Advertisement

Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 1645–1669 | Cite as

How does phosphoric acid interact with cherry stones? A discussion on overlooked aspects of chemical activation

  • J. M. González-Domínguez
  • M. C. Fernández-González
  • M. Alexandre-Franco
  • V. Gómez-Serrano
Original
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The fabrication of activated carbon (AC) is widely carried out by the so-called chemical activation method, in which the biomass substratum is put in touch with an impregnating chemical agent prior to the carbonization stage. Even though this methodology is known for a long time, there are many features that are still poorly understood, particularly those regarding the details of the underlying mechanisms involved during the interaction of the activating agent with the precursor, eventually leading to the development of AC. Previous research conducted in the laboratories dealt with the use of cherry stones (CS) and phosphoric acid, toward ACs with tailored porous structures, finding out that the experimental variables of the impregnation stage were crucial for their eventual characteristics. Thus, the results obtained at that time deserved further discussion, with the aim at unraveling the true nature of those findings. With such purpose, the authors comment further on the CS and H3PO4 in non-conventional impregnation methodologies, performed in the previous works. Four series of H3PO4-impregnated products were prepared in a previous research, using a wide range of impregnation strategies, aiming at controlling the loading of H3PO4 on the lignocellulosic substratum. Herein, with the mass uptake as the main, it was possible to link the uptake with the chemical changes of H3PO4 in agreement with essential chemistry knowledge. Mass gain is strongly dependent on the impregnation method, and interesting insights arise on the basis of the mass changes of CS after impregnation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support by Gobierno de Extremadura and European FEDER Funds are gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are directed toward Mr. Patrick Moosbrugger for his kind support on visual designing.

References

  1. Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB (2011) Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajpai P (2016) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, Chapter 2. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baquero MC, Giraldo L, Moreno JC, Suárez-García F, Martínez-Alonso A, Tascón JMD (2003) Activated carbons by pyrolysis of coffee bean husks in presence of phosphoric acid. J Anal Appl Pyrol 70:779–784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00180-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Biol 54:519–546.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boerstoel H, Maatman H, Picken SJ, Remmers R, Westering JB (2001) Liquid crystalline solutions of cellulose acetate in phosphoric acid. Polymer 42:7363–7369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00209-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchelta C, Medjram MS, Bertrand O, Bellat J-P (2008) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam. J Anal Appl Pyrol 82:70–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown EH, Whitt CD (1952) Vapor pressure of phosphoric acid. Ind Eng Chem 44:610–615.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50507a050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho W, Silva SS, Converti A, Vitolo M, Felipe MGA, Roberto IC, Silva MB, Manchilha IM (2002) Used of immobilized Candida yeast cells for xylitol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 98–100:489–496.  https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:98-100:1-9:489 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chávez-Sifontes M, Domine ME (2013) Lignin, structure and applications: depolymerization methods for obtaining aromatic derivatives of industrial interest. Adv Ciencias e Ingeniería 4:15–46Google Scholar
  10. Danish M, Ahmad T (2018) A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renewable Sustainable Energ Rev 87:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danish M, Hashim R, Ibrahim MNM, Sulaiman O (2014) Optimization study for preparation of activated carbon from Acacia mangium wood using phosphoric acid. Wood Sci Technol 48:1069–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0647-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danish M, Khanday WA, Hashim R, Sulaiman NSB, Akhtar MN, Nizami M (2017) Application of optimized large surface area date stone (Phoenix dactylifera) activated carbon for rhodamin B removal from aqueous solution: Box–Behnken design approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 139:280–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dardick C, Callahan AM (2014) Evolution of the fruit endocarp: molecular mechanisms underlying adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies. Front Plant Sci 5:284.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00284 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dardick CD, Callahan AM, Chiozzotto R, Schaffer RJ, Plagnani MC (2010) Stone formation in peach fruit exhibits spatial coordination of the lignin and flavonid pathways and similarity to Arabidopsis dehiscence. BMC Biol 8:13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-13 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobele G, Dizhbite T, Rossinskaja G, Telysheva G, Mier D, Radtke S, Faix O (2003) Pre-treatment of biomass with phosphoric acid prior to fast pyrolysis–a promising method for obtaining 1,6-anhydrosaccharides in high yields. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 68–9:197–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(03)00063-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doménech X (1998) Química de la hidrosfera (Hydrosphere chemistry), 2nd edn. Miraguano Ediciones, MadridGoogle Scholar
  17. Durán-Valle CJ, Gómez-Corzo M, Pastor-Villegas J, Gómez-Serrano V (2005) Study of cherry stones as raw matrial in preparation of carbonaceous adsorbents. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 73:59–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2004.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Henriksson G (2009) Wood chemistry and biotechnology. In: Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Henriksson G (eds) Pulp and paper chemistry and technology. Wood chemistry and wood biotechnology. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esteghlalian AR, Bilodeau M, Mansfield SD, Saddler SN (2001) Do enzymatic hydrolyzability and Simons´stain reflect the changes in the accessibility of lignocellulosic substrates to cellulase enzymes? Biotechnol Progr 17:1049–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fierro V, Torné-Fernández V, Montané D, Celzard A (2005) Study of the decomposition of kraft lignin impregnated with orthophosphoric acid. Thermochim Acta 433:142–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gámez S, Ramírez JA, Garrote G, Vázquez MV (2004) Manufacture of fermentable sugar solutions from sugar cane bagasse hydrolyzed with phosphoric acid at atmospheric pressure. J Agric Food Chem 52:4172–4177.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035456p CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gámez S, González-Cabriales JJ, Ramírez JA, Garrote G, Vázquez M (2006) Study of the hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse using phosphoric acid. J Food Eng 74:78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Girgis BS, Ishak MF (1999) Activated carbon from oreganum stalks by impregnation with phosphoric acid. Mater Lett 39:107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060219k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González JF, Encinar JM, Canito JL, Sabio E, Chacón M (2003) Pyrolysis of cherry stones: energy uses of the different fractions and kinetic study. J Anal Appl Pyrol 67:165–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(02)00060-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. González-Domínguez JM, Fernández-González MC, Alexandre-Franco M, Ansón-Casaos A, Gómez-Serrano V (2011) The influence of the impregnation method on yield of activated carbon produced by H3PO4 activation. Mater Lett 65:1423–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. González-Domínguez JM, Alexandre-Franco MF, Fernández-González MC, Ansón-Casaos A, Gómez-Serrano V (2017) Activated carbon from cherry stones by chemical activation: influence of the impregnation method on porous structure. J Wood Chem Technol 37:148–162.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2016.1253101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood NN, Earnshaw A (1989) Chemistry of the elements. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 589Google Scholar
  28. Grethlein HE (1985) The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Nat Biotechnol 3:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris EE, Lang BG (1947) Hydrolysis of wood cellulose and decomposition of sugar in dilute phosphoric acid. J Phys Chem 51:1430–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j150456a016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heredia A, Guillén R, Fernández-Bolaños J, Rivas M (1987) Olive stones as a source of fermentable sugars. Biomass 14:143–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(87)90016-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho TTT, Zimmermann T, Hauert R, Caseri W (2011) Preparation and charactrerization of cationic nanofibrillatted cellulose from estherification and high-shear disintegration processes. Cellulose 18:1391–1406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9591-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horvath AL (2006) Solubility of structurally complicated materials: I Wood. J Phys Chem Ref Data 35:77–92.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2035708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horvath L, Peszlen I, Peralta P, Kasal B, Li LG (2010) Mechanical properties of genetically engineered young aspen with modified ligning content and/or structure. Wood Fibre Sci 42:310–317. ISSN: 0735-6161Google Scholar
