Marine Biology

, Volume 142, Issue 6, pp 1153–1157 | Cite as

Male-male competition selects for delayed sex change in the protandrous shrimp Pandalus latirostris

Article

Abstract

In most protandrous species, male size advantage is generally regarded as unimportant in determining the timing of protandrous sex change. In pandalid shrimp, the size/age of male sex change often fluctuates among years and populations, but the adaptive significance of late reversing males (LRMs) is not well understood. This study experimentally examined the adaptive significance of LRMs in the protandrous pandalid shrimp Pandalus latirostris Rathbun. Field and laboratory studies were carried out in August–September of 1998–2002 on P. latirostris in Notoro Lagoon, Japan (44°03′N; 144°10′E). Mature females that had molted (i.e. mate receptive) were tethered in the field and their mating behavior with wild males was observed. Copulations occurred with a single male at a time, although other males could sequentially mate with a tethered female. Because tethered females rejected male approaches, males had difficulty transferring their spermatophores. In the laboratory, males copulated with non-tethered, recently molted females for only 15 min after molting. Recently molted females are wary of potential predators, since their soft exoskeleton makes them particularly vulnerable. Fast access by males enhanced fertilization success in this shrimp. The effect of male size on mating success in the laboratory was examined. Both small and large males successfully inseminated females in the absence of competitors. In experiments where large, medium, and small males competed for a female, however, larger males guarded females longer than smaller males, until the female molted and became receptive. Moreover, large males were more successful at copulating once molting occurred. These results imply that male-male competition drives delayed sex change in some situations.

Keywords

Mating Behavior Large Male Small Male Male Size Male Reproductive Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We express our appreciation to S. Nakao, B.I. Bergström, S.A. Arnott, E.L. Charnov, Y. Kanno, and an anonymous referee for their critical comments on and valuable discussions of this manuscript. T. Kawajiri, K. Nakazawa, and T. Nakanishi are acknowledged for their assistance in Notoro Lagoon. We are grateful to the staff of the Abashiri Marine Science Center, for help in conducting the laboratory experiments. S.C. was supported by research fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. This study was funded by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (no. 14540572) to S.G. This study complies with current Japanese law.

References

  1. Bauer RT (1986) Sex change and life history pattern in the shrimp Thor manningi (Caridea): a novel case of partial protandric hermaphroditism. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 170:11–31Google Scholar
  2. Berglund A (1990) Sequential hermaphroditism and the size-advantage hypothesis: an experimental test. Anim Behav 39:426–433Google Scholar
  3. Bergström BI (2000) The biology of Pandalus. Adv Mar Biol 38:55–245Google Scholar
  4. Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  5. Charnov EL, Hannah RW (2002) Shrimp adjust their sex ratio to fluctuating age distributions. Evol Ecol Res 4:239–246Google Scholar
  6. Chiba S, Goshima S, Mizushima T (2000) Factors affecting the occurrence of early maturing males in the protandrous pandalid shrimp Pandalus latirostris. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 203:215–224Google Scholar
  7. Collin R (1995) Sex, size and position: a test of models predicting size at sex change in the protandrous gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Am Nat 146:815–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghiselin MT (1969) The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q Rev Biol 44:189–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Grafen A, Ridley M (1983) A model of mate guarding. J Theor Biol 102:549–567Google Scholar
  10. Holthuis LB (1995) Notes on Indo–West Pacific Crustacea Decapoda III to IX. Zool Meded (Leiden) 69:139–151Google Scholar
  11. Jormalainen V (1998) Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Q Rev Biol 73:275–304Google Scholar
  12. Komai T (1999) A revision of the genus Pandalus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Pandalidae). J Nat Hist 33:1265–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubo I (1951) Bionomics of the prawn, Pandalus kessleri. J Tokyo Univ Fish 38:1–26Google Scholar
  14. Mizushima T (1981) Ecology and catch of the prawn, Pandalus kessleri in Zostera beds in Notsuke Bay, Hokkaido, Japan (in Japanese). In: Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries (ed) Seaweed beds. Kouseisha Kouseikaku, Tokyo, pp 57–74Google Scholar
  15. Mizushima T, Omi H (1979) Egg-laying period, hatching period and sexual behavior of the prawn, Pandalus kessleri, in Notsuke Bay, Hokkaido (in Japanese). Sci Rep Hokkaido Fish Exp Stn 36:53–63Google Scholar
  16. Nakashima Y (1987) Reproductive strategies in a partially protandrous shrimp, Athanas kominatoensis (Decapoda: Alpheidae): sex change as the best of a bad situation for subordinates. J Ethol 5:145–159Google Scholar
  17. Onishi Y, Chiba S, Goshima S (2001) Reproductive cycle of the protandric shrimp Pandalus latirostris. Benthos Res 56:9–20Google Scholar
  18. Sewell MA (1994) Small size, brooding, and protandry in the apodid sea cucumber Leptosynapta clarki. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 187:112–123Google Scholar
  19. Soong K, Chen J-L (1991) Population structure and sex-change in the coral-inhabiting snail Coralliophira violacea at Hsia-Liuchiu, Taiwan. Mar Biol 111:81–86Google Scholar
  20. Warner RR (1975) The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals. Am Nat 109:61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Warner RR (1988) Sex change and the size-advantage model. Trends Ecol Evol 3:133–136Google Scholar
  22. Wright WG (1988) Sex change in the Mollusca. Trends Ecol Evol 3:137–140Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Marine Biodiversity, Graduate School of Fisheries SciencesHokkaido UniversityHakodate 041-8611Japan
  2. 2.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations