Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 142, Issue 4, pp 693–706 | Cite as

Reproductive traits in dicyemids

  • H. FuruyaEmail author
  • F. G. Hochberg
  • K. Tsuneki
Article

Abstract

Several characters involved in the life cycle in dicyemids were examined to understand reproductive strategy and adaptations to cephalopod hosts. In most dicyemids distinctly small numbers of sperms are produced in a hermaphroditic gonad (infusorigen). The number of eggs and sperms are roughly equal (means of the number of sperm:egg=1:1.58). An inverse proportional relationship was found between the number of infusorigens and the gametes, suggesting a trade-off between them. Fecundity was positively correlated with the body size of adult stages (nematogens and rhombogens). Fecundity of a single dicyemid is not very high compared with that of the other endoparasite taxa, but a total reproductive capacity per community is high, because a great number of individuals multiply asexually in the renal sac. The size of mature infusoriform embryos (dispersal embryos) that develop from fertilized eggs was not correlated with their adult sizes, but the size of embryos was correlated with the maximum mantle length of the host octopus species. Although at present the process of infecting new hosts is still unknown, the size of the infusoriform embryo is likely determined by host-specific factors in this process. The size of vermiform embryos that are asexually formed from agametes was positively correlated with size of the adults; however, the number of vermiform embryos present in the axial cell of adults was not correlated with size of the adults. A correlation was not found between maximum mantle length of the host cephalopod species and length of the adult dicyemids. In dicyemid species the size of adults appears to be constrained by the renal habitat, including renal-pancreatic complex and branchial hearts of each host cephalopod species. Size thus may be determined by the volume of the renal sac, the diameter of the renal tubules, or the depth of folding in the surface of glandular renal appendages of cephalopods.

Keywords

Asexual Reproduction Axial Cell Mantle Length Oocyte Diameter Adult Body Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our gratitude to the late Dr. Y. Koshida, Professor Emeritus of Osaka University for his continual advice and suggestions on the biology of dicyemids. We also would like to thank Drs. B.H. McConnaughey, R.B. Short, and J.L. Mohr who donated their collections of dicyemids, which we examined during the course of this study, to the SBMNH. The dicyemid collection of Henri Nouvel (Université Paul-Sabatier) is currently housed in Geneve, Switzerland, at the Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle. Portions of his collection were made available to us through the courtesy of S. v. Boletzky (Laboratoire Arago Banyuls, France) and C. Combs (Université de Perpignan, France). This study was supported by grants from the Nakayama Foundation for Human Science, the Research Institute of Marine Invertebrates Foundation, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (research grant nos. 12740468 and 14540645), and visiting researcher funds from the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.

References

  1. Austin CR (1964) Gametogensis and fertilization in the mesozoan Dicyema aegira. Parasitology 54:597–600Google Scholar
  2. Bogolepova II (1957) Concerning the existence of Dicyemodeca Wheeler, 1897. Trans Leningrad Soc Nat 73:52–57Google Scholar
  3. Bogolepova-Dobrokhotova II (1960) Dicyemidae of the far-eastern seas. I. New species of the genus Dicyema. Zool Zh 39:1293–1302Google Scholar
  4. Bogolepova-Dobrokhotova II (1962) Dicyemidae of the far-eastern seas. II. New species of the genus Dicyemennea. Zool Zh 41:503–518Google Scholar
  5. Bogolepova-Dobrokhotova II (1963) The current classification of dicyemids. Parazit Sb 21:259–271Google Scholar
  6. Furuya H (1999) Fourteen new species of dicyemid mesozoans from six Japanese cephalopods, with comments on host specificity. Spec Divers 4:257–319Google Scholar
  7. Furuya H, Hochberg FG (1999) Three new species of Dicyema (phylum: Dicyemida) from cephalopods in the western Mediterranean. Vie Milieu 49:117–128Google Scholar
  8. Furuya H, Hochberg FG (2002) New species of Dicyemennea (phylum: Dicyemida) in deep-water Graneledone (Mollusca: Cephalopoda: Octopoda) from the Antarctic. J Parasitol 88:330–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1992a) Development of the infusoriform embryo of Dicyema japonicum (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae). Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 183:248–257Google Scholar
  10. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1992b) Two new species of the genus Dicyema (Mesozoa) from octopuses of Japan with notes on D. misakiense and D. acuticephalum. Zool Sci (Tokyo) 9:423–437Google Scholar
  11. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1993) The development of the hermaphroditic gonad in four species of dicyemid mesozoans. Zool Sci (Tokyo) 10:455–466Google Scholar
  12. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1994) The development of the vermiform embryos of two mesozoans, Dicyema acuticephalum and Dicyema japonicum. Zool Sci (Tokyo) 11:235–246Google Scholar
  13. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1996) The cell lineages of two types of embryo and a hermaphroditic gonad in dicyemid mesozoans. Dev Growth Differ 38:453–463Google Scholar
  14. Furuya H, Tsuneki K, Koshida Y (1997) Fine structure of a dicyemid mesozoan, Dicyema acuticephalum, with special reference to cell junctions. J Morphol 231:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2001) Developmental patterns and cell lineages of vermiform embryos in dicyemid mesozoans. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 201:405–416Google Scholar
  16. Furuya H, Damian RT, Hochberg FG (2002a) A new species of Dicyema (phylum Dicyemida) from Octopus burryi (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the Gulf of Mexico. J Parasitol 88:325–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Short RB (2002b) Dicyemennea canadensis n. sp. (phylum Dicyemida) from Bathypolypus arcticus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda: Octopoda). J Parasitol 88:119–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Furuya H, Hochberg FG, Tsuneki K (2003) Calotte morphology in the phylum Dicyemida: niche separation and convergence. J Zool (Lond) 259:(in press)Google Scholar
  19. Gersch J (1938) Der Entwicklungszyklus der Dicyemiden. Z Wiss Zool 151:515–605Google Scholar
  20. Ginetsinskaya TA (1988) Trematodes: their life cycles, biology and evolution (translation of original Russian edition, 1968). Amerind, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Godfray HCJ (1987) The evolution of clutch size in vertebrates. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:117–154Google Scholar
  22. Grell KG (1956) Protozoologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochberg FG (1982) The "kidneys" of cephalopods: a unique habitat for parasites. Malacologia 23:121–134Google Scholar
  24. Hochberg FG (1983) The parasite of cephalopods: a review. Mem Natl Mus Vict 44:109–145Google Scholar
  25. Hochberg FG (1990) Diseases caused by protistans and mesozoans. In: Kinne O (ed) Diseases of marine animals, vol III. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, pp 47–202Google Scholar
  26. Hochberg FG, Short RB (1970) Dicyemennea littlei sp. n. and Dicyema benthoctopi sp. n.: dicyemid Mesozoa from Benthoctopus megellanicus. Trans Am Microsc Soc 89:216–224Google Scholar
  27. Hochberg FG, Short RB (1983) Dicyemennea discocephala sp. n. (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) in a finned octopod from the Antarctic. J Parasitol 69:963–966Google Scholar
  28. Honzakova E, Olejincek J, Cerny V, Daniel M, Dusbabek F (1975) Relationship between number of eggs deposited and body weight of engorged Ixodes ricinus female. Folia Parasitol (Ceske Budejovice) 22:37−43Google Scholar
  29. Hyman LH (1940) The invertebrates, vol I. Protozoa through Ctenophora. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 233–247Google Scholar
  30. Hyman LH (1949) The invertebrates, vol II. Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 219–458Google Scholar
  31. Iwuala MOE, Okapala I (1977) Egg output in the weights and states of engorgement of Amblyomma variegatum (Fabr.) and Boophilus annulatus (Say): (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae). Folia Parasitol (Ceske Budejovice) 24:162–172Google Scholar
  32. Jackson JBC (1986) Modes of dispersal of clonal benthic invertebrates: consequences for species distributions and genetic structure of local populations. Bull Mar Sci 39:588–606Google Scholar
  33. Jennings JB, Calow P (1975) The relationship between high fecundity and the evolution of entoparasitism. Oecologia 21:109–115Google Scholar
  34. Kalavati C, Narasimhamurti CC (1980) A new dicyemid mesozoan, Dodecadicyema loligoi n. gen., n. sp. from the renal appendages of Loligo sp. Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 89:287–292Google Scholar
  35. Kalavati C, Narasimhamurti CC, Suseela T (1978) A new species of Dicyemennea, D. coromandelensis n. sp. from Sepia elliptica Hoyle. Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 87:161–167Google Scholar
  36. Kalavati C, Narasimhamurti CC, Suseela T (1984) Four new species of mesozoan parasites (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from cephalopods of Bay of Bengal. Proc Indian Acad Sci Anim Sci 93:639–654Google Scholar
  37. Katayama T, Wada H, Furuya H, Satoh N, Yamamoto M (1995) Phylogenetic position of the dicyemid Mesozoa inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 189:81–90Google Scholar
  38. Kearn GC (1985) Observations on egg production in the monogenean Entobdella soleae. Int J Parasitol 15:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kobayashi M, Furuya H, Holland WH (1999) Dicyemids are higher animals. Nature 401:762Google Scholar
  40. Kozloff EN (1990) Invertebrates. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 216–220Google Scholar
  41. Kozloff EN (1997) Studies on the so-called plasmodium of Ciliocincta sabellariae (phylum Orthonectida), with notes on an associated microsporan parasite. Cah Biol Mar 38:151–159Google Scholar
  42. Lameere A (1918) Contributions à la connaissance des Dicyémides. Bull Biol Fr Belg 51:347–390Google Scholar
  43. Lameere A (1922) L'histoire naturelle des Dicyémides. Bull Acad Belg Cl Sci 8:779–792Google Scholar
  44. Lapan EA (1975) Inositol polyphosphate deposits in the dense bodies of mesozoan dispersal larvae. Exp Cell Res 83:143–151Google Scholar
  45. Lapan EA, Morowitz HJ (1975) The dicyemid Mesozoa as an integrated system for morphogenetic studies. 1. Description, isolation and maintenance. J Exp Zool 193:147–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McConnaughey BH (1949) Mesozoa of the family Dicyemidae from California. Univ Calif Publ Zool 55:1–34Google Scholar
  47. McConnaughey BH (1951) The life cycle of the dicyemid Mesozoa. Univ Calif Publ Zool 55:295–336Google Scholar
  48. McConnaughey BH (1968) The Mesozoa. In: Florkin M, Scheer BT (eds) Polifera, Coelenterata, and Platyhelminthes. Chemical zoology, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 557–570Google Scholar
  49. McConnaughey BH (1983) Mesozoa. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Spermatogenesis and sperm function. Reproductive biology of invertebrates, vol II. Wiley, New York, pp 151–157Google Scholar
  50. Mössinger J, Wenk P (1986) Fecundity of Litomosoides carinii (Nematoda, Filarioidea): ecological and phylogenetic influences. Evolution 41:882–891Google Scholar
  51. Nesis KN (1982) Cephalopods of the world. T.F.H. Publications,Neptune City, N.J.Google Scholar
  52. Nouvel H (1932) Un Dicyémide nouveau de poulpe Dicyemennea lameerei n. sp. Bull Soc Zool Fr 57:217–223Google Scholar
  53. Nouvel H (1947) Les Dicyémides. 1re partie: systématique, générations, vermiformes, infusorigène et sexualité. Arch Biol 58:59–220Google Scholar
  54. Nouvel H (1948) Les Dicyémides. 2é partie: infusoriforme, tératologie, spécificité du parasitisme, affinités. Arch Biol 59:147–223Google Scholar
  55. Penchaszadeh PE (1968) Diciémoidos (Mesozoa) en cefalopodos de Argentina. Dicyema australis sp. nov. parasito del pulpo Octopus tehuelchus D'Orb. Neotropica (la Plata) 14:127–131Google Scholar
  56. Penchaszadeh PE (1969) Una nueva especie de Dicyemidae (Mesozoa) parasito del pulpo Octopus tehuelchus D'Orb., Dicyema platycephalum sp. nov. Neotropica (la Plata) 15:1–6Google Scholar
  57. Penchaszadeh PE, Christiansen HE (1970) Conocyema marplatensis sp. nov. (Mesozoa, Dicyemidae) parasito del pulpo Octopus tehuelchus D'Orbigny. Neotropica (la Plata) 16:119–123Google Scholar
  58. Poulin R (1995) Evolution of parasite life history traits: myths and reality. Parasitol Today 11:342–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Poulin R (1996) The evolution of life history strategies in parasitic animals. Adv Parasitol 37:107–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Powlowski J, Montoya-Burgos JI, Fahrni JF, West J, Zaninetti L (1996) Origin of the Mesozoa inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences. Mol Biol Evol 13:1128–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Price PW (1974) Strategies for egg production. Evolution 28:76–84Google Scholar
  62. Price PW (1977) General concepts on the evolutionary biology of parasites. Evolution 31:405–420Google Scholar
  63. Ridley RK (1968) Electron microscopic studies on dicyemid Mesozoa. I. Vermiform stages. J Parasitol 54:975–998Google Scholar
  64. Rohde K (1991) Size differences in hamuli of Kuhnia scombri (Monogenea: Polyophisthocotylea) from different geographical areas not due to differences in host size. Int J Parasitol 21:113–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rohde K (1993) Ecology of marine parasites. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 16–67Google Scholar
  66. Rondelaud D, Barthe D (1987) Fasciola hepatica L.: étude de le productivité d'un sporocyste en fonction de la taille de Lymnaea truncatula Müller. Parasitol Res 74:155–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Short RB (1961) A new mesozoan from the Florida Keys. J Parasitol 47:273–278Google Scholar
  68. Short RB (1962) Two new dicyemid mesozoans from the Gulf of Mexico. Tulane Stud Zool 9:101–11Google Scholar
  69. Short RB (1964) Dicyema typoides sp. n. (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Parasitol 50:646–651Google Scholar
  70. Short RB (1971) Three new species of Dicyema (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from New Zealand. Antarct Res Ser 17:231–249Google Scholar
  71. Short RB, Damian RT (1966) Morphology of the infusoriform larva of Dicyema aegira (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae). J Parasitol 52:746–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Short RB, Hochberg FG (1969) Two new species of Dicyema (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from Kaikoura, New Zealand. J Parasitol 55:583–596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Short RB, Hochberg FG (1970) A new species of Dicyemennea (Mesozoa: Dicyemidae) from near the Antarctic Peninsula. J Parasitol 56:517–522Google Scholar
  74. Short RB, Powell EC (1969) Dicyemennea eltanini sp. n. (Mesozoa: Dicyemeidae) from Antarctic waters. J Parasitol 55:794–799Google Scholar
  75. Shostak AW, Dick TA (1987) Effect of food intake by Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi (Copepoda) on growth of procercoids of Triaenophorus crassus (Pseudophyllidea) and on host fecundity. Am Midl Nat 115:225–233Google Scholar
  76. Sibly RM, Calow P (1986) Physiological ecology of animals: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Sinniah B, Subramaniam K (1991) Factors influencing the egg production of Ascaris lumbricoides: relationship to weight, length and diameter of worms. J Helminthol 65:141–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Smyth JD (1994) Introduction to animal parasitology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 22–154Google Scholar
  79. Sorci G, Morand S, Hugot J-P (1997) Host−parasite coevolution: comparative evidence for covariation of life history traits in primates and oxyurid parasites. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:285–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  81. Strathmann RR (1990) Why life histories evolve differently in the sea. Am Zool 30:197–207Google Scholar
  82. Strathmann RR, Strathmann MF (1982) The relationship between adult size and brooding in marine invertebrates. Am Nat 119:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stunkard HW (1954) The life history and systematic relations of the Mesozoa. Q Rev Biol 29:230–244Google Scholar
  84. Stunkard HW (1975) Life-histories and systematics of parasitic flatworms. Syst Zool 24:378–385Google Scholar
  85. Tedla S, Fernando CH (1970) On the biology of Ergasilus confusus Bere, 1931 (Copepoda), infesting yellow perch, Perca flaverscens L. in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, Canada. Crustaceana 19:1–14Google Scholar
  86. Thoney DA (1988) Developmental variation of Heteraxinoides xanthophilis (Monogenea) on hosts of different sizes. J Parasitol 74:999–1003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Truesdale FM, Mermilliod WJ (1977) Some observations on the host−parasite relationship of Macrobrachium ohione (Smith) (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) and Probopyrus bithynis Richardson (Isopoda, Bopyridae). Crustaceana 32:216–220Google Scholar
  88. Van Damme PA, Maertens D, Arrumm A, Hamerlynck O, Ollevier F (1993) The role of Callionymus lyra and C. reticulatus in the life cycle of Lernaeocera lusci in Belgian coastal waters (Southern Bight of the North Sea). J Fish Biol 42:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wenner EL, Windsor NT (1979) Parasitism of galatheid crustaceans from the Norfolk Canyon and Middle Atlantic Bight by bopyrid isopods. Crustaceana 37:293–303Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyGraduate School of Science, Osaka UniversityOsaka 560-0043Japan
  2. 2.Department of Invertebrate ZoologySanta Barbara Museum of Natural HistorySanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations