Advertisement

Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 475–483 | Cite as

Fibre morphological effects on mechano-sorptive creep

  • Fang Dong
  • Anne-Mari Olsson
  • Lennart SalménEmail author
Original

Abstract

The increased creep rate of paper under load during moisture cycling conditions as compared to that at high constant humidity is a problem in the use of packaging materials. In order to investigate the influence of morphological factors of the fibres on the occurrence and magnitude of this phenomenon, i.e. the occurrence of mechano-sorptive creep, studies on wood fibres isolated from different parts of spruce wood were performed. Thus, creep properties were studied on earlywood and latewood fibres from both juvenile wood and mature wood. In general, latewood fibres showed a higher degree of mechano-sorptive creep than earlywood fibres, and mature wood showed a higher degree of mechano-sorptive creep than juvenile fibres. The difference in mechano-sorptive creep rate between different fibres was shown to be correlated to the differences in fibril angle. The smaller the fibril angle the higher was the mechano-sorptive creep ratio. It was suggested that at fibril angles approaching 45° wood fibres do not exhibit mechano-sorptive creep.

Keywords

Dynamic Mechanical Analyser Creep Strain Wood Fibre Juvenile Wood Microfibril Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study has been conducted as part of a Master Thesis work by Fang Dong.

References

  1. Alfthan J (2004) Micro-mechanically based modeling of mechano-sorptive creep in paper. Solid mechanics. KTH, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazant ZP (1985) Constitutive equation of wood at variable humidity and temperature. Wood Sci Technol 19:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergander A, Salmén L (2002) Cell wall properties and their effects on the mechanical properties of fibers. J Mater Sci 37(1):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergander A, Brändström J, Daniel G, Salmén L (2002) Fibril angle variability in earlywood of Norway spruce using soft rot cavities and polarization confocal microscopy. J Wood Sci 48(4):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethe E (1969) Strength properties of construction wood stored under changing climates and mechanical load. Holz Roh-Werkst 27(8):291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgert I, Keckes J, Frühmann K, Fratzl P, Tschegg SE (2002) A comparison of two techniques for wood fibre isolation–evaluation by tensile tests on single fibres with different microfibril angle. Plant Biol 4:9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgert I, Gierlinger N, Zimmermann T (2005) Properties of chemically and mechanically isolated fibres of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Part 1. Structural and chemical characterization. Holzforschung 59:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cave ID (1968) The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall. Wood Sci Technol 2:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cave ID (1969) The longitudinal Young’s modulus of Pinus radiata. Wood Sci Technol 3:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksson L, Norén B (1965) The effect of moisture changes on the deformation of wood with tension in fibre direction. Holz Roh-Werkst 23(5):201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson EJ (1965) Creep of wood: role of water and effect of a changing moisture content. Nature 206(4980):213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groom L, Mott L, Shaler S (2002) Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part I. Determination and variability of stress–strain curves with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood Fiber Sci 34:14–27Google Scholar
  13. Habeger CC, Coffin DW (2000) The role of stress concentrations in accelerated creep and sorption-induced physical aging. J Pulp Paper Sci 26(4):145–157Google Scholar
  14. Habeger CC, Coffin DW, Hojjatie B (2001) Influence of humidity cycling parameters on the moisture-accelerated creep of polymeric fibers. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 39(17):2048–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haslach HW (1994) The mechanics of moisture accelerated tensile creep in paper. Tappi 77(10):179–186Google Scholar
  16. Jang HF (1998) Measurement of fibril angle in wood fibres with polarization confocal microscopy. J Pulp Paper Sci 24(7):224–230Google Scholar
  17. Kantola M, Seitsonen S (1969) On the relation between tracheid length and microfibrillar orientation measured by X-ray diffraction in conifer wood. Ann Acad Sci Fenn A VI Phys 300:1–10Google Scholar
  18. Kretschmann DE, Alden HA, Verrill S (1998) Variations of microfibril angle in loblolly pine: comparison of iodine crystallization and X-ray diffraction techniques. In: Butterfield BG (ed) Microfibril angle m in wood. Univ. Canterbury, Christchurch, pp 157–176Google Scholar
  19. Meylan BA (1968) Cause of high longitudinal shrinkage in wood. For Prod J 18(4):75–78Google Scholar
  20. Navi P, Pittet V, Plummer CJG (2002) Transient moisture effects on wood creep. Wood Sci Technol 36:447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olsson A-M, Salmén L, Eder M, Burgert I (2007) Mechano-sorptive creep in wood fibres. Wood Sci Technol 41(1):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Padanyi ZV (1993) Physical aging and glass transition: effects on the mechanical properties of paper and board. In: Baker CF (ed) Products of papermaking. Pira International Leatherhead, UK, pp 521–545Google Scholar
  23. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F (1983) The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibres. Part VI. Fibril angle and the shape of the stress-strain curve. J Pulp Paper Sci, Trans Techn Sect 9(4):TR 99–100Google Scholar
  24. Persson K (2000) Micromechanical modelling of wood and fiber properties. Ph.D. thesis. Dep. Mechanics and Materials, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  25. Sahlberg U, Salmén L, Oscarsson A (1997) The fibrillar orientation in the S2-layer of wood fibres as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. Wood Sci Technol 31:77–86Google Scholar
  26. Salmén L (1986) The cell wall as a composite structure. In: Bristow JA, Kolseth P (eds) Paper structure and properties. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 51–73Google Scholar
  27. Sedlachek KM (1995) The efffect of hemicelluloses and cyclic humidity on the creep of single fibers. Ph.D. thesis. Inst Paper Sci Technol, Univ. Georgia Tech., AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  28. Sedlachek KM, Ellis RL (1994) The effect of cyclic humidity on the creep of single fibers of Southern pine. In: Fellers C, Laufenberg TL (eds) Moisture-induced creep behaviour of paper and board. STFI, USDA, Stockholm, pp 22–49Google Scholar
  29. Söremark C, Fellers C (1993) Mechano-sorptive creep and hygroexpansion of corrugated board in bending. J Pulp Paper Sci 19(1):J19–26Google Scholar
  30. Söremark C, Fellers C, Henriksson L (1993) Mechano-sorptive creep of paper—influende of drying restraint and fibre orientation. In: Baker CF (ed) Products of papermaking. FRC. 1:547–574Google Scholar
  31. Wang JZ, Dillard DA, Wolcott MP, Kamke FA, Wilkes GL (1990) Transient moisture effects in fibers and composite materials. J Compos Mater 24:994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.InnventiaStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations