Keywords
Mass Measure Mexican Population Correct Table
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Dear Editor,
As you are aware, the supplementary table accompanying the article “Reference values of Total Lean Mass, and Fat Mass Measured With Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Healthy Mexican Population” [1, 2] recently published in this journal had some imprecisions in their calculations [3].
After reviewing our research and writing process, we have found these mistakes to be human in nature, and not methodological (an incorrect table was submitted); therefore, we have sent the correct table to this journal so the old one can be substituted.
Thank you very much for your attention and we apologize for the inconveniences that arise on the replacement of this table.
References
- 1.Clark P, Denova-Gutiérrez E, Ambrosi R et al (2016) Reference values of total lean mass, appendicular lean mass, and fat mass measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Healthy Mexican Population. Calcif Tissue Int 99:462. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0181-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Clark P et al (2016) Supplementary material 1. Calcif Tissue Int. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0181-z Google Scholar
- 3.Comment on paper “Reference values of Total Lean Mass, and Fat Mass measured with Dual-Energy x-ray absorptiometry in a Healthy Mexican Population” Eva Amado-Bonilla, Maria I. Pintado-Vidal, Maria I. Mangas-Borrego, Estefania Marcheno-Ortiz, Jorge Barrantes-Chacon, Jose M. Moran. From the School of Nursing and Educational Therapy. University of Extremadura. Nursing Department. Health Science Research Methodology Collaboration GroupGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016