Advertisement

Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 243–260 | Cite as

Short hold times in dynamic vapor sorption measurements mischaracterize the equilibrium moisture content of wood

  • Samuel V. Glass
  • Charles R. Boardman
  • Samuel L. Zelinka
Original

Abstract

Recently, the dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) technique has been used to measure sorption isotherms and develop moisture-mechanics models for wood and cellulosic materials. This method typically involves measuring the time-dependent mass response of a sample following step changes in relative humidity (RH), fitting a kinetic model to the data, and extrapolating the asymptotic mass. A series of steps covering the full RH range is used to generate the sorption isotherm. The majority of prior DVS data were taken with hold times of either 60 min or until the change in moisture content was <0.002% per minute over a 10-min period. Here, DVS measurements on wood and isolated wood polymers are presented where the hold times at certain relative humidity steps were much longer, ranging between 24 and 50 h. The data clearly show that the criteria for hold time in previous DVS measurements result in significant errors in prediction of the asymptotic mass. Although the data at short times are consistent with previous measurements, the data exhibit slow sorption behavior with characteristic times on the order of 500–2000 min that cannot be identified with shorter hold times. The results suggest that new hold time criteria need to be developed for dynamic vapor sorption measurements in wood.

Keywords

Lignin Hold Time Cellulosic Material Equilibrium Moisture Content Moisture Sorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Astill D, Hall P, McConnell J (1987) An automated vacuum microbalance for measurement of adsorption isotherms. J Phys E Sci Instrum 20:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benham M, Ross D (1989) Experimental determination of absorption–desorption isotherms by computer-controlled gravimetric analysis*. Z Phys Chem 163:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergren MS (1994) An automated controlled atmosphere microbalance for the measurement of moisture sorption. Int J Pharm 103:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceylan Ö, Landuyt L, Meulewaeter F, Clerck K (2012) Moisture sorption in developing cotton fibers. Cellulose 19:1517–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Driemeier C, Mendes FM, Oliveira MM (2012) Dynamic vapor sorption and thermoporometry to probe water in celluloses. Cellulose 19:1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelund ET, Klamer M, Venås TM (2010) Acquisition of sorption isotherms for modified woods by the use of dynamic vapour sorption instrumentation: principles and practice. In: 41st annual meeting of the international research group on wood protection, Biarritz, France, 9–13 May 2010. IRG SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelund ET, Thygesen LG, Svensson S, Hill CAS (2013) A critical discussion of the physics of wood–water interactions. Wood Sci Technol 47:141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glass SV, Zelinka SL (2010) Moisture relations and physical properties of wood. In: Ross RJ (ed) Wood handbook, wood as an engineering material. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  9. Glass SV, Zelinka SL, Johnson JA (2014) Investigation of historic equilibrium moisture content data from the Forest Products Laboratory. General technical report FPL–GTR–229. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, p 34Google Scholar
  10. Hill CAS, Norton A, Newman G (2009) The water vapor sorption behavior of natural fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 112:1524–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill CAS, Norton AJ, Newman G (2010a) The water vapour sorption properties of Sitka spruce determined using a dynamic vapour sorption apparatus. Wood Sci Technol 44:497–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill CAS, Norton A, Newman G (2010b) The water vapor sorption behavior of flax fibers—Analysis using the parallel exponential kinetics model and determination of the activation energies of sorption. J Appl Polym Sci 116:2166–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill CAS, Keating BA, Jalaludin Z, Mahrdt E (2012) A rheological description of the water vapour sorption kinetics behaviour of wood invoking a model using a canonical assembly of Kelvin-Voigt elements and a possible link with sorption hysteresis. Holzforschung 66:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill CAS, Ramsay J, Laine K, Rautkari L, Hughes M (2013) Water vapour sorption behaviour of thermally modified wood. Int Wood Prod J 4:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jalaludin Z, Hill CAS, Samsi HW, Husain H, Xie Y (2010a) Analysis of water vapour sorption of oleo-thermal modified wood of Acacia mangium and Endospermum malaccense by a parallel exponential kinetics model and according to the Hailwood-Horrobin model. Holzforschung 64:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jalaludin Z, Hill CAS, Xie Y, Samsi HW, Husain H, Awang K, Curling SF (2010b) Analysis of the water vapour sorption isotherms of thermally modified acacia and sesendok. Wood Mat Sci Eng 5:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keating BA, Hill CAS, Sun D, English R, Davies P, McCue C (2013) The water vapor sorption behavior of a galactomannan cellulose nanocomposite film analyzed using parallel exponential kinetics and the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model. J Appl Polym Sci 129:2352–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kohler R, Dück R, Ausperger B, Alex R (2003) A numeric model for the kinetics of water vapor sorption on cellulosic reinforcement fibers. Compos Interfaces 10:255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohler R, Alex R, Brielmann R, Ausperger B (2006) A new kinetic model for water sorption isotherms of cellulosic materials. Macromol Symp 244:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall PV, Cook PA, Williams DR (1994) A new analytical technique for characterising the water vapour sorption properties of powders. Paper presented at the international symposium on solid oral dosage forms, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  21. Olsson AM, Salmén L (2004) The association of water to cellulose and hemicellulose in paper examined by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 339:813–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Paes SS, Sun S, MacNaughtan W, Ibbett R, Ganster J, Foster TJ, Mitchell JR (2010) The glass transition and crystallization of ball milled cellulose. Cellulose 17:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patera A, Derome D, Van den Bulcke J, Carmeliet J (2013) 3D Experimental investigation of the hygro-mechanical behaviour of wood at cellular and sub-cellular scale: detection of local deformations. In: 1st international conference on tomography of materials and structures (ICTMS 2013). pp 55–58Google Scholar
  24. Popescu C-M, Hill CAS, Curling S, Ormondroyd G, Xie Y (2013) The water vapour sorption behaviour of acetylated birch wood: how acetylation affects the sorption isotherm and accessible hydroxyl content. J Mat Sci 49:2362–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rasmussen M, Akinc M (1983) Microcomputer-controlled gravimetric adsorption apparatus. Rev Sci Instrum 54:1558–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharratt V, Hill CAS, Zaihan J, Kint DPR (2010) Photodegradation and weathering effects on timber surface moisture profiles as studied using dynamic vapour sorption. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2659–2662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siau JF (1995) Wood: influence of moisture on physical properties. Department of Wood Science and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  28. Skaar C (1988) Wood–water relations. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spalt H (1957) The sorption of water vapor by domestic and tropical woods. For Prod J 7:331Google Scholar
  30. Spalt H (1958) The fundamentals of water vapor sorption by wood. For Prod J 8:288–295Google Scholar
  31. Stamm AJ (1964) Wood and cellulose science. The Ronald Press Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun S, Mitchell JR, MacNaughtan W, Foster TJ, Harabagiu V, Song Y, Zheng Q (2009) Comparison of the mechanical properties of cellulose and starch films. Biomacromolecules 11:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thybring EE, Klamer M, Venås TM (2011) Adsorption boundary curve influenced by step interval of relative humidity investigated by Dynamic Vapour Sorption equipment. In: 42nd annual meeting of the international research group on wood protection, Queenstown, New Zealand. IRG Secretariat, pp Paper IRG/WP 11-40547Google Scholar
  34. Tiemann HD (1906) Effect of moisture upon the strength and stiffness of wood. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Bulletin 70, Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Volkova N, Ibrahim V, Hatti-Kaul R, Wadsö L (2012) Water sorption isotherms of Kraft lignin and its composites. Carbohydr Polym 87:1817–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willems W (2015) A critical review of the multilayer sorption models and comparison with the sorption site occupancy (SSO) model for wood moisture sorption isotherm analysis. Holzforschung 69:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams D (1995) The characterisation of powders by gravimetric water vapour sorption. Int Labmate 20:40–42Google Scholar
  38. Williams DL, Hodge DB (2013) Impacts of delignification and hot water pretreatment on the water induced cell wall swelling behavior of grasses and its relation to cellulolytic enzyme hydrolysis and binding. Cellulose 21:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xie Y, Hill CA, Xiao Z, Jalaludin Z, Militz H, Mai C (2010) Water vapor sorption kinetics of wood modified with glutaraldehyde. J Appl Polym Sci 117:1674–1682Google Scholar
  40. Xie Y, Hill C, Jalaludin Z, Curling S, Anandjiwala R, Norton A, Newman G (2011a) The dynamic water vapour sorption behaviour of natural fibres and kinetic analysis using the parallel exponential kinetics model. J Mat Sci 46:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xie Y, Hill CA, Jalaludin Z, Sun D (2011b) The water vapour sorption behaviour of three celluloses: analysis using parallel exponential kinetics and interpretation using the Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic model. Cellulose 18:517–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yakimets I, Paes SS, Wellner N, Smith AC, Wilson RH, Mitchell JR (2007) Effect of water content on the structural reorganization and elastic properties of biopolymer films: a comparative study. Biomacromolecules 8:1710–1722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yelle DJ, Ralph J, Frihart CR (2008) Characterization of nonderivatized plant cell walls using high-resolution solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Chem 46:508–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zaihan J, Hill CAS, Curling S, Hashim WS, Hamdan H (2009) Moisture adsorption isotherms of Acacia mangium and Endospermum malaccense using dynamic vapour sorption. J Trop For Sci 21:277–285Google Scholar
  45. Zaihan J, Hill C, Curling S, Hashim W, Hamdan H (2010) The kinetics of water vapour sorption: analysis using parallel exponential kinetics model on six Malaysian hardwoods. J Trop For Sci 22(2):107–117Google Scholar
  46. Zelinka SL, Glass SV (2010) Water vapor sorption isotherms for southern pine treated with several waterborne preservatives ASTM. J Test Eval 38:80–88Google Scholar
  47. Zelinka SL, Lambrecht MJ, Glass SV, Wiedenhoeft AC, Yelle DJ (2012) Examination of water phase transitions in Loblolly pine and cell wall components by differential scanning calorimetry. Thermochim Acta 533:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zelinka SL, Glass SV, Boardman CR, Derome D (2016a) Moisture storage and transport properties of preservative treated and untreated southern pine wood. Wood Mat Sci Eng 11:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zelinka SL, Glass SV, Jakes JE, Stone DS (2016b) A solution thermodynamics definition of the fiber saturation point and the derivation of a wood–water phase (state) diagram. Wood Sci Technol 50:443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel V. Glass
    • 1
  • Charles R. Boardman
    • 1
  • Samuel L. Zelinka
    • 1
  1. 1.Building and Fire SciencesUS Forest Service, Forest Products LaboratoryMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations