Scholar
  26. Travis PB (1983) Ultrastructural study of body wall organization and Y-cell composition in the Gastrotricha. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 21:52–68Google Scholar
  27. Tyler S, Melanson LA, Rieger RM (1980) Adhesive organs of the Gastrotricha. II. The organs of Neodasys. Zoomorphologie 95:17–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Marine StationFort PierceUSA

Personalised recommendations