Advertisement

A Comprehensive Study of Bone Manifestations in Adult Gaucher Disease Type 1 Patients in Argentina

  • Beatriz OliveriEmail author
  • Diana González
  • Felisa Quiroga
  • Claudio Silva
  • Paula Rozenfeld
Original Research

Abstract

Gaucher disease (GD) is the most prevalent lysosomal storage disease, and bone involvement is the most disabling condition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone involvement in adult patients with GD, using an observational cross-sectional study. Patients were evaluated using X-rays, bone densitometry (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biochemical bone markers. Thirty-two type 1GD patients were included (mean age: 40 ± 16 years). Patients had received velaglucerase for 2.7 ± 1.4 years; 19/32 had been treated previously with imiglucerase. Ninety-four percent of subjects met therapeutic goals for hematological parameters, and eight were splenectomized (SPX). Nineteen patients had irreversible bone lesions (IL), i.e., avascular necrosis, bone infarction, and/or vertebral fractures. MRI showed marrow infiltration in 71% of patients. Patients with IL had higher bone marrow burden than those without (p = 0.001). All SPX patients had IL, a higher prevalence of bone marrow edema (p = 0.02), and lower TBS (p = 0.03) than non-SPX patients. Only 18.7% of patients had abnormal BMD, with no correlation with fractures (FX). TBS values were < 1350 in 53% of patients and tended to be lower in those with FX (p = 0.06). Patients with P1NP in the lower quartile had lower TBS (p = 0.03) than those with P1NP in the higher quartiles. TBS correlated moderately but not significantly with P1NP (r = 0.32) and BMB (r =  0.44). A high prevalence of IL was documented. Bone quality was more affected than BMD in fracture patients. Low bone formation, active bone marrow infiltration, and splenectomy might be implicated in IL.

Keywords

Gaucher disease Skeletal complications Velaglucerase Bone involvement Bone quality or TBS Bone markers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the following haematologists who collaborated in the recruitment of the patients: Arizo A, Aznar M, Bolesina M, Fernandez Sasso D., Fernandez V, Fondevila C, Guelbert N, Meschengeiser S, Murieda B, Navarro G, Onelda G, Rocaspana A, Romero Maciel A, Ruiz A., Santini F, Sanchez G, Stivel M, Watman N.

Author Contributions

OB participated in the study design, acquisition and analysis of data, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. GD participated in the acquisition and analysis of data and drafting and revision of the manuscript. SC and QF participated in acquisition of data, RP participated in acquisition of data and critical review of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Beatriz Oliveri, Diana González, and Paula Rozenfeld have received speaking honoraria from Shire; Felisa Quiroga and Claudio Silva declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of IBYME (Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Argentina). All patients or their guardians provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Stirnemann J, Belmatoug N, Camou F, Serratrice C, Froissart R, Caillaud C et al (2017) A review of Gaucher disease pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatments. Int J Mol Sci 18:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Futerman AH, Sussman JL, Horowitz M, Silman I, Zimran A (2004) New directions in the treatment of Gaucher disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horowitz M, Zimran A (1994) Mutations causing Gaucher disease. Hum Mutat 3:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drelichman G, Linares A, Villalobos J, Cabello JF, Kerstenetzky M, Kohan RM, Martins AM. (2012) Gaucher disease in Latin America. A report from the Gaucher Disease International Registry and the Latin American Group for Gaucher Disease. Medicina 72:273–82Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deegan PB, Pavlova E, Tindall J et al (2011) Osseous manifestations of adult Gaucher disease in the era of enzyme replacement therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 90:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcucci G, Zimran A, Bembi B et al (2014) Gaucher disease and bone manifestations. Calcif Tissue Int 95:477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giraldo P, Solano V, Pérez-Calvo JI, Giralt M, Rubio-Félix D, Spanish Group on Gaucher disease (2005) Quality of life related to type 1 Gaucher disease: Spanish experience. Qual Life Res 14(2):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wenstrup RJ, Roca-Espiau M, Weinreb NJ, Bembi M (2002) Skeletal aspects of Gaucher disease: a review. Br J Radiol 75(1):A2–A12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Silva BC, Leslie D, Resch H et al (2014) Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J Bone Miner Res 29:518–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maas M, van Kuijk C, Stoker J et al (2003) Quantification of bone involvement in Gaucher disease: MR imaging bone marrow burden score as an alternative to dixon quantitative chemical shift MR imaging–initial experience. Radiology 229(2):554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bondar C, Mucci J, Crivaro A, Ormazabal M, Ceci R, Oliveri B, González D, Rozenfeld P (2017) In vitro osteoclastogenesis from Gaucher patients’ cells correlates with bone mineral density but not with chitotriosidase. Bone 103:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drelichman G, Fernández Escobar N, Basack N et al (2015) Argentina Gaucher disease consensus update: Argentine group for diagnosis and treatment of Gaucher disease. Hematologia 19:4–51Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Dussen L, Biegstraaten M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hollak CEM (2014) Modelling Gaucher disease progression: long term enzyme replacement therapy reduces the incidence of splenectomy and bone complications. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andrade-Campos M, Valero E, Roca M, Giraldo P (2018) On behalf of the, Spanish group on Gaucher disease: the utility of magnetic resonance imaging for bone involvement in Gaucher disease. Assessing more than bone crises blood cells, Mol Dis 68: 126–134Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaplan P, Andersson HC, Kacena K, Yee JD (2006) The clinical and demographic characteristics of nonneuronopathic Gaucher disease in 887 children at diagnosis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 160:603–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drelichman G, Fernández Escobar N, Basack N et al (2016) Skeletal involvement in Gaucher disease: an observational multicenter study of prognostic factors in the Argentine Gaucher disease patients. Am J Hematol 91:E448–E453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mikosch P, Hughes D (2010) An overview on bone manifestations in Gaucher disease. Wien Med Wochenschr 160:609–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan A, Hangartner T, Weinreb NJ et al (2012) Risk factors for fractures and avascular osteonecrosis in type 1 Gaucher disease: a study from the International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Gaucher registry. J Bone Miner Res 27:1839–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, O´Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 10:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C (2013) The epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. In: Rosen C (ed) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism, 8th edn. Wiley-Blackell, New Jersey, pp 348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Crary S, Buchanan G (2009) Vascular complications after splenectomy for hematologic disorders. Blood 114:2861–2868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mucci JM, Rozenfeld P (2015) Pathogenesis of bone alterations in Gaucher disease: the role of immune system. J Immunol.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/192761 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359(9321):1929–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hans D, Goertzen AL, Krieg MA, Leslie WD (2011) Bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone density: the Manitoba study. J Bone Miner Res 26:2762–2769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harvey NC, Glüer CC, Binkley N, McCloskey EV, Brandi ML, Cooper C et al (2015) Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice: a consensus report of a European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group. Bone 78:216–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ulivieri FM, Silva BC, Sardanelli F, Hans D, Bilezikian JP, Caudarella R (2014) Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis. Endocrine 7:435–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baldini M, Casirati G, Ulivieri FM, Cassinerio E, Chalouhi KK, Poggiali E et al (2018) Skeletal involvement in type 1 Gaucher disease: not just bone mineral density. Blood Cells Mol Dis 68:148–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2017.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Herrera S, Perez-Lopez J, Molto-Abad M, Guerri-Fernandez G, Cabezudo E, Novelli S et al (2017) Assessment of bone health in patients with type 1 Gaucher disease using impact microindentation. J Bone Miner Res 32:1575–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parisi MS, Mastaglia SR, Bagur A, Goldstein G, Zeni SN, Oliveri B (2008) Body composition and bone metabolism in young Gaucher disease type I patients treated with imiglucerase. Eur J Med Res 13:31–38Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Dussen L, Lips P, Everts VE et al (2011) Markers of bone turnover in Gaucher disease: modeling the evolution of bone disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2194–2205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giuffrida G, Cingari M, Parrinello N et al (2012) Bone turnover markers in patients with type 1 Gaucher disease. Hematol Rep 4:e21.  https://doi.org/10.4081/hr.2012.e21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Panicker LM, Srikanth MP, Castro-Gomes T, Miller D, Andrews NW. Feldman RA (2018) Gaucher disease iPSC-derived osteoblasts have developmental and lysosomal defects that impair bone matrix deposition. Hum Mol Genet 27:811–822.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mistry PK, Liu J, Yang M, Nottoli T, McGrath J, Jain D et al (2010) Glucocerebrosidase gene-deficient mouse recapitulates Gaucher disease displaying cellular and molecular dysregulation beyond the macrophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19473–19478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reed M, Baker RJ, Mehta AB, Hughes D (2013) Enhanced differentiation of osteoclasts from mononuclear precursors in patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 51:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mucci M, Scian R, De Francesco PN et al (2012) Induction of osteoclastogenesis in an in vitro model of Gaucher disease is mediated by T cells via TNF-α. Gene 509:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lai JKC, Robertson PL, Goh C, Szer J (2018) Intraobserver and interobserver variability of the bone marrow burden (BMB) score for the assessment of disease severity in Gaucher disease, possible impact of reporting experience. Blood Cell Mol Dis 68:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyere O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A et al (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1501-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Osteoporosis y Enf. Metabólicas OseasINIGEM (UBA-CONICET) Hosp.de Clínicas JSMCiudad Autonoma de Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Mautalen Salud e InvestigaciónCiudad Autonoma de Buenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Diagnóstico MaipúBuenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.IIFP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICETFacultad de Ciencias Exactas, Departamento de Ciencias BiologicasBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations