Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 317–319

Controversies in Bone Mineral Density Diagnostic Classifications

  • P. D. Miller
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 2.
    Arlot ME, Sornay-Rendu E, Garnero P, et al. (1997) Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res 2:683–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Nelson DA, Molley R, Kleerekoper M (1997) Prevalence of osteoporosis in women referred for bone density testing. J Clin Densitometry 1:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Faulker KG, VonStetten E, Miller P (1999) Discordance in patient classification using T scores. J Clin Densitom 2:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Faulkner KG, Roberts LA, McClung MR (1996) Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA system. Osteoporosis Int 6:432–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Ahmed AIH, Blake GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman I (1997) Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: Do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis? Osteoporosis Int 7:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    Greenspan SL, Maitland-Ramsey L, Myers E (1996) Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on sitespecific analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 58:409–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. D. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Colorado Health Sciences CenterColorado Center for Bone ResearchLakewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations