Marine Biology

, Volume 142, Issue 6, pp 1083–1091 | Cite as

Ecology of a corallivorous gastropod, Coralliophila abbreviata, on two scleractinian hosts. I: Population structure of snails and corals

  • Iliana B. Baums
  • Margaret W. Miller
  • Alina M. Szmant
Article

Abstract

Despite their potential importance in structuring reef communities, invertebrate corallivores and their population structures are poorly understood. We found distinct differences in the population structures (length-frequency distribution and sex ratio) of the corallivorous gastropod Coralliophila abbreviata residing on two coral-host taxa, Montastraea spp. and Acropora palmata, in the Florida Keys. In each of two survey years, around 50% of the Montastraea spp. colonies were infested, with a mean snail density of eight snails per infested colony (range 1–45), while around 20% of A. palmata colonies harbored three snails per infested colony (range 1–23). Variation in patterns of snail occurrence was also observed within a host taxon. A. palmata occurred in low- and high-density stands (0.4 and 1 colony m–2, respectively, at the initial survey) at different sites. Hurricane Georges struck the area in September 1998. When resurveyed in 1999, density of colonies in low-density stands had decreased by 75% to 0.1 colonies m–2. This decrease was accompanied by a doubling in the proportion of colonies infested with snails (from 19% to 46%) and an increase in snail density per infested colony (from 3.7±3.3 SD to 5.4±4.6 SD) as snails apparently concentrated on surviving A. palmata. In contrast, sites with high density A. palmata stands (thickets) retained colony densities of about ~1 colony m–2 among years, while snail infestation increased only from 9% to 14% of colonies surveyed and snail density essentially remained unchanged (from 2.7±1.8 to 2.9±1.9 snails per infested colony). Snails collected from Montastraea spp. were shorter than those from A. palmata in low-density stands and were longest on A. palmata in thickets. On both host taxa, female snails were longer than males. The sex ratio of snails on Montastraea spp. hosts was even (1:1), while that of snails on A. palmata was skewed (70% males). Factors that could explain observed differences in size structure and sex ratio between Coralliophila populations on the two coral host taxa include: differential susceptibility to predators, influence of host tissue nutritional quality and/or secondary metabolite content, and genetic differences (cryptic species). The host-specific characteristics of C. abbreviata populations imply that the impact of gastropods on reef communities will vary with the coral species composition.

References

  1. Abevsirigunawardana MD, Ekaratne SUK (2000) Responses by corallivorous drupellids to bleach-induced changes in coral species composition. In: Hopley D, Hopley PM, Tamelander J, Done T (eds) Abstracts of intended contributions. 9th Int Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, Indonesia, p 290Google Scholar
  2. Aronson RB, Precht W (2001) White band disease and the changing face of Caribbean coral reefs. Hydrobiologia 460:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ault JS, Bohnsack JA, Meesters GA (1998) A retrospective (1979–1996) multispecies assessment of coral reef fish stocks in the Florida Keys, USA. Fish Bull 96:395–414Google Scholar
  4. Bak RPM (1976) The growth of coral colonies and the importance of crustose coralline algae and burrowing sponges in relation with carbonate accumulation. Neth J Sea Res 10:285–337Google Scholar
  5. Baums IB, Miller MW, Szmant AM (2003) Ecology of a corallivorous gastropod on two scleractinian hosts. II: feeding, respiration and growth. Mar Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Birkeland C, Lucas JS (1990) Acanthaster planci: major management problem of coral reefs. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  7. Brawley SH, Adey WH (1982) Coralliophila abbreviata: A significant corallivore! Bull Mar Sci 32(2):595–599Google Scholar
  8. Bruckner AW, Hourigan TF (2002) Proactive management for conservation of Acropora palmata and Acropora cervicornis: application of the US Endangered Species Act. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef Symp (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Bruckner RJ, Bruckner AW, Williams EH Jr (1997) Life history strategies of Coralliophila abbreviata Lamarck (Gastropoda: Coralliophilidae) on the southeast coast of Puerto Rico. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Sym 1:627–632Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter RC (1997) Invertebrate predators and grazers. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death of coral reefs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 198–229Google Scholar
  11. Chen M-H, Soong K (2002) Estimation of age in the sex-changing, coral-inhabiting snail Coralliophila violacea from the growth striae on opercula and a mark-recapture experiment. Mar Biol 140:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen M-H, Yang Y-W, Soong K (1998) Preliminary observations on change of sex by the coral-inhabiting snails Coralliophila violacea (Larmarck) (Gastropoda:Coralliophilidae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 230:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiappone M, Sullivan KM (1997) Rapid assessment of reefs in the Florida Keys: results from a synoptic survey. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Sym 2:1509–1514Google Scholar
  14. Gladfelter EH, Monahan RK, Gladfelter WB (1978) Growth rates of five reef-building corals in the northeastern Caribbean. Bull Mar Sci 28:728–734Google Scholar
  15. Glynn PW (1990) Feeding ecology of selected coral-reef macroconsumers: patterns and effects on coral community structure. In: Dubinsky Z (ed) Ecosystems of the world 25: coral reefs. Elsevier, New York, pp 365–400Google Scholar
  16. Gochfeld DJ, Aeby GS (1997) Control of populations of the coral-feeding nudibranch Phestilla sibogae by fish and crustacean predators Mar Biol 130:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg WM (1971) A note on the feeding behavior of the snapping shrimp Synalpheus fritzmuelleri Coutière (Decapoda, Alpheidae). Crustaceana 21:318–320Google Scholar
  18. Hayes JA (1989) The biology and ecology of Coralliophila abbreviata Lamarck (Gastropoda: Coralliophilidae): the importance of corallivores in the ecology of coral reefs. Dissertation, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes JA (1990a) Distribution, movement and impact of the corallivorous gastropod Coralliophila abbreviata (Lamarck) on a Panamanian patch reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 142:25–42Google Scholar
  20. Hayes JA (1990b) Prey preference in a Caribbean corallivore, Coralliophila abbreviata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda, Coralliophilidae). Bull Mar Sci 47(2):557–560Google Scholar
  21. Jaap W (1984) The ecology of the south Florida coral reefs: a community. Prepared for National Coastal Ecosystems Team, Division of Biological Services, Research and Development, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. and Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Metairie, La.Google Scholar
  22. Jaap WC, Halas JC, Muller RG (1988) Community dynamics of stony corals (Milleporina and Scleractinia) at Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary, Florida, during 1981–1986. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:237–243Google Scholar
  23. Knowlton N, Lang JC, Rooney MC, Clifford P (1981) Evidence for delayed mortality in hurricane-damaged Jamaican staghorn corals. Nature 294:251–252Google Scholar
  24. Knowlton N, Lang JC, Keller BD (1990) Case study of natural population collapse: post-hurricane predation on Jamaican staghorn corals. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci 31:1–25 Google Scholar
  25. Koch V, Wolff M (1996) The mangrove snail Thais kiosquiformis Duclos: a case of life history adaptation to an extreme environment. J Shellfish Res 15(2):421–432Google Scholar
  26. McClanahan TR (1997) Dynamics of Drupella cornus populations on Kenyan coral reefs. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:633–638Google Scholar
  27. Miller AC (1981) Cnidarian prey of the snails Coralliophila abbreviata and C. caribaea (Gastropoda: Muricidae) in Discovery Bay, Jamaica. Bull Mar Sci 31:932–934Google Scholar
  28. Moran MJ (1986) The Acanthaster phenomenon. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 24:379–480Google Scholar
  29. Ott B, Lewis JB (1972) The importance of the gastropod Coralliophila abbreviata (Lamarck) and the polychaete Hermodice carunculata (Pallas) as coral reef predators. Can J Zool 50:1651–1656Google Scholar
  30. Porter JW, Meier OW (1992) Quantification of loss and change in Floridian reef coral populations. Am Zool 32:625–640Google Scholar
  31. Robertson R (1970) Review of the predators and parasites of stony corals, with special references to symbiotic prosobranch gastropods. Pac Sci 14:43–54Google Scholar
  32. Trussel GC (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: The role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50:448–454Google Scholar
  33. Turner ST (1994) The biology and population outbreaks of the corallivorous gastropod Drupella on Indo-Pacific reefs. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 32:461–530Google Scholar
  34. Ward J (1965) The digestive tract and its relations to feeding habits in the stenoglossan prosobranch Coralliophila abbreviata (Lamarck). Can J Zool 43:447–464Google Scholar
  35. Weil E, Knowlton N (1994) A multi-character analysis of the Caribbean coral Montastraea annularis (Ellis and Solander, 1786) and its two sibling species, M. faveolata (Ellis and Solander, 1786) and M. franksi (Gregory, 1895). Bull Mar Sci 55:151–175Google Scholar
  36. Wells FE, Lalli CM (1977) Reproduction and brood protection in the Caribbean gastropods Coralliophila abbreviata and C. caribaea. J Molluscan Stud 43:79–87Google Scholar
  37. Zipser E, Vermeij GJ (1978) Crushing behavior of tropical and temperate crabs. Exp Mar Biol Ecol 31:155–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iliana B. Baums
    • 1
  • Margaret W. Miller
    • 2
  • Alina M. Szmant
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Marine Biology and FisheriesUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.NOAA-FisheriesSoutheast Science CenterMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Center for Marine ScienceUniversity of North Carolina at WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations