Marine Biology

, Volume 143, Issue 6, pp 1175–1183 | Cite as

The hydrozoan coral Millepora dichotoma: speciation or phenotypic plasticity?

  • Efrat Meroz-Fine
  • Itzchak Brickner
  • Yossi Loya
  • Micha Ilan
Research Article

Abstract

This article describes ecological and biological differences between two morphs of the Red Sea fire coral Millepora dichotoma. The species is divided into two main morphs: branching and encrusting, which were found to differ both in color and morphology. Each morph has two or more sub-morphs. A total of 372 M. dichotoma colonies were examined in a census at two study sites in the Gulf of Elat. Colony size and abundance of the two morphs were found to differ significantly between sites. Experimental examination of each morph's morphological plasticity revealed different growth rates and difference in growth plasticity between the branching and the encrusting morph. Most of the fragments from the branching colonies (94%) attached to experimentally placed Plexiglas substrate, compared with much less attachment by the encrusting fragments (11%). The growth form of the branching morph on the Plexiglas switched to encrusting, spreading over and covering the substrate. When the new encrusting colony reached the edge of this substrate, it started to produce tips, and returned to growth in the classic branching form. The encrusting morph did not change its growth form. Following attachment of the original fragments of the branching morph to the substrate, 8.1% of them produced new tips. When the original branches were removed, after converting to encrusting growth form, 19% of the fragments produced new tips. The capsule size of nematocysts of the two morphs was also significantly different (t-test, P<0.05). Molecular data (ITS region) clearly demonstrate that these two M. dichotoma morphs differ considerably. Molecular evidence (srRNA) from the symbiotic zooxanthellae also shows a different pattern of clades in the hosts. The ecological, biological and molecular data thus attest to the two morphs being distinguishable. Contrary to previous reports, we consequently suggest that the two morphs of M. dichotoma found in the Gulf of Elat are actually two distinct species.

References

  1. Amaral FD (1994) Morphological variation in the reef coral Montastrea cavernosa in Brazil. Coral Reefs 13:113–117Google Scholar
  2. Amaral FD, Silva RS, Mauricio-da-Silva L, Sole-Cava AM (1997) Molecular systematics of Millepora alcicornis Linnaeus, 1758 and M. braziliensis Verrill, 1868 (Hydrozoa: Milleporidae) from Brazil. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp vol II, pp 1577–1580Google Scholar
  3. Arsenault DJ, Marchinko KB, Palmer R (2001) Precise tuning of barnacle leg length to coastal wave action. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2149–2154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barata C, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia magna Straus: variable maturation instar as an adaptive response to predation pressure. Oecologia 129:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beltran-Torres AU, Carricart-Ganivet JP (1993) Skeletal morphologic variation in Montastrea cavernosa (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) at Isla Verde coral reef, Veracruz, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 41(3A):559–562Google Scholar
  6. Boschma H (1948) The species problem in Millepora. Zool Verh Leiden 1:1-115Google Scholar
  7. Boschma H (1962) On milleporine corals from Brazil. K Ned Akad Wet Amst Proc 65C:302–312Google Scholar
  8. Bosscher H, Meesters EH (1992) Depth related changes in the growth rate of Montastrea annularis. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:507–512Google Scholar
  9. Bruno JF, Edmunds PJ (1997) Clonal variation for phenotypic plasticity in the coral Madracis mirabilis. Ecology 78:2177–2190Google Scholar
  10. Chen CA, Willis BL, Miller DJ (1996) Systematic relationships between tropical corallimorpharians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Corallimorpharia): utility of the 5.8S and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) refions of the rRNA transcription unit. Bull Mar Sci 59:196–208Google Scholar
  11. Chen CA, Chen CP, Fan TY, Yu JK, Hsieh HL (2002) Nucleotide sequences of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and their utility in distinguishing closely related Perinereis polychaets (Annelida; Polychaeta; Nereididae).Google Scholar
  12. Edmunds PJ (1999) The role of colony morphology and substratum inclination in the success of Millepora alcicornis on shallow coral reefs. Coral Reefs 18:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graus RR, MacIntyre IG (1982) Variation in the growth forms of the reef coral Montastrea annularis (Ellis and Solander): a quantitative evaluation of growth response to light distribution using computer simulation. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 12:441–464Google Scholar
  14. Lesser MP, Weis VM, Patterson MR, Jokiel PL (1994) Effects of morphology and water motion on carbon delivery and productivity in the reef coral, Pocillopora-damicornis (Linnaeus) - diffusion-barriers, inorganic carbon limitation, and biochemical plasticity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 178:153–179Google Scholar
  15. Lewis JB (1989) The ecology of Millepora. Coral Reefs 8:99–107Google Scholar
  16. Manchenko GP, Moschenko AV, Odintsov VS (1993) Biochemical genetics and systematics of Millepora (Coelenterata: Hydrozoa) from the shore of south Vietnam. Biochem Syst Ecol 21:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mariscal RN (1974) Nematocysts. In: Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (eds) Coelenterate biology. Academic, New York, pp 129–178Google Scholar
  18. Medina M, Weil E, Szmant AM (1999) Examination of the Montastraea annularis species complex (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) using ITS and COI sequences. Mar Biotechnol 1:89–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mokady O, Brickner I (2001) Host-associated speciation in a coral inhabiting barnacle. Mol Biol Evol 18:975–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mokady O, Loya Y, Achituv Y, Geffen E, Graur D, Rozenblatt S, Brickner I (1999) Speciation versus phenotypic plasticity in coral inhabiting barnacles-Darwins observations in an ecological context. J Mol Evol 49:367–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Muko S, Kawasaki K, Sakai K, Takasu F, Shigesada N (2000) Morphological plasticity in the coral Porites sillimaniani and its adaptive significance. Bull Mar Sci 66:225–239Google Scholar
  22. Odorico DM, Miller DJ (1997a) Variation in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA among five species of Acropora (Cnidaria; Scleractinia): patterns of variation consistent with reticulate evolution. Mol Biol Evol 14:465–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Odorico DM, Miller DJ (1997b) Internal and external relationships of the Cnidaria: implications of primary and predicted secondary structure of the 5'-end of the 23S-like rDNA. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsen GJ, Matsuda H, Hagstrom R, Overbeek R (1994) FastDNAml—a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA-sequences using maximum-likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci 10:41–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowan R, Powers DA (1991) Molecular genetic identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 71:65–73Google Scholar
  26. Rowan R, Knowlton N, Baker A, Jara J (1997) Landscape ecology of algal symbionts creates variation in episodes of coral bleaching. Nature 388:265–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.Google Scholar
  28. Schwaninger HR (1999) Population structure of the widely dispersing marine bryozoan Membranipora membranacea (Cheilostomata): implications for population history, biogeography, and taxonomy. Mar Biol 135:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith LD, Palmer AR (1994) Effects of manipulated diet on size and performance of Brachyuran crab claws. Science 264:710–712Google Scholar
  30. Stearn CW, Riding R (1973) Forms of the hydrozoan Millepora on a recent coral reef. Lethaia 6:187–200Google Scholar
  31. Takabayashi M, Carter DA, Loh WKW, Hoegh-Guldberg O (1998) A coral specific primer for PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region in ribosomal DNA. Mol Ecol 7:925–931PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Todd PA, Sanderson PG, Chou LM (2001) Morphological variation in the polyps of the scleractinian coral Favia speciosa (Dana) around Singapore. Hydrobiologia 444:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vago R, Shai Y, Ben-Zion M, Dubinsky Z, Achituv Y (1994) Computerized tomography and image analysis, a tool for examining the skeletal characteristics of reef building organisms. Limnol Oceanogr 39:448–452Google Scholar
  34. Vago R, Achituv Y, Vaky L, Dubinsky Z, Kizner Z (1998) Colony architecture of Millepora dichotoma Forskal. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 224:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Veron JEN, Odorico DM, Chen CA, Miller DJ (1996) Reassessing evolutionary relationships of scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 15:1–9Google Scholar
  36. Weerdt WH de (1981) Transplantation experiments with Caribbean Millepora species (Hydrozoa, Coelenterata), including some ecological observations on growth forms. Bijdr Dierkd 51:1–19Google Scholar
  37. Weerdt WH de (1984) Taxonomic characters in Caribbean Millepora species (Hydrozoa, Coelenterata) including some ecological observations on growth forms. Bijdr Dierkd 54:243–362Google Scholar
  38. West JM (1997) Plasticity in the sclerites of a gorgonian coral: tests of water motion, light level, and damage cues. Biol Bull 192:279–289Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Efrat Meroz-Fine
    • 1
  • Itzchak Brickner
    • 1
  • Yossi Loya
    • 1
  • Micha Ilan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations