Association Between the Decline in Muscle Health and the Decline in Bone Health in Older Individuals from the SarcoPhAge Cohort
The longitudinal relationship between bone health and muscle health is scarcely explored. We aimed to explore the relationship between bone decline and muscle decline over 1 year in older individuals. We used data from the SarcoPhAge cohort, which aims to identify the consequences of sarcopenia. In this way, this study also highlights the yearly changes in muscle mass (by dual-energy absorptiometry), muscle weakness (by grip strength), and/or physical performance (by the short physical performance battery test). Measurements of areal bone mineral density (aBMD), enabling the diagnosis of osteoporosis, and bone microarchitecture (by means of the trabecular bone score) were also performed each year. A 1-year clinically relevant decline in bone and muscle health components was evidenced using the Edwards–Nunnally index. Among the 232 participants with complete data (75.5 ± 5.4 years, 57.8% women), we observed an association between a clinically relevant decline in the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and a decrease in aBMD (adjusted OR = 2.12 [1.14–2.51] for the spine, 2.42 [1.10–5.34] for the hip and 2.12 [1.04–5.81] for the neck), as well as a significant association between SMI and deterioration of the skeletal microarchitecture (aOR = 3.99 [2.07–7.70]). A clinically relevant decline in muscle strength was associated with a decrease in spine aBMD (aOR = 2.93 [1.21–7.12]) and hip aBMD (aOR = 3.42 [1.37–7.64]) only. The decline in muscle performance was related to the decline in bone microarchitecture only (aOR = 2.52 [1.23–5.17]). Individuals with incident sarcopenia had an approximately fivefold higher risk of concomitantly developing osteoporosis. A dynamic relationship between impaired muscle and bone health was observed, with an obvious association between the concomitant incidences of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.
KeywordsSarcopenia Osteoporosis Follow-up SarcoPhAge study Muscle strength Physical performance
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Médéa Locquet, Charlotte Beaudart, Jean-Yves Reginster, and Olivier Bruyère declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The study protocol and related amendments received approval from the competent ethics authority of our institution (under reference 2012/277). All procedures were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Prior to the collection of baseline measurements and at each additional test added, the participants were rigorously informed about the study objectives and procedures, after which they provided informed written consent to the protocol itself and its amendments.
- 24.Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ (2009) Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev 54:S59–S65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Elosua R, Marrugat J, Molina L et al (1994) Validation of the Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire in Spanish men. Am J Epidemiol 139:1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Imerci A, Yalın Kılınç C, Aydogan NH et al (2017) Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX®) results calculated with and without bone mineral density values for the evaluation of fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. J Clin Densitom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gómez JF, Curcio C-L, Alvarado B et al (2013) Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery (SPPB): a pilot study on mobility in the Colombian Andes. Colomb Med 44:165–171Google Scholar
- 37.Elkasrawy MN, Hamrick MW (2010) Myostatin (GDF-8) as a key factor linking muscle mass and bone structure. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 10:56–63Google Scholar
- 39.Harvey NC, Odén A, Orwoll E et al (2018) Measures of physical performance and muscle strength as predictors of fracture risk independent of FRAX, falls and BMD: a meta-analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study. J Bone Miner Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Russo CR, MD (2009) The effects of exercise on bone. Basic concepts and implications for the prevention of fractures. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 6:223–228Google Scholar