  35. Hsu TA, Ladisch MR, Tsao GR (1980) Alcohol from cellulose. Chem Technol 10:315–319Google Scholar
  36. Jagtoyen M, Derbyshire F (1998) Activated carbons from yellow poplar and white oak by H3PO4 activation. Carbon 36:1085–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00082-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kilpelainen I, Xie H, King A, Granstrom M, Heikkinen H, Argyropoulos DS (2007) Dissolution of wood in ionic liquids. J Agric Food Chem 55:9142–9148.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf071692e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3713–3729.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801542g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lai YZ (1991) Wood and cellulosic chemistry, vol 10. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 455Google Scholar
  40. Lenihan P, Orozco A, O´Neill E, Ahmad MNM (2011) Kinetic modelling of dilute acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Biofuel production-recent developments and prospects INTECH, Rijeka, pp 293–308Google Scholar
  41. Lide DR (ed) (2005) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 86th edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  42. Lim WC, Srinivasakannan C, Balasubramanian N (2010) Activation of palm shells by phosphoric acid impregnation for high yielding activated carbon. J Anal App Pyrol 88:181–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu Q, Zhong Z, Wang S, Luo Z (2011) Interactions of biomass compounds during pyrolyis: a TG-FTIR study. J Anal Appl Pyrol 90:213–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mantanis GI, Young RA, Rowell RM (1994) Swelling of wood. Part 1. Swelling in water. Wood Sci Technol 28:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martínez EA, Villarreal MLM, Almeida e Silva JB, Solenzal AIN, Canilha L, Mussatto SI (2002) Uso de diferentes materias primas para la producción biotecnológica de xilitol. (Use of different raw materials for the biotechnological production of xylithol) Ciencia y Tecnología. Alimentaria 3:295–301.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11358120209487742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Caturla F, Sellés MJ (1995) Porosity in granular carbons activated with phosphoric acid. Carbon 33:1105–1113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00317-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Negahdar L, Delidovich I, Palkovits R (2016) Aqueous-phase hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses over molecular acidic catalysts: Insights into the kinetics and reaction mechanism. Appl Catal B Environ 184:285–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nguyen S, Sophonputtanaphoca S, Kim E, Penner MH (2009) Hydrolytic methods for the quantification of fructose equivalents in herbaceous biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 158:352–361.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8596-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Oinonen P, Zhang L, Lawoko M, Henriksson G (2015) On the formation of lignin polysaccaride networks in Norway spruce. Phytochemistry 111:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.10.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Olivares-Marín M, Fernández-González C, Macías-García A, Gómez-Serrano V (2006) Thermal behaviour of lignocellulosic material in the presence of phosphoric acid. Influence of the acid content in the initial solution. Carbon 44:2347–2350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orozco A, Ahmad M, Rooney D, Walker G (2007) Dilute acid hydrolysis of cellulose and cellulosic bio-waste using a microwave reactor system. Proc Safety Environ Protection 85:446–449.  https://doi.org/10.1205/psep07003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Palonen H, Thomsen AB, Tenkanen M, Schmidt AS, Viikari U (2004) Evaluation of wet oxidation pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood. J Appl Biochem Biotechnol 117:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:117:1:01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pettersen RC (1984) The chemistry of solid wood. Advances in chemistry series. In: Rowell R (ed.) vol. 205, Chapter 2, The chemical composition of wood, Am. Chem. Soc., pp 57–126Google Scholar
  54. Platanov VA (2000) Properties of polyphosphoric acid. Fibre Chem 32:325–329.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004199406779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Satarn J, Lamamorphanth W, Kamwilaisak K (2014) Acid hydrolysis from corn stover for reducing sugar. Adv Mater Res 931–932:1608–1613.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.1608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharpe AG (1989) Química Inorgánica (Inorganic chemistry). Editorial Reverté, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  57. Solum MS, Pugmire RJ, Jagtoyen M, Derbyshire F (1995) Evolution of carbon structure in chemically activated wood. Carbon 31:1247–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00067-N CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stamm AJ (1934) Effect of inorganic salts upon the swelling and the shrinking of wood. J Am Chem Soc 56:1195–1204.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01320a063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stamm AJ (1964) Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press, New York. ISBN 0826084958Google Scholar
  60. Stone JE, Scallan AM, Donefer E, Ahlgren E (1969) Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of similar size to a cellulase enzyme. Adv Chem 95:219–241.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1969-0095.ch013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD (2002) Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 124:4974–4975.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025790m CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Toy ADF (1973) Phosphorus. In: Comprehensive inorganic chemistry, Trotman-Dickenson, Vol. 2, Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsoncheva T, Mileva A, Tsyntsarski B, Paneva D, Spassova I, Kovacheva D, Velinov N, Karashanova D, Georgieva B, Petrov N (2018) Activated carbon from Bulgarian peach stones as a support of catalysts for methanol decomposition. Biomass Bioenerg 109:135–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsubota T, Morita M, Kamimura S, Ohno T (2015) New approach for synthesis of activated carbon from bamboo. J Porous Mater 23:349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-015-0087-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Agriculture (1957) Shrinking and swelling of wood in use. Forest Products Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Report No. 736Google Scholar
  66. Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG, Morgan TJ (2012) An overview on the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass. Fuel 94:1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wertz DL, Cook GA (1985) Phosphoric acid solutions. I: molecular association in a 57.8 molal aqueous solution. J Solut Chem 14:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wyman CE (1994) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: technology, economics and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 50:3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(94)90214-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wyman CE (2013) Introduction, In: Wyman CE (ed) Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals, 1st Ed., Chapter 1, Wiley, New York, pp 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organic and Inorganic ChemistryUniversity of ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Processes and Nanotechnology. Group of Carbon Nanostructures and NanotechnologyInstituto de Carboquímica ICB-CSIC. C/Miguel LuesmaSaragossaSpain

Personalised recommendations