Theory of Computing Systems

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 927–966

Highly Expressive Query Languages for Unordered Data Trees

Article

Abstract

We study highly expressive query languages for unordered data trees, using as formal vehicles Active XML and extensions of languages in the while family. All languages may be seen as adding some form of control on top of a set of basic pattern queries. The results highlight the impact and interplay of different factors: the expressive power of basic queries, the embedding of computation into data (as in Active XML), and the use of deterministic vs. nondeterministic control. All languages are Turing complete, but not necessarily query complete in the sense of Chandra and Harel. Indeed, we show that some combinations of features yield serious limitations, analogous to FOk definability in the relational context. On the other hand, the limitations come with benefits such as the existence of powerful normal forms providing opportunities for optimization. Other languages are “almost” complete, but fall short because of subtle limitations reminiscent of the copy elimination problem in object databases.

Keywords

Query languages Data trees XML Expressiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Abiteboul, S., Benjelloun, O., Milo, T.: The active XML project: an overview. VLDB J. 17(5) (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abiteboul, S., Bourhis, P., Vianu, V.: Comparing workflow specification languages: a matter of views. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 37(2) (2012). Also ICDT 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abiteboul, S., Compton, K.J., Vianu, V.: Queries are easier than you thought (probably). In PODS (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abiteboul, S., Kanellakis, P.: Object identity as a query language primitive. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (JACM) 45(5) (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abiteboul, S., Segoufin, L., Vianu, V.: Static analysis of active XML systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 34(4) (2009). Also PODS 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abiteboul, S., Vianu, V.: Generic computation and its complexity. In STOC, pp. 209–219 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abiteboul, S., Vianu, V.: Computing with first-order logic. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 50(2) (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benedikt, M., Koch, C.: From XQuery to relational logics. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 34(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bojanczyk, M.: Automata for data words and data trees. In RTA, pp. 1–4 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Hull, R., Su, J.: Artifact-centric workflow dominance. In ICSOC/ServiceWave (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hidders, J., Marrara, S., Paredaens, J., Vercammen, R.: On the expressive power of XQuery fragments. In DBPL (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hidders, J., Paredaens, J., Vercammen, R., Demeyer, S.: A light but formal introduction to XQuery. In XSym (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janssen, W., Korlyukov, A., den Bussche, J.V.: On the tree-transformation power of XSLT. Acta Inf. 43(6) (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch, C.: On the complexity of nonrecursive XQuery and functional query languages on complex values. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 31(4) (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Libkin, L.: Elements of Finite Model Theory. Springer, Berlin (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neven, F.: Automata, logic, and XML. In Computer Science Logic (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwentick, T.: Automata for XML - a survey. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 73(3) (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Segoufin, L.: Automata and logics for words and trees over an infinite alphabet. In Computer Science Logic, pp. 41–57 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Segoufin, L.: Static analysis of XML processing with data values. SIGMOD Record 36(1), 31–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRIA & ENS CachanCACHAN CedexFrance
  2. 2.CNRS LIFL & Université Lille 1 & INRIA LilleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance
  3. 3.U. C. San Diego & INRIA-SaclayLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations