Marine Biology

, Volume 145, Issue 4, pp 833–842

Macrobenthic migration and its influence on the intertidal diversity dynamics of a meso-tidal system

Research Article
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

The link between movement and migration of organisms to patterns of biodiversity may be an important mechanism of biodiversity maintenance at local scales, but is regularly underestimated in marine studies. Patterns of diversity, density and distribution of all mobile macrofaunal components of an intertidal assemblage were quantitatively investigated throughout diurnal and tidal cycles in a meso-tidal system in southwest Ireland. A significant trend of decreasing diversity with shore height was observed during periods of emersion at both day and night, but not during immersion. While certain taxa (e.g. the isopod Ligia oceanica and the sea mite Erythraeus sp.) exhibited obvious patterns of activity and migration with tide and time, the majority of species were observed to be sedentary or showed no obvious pattern of migration. The influence of rare, transient species on biodiversity measurement and community structure was significant, particularly during periods of immersion. In order to produce meaningful descriptions of intertidal biodiversity, it is therefore crucial that future studies be conducted during periods of immersion and emersion, and that they should consider the influence of migrating species.

References

  1. Barnes RSK (1981) An experimental study of the pattern and significance of the climbing behaviour of Hydrobia ulvae. J Mar Biol Ass UK 61:285–299Google Scholar
  2. Barnes RSK, Hughes RN (1988) Rocky shores and kelp forests. In: Barnes RSK, Hughes RN (eds) An introduction to marine ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 119–160Google Scholar
  3. Beaugrand G, Ibanez F (2002) Spatial dependence of calanoid copepod diversity in the North Atlantic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 232:197–211Google Scholar
  4. Bell JJ, Turner JR (2003) Temporal and spatial variability of mobile fauna on a submarine cliff and boulder scree complex: a community in flux. Hydrobiologia 503:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyst B, Vanaverbeke J, Vincx M, Mees J (2002) Tidal and diurnal periodicity in macrocrustaceans and demersel fish of an exposed sandy beach, with special emphasis on juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 225:263–274Google Scholar
  6. Chapman MG (2000) A comparative study of differences among species and patches of habitat on movements of three species of intertidal gastropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 244:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1994) Dispersal of the intertidal snail, Nodolittorina pyramidalis, in response to the topographic complexity of the substratum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 179:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello MJ, Myers AA (1996) Turnover of transient species as a contributor to the richness of a stable amphipod (Crustacea) fauna in a sea inlet. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 202:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook AC, Long M, Barnes DKA (2000) Quantifying daily migrations in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. J Mar Biol Ass UK 80:177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowe TP, Underwood AJ (1998) Testing behavioural “preference” for suitable microhabitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 225:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson Shepherd AR, Warwick RM, Clarke KR, Brown BE (1992) An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives. Environ Biol Fish 33:367–380Google Scholar
  12. Gaston KJ (2003) The how and why of biodiversity. Nature 421:900–901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson RN, Robb L, Burrows MT, Ansell AD (1996) Tidal, diel and longer term changes in the distribution of fishes on a Scottish sandy beach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130:1–17Google Scholar
  14. Grinnell J (1922) The role of the “Accidental”. Auk 39:373–380Google Scholar
  15. Hampel H, Cattrijsse A, Vincx M (2003) Tidal, diel and semi-lunar changes in the faunal assemblage of an intertidal salt marsh creek. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 56:795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins JP, Roberts CM, Clark V (2000) The threatened status of restricted-range coral reef fish species. Anim Conserv 3:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howson CM, Picton BE (eds) (1997) The species directory of the marine fauna and flora of the British Isles and surrounding seas. Ulster Museum, BelfastGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson N, Williams GA (2003) An assessment of variation in molluscan grazing pressure on Hong Kong rocky shores. Mar Biol 142:495–507Google Scholar
  19. Ingolfsson A, Agnarsson I (2004) Amphipods and isopods in the rocky intertidal: dispersal and movements during high tide. Mar Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Kavaliers M, Perrot-Sinal (1996) Measuring activity in invertebrates and lower vertebrates. In: Ossenkopp KP, Kavaliers M, Sanberg, PR (eds) Measuring movement and locomotion: from invertebrates to humans. Landes, Austin, Tex., pp 13–31Google Scholar
  21. Kerr B, Riley MA, Feldman MW, Bohannan BJM (2002) Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levings SC, Garrity SD (1983) Diel and tidal movement of two co-occurring neritid snails; differences in grazing patterns on a tropical rocky shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 67:261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Mattila J, Chaplin G, Eilers MR, Heck KL, O’Neal JP, Valentine JF (1999) Spatial and diurnal distribution of invertebrate and fish fauna of a Zostera marina bed and nearby unvegetated sediments in Damariscotta River, Maine (USA). J Sea Res 41:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKeown BA (1984) Fish migration. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Mora C, Chittaro PM, Sale PF, Kritzer JP, Ludsin, SA (2003) Patterns and processes in reef fish diversity. Nature 421:933–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Morrison MA, Francis MP, Hartill BW, Parkinson DM (2002) Diurnal and tidal variation in the abundance of the fish fauna of a temperate tidal mudflat. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 54:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers AA (1997) Biogeographic barriers and the development of marine biodiversity. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 44:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newell GE (1958a) The behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and its relation to position on the shore. J Mar Biol Ass UK 37:229–239Google Scholar
  30. Newell GE (1958b) An experimental analysis of the behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and in the laboratory. J Mar Biol Ass UK 37:241–266Google Scholar
  31. Nickel LA, Sayer MDJ (1998) Occurrence and activity of mobile macrofauna on a sublittoral reef: diel and seasonal variation. J Mar Biol Ass UK 78:1061–1082Google Scholar
  32. Petraitis PS (1982) Occurrence of random and directional movements in the periwinkle, Littorina littorea (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 59:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raffaelli D, Hawkins S (1996) Intertidal ecology. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Rochette R, Dill LM (2000) Mortality, behavior and the effects of predators on the intertidal distribution of littorinid gastropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 253:165–191Google Scholar
  35. Sagarin RD, Gaines SD (2002) The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecol Lett 5:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takada Y (1999) Influence of shade and number of boulder layers on mobile organisms on a warm temperate boulder shore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:171–179Google Scholar
  37. Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:139–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner JR, Warman CG (1991) The mobile fauna of sublittoral cliffs. In Myers AA, Little C, Costello MJ Partridge JC (eds) The ecology of Lough Hyne. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp 127–138Google Scholar
  39. Warwick RM, Clarke KR (1995) New ‘biodiversity’ measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 129:301–305Google Scholar
  40. Yamada SB, Boulding EG (1996) The role of highly mobile crab predators in the intertidal zonation of their gastropod prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 204:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. C. Davidson
    • 1
  • A. C. Crook
    • 2
  • D. K. A. Barnes
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant ScienceUniversity College CorkCork
  2. 2.Centre for the Development of Teaching and LearningUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.Biological Sciences Division, British Antarctic SurveyNERCCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations