Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 481–498

Stiffness of normal, opposite, and tension poplar wood determined using micro-samples in the three material directions

  • Patrick Perre
  • Anh Tuan Dinh
  • Carole Assor
  • Xavier Frank
  • Gilles Pilate
Original

Abstract

Mechanical tests on micro-samples were performed in the three material directions in normal, opposite, and tension wood collected from a poplar tree. Two custom micro-devices were designed and built in the laboratory to test samples under pure tension in the transverse direction and under 4-point bending conditions in the longitudinal direction. Both devices were designed to handle samples with a small transverse section (a few square mm), which allowed to select zones with homogenous anatomical features. The results indicate a very high longitudinal stiffness in tension wood (up to 35 GPa compared to an average of 18 GPa for normal wood). Considering wood density, the value represents a specific modulus that is nearly 70 % crystalline cellulose. However, tension wood is slightly less stiff in the tangential and radial directions (1,150 vs. 1,500 MPa for normal wood in the radial direction and 430 vs. 530 MPa in the tangential direction).

References

  1. Badel E, Perré P (1999) Determination of the elastic properties in different anatomical elements of oak using tensile tests on micro-samples. Ann For Sci 56:467–478 (in French)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergander A, Salmen L (2002) Cell wall properties and their effects on the mechanical properties of fibres. J Mater Sci 37:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booker RE, Sell J (1998) The nanostructure of the cell wall and its functions in a living tree. Holz Roh-Werkst 56:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brancheriau L, Bailleres H, Guitard D (2002) Comparison between modulus of elasticity values calculated using 3 and 4 point bending tests on wooden sample. Wood Sci Technol 36:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterfield BG (ed) (1998) Microfibril angle in wood. IAWA & IUFRO, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng Q, Wang S, Harper DP (2009) Effects of process and source on elastic modulus of single cellulose fibrils evaluated by atomic force microscopy. Compos A 40:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clair B, Thibaut B, Sugiyama J (2005) On the detachment of the gelatinous layer in tension wood fiber. J Wood Sci 51:218–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farruggia F (1998) Determination of the elastic properties of a set of wood fibres from its structural organisation and mechanical tests under a microscope. PhD thesis, ENGREF Nancy, (in French)Google Scholar
  9. Farruggia F, Perré P (2000) Microscopic tensile tests in the transverse plane of earlywood and latewood part of spruce. Wood Sci Technol 34:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forsberg F, Mooser R, Arnold M, Hack E, Wyss P (2008) 3D Micro-scale deformations of wood in bending: synchrotron radiation μCT data analyzed with digital volume correlation. J Struct Biol 164(2008):255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank X, Perré P (2010) The potential of meshless methods to address physical and mechanical phenomena involved during drying at the pore level. Dry Technol 28:932–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids—structure and properties. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillis P (1972) Orthotropic elastic constants of wood. Wood Sci Technol 6:138–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gindl W, Schöberl T (2004) The significance of the elastic modulus of wood cell walls obtained from nanoindentation measurements. Compos Part A 35:1345–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guitard D (1987) Mechanics of wood and composites (in French). Cepadues Editions, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstetter K, Hellmich C, Eberhardsteiner J (2005) Development and experimental validation of a continuum micromechanics model for the elasticity of wood. Eur J Mech A Solids 24:1030–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmberg S, Persson K, Petersson H (1999) Nonlinear mechanical behaviour and analysis of wood and fibre materials. Comput Struct 72:459–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jourez B (1997) Tension wood : definition and distribution inside the tree. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 1:100–112 (in French)Google Scholar
  19. Jourez B, Riboux A, Leclercq A (2001) Anatomical characteristics of tension wood and opposite wood in young inclined stems of poplar (Populus euramericana CV ‘Ghoy’). IAWA 22:133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keller R (1994) The constitution of wood in wood: an engineering materiel. Ph. Jodin (ed), ARBOLOR, ENGREF Nancy, (in French)Google Scholar
  21. Kollmann FP, Côté WA (1968) Principles of wood science and technology. Volume I: solid wood. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koponen S, Toratti T, Kanerva P (1991) Modeling longitudinal elastic and shrinkage of wood based on cell structure. Wood Sci Technol 25:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marchal R, Berthelot A, Reuling D, Aleon A, El Haouzali H, Paillassa E (2009) Wood quality directory of plantation poplar clones. Forêt Privée Française; FCBA; Arts et Métiers ParisTech de Cluny; Chambre Syndicale du Peuplier de France. (in French)Google Scholar
  24. Marhofer RJ, Reiling S, Brickmann J (1996) Computer simulations of crystal structure and elastic properties of cellulose. Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem 100:1350–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nairn JA (2007) Material point method simulations of transverse fracture in wood with realistic morphologies. Holzforschung 61:375–381Google Scholar
  26. Nakai T, Yamamoto H, Nakao T, Hamatake M (2005) Mechanical behavior of the crystalline region of wood and the piezoelectric response of wood in tension tests. Wood Sci Technol 39:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Navi P, Heger F (2005) Thermo-hygro-mechanical behaviour of wood Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. CH—1015 LausanneGoogle Scholar
  28. Neagu RC, Gamstedt EK (2007) Modelling of effects of ultrastructural morphology on the hygroelastic properties of wood fibres. J Mater Sci 42:10254–10274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Okuyama T, Yamamoto H, Iguchi M, Yoshida M (1990) Generation process of growth stresses in cell walls. II. Growth stress in tension wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 36:797–803Google Scholar
  30. Perré P (2002) Wood as a multi-scale porous medium: Observation, Experiment, and Modelling. In: Proceedings of the first international conference of the European Society for wood mechanics, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp 365–384Google Scholar
  31. Perré P (2005) MeshPore: a software able to apply image- based meshing techniques to anisotropic and heterogeneous porous media. Dry Technol 23:1993–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perré P (2010) Multiscale modelling of drying as a powerful extension of the macroscopic approach: application to solid wood and biomass processing. Dry Technol 28:944–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perré P, Badel E (2003) Properties of oak wood predicted from X-ray inspection: representation, homogenisation and localisation. Part II: computation of macroscopic properties and microscopic stress fields. Ann For Sci 60:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perré P, Huber F (2007) Measurement of free shrinkage at the tissue level using an optical microscope with an immersion objective: results obtained for Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and spruce (Picea abies). Ann For Sci 64:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qing H, Mishnaevsky L Jr (2009) 3D Hierarchical computational model of wood as a cellular material with fibril reinforced, heterogeneous multiple layers. Mech Mater 41:1034–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakudara I, Nukushina Y, Ito T (1962) Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions of oriented polymers. J Polym Sci 57:651–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simon P (2009) Multiscale approach of the wood behaviour in its transverse plane. PhD thesis, I.N.S.A Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  38. Thibaut B, Gril J, Fournier M (2001) Mechanics of wood and trees: some new highlights for an old story. C R Acad Sci Serie IIb Mec 329:701–716Google Scholar
  39. Watanabe U, Fujita M, Norimoto M (2002) Transverse Young’s Moduli and cell shapes in coniferous early wood. Holzforschung 56:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yamamoto H (2004) Role of the gelatinous layer on the origin of the physical properties of the tension wood. J Wood Sci 50:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamamoto H, Okuyama T, Sugiyama K, Yoshida M (1992) Generation process of growth stresses in cell walls. IV. Action of the cellulose microfibrils upon the generation of the tensile stresses. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:107–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Perre
    • 1
  • Anh Tuan Dinh
    • 2
  • Carole Assor
    • 3
  • Xavier Frank
    • 4
  • Gilles Pilate
    • 5
  1. 1.Ecole Centrale Paris, LGPMChâtenay-MalabryFrance
  2. 2.AgroParisTech, LERFoB UMR1092NancyFrance
  3. 3.INRA, UR BIANantesFrance
  4. 4.INRA, LERFoB UMR1092, ENGREFNancyFrance
  5. 5.INRA, UR0588 Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie ForestièresOrléansFrance

Personalised recommendations