Modified hardwood sawdust as adsorbent of heavy metal ions from water

  • Marina Sciban
  • Mile Klasnja
  • Biljana Skrbic


The sawdust of oak and black locust hardwood was found to have good adsorption capacities for heavy metal ions. The leaching of coloured organic matters during the adsorption can be prevented by each of the following pre-treatments of adsorbents: with formaldehyde in acidic medium, with sodium hydroxide solution after formaldehyde treatment, or with sodium hydroxide only. The studies indicated that the leaching of coloured matters from modified hardwood sawdust was less than that from unmodified hardwood sawdust, namely between 70 and 94%, dependent on wood species and the method of modification. At the same time, adsorption capacities of modified adsorbents were higher than unmodified adsorbents when sodium hydroxide was applied for modification. When formaldehyde was applied for modification, the adsorption capacities of adsorbents remained unchanged. Only the application of sodium hydroxide was recommended for modification of hardwood sawdust.


Adsorption Capacity Sodium Hydroxide Wheat Straw Sawdust Sodium Hydroxide Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The results are part of the Project No. 1775 “Development of methods for identification of toxic and cancerogenic pollutants in mass-cultures and procedures of their separation”, which is financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Technologies and Development of the Republic of Serbia.


  1. Aoyama M, Seki K, Honma S, Kasai A (1993) Adsorption of heavy metal ions by hardwood barks. Cellulose Chem Technol 27:39–46Google Scholar
  2. Baes AU, Umali SJP, Mercado RL (1996) Ion exchange and adsorption of some heavy metals in a modified coconut coir cation exchanger. Water Sci Technol 34(11):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33(1):2469–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bousher A, Shen X, Edyvean RGJ (1997) Removal of coloured organic matter by adsorption onto low-cost waste materials. Water Res 31(8):2084–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deshkara AM, Bokade SS, Dara SS (1990) Modified Hardwickia binata bark for adsorption of mercury(II) from water. Water Res 24(8):1011–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gosset T, Trancart JL, Thevenot DR (1986) Batch metal removal by peat. Water Res 20(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kratochvil D, Volesky B, Demopoulos G (1997) Optimizing Cu removal/recovery in a biosorption column. Water Res 31(9):2327–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee BG, Rowell RM (2004) Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using lignocellulosic fibers. J Nat Fibers 1(1):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mameri N, Boudries N, Addour L, Belhocine D, Lounici H, Grib H, Pauss A (1999) Batch zinc biosorption by a bacterial nonliving Streptomyces rimosus biomass. Water Res 33(6):1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maranon E, Sastre H (1992) Preconcentration and removal of trace metals from water by apple waste. Bioresour Technol 40:7–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rios JV, Bess-Oberto L, Tiemann KJ, Gardea-Torresdey JL (1999) Investigation of metal ion binding by agricultural by-products. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on hazardous waste research, St.Louis, pp 121–130Google Scholar
  12. Scheikl M, Dunky M (1998) Measurement of dynamic and static contact angles on wood for the determination of its surface tension and the penetration of liquids into the wood surface. Holzforschung 52(1):89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sciban M, Klasnja M (2004) Wood sawdust and wood originate materials as adsorbents for heavy metal ions. Holz Roh Werkst 62:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seki K, Saito N, Aoyama M (1997) Removal of heavy metal ions from solutions by coniferous barks. Wood Sci Technol 31:441–447Google Scholar
  15. Soo-Hong M, Park JK (2003) Mechanism of cadmium ion removal by base treated juniper fiber. In: IAWPS2003 proceedings, vol 1, April 21–24, Daejeon, Korea, pp 607–614Google Scholar
  16. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (eds) (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th edn. APHA, AWWA, WEF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun G, Shi W (1998) Sunflower stalks as adsorbents for the removal of metal ions from wastewater. Ind Eng Che Res 37:1324–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun RC, Fang JM, Goodwin A, Lawther JM, Bolton AJ (1998) Physico-chemical and structural characterization of alkali lignins from abaca fibre. J Wood Che Technol 18(3):313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong A (1994) Impact of biomass potassium on the operation of effluent-free agri-pulp mills. In: Proceedings of the 1994 pulping conference, TAPPI, Atlanta, pp 745–747Google Scholar
  20. Zanuttini M, Citroni M, Martinez MJ, Marzocchi V (1998) Chemimechanical pulping of poplar wood—alkaline wood pretreatment at low temperature. Holzforschung 52(4):405–409Google Scholar
  21. Zanuttini M, Marzocchi V, Citroni M (1999) Alkaline treatment of poplar wood. Holz Roh Werkst 57:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang L, Zhao L, Yu Y, Chen C (1998) Removal of lead from aqueous solution by non-living Rhizopus nigricans. Water Res 32(5):1437–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia-Montenegro

Personalised recommendations