Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 383–402 | Cite as

Elastic characterization of wood by Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS): a comprehensive study

  • R. Longo
  • D. Laux
  • S. Pagano
  • T. Delaunay
  • E. Le Clézio
  • O. Arnould
Original
  • 174 Downloads

Abstract

The main principle of Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS) measurement method is to excite a sample and to deduce its elastic constants from its free mechanical resonant frequencies. The goal of this paper is to propose an application of RUS in the case of wood cubic samples by: (1) using frequencies and mode shapes (or vibration patterns) of the free resonant modes in an iterative numerical procedure to solve the inverse problem for identifying components of the stiffness tensor of the sample’s material, (2) finding the limits and optimizing the robustness of the identification procedure in the case of wood and (3) applying it to a large density range of wood samples. Specific continuous waves have been used as excitation signal in order to experimentally determine the free resonant frequencies and mode shapes of the sample in a faster way by means of Scanning Doppler Vibrometer measurements. Afterward, the stiffness tensor was derived by solving iteratively an inverse problem. The gain of using the mode shapes in the inverse identification procedure is demonstrated to be particularly necessary for wood, especially for pairing each measured frequency with its corresponding theoretically predicted one, as viscoelastic damping causes the resonant peaks to overlap and/or disappear. A sensitivity analysis of each elastic constant on the measured resonant frequencies has thus been performed. It shows that, in its current state of development, not all of the elastic constants can be identified robustly and a modified identification procedure is thus proposed. This modified procedure has been applied successfully to wood samples with a large density range, including softwood and hardwood, and particularly non-homogeneous wood species or with specific anatomical features.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Gilles Despaux and Franck Augereau (IES, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS) for their precious help in the conception of the instrumentation of the Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometer and Tancrède Alméras (LMGC, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS) and Arie van der Lee (IEM, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS) for the X-ray diffraction measurements. Financial support from Labex NUMEV (Univ. Montpellier, CNRS) and StressInTrees project (ANR-12-BS09-0004 funded by the French National Research Agency ANR) is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

226_2017_980_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (61 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 60 KB)

References

  1. Arnould O, Stürzenbecher R, Bardet S, Hofstetter K, Guibal D, Amusant N, Pizzi A (2010) Mechanical potential of eco-OSB produced from durable and nondurable species and natural resins. Holzforschung 64(6):791–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bader TK, Hofstetter K, Eberhardsteiner J, Keunecke D (2012) Microstructure–stiffness relationships of common yew and Norway spruce. Strain 48(4):306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bader TK, Eberhardsteiner J, De Borst K (2017) Shear stiffness and its relation to the microstructure of 10 European and tropical hardwood species. Wood Mater Sci Eng 12(2):82–91Google Scholar
  4. Bardet S, Gril J (2002) Modelling the transverse viscoelasticity of green wood using a combination of two parabolic elements. C R Mécanique 330(8):549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard S, Grimal Q, Haupert S, Laugier P (2011) Assessment of anisotropic elasticity of small bone samples with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy: attenuation does not prevent the measurements. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, pp 1599–1602.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2011.0397
  6. Bernard S, Grimal Q, Laugier P (2014) Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy for viscoelastic characterization of anisotropic attenuative solid materials. J Acoust Soc Am 135(5):2601–2613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard S, Marrelec G, Laugier P, Grimal Q (2015) Bayesian normal modes identification and estimation of elastic coefficients in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Inverse Probl 31(6):065 010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brabec M, Lagaña R, Milch J, Tippner J, Sebera V (2017) Utilization of digital image correlation in determining of both longitudinal shear moduli of wood at single torsion test. Wood Sci Technol 51(1):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brancheriau L, Baillères H (2002) Natural vibration analysis of clear wooden beams: a theoretical review. Wood Sci Technol 36(4):347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brémaud I, Cabrolier P, Gril J, Clair B, Gerard J, Minato K, Thibaut B (2010) Identification of anisotropic vibrational properties of Padauk wood with interlocked grain. Wood Sci Technol 44(3):355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brémaud I, Gril J, Thibaut B (2011) Anisotropy of wood vibrational properties: dependence on grain angle and review of literature data. Wood Sci Technol 45(4):735–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brémaud I, Ruelle J, Thibaut A, Thibaut B (2013) Changes in viscoelastic vibrational properties between compression and normal wood: roles of microfibril angle and of lignin. Holzforschung 67(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruno L, Poggialini A (2005) Elastic characterization of anisotropic materials by Speckle interferometry. Exp Mech 45(3):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruno L, Felice G, Pagnotta L, Poggialini A, Stigliano G (2008) Elastic characterization of orthotropic plates of any shape via static testing. Int J Solids Struct 45(3–4):908–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bucur V (2006) Acoustics of wood, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Bucur V, Archer RR (1984) Elastic constants for wood by an ultrasonic method. Wood Sci Technol 18(4):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bucur V, Rasolofosaon P (1998) Dynamic elastic anisotropy and nonlinearity in wood and rock. Ultrasonics 36(7):813–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahl KB, Malo KA (2009) Linear shear properties of spruce softwood. Wood Sci Technol 43(5–6):499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahmen S, Ketata H, Ben Ghozlen M, Hosten B (2010) Elastic constants measurement of anisotropic Olivier wood plates using air-coupled transducers generated Lamb wave and ultrasonic bulk wave. Ultrasonics 50(4–5):502–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. De Borst K, Bader TK, Wikete C (2012) Microstructure–stiffness relationships of ten European and tropical hardwood species. J Struct Biol 177:532–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Delaunay T, Le Clézio E, Guennou M, Dammak H, Pham Thi M, Feuillard G (2008) Full tensorial characterization of single PZN-12%PT crystal by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 55(2):476–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dünisch O (2017) Relationship between anatomy and vibration behaviour of softwoods and hardwoods. IAWA J 38(1):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. El Mouridi M, Laurent T, Brancheriau L, Arnould O, Famiri A, Hakam A, Gril J (2011) Searching for material symmetries in the burr wood of thuja by a direct contact ultrasonic method on spherical samples. Maderas-Cienc tecnol 13(3):285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fang CH, Guibal D, Clair B, Gril J, Liu YM, Liu SQ (2008) Relationships between growth stress and wood properties in poplar I-69 (Populus deltoides Bartr. cv. “Lux” ex I-69/55). Ann For Sci 65(3):307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farzbod F, Hurley DH (2012) Using eigenmodes to perform the inverse problem associated with resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 59(11):2470–2475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fig M (2008) Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS). Matlab® Central. http://fr.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/11399-resonant-ultrasound-spectroscopy--rus-. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
  27. Forest Products Laboratory (2010) Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190Google Scholar
  28. François M, Geymonat G, Berthaud Y (1998) Determination of the symmetries of an experimentally determined stiffness tensor: application to acoustic measurements. Int J Solids Struct 35(31–32):4091–4106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garab J, Keunecke D, Hering S, Szalai J, Niemz P (2010) Measurement of standard and off-axis elastic moduli and Poisson’s ratios of spruce and yew wood in the transverse plane. Wood Sci Technol 44(3):451–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gindl W (2002) Comparing mechanical properties of normal and compression wood in Norway spruce: the role of lignin in compression parallel to the grain. Holzforschung 56(4):395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonçalves R, Trinca AJ, Cerri DGP (2011) Comparison of elastic constants of wood determined by ultrasonic wave propagation and static compression test. Wood Fiber Sci 43(1):64–75Google Scholar
  32. Gonçalves R, Trinca AJ, Pellis BP (2014) Elastic constants of wood determined by ultrasound using three geometries of specimens. Wood Sci Technol 48(2):269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grimsel M (1998) Computer-aided identification of mechanical wood properties. In: Kurjatko S, Kúdela J (eds) Wood structure and properties’98, Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, pp 185–192Google Scholar
  34. Guillaume P, Schoukens J, Pintelon R, Kollar I (1991) Crest-factor minimization using nonlinear Chebyshev approximation methods. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 40(6):982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guitard D, El Amri F (1987) Modèles prévisionnels de comportement élastique tridimensionnel pour les bois feuillus et les bois résineux (Predictive models of tridimensional elastic behavior of hardwoods and softwoods). Ann Sci For 44(3):335–358 (in French) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guitard D, Gachet C (2004) Paramètres structuraux et/ou ultrastructuraux facteurs de la variabilité intra-arbre de l’anisotropie élastique du bois (Structural and/or ultrastructural parameters factors of intra-tree wood elastic anisotropy variability). Ann For Sci 61:129–139 (in French) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hassel B, Berard P, Modén C, Berglund L (2009) The single cube apparatus for shear testing—full-field strain data and finite element analysis of wood in transverse shear. Compos Sci Technol 69:877–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hering S, Keunecke D, Niemz P (2012) Moisture-dependent orthotropic elasticity of beech wood. Wood Sci Technol 46(5):927–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keunecke D, Sonderegger W, Pereteanu K, Lüthi T, Niemz P (2007) Determination of Young’s and shear moduli of common yew and Norway spruce by means of ultrasonic waves. Wood Sci Technol 41:309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keunecke D, Hering S, Niemz P (2008) Three-dimensional elastic behaviour of common yew and Norway spruce. Wood Sci Technol 42(8):633–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keunecke D, Merz T, Sonderreger W, Schnider T, Niemz P (2011) Stiffness moduli of various softwood and hardwood species determined with ultrasound. Wood Mater Sci Eng 6(3):91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohlhauser C, Hellmich C (2012) Determination of Poisson’s ratios in isotropic, transversely isotropic, and orthotropic materials by means of combined ultrasonic-mechanical testing of normal stiffnesses: Application to metals and wood. Eur J Mech A Solid 33:82–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohlhauser C, Hellmich C, Vitale-Brovarone C, Boccaccini AR, Rota A, Eberhardsteiner J (2009) Ultrasonic characterisation of porous biomaterials across different frequencies. Strain 45(1):34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laghdir A, Fortin Y, De La Cruz CM, Hernández RE (2008) Development of a technique to determine the 3D elasticty tensor of wood as applied to drying stress modeling. Maderas-Cienc tecnol 10(1):35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laux D, Ferrandis JY, Leveque G, Gatt JM (2006) Elastic properties of composites: periodical homogenisation technique and experimental comparison using acoustic microscopy and resonant ultrasonic spectroscopy. Ultrasonics 45:104–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Longo R, Vanherzeele J, Vanlanduit S, Guillaume P (2008) Underwater visualization of multi-input interleaved multisine wave fronts for ultrasonic testing of bones specimens using Laser Doppler vibrometry. In: 8th international conference on vibration measurements by laser techniques: advances and applications, proceedings SPIE, vol 70980T. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.803032
  47. Longo R, Delaunay T, Laux D, El Mouridi M, Arnould O, Le Clézio E (2012) Wood elastic characterization from a single sample by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Ultrasonics 52:971–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Majano-Majano A, Fernandez-Cabo JL, Hoheisel S, Klein M (2012) A test method for characterizing clear wood using a single specimen. Exp Mech 52:1079–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mesnil O, Ruzzene M (2016) Sparse wavefield reconstruction and source detection using compressed sensing. Ultrasonics 67:94–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Migliori A, Sarrao JL, Visscher WM, Bell TM, Lei M, Fisk Z, Leisure R (1993) Resonant ultrasound spectroscopic technics for measurement of the elastic moduli of solids. Physica B 183:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Obataya E, Ono T, Norimoto M (2000) Vibrational properties of wood along the grain. J Mater Sci 35:2993–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ozyhar T, Hering S, Niemz P (2013a) Moisture-dependent orthotropic tension–compression asymmetry of wood. Holzforschung 67(4):395–404Google Scholar
  53. Ozyhar T, Hering S, Sanabria SJ, Niemz P (2013b) Determining moisture-dependent elastic characteristics of beech wood by means of ultrasonic waves. Wood Sci Technol 47(2):329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2001) Compressive behaviour of softwood under uniaxial loading at diffrent orientations to the grain. Mech Mater 33:705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruelle J, Beauchêne J, Thibaut A, Thibaut B (2007) Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of tension and opposite wood from ten tropical rainforest trees from different species. Ann For Sci 64:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ruelle J, Beauchêne J, Yamamoto H, Thibaut B (2011) Variations in physical and mechanical properties between tension and opposite wood from three tropical rainforest species. Wood Sci Technol 45(2):339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schoch W, Heller I, Schweingruber FH, Kienast F (2004) Wood anatomy of central European species. Online version: www.woodanatomy.ch. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
  58. Scholz G, Liebner F, Koch G, Bues CT, Günther B, Bäucker E (2007) Chemical, anatomical and technological properties of Snakewood [Brosimum guianense (Aubl.) Huber]. Wood Sci Technol 41:673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schubert SI, Gsell D, Dual J, Motavalli M, Niemz P (2006) Rolling shear modulus and damping factor of spruce and decayed spruce estimated by modal analysis. Holzforschung 60:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Se Golpayegani A, Brémaud I, Gril J, Thevenon MF, Arnould O, Pourtahmasi K (2012) Effect of extractions on dynamic mechanical properties of white mulberry (Morus alba). J Wood Sci 58:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seichepine JL (1980) Mise au point d’une méthode expérimentale destinée à l’identification de la matrice des complaisances élastiques de solides anisotropes : Application aux matériaux bois (Development of an experimental method for the identification of the elastic compliance matrix of anisotropic solids: application to wood materials). PhD thesis, I.N.P. de Lorraine, Nancy (in French) Google Scholar
  62. Sliker A (1988) A method for predicting non-shear compliances in the RT plane of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 20(1):44–55Google Scholar
  63. Sliker A (1989) Measurement of the smaller Poisson’s ratios and related compliances for wood. Wood Fiber Sci 21(3):252–262Google Scholar
  64. Timell T (1986) Compression wood in gymnosperms. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vázquez C, Gonçalves R, Bertoldo C, Baño V, Vega A, Crespo J, Guaita M (2015) Determination of the mechanical properties of Castanea sativa Mill. using ultrasonic wave propagation and comparison with static compression and bending methods. Wood Sci Technol 49(3):607–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Visscher WM, Migliori A, Bell TM, Reinert RA (1991) On the normal modes of free vibration of homogeneous and anisotropic elastic objects. J Acoust Soc Am 90(4):2154–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Voigt W (1928) Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik (Textbook of crystal physics), reprint of the 1st edn. Teubner, Leipzig (in German) Google Scholar
  68. Vorobyev A, Arnould O, Laux D, Longo R, van Dijk NP, Gamstedt EK (2016) Characterisation of cubic oak specimens from the Vasa ship and recent wood by means of quasi-static loading and resonance ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS). Holzforschung 70(5):457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whealer EA (2011) Insidewood—a web resource for hardwood anatomy. IAWA J 32(2):199–211, online version: http://insidewood.lib.ncsu.edu/search. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
  70. Yamamoto H, Okuyama T, Yoshida M (1993) Method of determining the mean microfibril angle of wood over a wide range by the improved Cave’s method. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 39(4):375–381Google Scholar
  71. Yoshihara H (2012) Off-axis Young’s modulus and off-axis shear modulus of wood measured by flexural vibration tests. Holzforschung 66:207–213Google Scholar
  72. Zhang W, Sliker A (1991) Measuring shear moduli in wood with small tension and compression samples. Wood Fiber Sci 23(1):58–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IESUniv. Montpellier, CNRSMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.ESEO Group - GSIIAngersFrance
  3. 3.LAUM, CNRSLe MansFrance
  4. 4.LMGCUniv. Montpellier, CNRSMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations