Marine Biology

, Volume 145, Issue 2, pp 381–391 | Cite as

Intertidal assemblages on artificial and natural habitats in marinas on the north-west coast of Italy

Research Article

Abstract

Following the progressive expansion of human populations, the number of artificial habitats is increasing in shallow waters of urbanised coastal areas. The comparison of assemblages between natural and artificial habitats is necessary to determine whether there is real loss and fragmentation of natural habitats. This study investigates the changes in intertidal assemblages caused by marinas for tourists, along exposed rocky shores on the north-west coast of Italy. Marinas, being made of transplanted boulders and by internal wave-sheltered seawalls, introduce different types of artificial habitats in a relatively small area. Intertidal assemblages on breakwaters, seawalls and adjacent rocky shores were compared at three locations, thousands of metres apart. To assess the generality of patterns through time, natural and artificial habitats were sampled at three different times, over a period of about 2 years. Data were analysed by means of multivariate and univariate analyses to test the hypotheses that assemblages and abundances of single taxa differed among habitats, consistently among locations and times of sampling. Furthermore, the variability of assemblages at the scales of tens of centimetres and metres was compared among habitats. Assemblages on seawalls were largely distinct from those on rocky shores or breakwaters. Seawalls, which supported a smaller number of species than breakwaters and rocky shores, were dominated by encrusting algae and lacked common species such as Rissoella verrucosa and Patella rustica. The abundance of main-space occupiers did not differ between breakwaters and rocky shores, but there were differences in variability of assemblages at both the spatial scales investigated. This study provides evidence for differences between intertidal assemblages supported by artificial habitats at marinas and those on adjacent rocky shores. Differences in habitat-structure (and/or wave-exposure in the case of seawalls) could explain the occurrence of distinct intertidal assemblages. Despite the nature and magnitude of these differences, varied according to the type of artificial habitat considered, neither breakwaters nor seawalls could be considered surrogates of rocky shores.

References

  1. Alabiso G, Cannalire M, Ghionda D, Milillo M, Leone G, Caciorgna O (1997) Particulate matter and chemical-physical conditions of an inner sea—the Mar Piccolo in Taranto—a new statistical approach. Mar Chem 58:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Robinson J (2004) Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Archambault P, Bourget E (1996) Scales of coastal heterogeneity and benthic intertidal species richness, diversity and abundance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 136:111–121Google Scholar
  5. Bacchiocchi F, Airoldi L (2003) Distribution and dynamics of epibiota on hard structures for coastal protection. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:1157–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck MW (2000) Separating the elements of habitat structure: independent effects of habitat complexity and structural components on rocky intertidal gastropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 249:29–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell SS, Hall MO, Soffian S, Madley K (2002) Assessing the impact of boat propeller scars on fish and shrimp utilizing seagrass beds. Ecol Appl 12:206–217Google Scholar
  8. Benedetti-Cecchi L (2000) Predicting direct and indirect interactions during succession in a mid-littoral rocky shore assemblage. Ecol Monogr 70:45–72Google Scholar
  9. Benedetti-Cecchi L, Cinelli F (1993) Early patterns of algal succession in a midlittoral community of the Mediterranean Sea: a multifactorial experiment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 169:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benedetti-Cecchi L, Bulleri F, Cinelli F (1998) Density dependent foraging of sea urchins in shallow subtidal reefs on the west coast of Italy (western Mediterranean). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:203–211Google Scholar
  11. Benedetti-Cecchi L, Bulleri F, Cinelli F (2000) The interplay of physical and biological factors in maintaining mid-shore and low-shore assemblages on rocky coasts in the north-west Mediterranean. Oecologia 123:406–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biselli S, Bester K, Huhnerfuss H, Kent K (2000) Concentrations of the antifouling compound Irgarol 1051 and of organotins in water and sediments of German North and Baltic Sea marinas. Mar Pollut Bull 40:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanchard D, Bourget E (1999) Scales of coastal heterogeneity: influence on intertidal community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179:163–173Google Scholar
  14. Bourget E, DeGuise J, Daingle G (1994) Scales of substratum heterogeneity, structural complexity, and the early establishment of a marine epibenthic community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Branch GM, Cherry MI (1985) Activity rhythms of the pulmonate limpets Siphonaria capensis Q. & G. as an adaptation to osmotic stress, predation and wave action. J Exp Mar Biol 87:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349Google Scholar
  17. Bulleri F, Menconi M, Cinelli F, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2000) Grazing by two species of limpets on artificial reefs in the northwest Mediterranean. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 255:1–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cabanes C, Cazenave A, Le Provost C (2001) Sea level rising during past 40 years determined from satellite and in situ observations. Science 294:840–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter DJ, Draper L (1988) Has the north-east Atlantic become rougher? Nature 332:94Google Scholar
  20. Champalbert G (1996) Characteristics of zooplankton standing stock and communities in the western Mediterranean Sea—relations to hydrology. Sci Mar 60:97–113Google Scholar
  21. Chapman MG, Bulleri F (2003) Intertidal seawalls—new features of landscape in intertidal environments. Landscape Urban Plann 62:159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143Google Scholar
  23. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Connell JH (1961) The effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Ecol Monogr 31:61–104Google Scholar
  25. Connell SD (2000) Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 247:183–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Connell SD, Glasby TM (1998) Do urban structures influence local abundances and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia. Mar Environ Res 47:1–15Google Scholar
  27. Cook SB, Cook CB (1978) Tidal amplitude and the activity of the pulmonate limpets Siphonaria nemoralis (Gould) and S. alternata (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 35:119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crawford DW, Bonnevie NL, Wenning RJ (1995) Sources of pollution and sediment contamination in Newark Bay, New Jersey. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30:85–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Creed JC, Amado Filho GM (1999) Disturbance and recovery of the macroflora of a seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson) meadow in the Abrolhos Marine National Park, Brazil: an experimental evaluation of anchor damage. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cusson M, Bourget E (1997) Influence of topographic heterogeneity and spatial scales on the structure of neighbouring intertidal endobenthic macrofaunal community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 150:181–193Google Scholar
  31. Das P, Marchesiello P, Middleton JH (2000) Numerical modelling of tide-induced residual circulation in Sydney Harbour. Mar Freshw Res 51:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davis GE (1977) Anchor damage to a coral reef on the coast of Florida. Biol Conserv 11:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis JLD, Levin LA, Walther SM (2002) Artificial armored shorelines: sites for open-coast species in a southern California bay. Mar Biol 140:1249–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dethier MN, Graham ES, Cohen S, Tear LM (1993) Visual versus random-point percent cover estimations: ‘objective’ is not always better. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 110:9–18Google Scholar
  35. Diez S, Abalos M, Bayona JM (2002) Organotin contamination in sediments from the western Mediterranean enclosures following 10 years of TBT regulation. Water Res 36:905–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animal and plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Etter RJ (1989) Life history variation in the intertidal snail Nucella lapillus across a wave-exposure gradient. Ecology 70:1857–1876Google Scholar
  38. Francour P, Ganteaume A, Poulain M (1999) Effects of boat anchoring in Posidonia oceanica seagrass beds in the Port-Cros National Park (north-western Mediterranean Sea). Aquat Conserv 9:391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gabric AJ, Bell PRF (1993) Review of the effects of non point nutrient loading on coastal ecosystems. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 44:261–283Google Scholar
  40. Glasby TM (1999) Differences between subtidal epibiota on pier pilings and rocky reefs at marinas in Sydney, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 48:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Glasby TM (2000) Surface composition and orientation interact to affect subtidal epibiota. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 248:177–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gray JS (1997) Marine biodivesity: patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodivers Conserv 6:153–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grevemeyer I, Herber R, Essen H-H (2000) Microseismological evidence for a changing wave climate in the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Nature 408:349–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hammond A (1992) World resources 1992–1993: towards sustainable development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Hawkins SJ, Hartnoll RG (1983) The influence of barnacle cover on the number, growth and behaviour of Patella vulgata on a vertical pier. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 62:855–867Google Scholar
  46. Hollin D (1992) Marinas are big business in Texas. Parks Recreation 27:42–45Google Scholar
  47. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967Google Scholar
  48. Little C (1989) Factors governing patterns of foraging activity in littoral marine herbivorous molluscs. J Mollusc Stud 55:273–284Google Scholar
  49. McCoy ED, Bell SS (1991) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  50. McGuinness KA, Underwood AJ (1986) Habitat structure and the nature of communities in intertidal boulders. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 104:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Menconi M, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Cinelli F (1999) Spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of algae and invertebrates on rocky shores in the northwest Mediterranean. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 233:1–23Google Scholar
  52. Menge BA (1978) Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community: effect of an algal canopy, wave action and desiccation on predator feeding rates. Oecologia 34:17–35Google Scholar
  53. Menge BA, Lubchenco J (1981) Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecol Monogr 51:429–450Google Scholar
  54. Paine RT (1980) Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. The third Tansley lecture. J Anim Ecol 49:667–685Google Scholar
  55. Qian P-Y, Rittschof D, Sreedhar B (2000) Macrofouling in unidirectional flow: miniature pipes as experimental models for studying the interaction of flow and surface characteristics on the attachment of barnacle, bryozoan and polychaete larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207:109–121Google Scholar
  56. Reilly FJ, Spagnolo RJ, Ambrogio E (1996) Marine and estuarine shallow water science and management. Estuaries 19:165–168Google Scholar
  57. Salmona P, Verardi D (2001) The marine protected area of Portofino, Italy: a difficult balance. Ocean Coast Manage 44:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith C, Jenner P (1995) Marinas in Europe. Travel Tourism Analyst 6:56–72Google Scholar
  59. Southward AJ, Orton JH (1954) The effects of wave-action on the distribution and numbers of the commoner plants and animals living on the Plymouth breakwall. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 33:1–19Google Scholar
  60. Steele JH (1989) Discussion: scale and coupling in ecological systems. In: Roughgarden J, May RM, Levin S (eds) Perspectives in theoretical ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 170–180Google Scholar
  61. Steneck RS (1982) A limpet-coralline alga association: adaptations and defenses between a selective herbivore and its prey. Ecology 63:507–522Google Scholar
  62. Thiel M, Nehl G, Bräger S, Meissner J (1992) The impact of boating on the distribution of seals and moulting ducks in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein. Neth J Sea Res 20:221–233Google Scholar
  63. Thomas KV (1999) Determination of the antifouling agent zinc pyrithone in water samples by copper chelate formation and light-performance liquid chromatography-atmosferic ionisation mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 833:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thompson RC, Crowe TP, Hawkins SJ (2002) Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years. Environ Conserv 29:168–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Underwood AJ (1981) Structure of a rocky intertidal community in New South Wales: patterns of vertical distribution and seasonal changes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 51:57–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1989) Experimental analysis of the influences of topography of the substratum on movements and density of an intertidal snail, Littorina unifasciata. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 134:175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1998a) A method for analysing spatial scales of variation in composition of assemblages. Oecologia 117:570–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1998b) Spatial analyses of intertidal assemblages on sheltered shores. Aust J Ecol 23:138–157Google Scholar
  70. Wethey DS (1986) Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: influence of surface contour. Bull Mar Sci 39:393–400Google Scholar
  71. Whorff JS, Whorff LL, Sweet MH (1995) Spatial variation in an algal turf community with respect to substratum slope and wave height. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 75:429–444Google Scholar
  72. Widmer W, Underwood A, Chapman G (2002) Recreational boating on Sydney Harbour. Nat Resour Manage 5:22–27Google Scholar
  73. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Yapp GA (1986) Aspect of population, recreation and management of the Australian coastal zone. Coast Manage 14:47–66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Laboratories A11University of SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Scienze AmbientaliUniversità di Bologna RavennaItaly

Personalised recommendations